The prefaces to English school grammars of the eighteenth century may be conceptualised as a frame of reference for the authorial voice behind them. To promote and boost the sales of their works, grammarians generally wrote sound, meaningful prefaces that combined propositional content with metadiscursive comments. Therefore, this kind of prefatory material falls within the scope of what Genette (1997: 1–2) calls the “paratextual apparatus” of a work, which aims to provide the reader with essential information for the correct reception, understanding and perusal of the book. This paper focuses on grammarians’ textual and interpersonal metacomments as thoughtful strategies to guide the reader carefully through the text, as well as to shape the contents and message of the book at various levels (Hyland 2000; Lorés-Sanz 2006: 92). To this end, a study corpus of fifteen English school grammars has been retrieved from the ECEG Database (2010) by restricting two search parameters: target audience and authors’ place of birth.
2000– 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Accessed 21 May 2013, at: [URL]
Eighteenth-Century English Grammars (ECEG)
2010 Compiled by Nuria Yáñez-Bouza and M. Esther Rodríguez-Gil. Manchester: Manchester University. Accessed 23 May 2013, at: [URL]
2010 “ ‘Just to Give you Kind of a Map of Where We Are Going’: A Taxonomy of Metadiscourse in Spoken and Written Academic English”. Nordic Journal of English Studies 9 (2): 69‒97.
2008Metadiscourse in Academic Speech: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach. Bern: Peter Lang.
Arrington, Philip and Shirley K. Rose
1987 “Prologues to What is Possible: Introductions as Metadiscourse”. College Composition and Communication 38 (3): 306‒18.
1999Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Baker, Mona and Gabriela Saldanha
(eds)2009Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, 2nd edn. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Bamford, Julia and Marina Bondi
(eds)2005Dialogue within Discourse Communities. Tübingen: De Gruyter Mouton
Beauvais, Paul Jude
1989 “A Speech Act Theory of Metadiscourse”. Written Communication 6 (1): 11‒30.
Bondi, Marina and Davide Mazzi
2008 “ ‘In This Article, We Focus on…’: Metadiscourse across Disciplines”. In Aurelia Martelli and Virginia Pulcini (eds), Investigating English with Corpora: Studies in Honour of Maria Teresa Prat, 293‒310. Milan: Polimetrica.
2009Metadiscourse in Middle English and Early Modern English Religious Texts: A Corpus-Based Study. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
2003 “Key Concepts in ELT: Discourse Community”. English Language Teaching Journal 57 (4): 398‒400.
2003The Forgotten Women Grammarians of Eighteenth-Century England. PhD Dissertation. University of Connecticut.
2005 “The Role of Metadiscourse in University-Level EAP Reading Instruction”. In Julia Bamford and Marina Bondi (eds), Dialogue within Discourse Communities: Metadiscursive Perspective on Academic Genres, 87‒101. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Cheng, Xiaoguang and Margaret Steffensen
1996 “Metadiscourse: A Technique for Improving Student Writing”. Research in the Teaching of English 30 (2): 149‒81.
1983Metadiscourse: What Is It and How Is It Used in School and Non-School Social Science Texts. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Crismore, Avon and Rodney Farnsworth
1990 “Metadiscourse in Popular and Professional Science Discourse”. In Walter Nash (ed.), The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse, 118‒36. London: Sage.
2004 “Textual Metadiscourse in Research Articles: A Marker of National Culture or of Academic Discipline?” Journal of Pragmatics 36 (10): 1807‒25.
1750 (1745) A New Grammar, with Exercises of Bad English: or, An Easy Guide to Speaking and Writing the English Language Properly and Correctly. Newcastle: Printed for Tho. Stack.
1991 “Introduction to the Paratext”. New Literary History 22 (2): 261‒72.
1997Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, Michael A.K
1970 “Language Structure and Language Function”. In John Lyons (ed.), New Horizons in Linguistics, 140‒65. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
2008 “Joseph Priestley’s two Rudiments of English Grammar: 1761 and 1768”. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-Writing in Eighteenth-Century England, 177‒91. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
1997Text, Role and Context: Developing Academic Literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2006 “The Referential Function of Metadiscourse: ‘Thing(s)’ and ‘Idea(s)’ in Academic Lectures”. In Ana Maria Hornero, María José Luzón and Silvia Murillo (eds), Corpus Linguistics: Applications for the Study of English, 315‒33. Bern: Peter Lang.
1762An Introduction to English Grammar. London: Printed for A. Millar and R. and J. Dodsley.
2009 “Argumentation, Metadiscourse and Social Cognition: Organizing Knowledge in Political Communication”. Discourse and Society 20 (6): 727‒46.
1992 “Introduction: The Stuff These People Write”. In Walter Nash (ed.), The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse, 8‒30. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2006Discourse Analysis: An Introduction. London: Continuum.
2008 “Mid-Century Grammars and their Reception in the Monthly Review and the Critical Review”. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-writing in Eighteenth-century England, 125‒42. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
2004 “Aiding the Reader: The Use of Metalinguistic Devices in Scientific Discourse”. Nottingham Linguistic Circular 18: 291‒48.
2001 “The Book Trades”. In Isabel Rivers (ed.), Book and Their Readers in Eighteenth-Century England: New Essays, 1‒34. London: Continuum.
2008 “Audience Guidance and Learned Medical Writing in Late Medieval English”. In Maurizio Gotti and Françoise Salager-Meyer (eds), Advances in Medical Discourse Analysis: Oral and Written Context, 431‒56. Bern: Peter Lang.
2007 “Historical Pragmatics: What It Is and How to Do It”. In Susan M. Fitzmaurice and Irma Taavitsainen (eds), Methods in Historical Pragmatics, 11‒36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2003 “Text-Structuring Metadiscourse, Intonation and the Signalling of Organisation in Academic Lectures”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2 (1): 5‒20.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid
2008a “Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar Writing: An Introduction”. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-Writing in Eighteenth-Century England, 1‒14. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Tieken-Book van Ostade, Ingrid
2008b “The 1760s: Grammars, Grammarians and the Booksellers”. In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-Writing in Eighteenth-Century England, 101‒24. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Vande Kopple, William J
1985 “Some Exploratory Discourse on Metadiscourse”. College Composition and Communication 36: 831‒4.
1999 “The Social Construction of Standard English: Grammar Writers as a ‘Discourse Community’”. In Tony Bex and Richard J. Watts (eds), Standard English: The Widening Debate, 40‒68. London: Routledge.
Watts, Richard J
2008 “Grammar Writers in Eighteenth-Century Britain: A Community of Practice or a Discourse Community?” In Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (ed.), Grammars, Grammarians and Grammar-Writing in Eighteenth-Century England, 37‒56. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
2011 “Playful Paratexts: The Front Matter of Anthony Munday’s Iberian Romance Translations”. In Helen Smith and Louise Wilson (eds), Renaissance Paratexts, 121‒31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2017. Paratext, title-pages and grammar books. Studia Neophilologica 89:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
2022. Methodological approaches to the study of codification, prescription, and prescriptivism. Studia Neophilologica 94:3 ► pp. 334 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.