Cover not available
Article published In:
Morality and language aggression
Edited by Dániel Z. Kádár and Vahid Parvaresh
[Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:1] 2019
► pp. 6–31

Morality, moral order, and language conflict and aggression

A position paper

 | Dalian University of Foreign Languages, China | Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary
 | Anglia Ruskin University, UK
 | Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hungary
In this position paper, we provide an overview of what we regard as the most important features of the relationship between the moral order and morality in the context of language conflict and aggression. While in previous pragmatic research the concepts of morality and moral order have been rarely brought together, we illustrate that they are inseparable, in particular in the context of conflict and aggression. We propose an analytic model – with replicability in mind – which captures the dynamic relationship between these phenomena: the model is centred on the idea that perceived (a) violations of the moral order, (b) breaches of moral norms, principles and ideologies, (c) conflict and (d) aggression constitute a cluster. The explanatory power of this dynamics resides in the fact that it can account for a variety of seemingly unrelated scenarios, such as conflicts triggered by the violation of interactional norms vs. rites of moral aggression. Along with detailing the model, we explore the relationship between various methodologies through which one can examine morality and the moral order in the context of language conflict and aggression.
Keywords: morality, moral order, pragmatics, ethnomethodology, ritual, aggression
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Key terms
      • 1.1.1Morality
      • 1.1.2The moral order
  • 2.Language aggression, morality and the moral order
  • 3.Approaches to examining morality and moral order
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00017.kad
References (69)
References
Allman, William F. 1995. The Stone Age Present: How Evolution Has Shaped Modern Life – From Sex, Violence, and Language to Emotions, Morals, and Communities. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Bandura, Albert. 1978. “Social learning theory of aggression.” Journal of Communication 28(3): 12–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baratta, Alex. 2014. “Military impoliteness as an (eventually) unmarked form: A comment on Bousfield (2007).” Journal of Pragmatics 601: 17–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, Jörg. 1998. “Introduction: Morality in discourse.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 31(3/4): 279–294.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Sunil. 2010. “Language socialisation and the construction of socio-moral meanings.” Journal of Moral Education 29(2): 149–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boltanski, Luc, and Laurent Thévenot. 2000. “The reality of moral expectations: A sociology of situated judgement.” Philosophical Explorations: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Mind and Action 3(3): 208–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bou-Franch, Patricia, and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. 2014. “Gender ideologies social identity processed in online aggression against women.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 2(2): 226–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, Derek. 2010. “Researching impoliteness and rudeness: Issues and definitions.” In: Interpersonal Pragmatics, Handbooks of Pragmatics. ed. by Miriam Locher, and Sage Lambert Graham, 101–134. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Boxer, Paul, Amanda Sheffield Morris, Andrew M. Terranova, Mumbe Kithakye, Sarah C. Savoy, and Adrienne F. McFaul. 2008. “Coping with exposure to violence: Relatopns to emotional symptoms and aggression in three urban samples.” Journal of Child and Family Studies 17(6): 881–893. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braverman, Irus. 2009. “Loo law: The public washroom as a hyper-regulated place.” Hastings Women’s Law Journal 20(1): 45–71.Google Scholar
Bull, Peter, and Maurice Waddle. 2019. “‘Let me now answer, very directly, Marie’s question’: The impact of quoting members of the public in Prime Minister’s Questions” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict (present Special Issue). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall. 2004. Interactional Ritual Chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. “Towards an anatomy of impoliteness.” Journal of Pragmatics 25(3): 349–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link . Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 35–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Causing Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1999. Implicit Meanings: Selected Essays in Anthropology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 1998. “Complaints about Transgressions and Misconduct.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 31(3/4): 295–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flack, Jessica C., and Frans B. M. de Waal. 2000. “‘Any animal whatever’. Darwinian Building Blocks of Morality in Monkeys and Apes.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 7(1/2):1–29.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce, and William Nolen. 1981. “The association of deference with linguistic form.” International Journal of the Sociology of Language 271: 93–110.Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. 2009. “Impoliteness and Identity in the American News Media: The ‘Culture Wars’”. Journal of Politeness Research 5(2): 273–303.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1964. “Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities.” Social Problems 11(3): 225–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
. 1963. Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
. 1967. Interaction Ritual. Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Graham, Jesse, Brian A. Nosek, Jonathan Haidt, Ravi Iyer, Spassena P. Koleva, and Peter H. Ditto. 2011. “Mapping the moral domain.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101(2): 366–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Allen. 1990. “Introduction”. In: Conflict Talks: Sociolinguistics Investigations of Arguments in Conversations. ed. by Allen Grimshaw, 1–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gu, Yueguo. 1990. “Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese.” Journal of Pragmatics 14(2): 237–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Haidt, Jonathan, and Kesebir, Selin. 2010. “Morality.” In Handbook of Social Psychology (5th ed.), ed. by Susan Fiske, Daniel Gilbert, and Gardner Lindzey, 797–832. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2015. Im/Politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Offence, Public Denunciation and the Blurring of Public and Private Life.” Keynote lecture presented at the 1st International Symposium on Internet Pragmatics, Fuzhou, China, September 2018.
Hoffman, Martin. 1979. “Development of Moral Thought, Feeling, and Behaviour.” American Psychologist 34(10): 958–966. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horgan, Mervyn. 2019. “Everyday Incivility and the Urban Interaction Order: Theorizing Moral Affordances in Ritualized Interaction.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict (present Special Issue). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2013. In-group Ritual and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Juliane House. Under review. “Linguistic Forms, Standard Situations and Ritual Frames: A Contrastive Pragmatic Framework”.
Kohlberg, Lawrence. 1963. “The Development of Children’s Orientations toward a Moral Order.” Vita Humana 61: 11–33.Google Scholar
. 2008. “The Development of Children’s Orientations toward a Moral Order.” Human Development 51(1): 8–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Roderick M., and David M. Messick. 1998. “Getting by with a Little Help from our Enemies: Collective Paranoia and its role in Intergroup Relations.” In Intergroup Cognition and Intergroup Behaviour. ed. by Constantine Sedikides, John Schopler, and Chester A. Insko, 233–256. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lagerspetz, Kirsti M. J., and Martin Westman. 1980. “Moral Approval of Aggressive Acts: A Preliminary Investigation.” Aggressive Behaviour 6(2): 119–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Liu, Meng. 2003. “Rebellion and Revenge: The Meaning of Suicide of Women in Rural China.” International Journal of Social Welfare 11(4): 300–309.Google Scholar
Lorenz, Konrad. 2002. On Aggression. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, David. 1996. Culture and Psychology. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Miller, Joan. 1994. “Cultural Diversity in the Morality of caring: Individually Oriented versus Duty-based Interpersonal Moral Codes.” Cross-Cultural Research 28(1): 3–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moulinou, Iphigenia. 2019. “Explicit and Implicit Discursive Strategies and Moral Order in a Trial Process.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict (present Special Issue). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ning, Puyu, and Dániel Z. Kádár. “Ritual Public Humiliation – A Case Study of Chinese Adulterous Couples.” (forthcoming in Acta Linguistica Academica ).
Parvaresh, Vahid. 2019. “Moral Impoliteness.” Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict (present Special Issue). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parvaresh, Vahid, and Tahmineh Tayebi. 2018. “Impoliteness, Aggression, and the Moral Order.” Journal of Pragmatics 1321: 91–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piaget, Jean. 1950. The Psychology of Intelligence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rai, Tage Shakti, and Alan Fiske. 2011. “Moral Psychology is Relationship Regulation: Moral Motives for Unity, Hierarchy, Equality, and Proportionality.” Psychological Review 118(1): 55–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, David N., Yaacov Petscher, Christopher T. Stanley, and Gershon Tenenbaum. 2003. “Aggression and Violence in Sport: Moving beyond the Debate.” International Journal of Sports and Exercise Psychology 1(2): 167–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santrock, John W. 2012. A Topical Approach to Life-Span Development. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 1988. “Goffman and the Analysis of Conversation.” In Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interactional Order. ed. by Paul Drew and Anthony Wootton, 89–135. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
van Schie, Emil G. M., and Oene Wiegman. 2006. “Children and Videogames: Leisure Activities, Aggression, Social Integration, and School Performance.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 27(13): 1175–1194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sell, Roger. 1992. “Literary Texts and the Diachronic Aspects of Politeness.” In Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. ed. by Richard J. Watts, Konrad Ehlich, and Sachiko Ide, 109–130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2016. “The Bases of (Im)politeness Evaluations: Culture, the Moral Order and the East-West Debate.” East Asian Pragmatics 1(1): 73–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutton, Jon, Peter K. Smith, and John Swettenham. 1999. “Bullying and ‘Theory of Mind’: A Critique of the ‘Social Skills Deficit’ View of Antisocial Behaviour.” Social Development 8(1): 117–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina. 2011. “From Politeness1 to Politeness2: Tracking Norms of Im/Politeness across Time and Space.” Journal of Politeness Research 7(2): 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Karen. 2008. “‘Reasonable hostility’: Situation-appropriate Face Attack”. Journal of Politeness Research 4(2): 169–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsang, Jo-Ann. 2002. “Moral Rationalization and Integration of Situational Factors and Psychological Processes in Immoral Behavior.” Review of General Psychology 6(1): 25–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vaske, Jerry J., Maureen P. Donnelly, Karin Whittmann, and Susan Laidlaw. 1995. “Interpersonal vs. Social-values Conflict.” Leisure Sciences: An Interdisciplinary Journal 17(3): 205–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Geoffrey M. 2010. “Moral Discourse and the Rhetoric of Emotion.” In Psychological Anthropology: A Reader of Self in Culture. ed. by Robert A. LeVine, 68–82. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert. 1989. Meaning and Moral Order: Explorations in Cultural Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (36)

Cited by 36 other publications

Mortazavi, Seyed Mohammadreza & Hamed Zandi
2025. “#HaveYouNoShame”: Unraveling the pragmatics of impolite political hashtags. Journal of Pragmatics 235 ► pp. 238 ff. DOI logo
Alvanoudi, Angeliki
2024. Conventionalized impoliteness formulae in third-party assessments. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict DOI logo
Brown, Lucien
2024. “The denigration of Korean men’s genitals”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 12:2 ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni & Michele Zappavigna
2024. The role of social affiliation in incitement: A social semiotic approach to far-right terrorists’ incitement to violence. Language in Society 53:4 ► pp. 623 ff. DOI logo
Faria, Rita
2024. Perceptions of Forms of Address in European Portuguese in Online Metadiscourse or What Happens When You Use você in Court. Languages 9:4 ► pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Jin, Ying & Dennis Tay
2024. Use of Offensive Animal Metaphor as an Interactional Activity in Online Forum Discussions. Metaphor and Symbol 39:4 ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Björkenfeldt, Oscar & Linnea Gustafsson
2023. Impoliteness and morality as instruments of destructive informal social control in online harassment targeting Swedish journalists. Language & Communication 93 ► pp. 172 ff. DOI logo
Boukhris, Khouloud
2023. Online gaming and language aggression in a Tunisian Arabic context. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 19:2 ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane, Dániel Z. Kádár, Fengguang Liu & Yulong Song
2023. Aggression in diplomatic notes – a pragmatic analysis of a Chinese-American conflict in times of colonisation. Text & Talk 43:6 ► pp. 755 ff. DOI logo
Mattiello, Elisa
2023. Slang and verbal aggression. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 11:1 ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Saz-Rubio, Ma Milagros del
2023. Assessing impoliteness-related language in response to a season's greeting posted by the Spanish and English Prime Ministers on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics 206 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni
2022. Exploring the grammar of othering and antagonism as enacted in terrorist discourse: verbal aggression in service of radicalisation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9:1 DOI logo
Etaywe, Awni
2024. Compassion as appraisal, performative identity and moral affiliation. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 6:1 ► pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael, Dániel Z. Kádár & Rosina Márquez Reiter
2022. Offence and morality: Pragmatic perspectives. Language & Communication 87 ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo
Ozhohan, Andrii, Nataliia Stratulat, Pavlo Lysianskyi, Maiia Yurkovska & Olha Zaluzhna
2022. The Impact of Political Lobbying on the Aggravation of Language Conflicts in the Era of Globalization. Cuestiones Políticas 40:75 ► pp. 431 ff. DOI logo
Paternoster, Annick
2022. Defining Etiquette. In Historical Etiquette, ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Zhao, Linsen & Yongping Ran
2022. Rationalizing impoliteness: Taking offence and providing vicarious accounts in mother-in-law/daughter-in-law conflict mediation. Journal of Pragmatics 197 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Blitvich, Pilar Garcés-Conejos & Dániel Z. Kádár
2021. Morality in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 385 ff. DOI logo
Bou-Franch, Patricia
2021. Evaluation, Conflict and Prescriptive Metapragmatic Comments: (Re)constructing Transmedia Stories. In Analyzing Digital Discourses, ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Bou-Franch, Patricia
2022. Morality, aggression, and social activism in a transmedia sports controversy. Language & Communication 84 ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2021. Humour and (mock) aggression: Distinguishing cyberbullying from roasting. Language & Communication 81 ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane, Dániel Z. Kádár, Fengguang Liu, Shiyu Liu, Wenrui Shi, Zongfeng Xia & Lin Jiao
2021. Interaction, speech acts and ritual: An integrative model. Lingua 257 ► pp. 103082 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House
2021. Ritual frames and mimesis: Analysing military training in Chinese universities. Language & Communication 80 ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Juliane House
2022. Aggression and its (de)escalation in mediatised rites of aggression. Language & Communication 87 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Pérez-Arredondo, Carolina & Eduardo Graells-Garrido
2021. Twitter and abortion. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9:1 ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Raczynski, Stanislaw
2021. Catastrophes and Agent-Based Models. In Catastrophes and Unexpected Behavior Patterns in Complex Artificial Populations [Evolutionary Economics and Social Complexity Science, 27], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Raczynski, Stanislaw
2022. Discrete Event Models. In Models for Research and Understanding [Simulation Foundations, Methods and Applications, ], ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z.
2020. Capturing injunctive norm in pragmatics: Meta-reflective evaluations and the moral order. Lingua 237 ► pp. 102814 ff. DOI logo
Kádár, Dániel Z. & Andrea Szalai
2020. The socialisation of interactional rituals. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Ran, Yongping, Linsen Zhao & Dániel Z. Kádár
2020. The rite of reintegrative shaming in Chinese public dispute mediation. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 30:1 ► pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
Shokhayeva, Karlygash, Ainur Kalniyazova, Yerzhan Aryn, Yerlan Assembaiuly & Nuraly Otegen
2020. PRAGMATICS OF SPEECH STYLE IN BUSINESS COMMUNICATION AS A TOOL FOR DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN BUSINESS LINGUISTICS. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 8:4 ► pp. 1535 ff. DOI logo
Tayebi, Tahmineh
2020. Heterogeneous distribution of cultural conceptualizations and (im)politeness evaluations. International Journal of Language and Culture 7:1 ► pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
Tayebi, Tahmineh
2021. Conceptualizations of ugly and beautiful. International Journal of Language and Culture 8:1 ► pp. 128 ff. DOI logo
Parvaresh, Vahid
2019. Moral impoliteness. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 7:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Parvaresh, Vahid
2022. On the morality of taking offence. Language & Communication 87 ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 247 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.