As im/politeness scholars increasingly explore the intersections of identity and im/politeness, they reveal a growing need for empirical research that examines these intersections in a variety of discourses. This paper investigates the linkages between participants’ co-constructions of identity and impoliteness in naturally occurring classroom discourse. The data come from a corpus of conflictive interactions observed in seven hours of whole-class discussions and twelve hours of small-group discussions in four eighth-grade classrooms. I apply an analytic framework that combines a genre-approach (Garcés-Conejos Blitvich 2010, 2013) to impoliteness with a socio-constructivist approach (Bucholtz and Hall 2005) to identity, and I categorize identity according to Zimmerman’s (1998) three broad identity types: discourse identity, (genre)situated identity, and transportable identity. In co-constitutive processes (Miller 2013), participants co-construct impoliteness and identity, strategically initiating and assessing potential impoliteness acts to assert and reject identity claims.
Angouri, Jo, and Theodora Tseliga. 2010. “‘You HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT!’ From E-disagreement to E-impoliteness in Two Online Fora.”Journal of Politeness Research 6(1): 57–82.
Applebee, Arthur N., Judith A. Langer, Martin Nystrand, and Adam Gamoran. 2003. “Discussion-based Approaches to Developing Understanding: Classroom Instruction and Student Performance in Middle and High School English.” American Educational Research Journal 40(3): 685–730.
Arundale, Robert, B. 2009. “Face as Emergent in Interpersonal Communication: An Alternative to Goffman.” In Face, Communication and Social Interaction, edited by Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini, and Michael Haugh, 33–54. London: Equinox.
Bennett, Judith, Fred Lubben, Sylvia Hogarth, Bob Campbell, and Alison Robinson. 2004. A Systematic Review of the Nature of Small-groups Discussions in Science Teaching Aimed at Improving Students’ Understandings of Evidence: Review Summary. UK: University of York.
Bousfield, Derek. 2007. “Beginnings, Middles and Ends: A Biopsy of the Dynamics of Impolite Exchanges.”Journal of Pragmatics 39(12): 2185–2216.
Bousfield, Derek. 2013. “Face in Conflict.”Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1(1): 37–56.
Bucholtz, Mary. 1999. “‘Why be normal?’: Language and Identity Practices in a Community of Nerd Girls.”Language in Society 281: 203–233.
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2005. “Identity and Interaction: A Socio-cultural Linguistic Approach. Discourse Studies 7(4/5): 585–614.
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2008. “Finding Identity. Theory and Data.”Multilingua 271:151–163.
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
Buzzelli, Cary, and Bill Johnston. 2001. “Authority, Power, and Morality in Classroom Discourse.”Teaching and Teacher Education 171: 873–884.
Candela, Antonia. 1998. “Students’ Power in Classroom Discourse.”Linguistics in Education 10(2): 139–163.
Cashman, Holly R. 2006. “Impoliteness in Children’s Interactions in a Spanish/English Bilingual Community of Practice.”Journal of Politeness Research 2(2): 217–246.
Cashman, Holly R. 2008. “Accomplishing Marginalization in Bilingual Interaction: Relational Work as a Resource for the Intersubjective Construction of Identity.”Multilingua-Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 27(1/2): 129–150.
Cazden, Courtney B. 1988/2001. Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Chang, Wei-Lin Melody, and Michael Haugh. 2011. “Strategic Embarrassment and Face Threatening in Business Interactions.”Journal of Pragmatics 43(12): 2948–2963.
Chinn, Clark A., Angela M. O’Donnell, and Theresa S. Jinks. 2000. “The Structure of Discourse in Collaborative Learning.” The Journal of Experimental Education 69(1): 77–97.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2005. “Impoliteness and Entertainment in the Television Quiz Show: The Weakest Link.”Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 35–72.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2008. “Reflections on Impoliteness, Relational Work and Power.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 17–44. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011a. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011b. “‘It’s not what you said, it’s how you said it!’ Prosody and Impoliteness.” In Discursive Approaches to Politeness, edited by Linguistic Politeness Group, 57–83. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and Anne Wichmann. 2003. “Impoliteness Revisited: With Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects.” Journal of Pragmatics 35(10–11): 1545–1579.
Darics, Erika. 2010. “Politeness in Computer-mediated Discourse of a Virtual Team.”Journal of Politeness Research 6(1): 129–150.
Dobs, Abby M., and Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich. 2013. “Impoliteness in Polylogal Interaction: Accounting for Face-threat Witnesses’ Responses.”Journal of Pragmatics 531: 112–130.
Dynel, Marta. 2012. “Setting our House in Order: The Workings of Impoliteness in Multi-party Film Discourse.”Journal of Politeness Research 8(2): 161–194.
Eder, Donna. 1990. “Serious and Playful Disputes: Variation in Conflict Talk among Female Adolescents.” In Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations in Conversations, edited by Allen D. Grimshaw, 67–84. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2009. “Impoliteness and Identity in the American News Media: The “Culture Wars.”Journal of Politeness Research 5(2): 273–303.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2010a. “A Genre Approach to the Study of Im-politeness.”International Review of Pragmatics 1(2): 46–94.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2010b. “The YouTubification of Politics, Impoliteness and Polarization.” In Handbook of Research on Discourse Behavior and Digital Communication: Language Structures and Social Interaction, edited by Rotimi Taiwo, 540–563. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2013. “Face, Identity, and Im/politeness: Looking Backwards, Moving Forward – From Goffman to Practice Theory.” Journal of Politeness Research 9(1): 1–33.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, and Patricia Bou-Franch. 2010. “A Genre Approach to Impoliteness1 in a Spanish Television Talk Show: Evidence from Corpus-based Analysis, Questionnaires and Focus Groups.” Intercultural Pragmatics 7(4): 689–723.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Patricia Bou-Franch, and Nuria Lorenzo-Dus. 2013. “Identity and Impoliteness: The Expert in the Talent Show Idol.” Journal of Politeness Research 9(1): 97–121.
Gee, James P. 2000-2001. “Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education.”Review of Research in Education251: 99–125.
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2013. “Small stories and identities analysis as a framework for the study of im/politeness-in-interaction.” Journal of Politeness Research 9(1): 55–74.
Goodwin, Marjorie H. 1990. “Tactical Uses of Stories: Participation Frameworks within Girls’ and Boys’ Disputes.”Discourse Processes 13(1): 33–71.
Graham, Sage Lambert. 2007. “Disagreeing to Agree: Conflict (Im)politeness and Identity in a Computer Mediated Community.”Journal of Pragmatics 391: 742–759.
Gregory, Anne, and Dewey Cornell. 2009. “‘Tolerating’ Adolescent Needs: Moving beyond Zero Tolerance Policies in High School.”Theory into Practice 481: 106–113.
Haugh, Michael. 2007. “The Discursive Challenge to Politeness Research: An Interactional Alternative.”Journal of Politeness Research 31: 95–317.
Haugh, Michael. 2010a. “Intercultural (Im)politeness and the Micro-macro Issue. In Pragmatics across Languages and Cultures, edited by Anna Trosborg, 139–166. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Haugh, Michael. 2010b. “Jocular Mockery, (Dis)affiliation and Face.”. Journal of Pragmatics 42(8): 2106–2119. Journal of Politeness Research 6(1): 7–31.
Haugh, Michael. 2010c. “When is an Email Really Offensive?: Argumentativity and Variability in Evaluations of Impoliteness.”Journal of Politeness Research 6(1): 7–31.
Haugh, Michael, and Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini. 2010. “Face in Interaction.”Journal of Pragmatics 42(8): 2073–2077.
Heritage, John. 1984. “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by John Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, John. 2001. “Goffman, Garfinkel and Conversation Analysis.” In Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader, edited by Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon Yates, 47–56. London: Sage.
Holland, Dorothy, and Jean Lave. 2001. History in Person. Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press.
Inagaki, Kayoko, Giyoo Hatano, and Eiji Morita. (1998). “Construction of Mathematical Knowledge through Whole-class Discussion.” Learning and Instruction 8(6): 503–526.
Johnson, David W., and Roger T. Johnson. 1996. “Conflict Resolution and Peer Mediation Programs in Elementary and Secondary Schools: A Review of the Research.”Review of Educational Research 66(4): 459–506.
Joseph, John. 2013. “Identity Work and Face Work across Linguistic and Cultural Boundaries.”Journal of Politeness Research 9(1): 35–54.
Kádár, Daniel, and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kangasharju, Helena. 2002. “Alignment in Disagreement: Forming Oppositional Alliances in Committee Meetings.”Journal of Pragmatics 341:1447–1471.
Laursen, Brett, Benjamin D. Finkelstein, and Noel Townsend Betts. 2001. “A Developmental Meta-analysis of Peer Conflict Resolution.” Developmental Review 21(4): 423–449.
Locher, Miriam A. 2008. “Relational Work, Politeness and Identity Construction.” In Handbooks of Applied Linguistics.Volume 2: Interpersonal Communication, edited by Gerd Antos, Eija Ventola, and Tilo Weber, 509–540. New York: Mouton.de Gruyter.
Locher, Miriam A., and Andreas Langlotz. 2008. “Relational Work: At the Intersection of Cognition, Interaction and Emotion.”Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée (VALS-ASLA) 881: 165–191.
Locher, Miriam, and Richard J. Watts. 2005. “Politeness Theory and Relational Work.”Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 9–33.
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria. 2009. “‘You Are Barking Mad, I’m Out’: Impoliteness and Broadcast Talk.”Journal of Politeness Research 51: 159–187.
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, and Patricia Bou-Franch. 2011. “On-line Polylogues and Impoliteness: The Case of Postings Sent in Response to the Obama Reggaeton YouTube Video.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(10): 2578–2593.
McNair, Rodney E. 2000. “Working in the Mathematics Frame: Maximizing the Potential to Learn from Students’ Mathematics Classroom Discussions.”Educational Studies in Mathematics 42(2): 197–209.
Mehan, Hugh. 1980. “The Competent Student.”Anthropology and Education Quarterly 11(3): 131–152.
Merten, Don E. 1997. “The Meaning of Meanness: Popularity, Competition, and Conflict among Junior High School Girls.”Sociology of Education 701: 175–191.
Miller, Elizabeth, R. 2013. “Positioning Selves, Doing Relational Work and Constructing Identities in Interview Talk.”Journal of Politeness Research 9(1): 75–91.
Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mills, Sara. 2011. “Discursive Approaches to Politeness and Impoliteness.” In Discursive Approaches to Impoliteness, edited by Linguistic Politeness Research Group, 19–56. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
Mueller, Abby. 2011. “Using a Genre Approach to Analyze Impoliteness in Classroom Discourse.” Master’s Thesis, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC.
Mullany, Louise. 2008. “‘Stop Hassling Me!’ Impoliteness, Power and Gender Identity in the Professional Workplace.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, edited by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 231–251. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nystrand, Martin, Lawrence Wu, Adam Gamoran, Susie Zeiser, and Daniel A. Long. 2003. “Questions in Time: Investigating the Structure and Dynamics of Unfolding Classroom Discourse.” Discourse Processes 35(2): 135–198.
Ochs, Elinor. 1992. “Indexing Gender.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, edited by Alessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, 335–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ochs, Elinor. 1993. “Constructing Social identity: A Language Socialization Perspective.”Research on Language and Social Interaction 261: 287–306.
Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula. 2003. “Patterns of Participation in Classroom interaction: Girls’ and Boys’ Non-compliance in a Greek High School.”Linguistics and Education 14(1): 123–141.
Payne-Woolridge, Ruth. 2010. “Classroom Behaviour and Facework: Balancing Threats and Enhancements.”Classroom Discourse 1(2): 167–180.
Pennycook, Alastair. 2010. Language as Local Practice. London: Routledge.
Perelmutter, Renee. 2012. “Klassika Zhanra: The Flamewar as a Genre in the Russian Blogosphere.”Journal of Pragmatics 451: 74–89.
Pichler, Pia. 2006. “Multifunctional Teasing as a Resource for Identity Construction in the Talk of British Bangladeshi Girls.”Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(2): 225–249.
Raley, Jason D. 2006. “Finding Safety in Dangerous Places.” In Innovations in Ethnography: Theory, Methods, and Results, edited by George Spindler, and Lorie Hammond, 127–167. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Scollon, Ron, and Suzanne W. Scollon. 2001. Intercultural Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sinclair, John McHardy, and Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2007. “Theories of Identity and the Analysis of Face.”Journal of Pragmatics 391: 639–656.
Stewart, Miranda. 2011. “Protecting Speaker’s Face in Impolite Exchanges: The Negotiation of Face-wants in Workplace Interaction”Journal of Politeness Research 4(1): 31–53.
Streeck, Jürgen, and Siri Mehus. 2005. “Microethnography: The Study of Practices.” In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, edited by Kristine Fitch, and Robert E. Sanders, 381–404. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Swales, John. 1990. Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Terkourafi, Marina. 2005. “Beyond the Micro-level in Politeness Research.”Journal of Politeness Research 11: 237–262.
Tetreault, Chantal. 2010. “Collaborative Conflicts: Teens Performing Aggression and Intimacy in a French Cité.”Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 20(1): 72–86.
Ting-Toomey, Stella, and Atsuko Kurogi. 1998. “Facework Competence in Intercultural Conflict: An Updated Face-negotiation Theory.”International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 221:187–225.
Tsui, Lisa. 2002. “Fostering Critical Thinking through Effective Pedagogy: Evidence from Four Institutional Case Studies.”The Journal of Higher Education 73(6): 740–763.
Upadhyay, Shiv R. 2010. “Identity and Impoliteness in Computer Mediated Reader Responses.”Journal of Politeness Research 6(1): 105–127.
White, John W. 2011. “Resistance to Classroom Participation: Minority Students, Academic Discourse, Cultural Conflicts, and Issues of Representation in Whole Class Discussions.”Journal of Language, Identity, & Education 10(4): 250–265.
Wortham, Stanton. 2004. “From Good Student to Outcast: The Emergence of a Classroom Identity.”ETHOS 32(2): 164–187.
Zimmerman, Don H. 1998. “Identity, Context and Interaction.” In Identities in Talk, edited by Charles Antaki, and Sue Widdicombe, 87–106. London: Sage.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Blitvich, Pilar Garcés-Conejos & Alex Georgakopoulou
2021. Analysing Identity. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 293 ff.
2018. Relational work and identity negotiation in critical post observation teacher feedback. Journal of Pragmatics 135 ► pp. 101 ff.
Donaghue, Helen
2022. Teachers and supervisors negotiating face during critical account requests in post observation feedback. Journal of Politeness Research 18:1 ► pp. 37 ff.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar & Maria Sifianou
2017. (Im)politeness and Identity. In The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ► pp. 227 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Topics and Settings in Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 247 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.