Cover not available
Review published In:
Discourse and politics of migration in Italy: The production and reproduction of ethnic dominance and exclusion
Edited by Monica Colombo
[Journal of Language and Politics 12:2] 2013
► pp. 295–304
Book review

Review of Political Discourse Analysis: A Methods for Advanced Students by Isabela Fairclough and Norman Fairclough

Reviewed by
| Universität Innsbruck
Published online: 2 August 2012
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.12.2.07kie
References
Amossy, Ruth
2012 “Les enjeux du « déraisonnable »: rhétorique de la persuasion et rhétorique du dissensus.” In Chaïm Perelman (1912–2012). De la Nouvelle Rhétorique à la Logique Juridique, ed. by Benoît Frydman, and Michel Meyer, 17–37. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Aristoteles
2002 Rhetorik. Transl. and comm. by Christoph Rapp. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul
(2004) Analysing Political Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst
(2004) A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H
(2010) Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Peter Houtlosser
2002 “Strategic Maneuvering with the Burden of Proof.” In Advances in Pragma-Dialectics, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, 13–28. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
(2000) New Labour, New Language? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Garssen, Bart, and Manfred Kienpointner
2011 “Figurative Analogy in Political Argumentation.” In Keeping in Touch with Pragma-Dialectics, ed. by Eveline Feteris, Bart Garssen, and Francisca Snoeck-Henkemans, 39–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen
1988 Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. 11. Bd. Frankfurt/M., 47.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred
(1992) Alltagslogik. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
1993 “The Empirical Relevance of Ch. Perelman’ s New Rhetoric.” Argumentation 7 (4): 419–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00711059Google Scholar
1998 “Inventio.” In Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, Vol. 41, ed. by Gert Ueding, 561–587, especially 564–567. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
2003 “Perelman on Causal Arguments: The Argument of Waste.” In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren et al., 611–616. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar
Kienpointner, Manfred, and Anna Orlandini
2005 “La doxa de la justice à travers les langues et les époques.” Revue Internationale des droits de l’antiquité 521: 181–206.Google Scholar
Klein, Josef
1995 “Asyl-diskurs. Konflikte und blockaden in politik, medien und alltagswelt.” In Sprache im Konflikt, ed. by Ruth Reiher, 15–71. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2003 “Politische Rede.” In Historisches Wörterbuch der Rhetorik, Vol. 61, ed. by Gert Ueding, 1465–1521. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Kopperschmidt, Josef
2006 “Die Idee des ,,universalen Publikums”. In Die Neue Rhetorik. Studien zu Chaim Perelman, ed. by Josef Kopperschmidt, 227–279. München: Fink.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaim
. [1945] 1990 “De la justice.” In Éthique et droit, ed. by Chaim Perelman, 13–86. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Perelman, Chaim, and Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca
(1983) Traité de L’Argumentation: La Nouvelle Rhétorique. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Rawls, John
(1999) A Theory of Justice. Revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
(2001) Discourse and Discrimination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walton, Douglas N
1996 Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum, 38ff. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808630Google Scholar
(2008) Informal Logic: A Pragmatic Approach. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wengeler, Martin
(2003) Topos und Diskurs. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
(2011) The Discourse of Politics in Action. 2nd edition. London: Palgrave Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230316539Google Scholar
Zagar, Igor
2011 “The Use and Misuse of Topoi: Critical Discourse Analysis and Discourse-historical Approach.” In Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren et al., 2032–2046. Amsterdam: SicSat.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Moradi-Joz, Rasool, Saeed Ketabi & Mansoor Tavakoli
2019. On conductive argumentation. Journal of Language and Politics 18:1 ► pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
O’Halloran, Kieran
2014. Counter-discourse corpora, ethical subjectivity and critique of argument. Journal of Language and Politics 13:4 ► pp. 781 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2015. Counter-discourse corpora, ethical subjectivity and critique of argument: An alternative critical discourse analysis pedagogy. Journal of Language and Politics 13:4 ► pp. 781 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.