This article investigates the self-presentation and the construction of immigration discourses in articles and policy documents published by the British National Party (BNP) and the UK Independence Party (UKIP). By combining corpus analysis with the Discourse-Historical Approach to Critical Discourse Analysis, a picture emerges of two parties whose use of language is governed by the same principle of differentiation. Fundamental to the BNP’s and UKIP’s language is the dichotomy in-group/out-group. The in-group analysis investigates the parties’ choice of form of self-representation, claims to unique competence, denial of attributes and mutual perception. The out-group analysis shows how the parties construct immigration, and focuses on the aspects of legal status, quantification and origin. The analyses suggest considerable lexical and conceptual similarities in both in-group and out-group formation.
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michal Krzyżanowski, Tony McEnery, and Ruth Wodak
2008 “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and Society 19 (3): 273-306.
2012 “Explaining Membership in the British National Party: A Multilevel Analysis of Contact and Threat.” European Sociological Review 28 (5): 633-646.
Billig, Michael
1995Banal Nationalism. London: Thousand Oaks.
BNP
n.d. Racism Cuts Both Ways: The Scandal of Our Age. Retrieved from [URL].
Burgess, Ernest W., and Robert E. Park
1921Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Copsey, Nigel
2004Contemporary British Fascism: The British National Party and the Quest for Legitimacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Copsey, Nigel
2011 “Introduction.” In The British National Party: Contemporary Perspectives, ed. by Nigel Copsey and Graham Macklin, 1-15. London and New York: Routledge.
Copsey, Nigel and Graham Macklin
(eds)2011The British National Party: Contemporary Perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.
Cross, Colin
1961The Fascists in Britain. London: Barrie and Rockliff.
Edwards, Geraint O
2012 “A Comparative Discourse Analysis of the Construction of ‘In-Groups’ in the 2005 and 2010 Manifestos of the British National Party.” Discourse & Society 23 (3): 245-258.
Evans, Jocelyn, and Matthew J. Goodwin
2012From Voting to Violence? Far Right Extremism in Britain. Retrieved from [URL].
Ford, Robert, and Michael J. Goodwin
2010 “Angry White Men: Individual and Contextual Predictors of Support for the British National Party.” Political Studies 58 (1): 1-25.
Ford, Robert, Matthew J. Goodwin, and David Cutts
2012 “Strategic Eurosceptics and Polite Xenophobes: Support for the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) in the 2009 European Parliament Elections.” European Journal of Political Research 51 (2): 204-234.
Goodwin, Michael. J
2011New British Fascism: Rise of the British National Party. London and New York: Routledge.
Griffin, Roger
1991The Nature of Fascism. London and New York: Routledge.
Halikiopoulou, Daphne, and Sofia Vasilopoulou
2010 “Towards a ‘Civic’ Narrative: British National Identity and the Transformation of the British National Party.” The Political Quarterly 81 (4): 583-592.
John, Peter, Helen Margetts, David Rowland, and Stuart Weir
2006The BNP: The Roots of its Appeal. Essex: University of Essex.
John, Peter, and Helen Margetts
2009 “The Latent Support for the Extreme Right in British Politics.” West European Politics 32 (3): 496-513.
Linehan, Thomas P
2000British Fascism, 1918-1939: Parties, Ideology and Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak
2009 “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Michael Meyer and Ruth Wodak, 87-122. London: Sage.
Rhodes, James
2009 “The Banal National Party: The Routine Nature of Legitimacy.” Patterns of Prejudice 43 (2): 142-160.
Richardson, John E
2011 “Race and Racial Difference: The Surface and Depth of BNP Ideology.” In The British National Party: Contemporary Perspectives, ed. by Nigel Copsey and Graham Macklin, 38-61. London and New York: Routledge.
Richardson, John E
2013 “Racial Populism in British Fascist Discourse: The Case of COMBAT and the British National Party (1960-1967).” In Analysing Fascist Discourse: European Fascism in Talk and Text, ed. by John E. Richardson and Ruth Wodak, 181-203. New York and London: Routledge.
Richardson, John E., and Ruth Wodak
2009 “Recontextualising Fascist Ideologies of the Past: Right-Wing Discourses on Employment and Nativism in Austria and the United Kingdom.” Critical Discourse Studies 6 (4): 251-267.
Stubbs, Michael
2001Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. London: Blackwell.
Thurlow, Richard
1987Fascism in Britain: A History, 1918-1985. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
UNHCR
1951Asylum Seekers. Retrieved from [URL]. Retrieved September 14, 2012.
Wodak, Ruth
2009The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wodak, Ruth, Rudolf de Cillia, Martin Reisigl, and Karin Liebhart
2009The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Zauner, Adolf
1903 “Die romanischen Namen der Körperteile: eine onomasiologische Studie.” Romanische Forschungen 141: 339-530.
2023. The national nature of globalization and the global nature of nationalism: Historically and methodologically entangled. Theory & Psychology 33:2 ► pp. 175 ff.
Fitzgerald, Saira
2018. When you’re in with the in-crowd. Journal of Language and Discrimination 2:1 ► pp. 58 ff.
Xu, Bangjun & Yuan Tao
2023. National Identity in Media Discourses from Russia and Ukraine: Amid the 2022 Russo-Ukrainian War. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 68:3 ► pp. 419 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.