Article published In:
Right-Wing Populism in Europe & USA: Contesting Politics & Discourse beyond ‘Orbanism’ and ‘Trumpism’
Edited by Ruth Wodak and Michał Krzyżanowski
[Journal of Language and Politics 16:4] 2017
► pp. 582594
References (27)
References
Cap, Piotr. 2013. Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Lewis. 1871. Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There. London: Macmillan. See also: [URL], based on the 1896 edition.
Chilton, Paul. 1994. “La plaie qu’il convient de fermer …” Les métaphores du discours raciste. Journal of Pragmatics 21 (6): 583–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Security Metaphors. Geneva: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Language, Space and Mind. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017 forthcoming. Toward a neuro-cognitive model of socio-political discourse, and an application to the populist discourse of Donald Trump. Langage et société: 160–161.Google Scholar
Gallese, Vittorio. 2009. Mirror neurons, embodied simulation, and the neural basis of social identification. Psychoanalytic Dialogues 191: 519–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Mirror neurons and art. In Art and the Senses, edited by F. Bacci & D. Melcher, pp. 441–9. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2016. The Multimodal Nature of Visual Perception: Facts and Speculations. Gestalt Theory 38 (2/3): 127–140.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Linguistic Society of Korea, pp. 111–37. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Gallie, Walter B. 1964. Essentially Contested Concepts. In W. B. Gallie, Philosophy and the Historical Understanding, pp. 157–191. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher J. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Christopher 2015. Viewpoint in linguistic discourse: Space and evaluation in news reports of political protests. Critical Discourse Studies 12 (3):238–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. The visual basis of linguistic meaning and its implications for critical discourse analysis: integrating cognitive linguistic and multimodal methods. Discourse and Society 3(27): 335–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Isenberg, Nancy, D. Silbersweig, A. Engelien, S. Emmerich, K. Malavade, B. Beattie, A. C. Leon, & E. Stern. 1999. Linguistic threat activates the human amygdala. Proceedings of the National Academy. of Sciciences USA 961: 10456–10459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind. University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaal, Bertie. 2017. Worldview and Social Practice: A Discourse-Space \Approach to Political Text Analysis. PhD Thesis, Vrije Univesiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Kopytowska, Monika. 2015a. Ideology of “here and now”. Mediating distance in television news. Critical Discourse Studies 12(3): 347–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015b. Covering conflict: between universality and cultural specificity in news discourse genre and journalistic style. International Review of Pragmatics 71: 308–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto & Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2002. The Ideology of the Extreme Right. Manchester University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016. What is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulvermuller, Friedemann. 2013. How neurons make meaning: brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract semantics. Cognitive Scences 17(9): 458–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziem, Alexander. 2014. Frames of Understanding in Text and Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (25)

Cited by 25 other publications

Nawrocki, Michał
2024. Who are the ‘real’ people? The concept of relational popular identity and the self-identification of populist voters in Poland. International Sociology 39:6  pp. 672 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Xiaomei, Andrew South, Brett Hashimoto & Clifton Farnsworth
2024. Six Connotations of Sustainability in Civil and Construction Engineering: A Corpus Linguistics Study. Sustainability 16:15  pp. 6271 ff. DOI logo
GOKCEKUYU, Ertugrul
2023. A Bibliometric Analysis of Populism in Turkey. OPUS Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi 20:55  pp. 550 ff. DOI logo
Makki, Mohammad & Andrew S. Ross
2023. “We were cocked & loaded to retaliate”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 11:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Junchen
2023. How to build a “Dream” in political speech? A critical discourse analysis of the discursive construction of the Chinese Dream speech. Critical Arts 37:3  pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Alekseev, Alexander
2022. “It is in the nation-state that democracy resides”. Journal of Language and Politics 21:3  pp. 459 ff. DOI logo
Alekseev, Alexander
2023. Sovereignty in Political Discourses of the European Populist Radical Right: The Right of the People and the Right of the Peoples. In Sovereignty in Conflict [Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics, ],  pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Alekseev, Alexander
2024.  The (changing) concept of democracy in (transforming) European populist radical right discourses: the case of Polish Law and Justice . Journal of Contemporary European Studies  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Helal, Fethi
2022. ‘The people want …: ’ the populist specter in the Tunisian President’s inaugural speech. Critical Discourse Studies 19:3  pp. 233 ff. DOI logo
Keating, John
2021. Populist discourse and active metaphors in the 2016 US presidential elections. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:4  pp. 499 ff. DOI logo
Stopfner, Maria
2021. Just thank God for Donald Trump – Dialogue practices of populists and their supporters before and after taking office. Journal of Pragmatics 186  pp. 308 ff. DOI logo
Westberg, Gustav
2021. Affective rebirth: Discursive gateways to contemporary national socialism. Discourse & Society 32:2  pp. 214 ff. DOI logo
Anna De Fina & Alexandra Georgakopoulou
2020. The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, DOI logo
Demata, Massimiliano
2020. Populism and Nationalism in Jeremy Corbyn’s Discourse. In Discursive Approaches to Populism Across Disciplines,  pp. 253 ff. DOI logo
Li, Jianing & Min-Hsin Su
2020. Real Talk About Fake News: Identity Language and Disconnected Networks of the US Public’s “Fake News” Discourse on Twitter. Social Media + Society 6:2 DOI logo
Pasitselska, Olga & Christian Baden
2020. Who are ‘the people’?. Journal of Language and Politics 19:4  pp. 666 ff. DOI logo
Rheindorf, Markus
2020. Rhetorics, Discourse and Populist Politics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies,  pp. 622 ff. DOI logo
Stewart, Craig O.
2020. Populist linguistic tone in recent U.S. presidential campaign discourse: a DICTION analysis. Communication Research Reports 37:1-2  pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Breeze, Ruth
2019. Positioning “the people” and Its Enemies: Populism and Nationalism in AfD and UKIP. Javnost - The Public 26:1  pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Breeze, Ruth
2019. Emotion in politics: Affective-discursive practices in UKIP and Labour. Discourse & Society 30:1  pp. 24 ff. DOI logo
Deye, Joseph M & Gail T Fairhurst
2019. Dialectical tensions in the narrative discourse of Donald J. Trump and Pope Francis. Leadership 15:2  pp. 152 ff. DOI logo
Homolar, Alexandra & Ronny Scholz
2019. The power of Trump-speak: populist crisis narratives and ontological security. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32:3  pp. 344 ff. DOI logo
Moradi-Joz, Rasool, Saeed Ketabi & Mansoor Tavakoli
2019. On conductive argumentation. Journal of Language and Politics 18:1  pp. 83 ff. DOI logo
King, Barry
2018. Trump, celebrity and the merchant imaginary. Palgrave Communications 4:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.