Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Language and Politics
Vol. 19:2 (2020) ► pp.290–310

‘Effortful’, ‘needy’ and ‘freeloader’

Constructions of unemployed people’s deservingness in Finnish parliamentary discussions

ORCID logo | University of Helsinki

This article provides a rhetorical discourse analysis of constructions of unemployed people’s deservingness. Data consist of transcripts from Finnish parliament members debating the ‘Activation Model for Unemployment Security’, from December 2017. In the analysis, three discursive constructions of unemployed people’s deservingness were identified: an ‘effortful citizen lacking control’, a ‘needy citizen deserving the welfare state’s reciprocal acts’ and an ‘undeserving freeloader in need of an attitude adjustment’. Analysis focuses on how deservingness and undeservingness are rhetorically accomplished and treated as factual in parliament members’ accounts. The analysis pays particular attention to the question of how speakers build factuality through the management of categories, extreme case formulations, ‘truth talk’ and maximisation and minimisation strategies. The results reflect the negotiated nature of deservingness as well as varying constructions of unemployed people’s responsibility in the contemporary Nordic welfare state context.

Keywords: unemployment, deservingness, parliamentary debates, rhetorical discourse analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous literature on unemployed people’s deservingness
  • 3.Data and methods
  • 4.Data analysis
    • 4.1The ‘effortful’ citizen lacking control
    • 4.2A needy citizen deserving the welfare state’s reciprocal acts
    • 4.3The ‘freeloader’ in need of an attitude adjustment
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 November 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19056.tar
References
Appelbaum, Lauren D.
2001 “The Influence of Perceived Deservingness on Policy Decisions Regarding Aid to the Poor.” Political Psychology 221: 419–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Battle, Brittany
2018 “Deservingness, Deadbeat Dads, and Responsible Fatherhood: Child Support Policy and Rhetorical Conceptualizations of Poverty, Welfare, and the Family.” Symbolic Interaction 411: 443–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blomberg, Helena, Johanna Kallio, Olli Kangas, Christian Kroll, and Mikko Niemelä
2017 “Social Assistance Deservingness and Policy Measures: Attitudes of Finnish Politicians, Administrators and Citizens.” In The Social Legitimacy of Targeted Welfare: Attitudes to Welfare Deservingness, edited by Wim van Oorschot, Femke Roosma, Bart Meuleman, and Tim Reeskens, 209–224. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buss, Christopher
2019 “Public Opinion towards Targeted Labour Market Policies. A Vignette Study on the Perceived Deservingness of the Unemployed.” Journal of European Social Policy 29 (2): 228–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esmark, Anders, and Sarah R. Schoop
2017 “Deserving Social Benefits? Political Framing and Media Framing of ‘Deservingness’ in Two Welfare Reforms in Denmark.” Journal of European Social Policy 27 (5): 417–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Every, Danielle, and Martha Augoustinos
2007 “Constructions of racism in the Australian parliamentary debates on asylum seekers.” Discourse & Society 18 (4): 411–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Stephen
2009 “The Effortful Citizen: Discursive Social Psychology and Welfare Reform.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 191: 393–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Elyse
2013 “Under-Served and Un-Deserving: Youth Empowerment Programs, Poverty Discourses and Subject Formation.” Geoforum 501: 107–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guetskow, Joshua
2010 “Beyond Deservingness: Congressional Discourse on Poverty, 1964–1996.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 6291: 173–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
HE 124/2017
Governmental Proposal on Amendment of Unemployment Security and Few Other Acts]
Ilie, Cornelia
2010a “Introduction”. In European Parliaments under Scrutiny: Discourse Strategies and Interaction Practices, edited by Cornelia Ilie, 1–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010b “Identity Co-Construction in Parliamentary Discourse Practices.” In European Parliaments under Scrutiny: Discourse Strategies and Interaction Practices, edited by Cornelia Ilie, 57–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Parliamentary Discourse and Deliberative Rhetoric.” In Parliament and Parliamentarism: A Comparative History of European Concept, edited by Pasi Ihalainen, Ilie Cornelia, and Kari Palonen, 91–98. New York: Berghahn Books. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Íñigo-Mora, Isabel
2010 “Rhetorical Strategies in the British and Spanish Parliaments.” In European Parliaments under Scrutiny: Discourse Strategies and Interaction Practices, edited by Cornelia Ilie, 329–372. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Carsten
2014 The Right and the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kangas, Olli, and Laura Kalliomaa-Puha
2019 “ The “Activation Model” in the Finnish Unemployment Protection System .” ESPN Flash Report 2019/05. Accessed August 28, 2019. [URL]
Katz, Michael
2013 Undeserving Poor: America’s Enduring Confrontation with Poverty. Oxford University Press. ProQuest Ebook Central. [URL]
Kissová, Lenka
2018 “The Production of (Un)Deserving and (Un)Acceptable: Shifting Representations of Migrants within Political Discourse in Slovakia.” East European Politics and Societies 32 (4): 743–766. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen, Christian A.
2008a “The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes. How Welfare Regimes Influence Public Support.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (2): 145–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008b “The Political Logic of Labour Market Reforms and Popular Images of Target Groups.” Journal of European Social Policy 18 (1): 50–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marston, Greg
2008 “A War on the Poor: Constructing Welfare and Work in Twenty-First Century.” Critical Discourse Studies 5 (4): 359–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meanwell, Emily, and Julie Swando
2013 “Who Deserves Good Schools? Cultural Categories of Worth and School Finance Reform.” Sociological Perspectives 56 (4): 495–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health
2019 “ Draft proposal on Amendment regarding the Activation Model .” Accessed August 28, 2019, [URL]
Møller, Marie Ø., and Deborah Stone
2013 “Disciplining Disability under Danish Active Labour Market Policy.” Social Policy & Administration 471: 586–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monforte, Pierre, Leah Bassel, and Kamran Khan
2019 “Deserving Citizenship? Exploring Migrants’ Experiences of the ‘Citizenship Test’ Process in the United Kingdom.” The British Journal of Sociology 70 (1): 24–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nygård, Mikael
2007 “Welfare or Workfare? Partisan Re/constructions of Finnish Unemployment Security in the Era of Retrenchment.” Journal of Language and Politics 6 (1): 29–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patrick, Ruth
2012 “Work as the Primary ‘Duty’ of the Responsible Citizen: a Critique of this Work-centric Approach.” People, Place & Policy Online 6 (1): 5–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pekonen, Kyösti
2008 “Two Versions of Representative Talk in the Finnish Parliament.” In The Parliamentary Style of Politics, edited by Suvi Soininen, and Tapani Turkka, 208–229. Helsinki: Helsinki University Print.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul
1996 ”The New Politics of the Welfare State.” World Politics 481: 143–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomeranz, Anita
1986 “Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimising Claims.” Human Studies 91: 219–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan
1996 Representing Reality. Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowlingson, Karen, and Stuart Connor
2011 “The ‘Deserving’ Rich? Inequality, Morality and Social Policy.” Journal of Social Policy 40 (3): 437–462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Anne, and Helen Ingram
1993 “Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy.” The American Political Science Review 87 (2): 334–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seu, Irene
2016 “ ‘The Deserving’: Moral Reasoning and Ideological Dilemmas in Public Responses to Humanitarian Communications.” British Journal of Social Psychology 551: 739–755. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slothuus, Rune
2007 “Framing Deservingness to Win Support for Welfare State Retrenchment.” Scandinavian Political Studies 30 (3): 323–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stone, Deborah
1989 “Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas.” Political Science Quarterly 104 (2): 281–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
2000 “Parliamentary Debates.” In Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Teun A. van Dijk, 45–78. Kalgenfurt: Drava Verlag.Google Scholar
van Oorschot, Wim
2006 “Making the Difference in Social Europe: Deservingness Perception among Citizens of European Welfare States.” Journal of European Social Policy 16 (1): 23–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 “Who Should Get What and Why? On Deservingness Criteria and the Conditionality of Solidarity among the Public.” Policy and Politics 28 (1): 33–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willen, Sarah
2012 “How is Health-related Deservingness Reckoned? Perspectives from Unauthorized Im/migrants in Tel Aviv.” Social Science & Medicine 741: 812–821. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoo, Grace
2008 “Immigrants and Welfare: Policy Constructions of Deservingness.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 6 (4): 490–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar