Review published in:
The Mediated Communication of Gender and Sexuality in Contemporary Politics
Edited by Angela Smith and Michael Higgins
[Journal of Language and Politics 19:1] 2020
► pp. 180–183
Book review

Michael Kelly (ed.) (2018). Languages after Brexit: How the UK Speaks to the World

Michael Kelly (ed.). Languages after Brexit: How the UK Speaks to the World
London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. ISBN 978-3-319-65168-2 $25.71

Reviewed by
| Chongqing Technology and Business University
Published online: 16 July 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.19064.dia
References
Bishop, Matthew, and Peter Clegg
2018 “Brexit: Challenges and Opportunities for Small Countries and Territories.” The Round Table 107 (3): 329–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cotter, John, and Elaine Dewhurst
2019 “Lessons from Roman Law: EU Law in England and Wales after Brexit.” The Law Teacher 53 (2): 173–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Geoff, and Anand Menon
2017 Brexit and British Politics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
German, Tracey
2016 “UK–Russia Relations and the Brexit Debate: Advancing Integration or Mutual Mistrust?” Global Affairs 2 (5): 503–511. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koller, Veronika, Susanne Kopf, and Marlene Miglbauer
(eds) 2019 Discourses of Brexit. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maccaferri, Marzia
2019 “Splendid Isolation Again? Brexit and the Role of the Press and Online Media in Re-narrating the European Discourse.” Critical Discourse Studies 16 (4): 389–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, Steve
2018 “The US, BREXIT and Anglo-American Relations.” Journal of Transatlantic Studies 16 (3): 272–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matti, Joshua, and Yang Zhou
2017 “The Political Economy of Brexit: Explaining the Vote.” Applied Economics Letters 24 (16): 1131–1134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Owen, Erica, and Stefanie Walter
2017 “Open Economy Politics and Brexit: Insights, Puzzles, and Ways Forward.” Review of International Political Economy 24 (2): 179–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stychin, Carl
2019 “Rethinking Legal Methods after Brexit.” The Law Teacher 53 (2): 212–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar