Article published In:
Parliamentary Discourse[Journal of Language and Politics 2:1] 2002
► pp. 71–92
[Journal of Language and Politics 2:1] 2002
► pp. 71–92
Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debates
Oral metadiscourse is envisaged in the present study as a set of rhetorically structured communicative and interactional strategies used by speakers to signal, highlight, mitigate, or cancel parts of their ongoing discourse and their varying relevance to different addressees and/or audience members. Parliamentary metadiscursive strategies are typical manifestations of MPs’ joint negotiations of the degree of directness, explicitness, appropriateness, etc., of the interlocutors’ discursive representations, interpretations and evaluations of events, processes, as well as people’s ideas and actions. One important consequence is that institutional adversariality co-occurs with interpersonal adversariality.
Metadiscourse does not simply consist of distinct fragments of discourse and discursive patterns. Some of the rhetorically most effective strategies of parliamentary metadiscourse operate simultaneously on several levels of discourse. These strategies include various manifestations of the participants’ cognitive and inter-relational acts aimed at controlling, evaluating, adjusting and negotiating the goals and the effects of their and of their interlocutors’ ongoing talk.
The metadiscursive level of parliamentary discourse helps to articulate particular aspects of speaker-interlocutor relations and/or speaker-audience relations. This involves particularly speaker role shifts, discursive scope widening/narrowing, multiple-audience targeting, re/definition of terms and concepts, minimising/maximising accountability and merit, challenging facts and statistics. Metadiscursive statements may convey simple, double or multiple messages
References
Adonis, A.
1993 Parliament Today (2nd edn). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Bakhtin, M. M.
1981 The dialogic imagination: Four essays. In: M. Holquist (ed.). (Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bateson, G.
1972/1955 A theory of play and fantasy. In: Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine, 177–93.
Bentley, Roy, Alan Dobson, Maggie Grant and David Roberts
1997 British Politics in Focus. Ormskirk, Lancas.: Causeway Press.
Bonaiuto, Marino and Alessandra Fasulo
1997 Rhetorical intentionality attribution: Its ontogenesis in ordinary conversation. British Journal of Social Psychology 361, 511–536. 
Copeland, Gary W. and Samuel C. Patterson
1997 Changing an institutionalized system. In: Gary W. Copeland and Samuel C. Patterson (eds.). Parliaments in the Modern World: Changing Institutions. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 151–160.
Corbett, Edward P. J.
1990 Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hockett, C.
1963 The problem of universals in language. In: Greenberg, J (ed.). Universals in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–29.
Ilie, Cornelia
2000 Cliché-based metadiscursive argumentation in the Houses of Parliament. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10(1), 65–84.
2001 Unparliamentary language: Insults as cognitive forms of ideological confrontation. In: R. Dirven, R. Frank and C. Ilie (eds.). Language and Ideology, Vol. II: Descriptive cognitive approaches. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Jakobson, Roman
1960 Closing statement: linguistics and poetics. In: T. A. Sebeok (ed.). Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 350–377.
Jost, J. T.
1995 Toward a Wittgensteinian social psychology of human development. Theory and Psychology 9(5), 5–25.
Leech, Geoffrey
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London and New York: Longman.
Limon, D. W. and McKay, W. R.
(eds.) 1997 Erskine May: Parliamentary Practice. 22nd edition. London: Butterworths.
Lucy, John A.
1993 Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, John
1977 Semantics: Vol. I. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Noh, Eun-Ju
1996 A relevance-theoretic account of metarepresentative uses in conditionals. In: V. Rouchota and A. Jucker (eds.). Current Issues in Relevance Theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 271–304.
Norton, Philip
1992 A reformed Parliament? The House Magazine, 22 June 1992.
1997 Representation of Interests: The Case of the British House of Commons. In: Gary W. Copeland and Samuel C. Patterson (eds). Parliaments in the Modern World: Changing Institutions.. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 13–28.
Papafragou, Anna
2000 On speech-act modality. Journal of Pragmatics 321, 519–538.
Riddell, P.
1989 In defence of parliament. Contemporary Record 3(1).
Rosaldo, M. Z.
1982 The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society 111: 203–237.
Seldon, Anthony
1994 Consensus: A debate too long? Parliamentary Affairs 47(4).
Silverstein, Michael
1976 Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In: K. Basso and H. Selby (eds.). Meaning in Anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 11–55.
Tannen, Deborah
1984 Conversational Style. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Press.
Van Dijk, Teun
2000 Parliamentary discourse. In: R. Wodak and T. A. Van Dijk (eds.). Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt, Austria: Drava Verlag, 45–78.
2001 Text and Context of Parliamentary Debates. (forthcoming in Paul Bayley (ed.).
Vico, Giambattista
1996 The Art of Rhetoric (Institutiones Oratoriae, 1711–1741). Amsterdam: Rodopi.