Article published in:
Parliamentary Discourse
[Journal of Language and Politics 2:1] 2002
► pp. 7192
Cited by

Cited by 38 other publications

No author info given
2021.  In Questioning and Answering Practices across Contexts and Cultures [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 323], Crossref logo
Albalat-Mascarell, Ana & María Luisa Carrió-Pastor
2019. Self-representation in political campaign talk: A functional metadiscourse approach to self-mentions in televised presidential debates. Journal of Pragmatics 147  pp. 86 ff. Crossref logo
Albusafi, Rahma Said
2019.  In Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ],  pp. 116 ff. Crossref logo
Archakis, Argiris & Villy Tsakona
2010. ‘The wolf wakes up inside them, grows werewolf hair and reveals all their bullying’: The representation of parliamentary discourse in Greek newspapers. Journal of Pragmatics 42:4  pp. 912 ff. Crossref logo
Archer, Dawn
2018. Negotiating difference in political contexts: An exploration of Hansard. Language Sciences 68  pp. 22 ff. Crossref logo
Cameron, Deborah & Sylvia Shaw
2016.  In Gender, Power and Political Speech,  pp. 27 ff. Crossref logo
Cuenca, Maria-Josep
2014. The use of demonstratives and context activation in Catalan parliamentary debate. Discourse Studies 16:6  pp. 729 ff. Crossref logo
Domínguez-Rodríguez, M. Victoria & Alicia Rodríguez-Álvarez
2015. “The reader is desired to observe…”. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16:1  pp. 86 ff. Crossref logo
Fetzer, Anita
2020. “And I quote”: Forms and functions of quotations in Prime Minister's questions. Journal of Pragmatics 157  pp. 89 ff. Crossref logo
Fetzer, Anita & Peter Bull
2019.  In The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 307],  pp. 73 ff. Crossref logo
Friedman, Elie & Zohar Kampf
2020. ‘To thine own self be true’: The perceived meanings and functions of political consistency. Language in Society 49:1  pp. 89 ff. Crossref logo
Gelabert-Desnoyer, Jaime J.
2008. Not so impersonal. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 18:3  pp. 407 ff. Crossref logo
Gkinopoulos, Theofilos
2020. Identity entrepreneurship in political commemorations: A longitudinal quantitative content analysis of commemorative speeches by leaders of parties in power and opposition before and during the Greek economic crisis. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 8:2  pp. 582 ff. Crossref logo
Gkinopoulos, Theofilos & Peter Hegarty
2018. Commemoration in crisis: A discursive analysis of who ‘we’ and ‘they’ have been or become in ceremonial political speeches before and during the Greek financial downturn. British Journal of Social Psychology 57:3  pp. 591 ff. Crossref logo
Granger, Sylviane
2014. A lexical bundle approach to comparing languages. Languages in Contrast 14:1  pp. 58 ff. Crossref logo
Granger, Sylviane
2016.  In Genre- and Register-related Discourse Features in Contrast [Benjamins Current Topics, 87],  pp. 59 ff. Crossref logo
Hamo, Michal, Zohar Kampf & Naama Weiss-Yaniv
2019. Populism as a keyword and as a meta-discursive resource for positioning in mediated political discourse. Discourse, Context & Media 29  pp. 100283 ff. Crossref logo
Ilie, Cornelia
2015.  In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Jakaza, Ernest & Marianna W. Visser
2016.  In Political Discourse in Emergent, Fragile, and Failed Democracies [Advances in Electronic Government, Digital Divide, and Regional Development, ],  pp. 126 ff. Crossref logo
Lee, Jack Tsen-Ta
2012. Shall the Twain Never Meet? Competing Narratives and Discourses of the Rule of Law In Singapore. SSRN Electronic Journal Crossref logo
Martínez Guillem, Susana
2009. Argumentation, metadiscourse and social cognition: organizing knowledge in political communication. Discourse & Society 20:6  pp. 727 ff. Crossref logo
Müftüler-Baç, Meltem & Rahime Süleymanoğlu-Kürüm
2015. Deliberations in the Turkish parliament. Journal of Language and Politics 14:2  pp. 258 ff. Crossref logo
Netz, Hadar & Ron Kuzar
2019. Discourse and metadiscourse of Hebrew SOV in the heated parliamentary arena. Journal of Pragmatics 141  pp. 67 ff. Crossref logo
Niven, David & Ellen A. Donnelly
2020. Who challenges disparities in capital punishment?: An analysis of state legislative floor debates on death penalty reform. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice 18:2  pp. 95 ff. Crossref logo
Plug, H. José
2017.  In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12],  pp. 159 ff. Crossref logo
Rai, Shirin M.
2010. Analysing Ceremony and Ritual in Parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies 16:3  pp. 284 ff. Crossref logo
Rai, Shirin M.
2017. Performance and politics: an approach to symbolic representation. Politics, Groups, and Identities 5:3  pp. 506 ff. Crossref logo
Rasiah, Parameswary
2010. A framework for the systematic analysis of evasion in parliamentary discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 42:3  pp. 664 ff. Crossref logo
Renardel de Lavalette, Kiki Yvonne, Corina Andone & Gerard J. Steen
2019. I did not say that the government should be plundering anybody’s savings. Journal of Language and Politics 18:5  pp. 718 ff. Crossref logo
Shanahan, Marie‐Claire & Robert Bechtel
2020. “We're taking their brilliant minds”: Science teacher expertize, meta‐discourse, and the challenges of teacher–scientist collaboration. Science Education 104:2  pp. 354 ff. Crossref logo
Shenhav, Shaul R.
2008. Showing and telling in parliamentary discourse: the case of repeated interjections to Rabin's speeches in the Israeli parliament. Discourse & Society 19:2  pp. 223 ff. Crossref logo
Truan, Naomi
2020. Narratives of dialogue in parliamentary discourse. Journal of Language and Politics Crossref logo
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2015.  In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27],  pp. 845 ff. Crossref logo
Verkuyten, Maykel & Wybren Nooitgedagt
2019. Parliamentary identity and the management of the far‐right: A discursive analysis of Dutch parliamentary debates. British Journal of Social Psychology 58:3  pp. 495 ff. Crossref logo
Vuković, Milica
2012. Positioning in pre-prepared and spontaneous parliamentary discourse: Choice of person in the Parliament of Montenegro. Discourse & Society 23:2  pp. 184 ff. Crossref logo
Vuković Stamatović, Milica
2017. Metaphors of parliamentary budget debates in times of crisis. Pragmatics and Society 8:2  pp. 281 ff. Crossref logo
Zhang, Man, Weiwei Sun, Huan Peng, Qiong Gan & Bo Yu
2017. A multidimensional analysis of metadiscourse markers across spoken registers. Journal of Pragmatics 117  pp. 106 ff. Crossref logo
Álvarez-Benito, Gloria & Catalina Fuentes-Rodríguez
2016.  In A Gender-based Approach to Parliamentary Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 68],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Adonis, A.
1993Parliament Today (2nd edn). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M.
1981The dialogic imagination: Four essays. In: M. Holquist (ed.). (Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, G.
1972/1955 A theory of play and fantasy. In: Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine, 177–93.Google Scholar
Bentley, Roy, Alan Dobson, Maggie Grant and David Roberts
1997British Politics in Focus. Ormskirk, Lancas.: Causeway Press.Google Scholar
Bonaiuto, Marino and Alessandra Fasulo
1997Rhetorical intentionality attribution: Its ontogenesis in ordinary conversation. British Journal of Social Psychology 36, 511–536. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, Gary W. and Samuel C. Patterson
1997Changing an institutionalized system. In: Gary W. Copeland and Samuel C. Patterson (eds.). Parliaments in the Modern World: Changing Institutions. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 151–160.Google Scholar
Corbett, Edward P. J.
1990Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hockett, C.
1963The problem of universals in language. In: Greenberg, J (ed.). Universals in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–29.Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia
2000Cliché-based metadiscursive argumentation in the Houses of Parliament. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10(1), 65–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Unparliamentary language: Insults as cognitive forms of ideological confrontation. In: R. Dirven, R. Frank and C. Ilie (eds.). Language and Ideology, Vol. II: Descriptive cognitive approaches. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1960Closing statement: linguistics and poetics. In: T. A. Sebeok (ed.). Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 350–377.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T.
1995Toward a Wittgensteinian social psychology of human development. Theory and Psychology 9(5), 5–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983Principles of Pragmatics. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Limon, D. W. and McKay, W. R.
(eds.) 1997Erskine May: Parliamentary Practice. 22nd edition. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A.
1993Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics: Vol. I. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Noh, Eun-Ju
1996A relevance-theoretic account of metarepresentative uses in conditionals. In: V. Rouchota and A. Jucker (eds.). Current Issues in Relevance Theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 271–304.Google Scholar
Norton, Philip
1992A reformed Parliament? The House Magazine, 22 June 1992.Google Scholar
1997Representation of Interests: The Case of the British House of Commons. In: Gary W. Copeland and Samuel C. Patterson (eds). Parliaments in the Modern World: Changing Institutions.. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 13–28.Google Scholar
Papafragou, Anna
2000On speech-act modality. Journal of Pragmatics 32, 519–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Riddell, P.
1989In defence of parliament. Contemporary Record 3(1). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosaldo, M. Z.
1982The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society 11: 203–237. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seldon, Anthony
1994Consensus: A debate too long? Parliamentary Affairs 47(4).Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
1976Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In: K. Basso and H. Selby (eds.). Meaning in Anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 11–55.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1984Conversational Style. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun
2000Parliamentary discourse. In: R. Wodak and T. A. Van Dijk (eds.). Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt, Austria: Drava Verlag, 45–78.Google Scholar
2001Text and Context of Parliamentary Debates. (forthcoming in Paul Bayley (ed.).Google Scholar
Vico, Giambattista
1996The Art of Rhetoric (Institutiones Oratoriae, 1711–1741). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar