Article published In:
Parliamentary Discourse[Journal of Language and Politics 2:1] 2003
► pp. 71–92
[Journal of Language and Politics 2:1] 2003
► pp. 71–92
Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debates
Oral metadiscourse is envisaged in the present study as a set of rhetorically structured communicative and interactional strategies used by speakers to signal, highlight, mitigate, or cancel parts of their ongoing discourse and their varying relevance to different addressees and/or audience members. Parliamentary metadiscursive strategies are typical manifestations of MPs’ joint negotiations of the degree of directness, explicitness, appropriateness, etc., of the interlocutors’ discursive representations, interpretations and evaluations of events, processes, as well as people’s ideas and actions. One important consequence is that institutional adversariality co-occurs with interpersonal adversariality.
Metadiscourse does not simply consist of distinct fragments of discourse and discursive patterns. Some of the rhetorically most effective strategies of parliamentary metadiscourse operate simultaneously on several levels of discourse. These strategies include various manifestations of the participants’ cognitive and inter-relational acts aimed at controlling, evaluating, adjusting and negotiating the goals and the effects of their and of their interlocutors’ ongoing talk.
The metadiscursive level of parliamentary discourse helps to articulate particular aspects of speaker-interlocutor relations and/or speaker-audience relations. This involves particularly speaker role shifts, discursive scope widening/narrowing, multiple-audience targeting, re/definition of terms and concepts, minimising/maximising accountability and merit, challenging facts and statistics. Metadiscursive statements may convey simple, double or multiple messages
References (28)
Adonis, A. 1993. Parliament Today (2nd edn). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The dialogic imagination: Four essays. In: M. Holquist (ed.). (Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bateson, G. 1972/1955. A theory of play and fantasy. In: Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine, 177–93.
Bentley, Roy, Alan Dobson, Maggie Grant and David Roberts. 1997. British Politics in Focus. Ormskirk, Lancas.: Causeway Press.
Bonaiuto, Marino and Alessandra Fasulo. 1997. Rhetorical intentionality attribution: Its ontogenesis in ordinary conversation. British Journal of Social Psychology 361, 511–536. 
Copeland, Gary W. and Samuel C. Patterson. 1997. Changing an institutionalized system. In: Gary W. Copeland and Samuel C. Patterson (eds.). Parliaments in the Modern World: Changing Institutions. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 151–160.
Corbett, Edward P. J. 1990. Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hockett, C. 1963. The problem of universals in language. In: Greenberg, J (ed.). Universals in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–29.
Ilie, Cornelia. 2000. Cliché-based metadiscursive argumentation in the Houses of Parliament. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10(1), 65–84.
. 2001. Unparliamentary language: Insults as cognitive forms of ideological confrontation. In: R. Dirven, R. Frank and C. Ilie (eds.). Language and Ideology, Vol. II: Descriptive cognitive approaches. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Closing statement: linguistics and poetics. In: T. A. Sebeok (ed.). Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 350–377.
Jost, J. T. 1995. Toward a Wittgensteinian social psychology of human development. Theory and Psychology 9(5), 5–25.
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London and New York: Longman.
Limon, D. W. and McKay, W. R. (eds.). 1997. Erskine May: Parliamentary Practice. 22nd edition. London: Butterworths.
Lucy, John A. 1993. Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics: Vol. I. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Noh, Eun-Ju. 1996. A relevance-theoretic account of metarepresentative uses in conditionals. In: V. Rouchota and A. Jucker (eds.). Current Issues in Relevance Theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 271–304.
Norton, Philip. 1992. A reformed Parliament? The House Magazine, 22 June 1992.
. 1997. Representation of Interests: The Case of the British House of Commons. In: Gary W. Copeland and Samuel C. Patterson (eds). Parliaments in the Modern World: Changing Institutions.. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 13–28.
Papafragou, Anna. 2000. On speech-act modality. Journal of Pragmatics 321, 519–538.
Riddell, P. 1989. In defence of parliament. Contemporary Record 3(1).
Rosaldo, M. Z. 1982. The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society 111: 203–237.
Seldon, Anthony. 1994. Consensus: A debate too long? Parliamentary Affairs 47(4).
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In: K. Basso and H. Selby (eds.). Meaning in Anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 11–55.
Tannen, Deborah. 1984. Conversational Style. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Press.
Van Dijk, Teun. 2000. Parliamentary discourse. In: R. Wodak and T. A. Van Dijk (eds.). Racism at the Top. Parliamentary Discourses on Ethnic Issues in Six European States. Klagenfurt, Austria: Drava Verlag, 45–78.
. 2001. Text and Context of Parliamentary Debates. (forthcoming in Paul Bayley (ed.).
Vico, Giambattista. 1996. The Art of Rhetoric (Institutiones Oratoriae, 1711–1741). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Cited by (58)
Cited by 58 other publications
Albalat-Mascarell, Ana
2023. Approaches to the Analysis of Metadiscourse Features in Political Discourse. Complutense Journal of English Studies 31 ► pp. e81534 ff. 
Barreto, Rachel Cardoso & Paulo Alkmin Costa Júnior
2023. As Transmissões ao Vivo no Legislativo e no Judiciário. Dados 66:1
Carrió-Pastor, María Luisa & Ana Albalat-Mascarell
2023. The use of boosters and evidentials in British campaign debates on the Brexit referendum. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Klepański, Jakub, Maciej Hartliński & Arkadiusz Żukowski
2023. The European migrant crisis in Polish parliamentary discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 22:4 ► pp. 485 ff.
Lastres-López, Cristina
2023. Morphosyntactic and pragmatic variation in conditional constructions in
English and Spanish parliamentary discourse. In Exploring Language and Society with Big Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 111], ► pp. 308 ff.
Almutairi, Bandar Alhumaidi A.
2022. Diachronic changes of least delicate appraisal in parliamentary and congressional language. Functions of Language 29:2 ► pp. 169 ff.
Engel, Alexandra, Jason Grafmiller, Laura Rosseel & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2022. Assessing the complexity of lectal competence: the register-specificity of the dative alternation aftergive. Cognitive Linguistics 33:4 ► pp. 727 ff.
Gelabert-Desnoyer, Jaime J.
2022. Not so impersonal. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 407 ff.
Hyland, Ken, Wenbin Wang & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2022. Metadiscourse across languages and genres: An overview. Lingua 265 ► pp. 103205 ff.
Schwalbach, Jan
2022. Going in circles? The influence of the electoral cycle on the party behaviour in parliament. European Political Science Review 14:1 ► pp. 36 ff.
Valdovinos, Jorge I.
2022. Heidegger and Transparency: Between Truth and Attention. In Transparency and Critical Theory, ► pp. 303 ff.
Góra, Magdalena
2021. It's security stupid! Politicisation of the EU’s relations with its neighbours. European Security 30:3 ► pp. 439 ff.
Kim, Kyu-hyun & Kyung-Hee Suh
2021. Formulation questions and responses in Korean TV talk show interactions. In Questioning and Answering Practices across Contexts and Cultures [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 323], ► pp. 193 ff.
Manosevitch, Idit & Elie Friedman
2021. Accounting for Culture in Deliberation through Meta-discursive Analysis. Javnost - The Public 28:4 ► pp. 407 ff.
Fetzer, Anita
2020. “And I quote”: Forms and functions of quotations in Prime Minister's questions. Journal of Pragmatics 157 ► pp. 89 ff.
Fetzer, Anita
2022. ‘For (…) a leader like this Prime Minister to talk about morals and morality is a disgrace’: offensive action, uptake and moral implications in the context of parliamentary debates. Language & Communication 87 ► pp. 135 ff.
Fetzer, Anita
Friedman, Elie & Zohar Kampf
2020. ‘To thine own self be true’: The perceived meanings and functions of political consistency. Language in Society 49:1 ► pp. 89 ff.
Gkinopoulos, Theofilos
2020. Identity entrepreneurship in political commemorations: A longitudinal quantitative content analysis of commemorative speeches by leaders of parties in power and opposition before and during the Greek economic crisis. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 8:2 ► pp. 582 ff.
Niven, David & Ellen A. Donnelly
2020. Who challenges disparities in capital punishment?: An analysis of state legislative floor debates on death penalty reform. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice 18:2 ► pp. 95 ff.
Shanahan, Marie‐Claire & Robert Bechtel
2020. “We're taking their brilliant minds”: Science teacher expertize, meta‐discourse, and the challenges of teacher–scientist collaboration. Science Education 104:2 ► pp. 354 ff.
Albalat-Mascarell, Ana & María Luisa Carrió-Pastor
2019. Self-representation in political campaign talk: A functional metadiscourse approach to self-mentions in televised presidential debates. Journal of Pragmatics 147 ► pp. 86 ff.
Albalat-Mascarell, Ana & María Luisa Carrió-Pastor
2022. Marcadores de implicación en los discursos de campaña para las elecciones generales de 2016 en España. Spanish in Context 19:3 ► pp. 537 ff.
Albusafi, Rahma Said
2019. A Methodological Framework of Stance-Taking and Appraisal in the Parliament. In Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 116 ff.
Fetzer, Anita & Peter Bull
2019. Quoting ordinary people in Prime Minister’s Questions1. In The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 307], ► pp. 73 ff.
Hamo, Michal, Zohar Kampf & Naama Weiss-Yaniv
2019. Populism as a keyword and as a meta-discursive resource for positioning in mediated political discourse. Discourse, Context & Media 29 ► pp. 100283 ff.
Netz, Hadar & Ron Kuzar
2019. Discourse and metadiscourse of Hebrew SOV in the heated parliamentary arena. Journal of Pragmatics 141 ► pp. 67 ff.
Renardel de Lavalette, Kiki Yvonne, Corina Andone & Gerard J. Steen
2019. I did not say that the government should be plundering anybody’s savings. Journal of Language and Politics 18:5 ► pp. 718 ff.
Verkuyten, Maykel & Wybren Nooitgedagt
2019. Parliamentary identity and the management of the far‐right: A discursive analysis of Dutch parliamentary debates. British Journal of Social Psychology 58:3 ► pp. 495 ff.
Archer, Dawn
2018. Negotiating difference in political contexts: An exploration of Hansard. Language Sciences 68 ► pp. 22 ff.
Gkinopoulos, Theofilos & Peter Hegarty
2018. Commemoration in crisis: A discursive analysis of who ‘we’ and ‘they’ have been or become in ceremonial political speeches before and during the Greek financial downturn. British Journal of Social Psychology 57:3 ► pp. 591 ff.
Plug, H. José
2017. The strategic use of argumentation from example in plenary debates in the European Parliament. In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics [Argumentation in Context, 12], ► pp. 159 ff.
Vuković Stamatović, Milica
2017. Metaphors of parliamentary budget debates in times of crisis. Pragmatics and Society 8:2 ► pp. 281 ff.
Zhang, Man, Weiwei Sun, Huan Peng, Qiong Gan & Bo Yu
2017. A multidimensional analysis of metadiscourse markers across spoken registers. Journal of Pragmatics 117 ► pp. 106 ff.
Cameron, Deborah & Sylvia Shaw
2016. Gender and Speech Styles in the 2015 General Election Debates. In Gender, Power and Political Speech, ► pp. 27 ff.
Ilie, Cornelia & Ariadna Ştefănescu
2016. Interdiscursive strategies of metaphor-driven rhetoric in Romanian discourses on a political crisis. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 61:1 ► pp. 139 ff.
Jakaza, Ernest & Marianna W. Visser
2016. Argumentation and Appraisal in Divergent Zimbabwean Parliamentary Debates. In Political Discourse in Emergent, Fragile, and Failed Democracies [Advances in Electronic Government, Digital Divide, and Regional Development, ], ► pp. 126 ff.
Truan, Naomi
2016. « Les citations doivent être exactes ! ». TIPA. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage :32
Truan, Naomi
2021. Narratives of dialogue in parliamentary discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 20:4 ► pp. 563 ff.
Álvarez-Benito, Gloria & Catalina Fuentes-Rodríguez
2016. Introduction. In A Gender-based Approach to Parliamentary Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 68], ► pp. 1 ff.
Domínguez-Rodríguez, M. Victoria & Alicia Rodríguez-Álvarez
Ilie, Cornelia
2015. Parliamentary Discourse. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ► pp. 1 ff.
ILIE, CORNELIA
2023. Parliamentary Follow ups as Rhetorical Questioning
Answering Strategies. Studii și cercetări lingvistice 2023:2 ► pp. 240 ff.
Müftüler-Baç, Meltem & Rahime Süleymanoğlu-Kürüm
van Eemeren, Frans H. & Bart Garssen
2015. In Varietate Concordia—United in Diversity European Parliamentary Debate as an Argumentative Activity Type. In Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse [Argumentation Library, 27], ► pp. 845 ff.
Bu, Jiemin
2014. Towards a pragmatic analysis of metadiscourse in academic lectures: From relevance to adaptation. Discourse Studies 16:4 ► pp. 449 ff.
Cuenca, Maria-Josep
2014. The use of demonstratives and context activation in Catalan parliamentary debate. Discourse Studies 16:6 ► pp. 729 ff.
Cuenca, Maria-Josep
2023. Disagreement, epistemic stance and contrastive marking in Catalan parliamentary debate. Journal of Pragmatics 203 ► pp. 1 ff.
Granger, Sylviane
Granger, Sylviane
2016. A lexical bundle approach to comparing languages. In Genre- and Register-related Discourse Features in Contrast [Benjamins Current Topics, 87], ► pp. 59 ff.
Lee, Jack Tsen-Ta
2012. Shall the Twain Never Meet? Competing Narratives and Discourses of the Rule of Law In Singapore. SSRN Electronic Journal
Vuković, Milica
2012. Positioning in pre-prepared and spontaneous parliamentary discourse: Choice of person in the Parliament of Montenegro. Discourse & Society 23:2 ► pp. 184 ff.
Archakis, Argiris & Villy Tsakona
2010. ‘The wolf wakes up inside them, grows werewolf hair and reveals all their bullying’: The representation of parliamentary discourse in Greek newspapers. Journal of Pragmatics 42:4 ► pp. 912 ff.
Rai, Shirin M.
2010. Analysing Ceremony and Ritual in Parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies 16:3 ► pp. 284 ff.
Rai, Shirin M.
2017. Performance and politics: an approach to symbolic representation. Politics, Groups, and Identities 5:3 ► pp. 506 ff.
Rasiah, Parameswary
2010. A framework for the systematic analysis of evasion in parliamentary discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 42:3 ► pp. 664 ff.
Martínez Guillem, Susana
2009. Argumentation, metadiscourse and social cognition: organizing knowledge in political communication. Discourse & Society 20:6 ► pp. 727 ff.
Shenhav, Shaul R.
2008. Showing and telling in parliamentary discourse: the case of repeated interjections to Rabin's speeches in the Israeli parliament. Discourse & Society 19:2 ► pp. 223 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.