In this article we examine some linguistic characteristics of two speeches made by Tony Blair, in the British (2004) and the European (2005) parliaments. These speeches can be characterised as visionary speeches on Europe and European integration. By introducing a polyphonic perspective, we will point to specific linguistic features, such as polemic negation by ‘not’ and contrastive-concessive constructions by ‘but’, revealing different types of hidden interaction in which explicit and implicit voices are interwoven. Combined with the identification of pronominal references (to self and others), this perspective helps to spell out the complex relationship between text and context, in particular how to define a relevant context in a text analysis, and how the text itself constitutes its context. The theoretical framework used for analysing the speeches will be linguistic polyphony, as developed in the ScaPoLine theory.
2004Polyfonisk interaksjon via IKKE i vitenskapelig diskurs. Rhetorica Scan-dinavica 311, 23—40.
Fløttum, Kjersti
2005aThe self and the others � polyphonic visibility in research articles. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 29—44.
Fløttum, Kjersti
2005bMOI et AUTRUI dans le discours scientifique: l’exemple de la négation NE�PAS. In: Jacques Bres, Patrick Pierre Haillet, Sylvie Mellet, Henning Nølke, and Laurence Rosier (eds). Dialogisme, polyphonie: approches linguistiques. Duculot, 323—337.
Fløttum, Kjersti
2006Interrelation de voix internes et externes dans le discours. In: Laurent Perrin (ed). Le sens et ses voix. Metz: Recherches Linguistiques (281), 301—322.
2004The constitution of meaning � a meaningful constitution? Legitimacy, identity, and public opinion in the debate on the future of Europe. (Doctoral dissertation). Copenhagen: CBS.
Kinn, Torodd
2005Plays of we-hood: What do we mean by we? Akademisk Prosa 3,129—142.Skrifter fra KIAP. University of Bergen.
2004Visions, Ideologies and Utopias in the Discursive Construction of European Identities: Organizing, Representing and Legitimizing Europe. In: Martin Pütz, JoanneNeff-van Aertselaer, and Teun Adrianusvan Dijk (eds). Communicating Ideologies: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Language, Discourse, and Social Practice. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Wodak, Ruth and Gilbert Weiss
2005Analysing European Union discourses. In: Ruth Wodak and Paul Chilton (eds). A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 121—135.
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Brusenbauch Meislova, Monika
2019. All things to all people? Discursive patterns on UK–EU relationship in David Cameron’s speeches. British Politics 14:3 ► pp. 223 ff.
Fløttum, Kjersti
2010. EU discourse: Polyphony and unclearness. Journal of Pragmatics 42:4 ► pp. 990 ff.
Stenvoll, Dag & Peter Svensson
2011. Contestable contexts: the transparent anchoring of contextualization in text-as-data. Qualitative Research 11:5 ► pp. 570 ff.
Vuković, Milica
2012. Positioning in pre-prepared and spontaneous parliamentary discourse: Choice of person in the Parliament of Montenegro. Discourse & Society 23:2 ► pp. 184 ff.
2023. Linguistic polyphony in UN speeches on climate change: an analysis of implicit argumentation. Critical Discourse Studies► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.