Figurative language in international political discourse
The case of Iran
Figurative language is used in all domains of communication, including political discourse. And since figurative language is largely socio-culturally constructed it presents a significant locus for misinterpretation or even manipulation when it collides with the realm of international politics. This paper presents an analysis of several cases of the use of figurative language in Iranian political discourse. For example, it shows how transposing a Persian metaphor onto an English metaphor has led to a conceptual shift. Given the potential risks involved in misconstruing political discourse internationally, the paper concludes by calling for additional systematic comparative studies with respect to other languages.
Keywords: figurative language, political discourse, Persian, political metaphor, Iranian political discourse
Published online: 15 December 2009
Cited by 8 other publications
Collin, Richard Oliver
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
2004 Father George? Brother John? The familial metaphor in presidential campaign discourse. Syracuse Post-Standard. Available at: http://www.collegenews.org/x3180.xml
Anderson, R. D.., Jr
2002 The causal power of metaphor in politics. Available at: http://www. polisci.ucla.edu/faculty/anderson/MetaphorsCauses.htm
Bates, B. R.
Beer, F. A. and De Landtsheer, C.
Billig, M. and MacMillan, K.
Chilton, P. A.
Chilton, P. A. and Ilyin, M.
2002 The metaphorization of election as war in the 2001 general election campaign of Great Britain. Respectus Philologicus 2(7). Available at: http://filologija.vukhf.lt/ 2-7/cibulskiene.htm
2005 Speaking of values: The framing of American politics. The Forum 3(3), Article 7. Available at: http://www.bepress.com/forum/vol3/iss3/art7 doi:
Rosati, J. A.