References

REFERENCES

Bokus, B.
(1992) Peer co-narration: Changes in the structure of preschoolers’ participation. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 21, 253–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bower, A.
(1992, November) Observing the speech of the elderly. In Conceputalizing language in the study of aging. Symposium conducted at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America (P. Saunders, Chair), Washington, DC.Google Scholar
in press). Evaluation in the bereavement narratives of elderly Irish-American widowers. In H. Hamilton (Ed.) Old age and language: Multidisciplinary perspectives. New York: Garland.
Coupland, N., Coupland, J., & Giles, H.
(1991) Language, society and the elderly. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Emery, O.
(1986) Linguistic decrement in normal aging. In Language and Communication, 61, 47–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fayol, M., & Lemaire, P.
(1993) Levels of approach to discourse. In H. Brownell & Y. Joanette (Eds.) Narrative discourse in neurologically impaired and normal aging adults (pp. 2–21). San Diego, CA: Singular.Google Scholar
Glassie, H.
(1982) Passing the time in Ballymenone. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gold, D., Andres, D., Arbuckle, T., & Schwartzman, A.
(1988) Measurement and correlates of verbosity in elderly people. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 431, 27–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guy, G., & Boyd, S.
(1990) The development of a morphological class. Language Variation and Change, 21, 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, J., & Jensen, M.
(1980) A pragmatic evaluation of discourse communication in normal and senile elderly in a nursing home. In L. Obler & M. Albert (Eds.) Language and communication in the elderly (pp. 59–73). Lexington, MA: Lexington.Google Scholar
Kemper, S., Rash, S., Kynette, D., & Norman, S.
(1990) Telling stories: The structure of adults’ narratives. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 205–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
(1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
(1984) Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In J. Baugh & J. Sherzer (Eds.) Language in use (pp. 28–53). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Labov, W., & Auger, J.
(1993) The effect of normal aging on discourse: A sociolinguistic approach. In H. Brownell & Y. Joanette (Eds.) Discourse in neurologically impaired and normal aging adults (pp. 115–133). San Diego, CA: Singular.Google Scholar
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J.
this issue). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.) Essays on the verbal and visual arts: Proceedings of the 1966 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press. (Original work published 1967)
Mandl, H., Stein, N., & Trabasso, T.
(1984) Learning and comprehension of text. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
McGoldrick, M.
(1982) Irish families. In M. McGoldrick, J. Pearce, & J. Giordano (Eds.) Ethnicity in family therapy (pp. 310–339). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Milroy, L.
(1987) Observing and analyzing natural language: A critical account of sociolinguistic method. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
North, A., Ulatowska, H., Macaluso-Haynes, S., & Bell, H.
(1986) Discourse performance in older adults. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 231, 267–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Obler, L.
(1980) Narrative discourse style in the elderly. In L. Obler & M. Albert (Eds.) Language and communication in the elderly: Clinical, therapeutic and experimental issues (pp. 75–90). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Peterson, C., & McCabe, A.
(1983) Developmental psycholinguistics. New York: Plenum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pratt, M., & Robins, S.
(1991) That’s the way it was: Age differences in the structure and quality of adults’ personal narratives. Discourse Processes, 141, 73–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ripich, D.
(1991) Differential diagnosis and assessment. In R. Lubinski (Ed.) Dementia and communication (pp. 188–215). Philadelphia: B.C. Decker.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D., & Lessard, R.
(1975) Vocabulary richness: A sociolinguistic analysis. Science, 191, 689–690. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santi, S., & Obler, L.
(1991) Methodological issues in research on aging and language. In D. Ripich (Ed.) Handbook of geriatric communication disorders (pp. 333–347). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.Google Scholar
Scheper-Hughes, N.
(1979) Saints, scholars and schizophrenics: Mental illness in rural Ireland. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stein, N., & Glenn, C.
(1979) An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. Freedle (Ed.) New directions in discourse processing (pp. 53–120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Sutton-Smith, B.
(1978) The folkstories of children. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P.
(1983) Sociolinguistics (2nd ed.). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
Ulatowska, H., & Chapman, S.
(1991) Discourse studies. In R. Lubinski (Ed.) Dementia and communication (pp. 115–132). Philadelphia: B.C. Decker.Google Scholar
Walker, V., Roberts, P., & Hedrick, D.
(1988) Linguistic analysis of the discourse narratives of young and aged women. Folia Phoniatica, 401, 58–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, N.
(1982) CHP: The conversational historic present in American English narrative. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zborowski, M.
(1969) People in pain. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Armstrong, Elizabeth
2002. Variation in the discourse of non-brain-damaged speakers on a clinical task. Aphasiology 16:4-6  pp. 647 ff. DOI logo
Hamilton, Heidi E.
2005. Discourse and Aging. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis,  pp. 568 ff. DOI logo
Hamilton, Heidi E. & Toshiko Hamaguchi
2015. Discourse and Aging. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis,  pp. 705 ff. DOI logo
Lehman Blake, Margaret
2006. Clinical Relevance of Discourse Characteristics After Right Hemisphere Brain Damage. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 15:3  pp. 255 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.