Cover not available
Article published In:
Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages
Vol. 30:1 (2015) ► pp.116–141

Competences in contact

Phonology and lexifier targeted change

| University of California, Davis
This article examines phonological changes brought about by creole-lexifier contact, with secondary focus on the distinction of these changes from those occurring in creole formation. It is argued that lexifier-targeted change involves declarative competence: knowledge of what is and isn’t part of a phonological inventory. It is further argued that such changes do not undo the past, but involve historically innovative modifications to grammatical competence, which subsequently inform productive and perceptual knowledge. A formal account of Guadeloupian vowel data is proposed, which also addresses differential outcomes such as instances of apparent hypercorrection.
Keywords: phonology, contact, grammatical models, French Lexifier Creoles, decreolization
Published online: 9 April 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/jpcl.30.1.04rus
References (77)
Aceto, Michael. 1999. Looking beyond decreolization as an explanatory model of language change in creole-speaking communities. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 14(1). 93–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anttila, Arto. 1997. Deriving variation from grammar. In Frans Hinskens, Roeland van Hout, & W. Leo Wetzels (eds.), Variation, change and phonological theory, 35–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Variation in phonological theory. In J.K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill, & Nathalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 206–243. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Archibald, John. 1998. Second language phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aub-Buscher, Gertrud. 1993. French and French-based creoles: The case of the French Caribbean. In Carol Sanders (ed.), French today: Language in its social context, 119–214. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary E., Benjamin Munson, & Jan Edwards. 2007. The influence of vocabulary growth on developmental changes in types of phonological knowledge. In Jennifer Cole & José Ignacio Hualde (eds.), Laboratory phonology 91, 241–64. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Parth & Ingo Plag (eds.). 2005. The structure of creole words: Segmental, syllabic and morphological aspects. Tuebingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. 1980. Decreolisation and the creole continuum. In Albert Valdman & Arnold Highfield (eds.), Theoretical orientations in Creole studies 109–127. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1984. The language bioprogram hypothesis. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 71. 173–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. How to acquire language without positive evidence: What acquisitionists can learn from creoles. In Michel DeGraff (ed.), Language creation and language change, 49–74. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Bordal, Gori & Gudrun Ledegen. 2007. Le français de la Réunion: Lexique, morphosyntaxe, alternance codique et pronunciation. Bulletin PFC n° 7 ‘PFC: enjeux descriptifs, théoriques et didactiques.Google Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea. 2009. Perception, production and acoustic inputs in loanword phonology. In Andrea Calabrese & W. Leo Wetzels (eds.), Loan Phonology, 59–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carrington, Lawrence D. 1984. St. Lucian Creole: A descriptive analysis of its phonology and morphosyntax. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Chaudenson, Robert. 2000. Créolisation du français et francisation du créole. In Ingrid Neumann-Holzschuh & Edgar W. Schneider (eds.), Degrees of restructuring in creole languages (Creole Language Library volume 22), 361–381. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Creolization of language and culture. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coetzee, Andries W. 2006. Variation as accessing ‘non-optimal’ candidates. Phonology 231. 337–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeCamp, David. 1971. Towards a generative analysis of a post-creole continuum. In Dell Hymes (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages, 349–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeGraff, Michel. 1999. Creolization, language change, and language acquisition: A prolegomenon. In Michel DeGraff (ed.), Language creation and language change, 1–46. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, V.K. 1978. Dialect interference in West Indian children. Language and Speech 211. 76–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escure, Geneviève. 1997. Creole and dialect continua. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Férère, Gerard A. 1977. Neglected front rounded vowels in Haitian Creole. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 7(1). 23–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, Paul & Gerard Docherty. 2006. The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 341. 409–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Carol A. 1986. An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics 141. 3–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gouskova, Maria. 2012. Unexceptional segments. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30(1). 79–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Mark & Charles Reiss. 2000. Phonology as cognition. In Noel Burton-Roberts, Philip Carr, & Gerard Docherty (eds.), Phonological knowledge: Conceptual and empirical issues, 161–184. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. The phonological enterprise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Robert A. 1953. Haitian Creole: grammar, textes, vocabulary. Philadelphia: American Folklore Society.Google Scholar
. 1966. Pidgin and creole languages. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
. 1974. External history of the Romance languages. New York: American Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hazaël-Massieux, Marie-Christine. 2004. Le créole de Guadeloupe. In Colette Feuillard (ed.), Créoles – Langages et Politiques linguistiques: Actes du XXVIe Colloque International de Linguistique Fonctionnelle, 3–12. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2008. Textes anciens en créole français de la Caraïbe: Histoire et analyse. Paris: Publibook.Google Scholar
Holm, John. 2000. An introduction to pidgins and creoles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holt, D. Eric. 1997. The role of the listener in the historical phonology of Spanish and Portuguese: An optimality-theoretic account. Georgetown University dissertation.
Huez de Lemps, Christian. 1991. Indentured servants bound for the French Antilles in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. In Ida Altman & James Horn (eds.), “To make America”: European emigration in the early modern period, 172–203. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko, Armin Mester, & Jaye Padgett. 1995. Licensing and underspecification in optimality theory. Linguistic Inquiry 26(4). 571–613.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Haike 1995. Optimality theory and language change. Proceedings of the North-Eastern Linguistics Society 251. 219–232.Google Scholar
Kager, René. 1999. Optimality theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Thomas. 2011. Typology of creole phonology: Phoneme inventories and syllabus templates. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26(1). 155–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
LaCharité, Darlene & Carole Paradis. 2005. Category preservation and proximity versus phonetic approximation in loanword adaptation. Linguistic Inquiry 36(2). 223–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ledegen, Gudrun & Gori Bordal. 2005. PFC sur le terrain réunionnais: un paysage linguistique diversifié. Presentation at Phonological Variation: the Case of French , Tromso University, August 2005.
Lefebvre, Claire. 1998. Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina. 1997. English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ludwig, Ralph, Danièle Montbrand, Hector Poullet & Sylviane Telchid. 2002. Dictionnaire Créole – Français (Guadeloupe). Pointe-à-Pitre: Jasor.Google Scholar
Migge, Bettina. 2003. Creole formation as language change: The case of the Suriname creoles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2001. The Ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mülhäusler, Peter. 1997. Language ecology – contact without conflict. In Martin Pütz (ed.), Language choices: Conditions, constraints, and consequences, 3–15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oostindie, Gert & Inge Klinkers. 2003. Decolonizing the Caribbean: Dutch policies in a comparative perspective. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carole. 1995. Derivational constraints in phonology: Evidence from loanwords and implications. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society 311. 360–374.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole & Darlene LaCharité. 1997. Preservation and minimality in loanword adaptation. Journal of Linguistics 331. 379–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pater, Joe. 2006. The locus of exceptionality: Morpheme-specific phonology as constraint indexation. In Leah Bateman, Michael O’Keefe, Ehren Reilly, & Adam Werle (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory III1, 259–296. Amherst, Ma.: GLSA.Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 2008. Creoles as interlanguages: Inflectional morphology. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 23(1). 109–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Creoles as interlanguages: Phonology. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 24(1). 119–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Posner, Rebecca. 1996. The Romance languages. Cambridge: Cambridge Universitiy Press.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 2004. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reineke, John E. 1937. Marginal languages: A sociological survey of the creole languages and trade jargons. Yale University dissertation.
Rickford, John R. 1983. What happens in decreolization. In Roger Anderson (ed.), Pidginization and ceolization as language acquisition, 298–319. Rowley, Ma.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
. 1987. Dimensions of a creole continuum: History, texts, and linguistic analysis of Guyanese Creole. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1992. The evolution of linguistic complexity in pidgin and creole languages. In John A. Hawkins & Murray Gell-Mann (eds.), The evolution of human languages: Proceedings of the Workshop on the evolution of human languages , 213–228. Santa Fe.
Russell Webb, Eric. 2008. Formalizing creole sound change: An optimality theoretic account. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 23(2). 227–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Creole phonological restructuring: The role of perception in contact-induced change. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 25(2). 263–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo. 1909. Die Lingua Franca. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 331. 441–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwegler, Armin. 2000. The myth of decreolization: The anomalous case of Palenquero. In Ingrid Neumann-Holzschuh & Edgar W. Schneider (eds.), Degrees of restructuring in creole languages (Creole Language Library 22), 409–436. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sebba, Mark. 1997. Contact languages: Pidgins and creoles. New York: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Jeff. 2008. The emergence of pidgin and creole languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singh, Rajendra & Pieter Muysken. 1995. Wanted: A debate in pidgin/creole phonology. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 10(1). 157–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Children and creole genesis. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 21(1). 157–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. & Terence Kaufmann. 1988. Languages in contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Uffmann, Christian. 2003. Markedness, faithfulness and creolization: The retention of the unmarked. In Ingo Plag (ed.), The phonology and morphology of creole languages, 3–23. Tübingen: Niemayer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valdman, Albert. 1991. Decreolization or dialect contact in Haiti. In Francis Byrne & Thom Huebner (eds.), Development and structures of creole languages (Creole Language Library Volume 9), 75–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. L’influence de la norme émergente du créole haïtien sur les variétés vernaculaires régionales. In Aidan Coveney, Marie-Anne Hintze, & Carol Sanders (eds.), Variation et francophonie, 35–49. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
. 2010. Regional and social varieties of Haitian Creole. In Arthur K. Spears & Carole M. Berotte Joseph (eds.), The Haitian Creole language: History, structure, use, and education, 107–130. Lanham, MD: LexingtonGoogle Scholar
Winford, Donald. 1978. Phonological hypercorrection in the process of decreolization: The case of Trinidadian English. Journal of Linguistics 141. 277–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997a. Creole formation in the context of contact linguistics. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 12(1). 131–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997b. Reexamining Caribbean English creole continua. World Englishes 16(2). 233–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Creoles in the context of contact linguistics. In Glenn Gilbert (ed.), Pidgin and creole linguistics in the twenty-first century, 287–354. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar