Identifying inferences in focus

Cited by seven other publications

Balogh, Kata

2021. Additive particle uses in Hungarian. Studies in Language 45:2 ► pp. 428 ff.

Destruel, Emilie, David I. Beaver & Elizabeth Coppock

2019. It's Not What You Expected! The Surprising Nature of Cleft Alternatives in French and English. Frontiers in Psychology 10

Balasubramanyam, Vallem, Sai Suraj K.N & Talisetti Jamuna

2018. A COMPARITIVE EVALUATION OF 0.75% ROPIVACAINE WITH CLONIDINE AND 0.75% ROPIVACAINE WITH DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK- A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare 5:2 ► pp. 101 ff.

Cruschina, Silvio

2015. Some notes on clefting and fronting*. In Structures, Strategies and Beyond [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 223], ► pp. 181 ff.

Beke, Andras & Gyorgy Szaszak

2014. 2014 5th IEEE Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), ► pp. 493 ff.

Gerőcs, Mátyás, Anna Babarczy & and Balázs Surányi

2014. Exhaustivity in Focus: Experimental Evidence from Hungarian. In Language Use and Linguistic Structure, ► pp. 181 ff.

MATIĆ, DEJAN & DANIEL WEDGWOOD

2013. The meanings of focus: The significance of an interpretation-based category in cross-linguistic analysis. Journal of Linguistics 49:1 ► pp. 127 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.