Identifying inferences in focus

Cited by 7 other publications

Balasubramanyam, Vallem, Sai Suraj K.N & Talisetti Jamuna

2018. A COMPARITIVE EVALUATION OF 0.75% ROPIVACAINE WITH CLONIDINE AND 0.75% ROPIVACAINE WITH DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK- A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY. Journal of Evidence Based Medicine and Healthcare 5:2 ► pp. 101 ff.

Balogh, Kata

2021. Additive particle uses in Hungarian. Studies in Language 45:2 ► pp. 428 ff.

Beke, Andras & Gyorgy Szaszak

2014. 2014 5th IEEE Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom), ► pp. 493 ff.

Cruschina, Silvio

2015. Some notes on clefting and fronting*. In Structures, Strategies and Beyond [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 223], ► pp. 181 ff.

Destruel, Emilie, David I. Beaver & Elizabeth Coppock

2019. It's Not What You Expected! The Surprising Nature of Cleft Alternatives in French and English. Frontiers in Psychology 10

Gerőcs, Mátyás, Anna Babarczy & and Balázs Surányi

2014. Exhaustivity in Focus: Experimental Evidence from Hungarian. In Language Use and Linguistic Structure, ► pp. 181 ff.

MATIĆ, DEJAN & DANIEL WEDGWOOD

2013. The meanings of focus: The significance of an interpretation-based category in cross-linguistic analysis. Journal of Linguistics 49:1 ► pp. 127 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.