45005606 03 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code LA 102 Hb 15 9789027233660 06 10.1075/la.102 13 2007005103 00 BB 01 245 mm 02 164 mm 08 680 gr 10 01 JB code LA 02 0166-0829 02 102.00 01 02 Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 01 01 Linguistic Theory and South Asian Languages Essays in honour of K. A. Jayaseelan Linguistic Theory and South Asian Languages: Essays in honour of K. A. Jayaseelan 1 B01 01 JB code 707059497 Josef Bayer Bayer, Josef Josef Bayer University of Konstanz 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/707059497 2 B01 01 JB code 849059498 Tanmoy Bhattacharya Bhattacharya, Tanmoy Tanmoy Bhattacharya University of Delhi 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/849059498 3 B01 01 JB code 427059499 M.T. Hany Babu Babu, M.T. Hany M.T. Hany Babu Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages, Hyderabad 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/427059499 01 eng 11 296 03 03 x 03 00 282 03 01 22 495 03 2007 P381.S58 04 Grammar, Comparative and general--Syntax. 10 LAN009000 12 CFK 24 JB code LIN.GENER Generative linguistics 24 JB code LIN.SYNTAX Syntax 24 JB code LIN.THEOR Theoretical linguistics 01 06 02 00 The contributions to the present volume combine theoretical reasoning in syntax and phonology with a comparative research agenda in which South Asian languages figure prominently. 03 00 The South Asian languages, mainly Indo-Aryan and Dravidian, have become a focus of interest in the formal study of language as a natural consequence of the research program of the Principle and Parameters approach and an enforced interest in exploring the parametrical space of human language. The contributions to the present volume combine theoretical reasoning in syntax and phonology with a comparative research agenda in which South Asian languages figure prominently. The topics range from issues of clause structure, serial verb constructions, cleft- and question formation, to the question of what the proper syntactic format of modification should be, issues of binding theory and raising, and issues of complementation, the clausal periphery and clausal typing. The collection of articles concludes with two chapters on Dravidian and comparative phonology and a chapter on the shaping of phonological awareness by different writing systems. The authors and the editors devote this piece of work to Professor K.A. Jayaseelan, one of present-day India’s most influential linguists. 01 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/la.102.png 01 01 D502 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027233660.jpg 01 01 D504 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027233660.tif 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/la.102.hb.png 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/la.102.png 02 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/la.102.hb.png 03 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/la.102.hb.png 01 01 JB code la.102.01ack 06 10.1075/la.102.01ack ix ix 1 Miscellaneous 1 01 04 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.02bay 06 10.1075/la.102.02bay 1 11 11 Article 2 01 04 Introduction Introduction 1 A01 01 JB code 250077114 Josef Bayer Bayer, Josef Josef Bayer 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/250077114 2 A01 01 JB code 333077115 Tanmoy Bhattacharya Bhattacharya, Tanmoy Tanmoy Bhattacharya 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/333077115 3 A01 01 JB code 355077116 M.T. Hany Babu Babu, M.T. Hany M.T. Hany Babu 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/355077116 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.03cla 06 10.1075/la.102.03cla 13 13 1 Section header 3 01 04 Clause Structure Clause Structure 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.04bee 06 10.1075/la.102.04bee 15 28 14 Article 4 01 04 What is `Argument Sharing'? What is ‘Argument Sharing’? 01 04 A Case Study on Argument Sharing under VP-Serialization in Oriya A Case Study on Argument Sharing under VP-Serialization in Oriya 1 A01 01 JB code 565077117 Dorothee Beermann Beermann, Dorothee Dorothee Beermann Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/565077117 2 A01 01 JB code 815077118 Kalyanamalini Sahoo Sahoo, Kalyanamalini Kalyanamalini Sahoo Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/815077118 3 A01 01 JB code 989077119 Lars Hellan Hellan, Lars Lars Hellan Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/989077119 01 eng 30 00

The paper discusses some possible interpretations of the notion ‘argument sharing’ in the analysis of Oriya serial verb constructions (SVCs). The paper in particular addresses the notion of ‘token-sharing’. We argue that the concept of token-sharing, although, due to its rigour, theoretically the most interesting construct, cannot be maintained for object sharing in Oriya VP-serialization. We therewith aim at exposing salient properties both of the construction type and the notion itself.

01 01 JB code la.102.05boe 06 10.1075/la.102.05boe 29 40 12 Article 5 01 04 Pseudoclefts Pseudoclefts 01 04 a Fully Derivational Account a Fully Derivational Account 1 A01 01 JB code 75077120 Cedric Boeckx Boeckx, Cedric Cedric Boeckx Harvard University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/75077120 01 eng 30 00

This paper develops a syntactic account of pseudoclefts that is consonant with current attempts to develop a strictly derivational account of syntactic relations. In what follows, I show that recent proposals in the realm of the higher functional field, remnant movement, and binding conspire to yield a simple view on (specificational) pseudoclefts.

01 01 JB code la.102.06mad 06 10.1075/la.102.06mad 41 51 11 Article 6 01 04 The Cleft Question and the Question of Cleft The Cleft Question and the Question of Cleft 1 A01 01 JB code 27077121 P. Madhavan Madhavan, P. P. Madhavan CIEFL, Hyderabad 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/27077121 01 eng 30 00

This paper argues that in cleft constructions in Malayalam, the clefted constituent is (overtly) moved to the cleft focus, and that the ‘gap’ in the cleft clause is not created by movement of an empty operator as was proposed in Madhavan (1987) and some later studies. The cleft clause is shown to be non-finite; it has an Aspect Phrase dominating the vP, and no Tense node. This move solves the problem of moving a constituent out of the cleft clause without violating any constraint on movement. Non-copular clauses in general are argued to be in the domain of a Mood Phrase wherein resides finiteness. The paper also shows that the T node of the matrix clause of a cleft construction hosts a [+FOCUS] feature whereby it is able to attract an XP from within the clause. The idea in Jayaseelan (2000) that there is a Focus Phrase immediately above vP is integrated into the proposed analysis in such a way that the obligatory clefting of embedded interrogatives receives a principled explanation.

01 01 JB code la.102.07sri 06 10.1075/la.102.07sri 53 69 17 Article 7 01 04 Clausal Pied-piping and Subjacency Clausal Pied-piping and Subjacency 1 A01 01 JB code 731077122 K. Srikumar Srikumar, K. K. Srikumar Dr. B. R. Ambedkar University, Agra, India 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/731077122 01 eng 30 00

When question-words in Malayalam are subjected to long distance dependencies, direct extractions across finite clausal complements are restricted by complement/ non-complement asymmetry due to subjacency. However, clausal piedpiping rescues such long distance question-word dependencies. Long distance dependencies of question-words across infinitive complements, on the other hand, are possible adopting both strategies and are not affected by the complement/non-complement asymmetry. This state of affairs obtains largely because finite clausal complements are held on the left periphery of the matrix clause, which is an adjunct position, while infinitival clausal complements are held in situ. Therefore, direct extraction from the former is sensitive to subjacency, while from the latter, it is not. The present article looks at this phenomenon from the minimalist point of view in terms of the Minimal Link Condition (MLC).

01 01 JB code la.102.08mod 06 10.1075/la.102.08mod 71 71 1 Section header 8 01 04 Modification in DP Modification in DP 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.09kay 06 10.1075/la.102.09kay 73 105 33 Article 9 01 04 On the Syntax of Quantity in English On the Syntax of Quantity in English 1 A01 01 JB code 239077123 Richard S. Kayne Kayne, Richard S. Richard S. Kayne New York University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/239077123 01 eng 30 00

Many and few are adjectival modifiers of an unpronounced noun NUMBER and the same holds for much and little as modifiers of AMOUNT. This reflects a broader property of UG, namely that UG excludes the possibility that a single adjective could simultaneously express what is expressed by large/small and what is expressed by number. This property in turn can be seen as a special case of UG imposing a maximum of one interpretable syntactic feature per lexical item (Principle of Decompositionality). The analysis is extended to a few andquite a few, to numerous and to questions of scope and polarity.

01 01 JB code la.102.10bin 06 10.1075/la.102.10bin 107 107 1 Section header 10 01 04 Binding Binding 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.11gue 06 10.1075/la.102.11gue 109 125 17 Article 11 01 04 Coreference Violations `Beyond Principle B' Coreference Violations ‘Beyond Principle B’ 1 A01 01 JB code 349077124 Jacqueline Guéron Guéron, Jacqueline Jacqueline Guéron Université de Paris III - Sorbonne Nouvelle 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/349077124 01 eng 30 00

Jayaseelan (1992) aims to account for the fact that ‘inverse copula sentences’ such as My best friend is John may exclude coreference between a Name and a pronoun in the absence of the c-command configuration which triggers the application of Principle B of the Binding Theory. For example, the inverse copula sentence His teacher is John’s brother disallows coreference between his andJohn, while the corresponding predicative sentence, in which the structural relation between pronoun and name is identical, allows it: His brother is John’s teacher. Jayaseelan proposes an LF movement which creates a configuration subject to Principle B and which applies in a natural way to the inverse sentence but not to the corresponding canonical predicative sentence. I adopt Jay’s idea that LF movement provides the key to an account of coreference violations ‘beyond Principle B’ in the inverse copula sentence. I propose that the Focus constituent of the inverse sentence is preposed and subsequently 'deconstructed' into a Focus of Focus (F/F) and a presupposition of Focus (p/F). The rules which determine the interpretation of NPs at the syntaxsemantics interface then suffice to account for coreference violations both in the inverse copula sentence and in other sentence types.

01 01 JB code la.102.12reu 06 10.1075/la.102.12reu 127 142 16 Article 12 01 04 Perspectives on Binding Perspectives on Binding 1 A01 01 JB code 355077125 Eric J. Reuland Reuland, Eric J. Eric J. Reuland Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/355077125 01 eng 30 00

In this article I address the question as to why natural language has special principles governing the binding of pronouns and anaphors and the licensing of reflexive predicates. That is, why do we have principles such as conditions A, and B of the binding theory? Based on facts from Malayalam discussed by Jayaseelan (1997), I show that the role of licensing reflexivity and the obligation to be (locally) bound should be fundamentally distinguished. A crucial property of complex anaphors is that they allow the language system to express reflexivity, and yet prevent an arity violation from arising.

01 01 JB code la.102.13yad 06 10.1075/la.102.13yad 143 159 17 Article 13 01 04 Raising from a Tensed Clause and Linguistic Theory Raising from a Tensed Clause and Linguistic Theory 01 04 Evidence from Maithili Evidence from Maithili 1 A01 01 JB code 478077126 Yogendra P. Yadava Yadava, Yogendra P. Yogendra P. Yadava Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/478077126 01 eng 30 00

In Maithili there exists a rule which is analogous to the Subject-to-Subject Raising rule in English. This rule is interesting because it raises the subject of a tensed embedded clause, whereas the Subject-to-Subject Raising rule raises to the matrix subject position the subject of a tenseless embedded clause. The DPtrace in the former case apparently violates one of the principles of Universal Grammar, namely, the binding principle for anaphors, proposed in Chomsky (1981,1995), since it is not bound in its governing category. We demonstrate, however, that the DP-trace does obey the binding principle. What is required here is to investigate this phenomenon from the perspective of the parametric variation that distinguishes Maithili-type languages from English-type languages. This article consists of four main Sections. In Section 1, we analyze the raising construction in Maithili. We also look into the rule of i-insertion, which optionally applies to fill the empty subject position of the matrix IP, in case Subject-to-Subject Raising does not apply. In Section 2, we present evidence in support of the rule of Subject-to-Subject Raising in Maithili. Section 3 shows how the stipulation of this rule complies with the theta-criterion, proposed in Chomsky (1981). Section 4 is addressed to the detailed analysis of the binding relation that holds between a DP-trace and its antecedent. In this part, we argue that INFL in Maithili, unlike in English-type languages, is generated inside V and does not govern the subject DP. The subject DP is rather governed and Case-marked by the preceding COMP, though it does not happen in raising constructions, since we assume that a raising verb may optionally trigger CPdeletion. We also show that in Maithili-type languages the notion of ‘governing category’ must dispense with “accessible SUBJECT”, since AGR in these languages cannot be treated as accessible SUBJECT. Finally, we show how binding principle (A) holds for the antecedent/DP-trace relation in Maithili.

01 01 JB code la.102.14com 06 10.1075/la.102.14com 161 161 1 Section header 14 01 04 Complementizers and Complementation Complementizers and Complementation 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.15das 06 10.1075/la.102.15das 163 173 11 Article 15 01 04 The Ubiquitous Complementizer The Ubiquitous Complementizer 1 A01 01 JB code 439077127 Probal Dasgupta Dasgupta, Probal Probal Dasgupta University of Hyderabad 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/439077127 01 eng 30 00

Complement and adjunct clauses in Bangla often exhibit internal complementizers. Some of these, the present paper suggests, are particles base-generated in situ that covertly move their features to C at LF. This suggestion forms the core of a reasonably complete account of the placement of various clause particles relative to finite verbs in clause structure.

01 01 JB code la.102.16dav 06 10.1075/la.102.16dav 175 198 24 Article 16 01 04 Word Order, Parameters, and the Extended COMP Projection Word Order, Parameters, and the Extended COMP Projection 1 A01 01 JB code 534077128 Alice Davison Davison, Alice Alice Davison University of Iowa 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/534077128 01 eng 30 00

The structure of finite CP shows some unexpected syntactic variation in the marking of finite subordinate clauses in the Indic languages, which otherwise are strongly head-final. Languages with relative pronouns also have initial complementizers and conjunctions. Languages with final yes/no question markers allow final complementizers, either demonstratives or quotative participles. These properties define three classes, one with only final CP heads (Sinhala), one with only initial CP heads (Hindi, Punjabi, Kashmiri) and others with both possibilities. The lexical differences of final vs initial CP heads argue for expanding the CP projection into a number of specialized projections, whose heads are all final (Sinhala), all initial, or mixed. These projections explain the systematic variation in finite CPs in the Indic languages, with the exception of some additional restrictions and anomalies in the Eastern group.

01 01 JB code la.102.17bar 06 10.1075/la.102.17bar 199 214 16 Article 17 01 04 The Particle ne in Direct yes-no Questions The Particle ne in Direct yes-no Questions 1 A01 01 JB code 757077129 Madhumita Barbora Barbora, Madhumita Madhumita Barbora Tezpur University, Tezpur 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/757077129 01 eng 30 00

This paper examines the particle ne in direct yes-no questions in Assamese. The particle ne occurs in the clause final position. When overt it is optionally followed by a negative element nai ‘is not’ or the k-word ki ‘what’. Constituent wh-questions have an abstract Q morpheme in the C position. Our study shows that the yes-no questions too have an abstract Q morpheme in the C position. The particle ne is not a question particle but a [+wh] disjunctive marker. The negative nai and the k-wordki are not constituents of the Disjunctive Phrase. They occur outside the matrix clause and are constituents of the second clause, which is conjoined to the matrix clause by the disjunctive particle ne.

01 01 JB code la.102.18pho 06 10.1075/la.102.18pho 215 215 1 Section header 18 01 04 Phonology Phonology 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.19das 06 10.1075/la.102.19das 217 236 20 Article 19 01 04 Underspecification and the Phonology of *NC-Effects in Malayalam Underspecification and the Phonology of *NC̥-Effects in Malayalam 1 A01 01 JB code 160077130 Shyamal Das Das, Shyamal Shyamal Das Tripura University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/160077130 01 eng 30 00

The sequence of a nasal-plus-voiceless-obstruent (plosive) is a less favoured cluster cross-linguistically. Languages adopt various strategies to avoid such a cluster. These include nasal substitution, nasal deletion, post-nasal voicing, denasalization etc. The Dravidian language Malayalam exhibits post-nasal voicing to avoid NC̥. Interestingly, it also allows nasal gemination for the same purpose; and both the processes share identical domains: morpheme internal as well as across morphemes. Presumably this is a pointer towards some subtler facts at work inviting serious critical engagement. In course of the present study, it has been found that: (a) nasal gemination is a marked strategy to avoid NC̥ and is restricted to a limited set of morphemes; and (b) post-nasal voicing is a more productive and hence unmarked strategy in this language. A principled account, in terms of constraint interaction, of these discrete processes and their underlying functional unity emerges if the theory of underspecification is roped in while positing the input form. Additionally, some predictions follow automatically about the direction of language change.

01 01 JB code la.102.20vij 06 10.1075/la.102.20vij 237 247 11 Article 20 01 04 The Disyllabic Word Minimum The Disyllabic Word Minimum 01 04 Variations on a Theme in Bangla, Punjabi and Tamil Variations on a Theme in Bangla, Punjabi and Tamil 1 A01 01 JB code 549077131 K.G. Vijayakrishnan Vijayakrishnan, K.G. K.G. Vijayakrishnan CIEFL, Hyderabad 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/549077131 01 eng 30 00

In this article we examine the requirement that the minimal word be a disyllabic trochee being satisfied partially or fully in different ways in three unrelated languages spoken in India, namely, Punjabi, Bangla and Tamil. In Bangla, which does not have a phonemic vowel length distinction and where closed syllables count as bimoraic and heavy attracting prominence, monosyllables whether closed or open invariably have a long vowel. We argue that the monosyllabic lengthening is due to a catalectic syllable making these minimal words ‘virtual’ disyllables. Punjabi has a three-way distinction in syllable weight, a monomoraic light syllable, a bimoraic heavy syllable and a trimoraic superheavy syllable. Following the assumption in the literature, we assume that trimoraic syllables are virtual disyllables. We find that, by and large, monosyllables are trimoraic with a geminate final consonant augmenting the monosyllable to a superheavy status satisfying the disyllabic requirement. Finally, we examine an intriguing pattern of optional, final epenthesis in monosyllables in Tamil, once again arguing for a disyllabic word minimum. Between the three languages, we observe that the disyllabic minimality requirement is met in different ways, exhausting the three logical possibilities of stem augmentation, namely, vowel lengthening (in Bangla), consonant gemination (in Punjabi) and both consonant gemination and vowel epenthesis (in Tamil).

01 01 JB code la.102.21sai 06 10.1075/la.102.21sai 249 265 17 Article 21 01 04 Writing Systems and Phonological Awareness Writing Systems and Phonological Awareness 1 A01 01 JB code 652077132 Pingali Sailaja Sailaja, Pingali Pingali Sailaja University of Hyderabad 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/652077132 01 eng 30 00

This article deals with phonological awareness which is explicit or conscious knowledge of the phonological structure that speakers of a language exhibit. It seeks to establish whether biliterate speakers of Telugu and English who are exposed to an alphabetic writing system and a semi-syllabic writing system are able to manipulate words in terms of syllables and phonemes. This experimental study involves 30 native speakers of Telugu who also know English. The results show that the two languages in question are not treated alike by the speakers, although there is some evidence of transference from one language to another. It is apparent in many cases that rather than the sounds, the item that is processed mentally is a visual representation of the word. Moreover, each language seems to be processed in its own script although there is also evidence to show that the native language is more dominant and the second language is processed in the script of the native language.

01 01 JB code la.102.22lis 06 10.1075/la.102.22lis 267 270 4 Miscellaneous 22 01 04 List of contributors List of contributors 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.23bib 06 10.1075/la.102.23bib 271 274 4 Miscellaneous 23 01 04 Bibliography of K.A. Jayaseelan Bibliography of K.A. Jayaseelan 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.24ind 06 10.1075/la.102.24ind 275 277 3 Miscellaneous 24 01 04 Index of names Index of names 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.25ind 06 10.1075/la.102.25ind 279 280 2 Miscellaneous 25 01 04 Index of languages Index of languages 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.26ind 06 10.1075/la.102.26ind 281 282 2 Miscellaneous 26 01 04 Index of topics Index of topics 01 eng
01 JB code JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 https://benjamins.com 02 https://benjamins.com/catalog/la.102 Amsterdam NL 00 John Benjamins Publishing Company Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers onix@benjamins.nl 04 01 00 20070516 C 2007 John Benjamins Publishing Company D 2007 John Benjamins Publishing Company 02 WORLD WORLD US CA MX 09 01 JB 1 John Benjamins Publishing Company +31 20 6304747 +31 20 6739773 bookorder@benjamins.nl 01 https://benjamins.com 21 35 18 01 00 Unqualified price 02 JB 1 02 115.00 EUR 02 00 Unqualified price 02 97.00 01 Z 0 GBP GB US CA MX 01 01 JB 2 John Benjamins Publishing Company +1 800 562-5666 +1 703 661-1501 benjamins@presswarehouse.com 01 https://benjamins.com 21 35 18 01 00 Unqualified price 02 JB 1 02 173.00 USD
213006907 03 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code LA 102 Eb 15 9789027292452 06 10.1075/la.102 00 EA E107 10 01 JB code LA 02 0166-0829 02 102.00 01 02 Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 11 01 JB code jbe-all 01 02 Full EBA collection (ca. 4,200 titles) 11 01 JB code jbe-2015-all 01 02 Complete backlist (3,208 titles, 1967–2015) 05 02 Complete backlist (1967–2015) 11 01 JB code jbe-2015-la 01 02 Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today (vols. 1–226, 1980–2015) 05 02 LA (vols. 1–226, 1980–2015) 11 01 JB code jbe-2015-linguistics 01 02 Subject collection: Linguistics (2,773 titles, 1967–2015) 05 02 Linguistics (1967–2015) 01 01 Linguistic Theory and South Asian Languages Essays in honour of K. A. Jayaseelan Linguistic Theory and South Asian Languages: Essays in honour of K. A. Jayaseelan 1 B01 01 JB code 707059497 Josef Bayer Bayer, Josef Josef Bayer University of Konstanz 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/707059497 2 B01 01 JB code 849059498 Tanmoy Bhattacharya Bhattacharya, Tanmoy Tanmoy Bhattacharya University of Delhi 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/849059498 3 B01 01 JB code 427059499 M.T. Hany Babu Babu, M.T. Hany M.T. Hany Babu Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages, Hyderabad 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/427059499 01 eng 11 296 03 03 x 03 00 282 03 01 22 495 03 2007 P381.S58 04 Grammar, Comparative and general--Syntax. 10 LAN009000 12 CFK 24 JB code LIN.GENER Generative linguistics 24 JB code LIN.SYNTAX Syntax 24 JB code LIN.THEOR Theoretical linguistics 01 06 02 00 The contributions to the present volume combine theoretical reasoning in syntax and phonology with a comparative research agenda in which South Asian languages figure prominently. 03 00 The South Asian languages, mainly Indo-Aryan and Dravidian, have become a focus of interest in the formal study of language as a natural consequence of the research program of the Principle and Parameters approach and an enforced interest in exploring the parametrical space of human language. The contributions to the present volume combine theoretical reasoning in syntax and phonology with a comparative research agenda in which South Asian languages figure prominently. The topics range from issues of clause structure, serial verb constructions, cleft- and question formation, to the question of what the proper syntactic format of modification should be, issues of binding theory and raising, and issues of complementation, the clausal periphery and clausal typing. The collection of articles concludes with two chapters on Dravidian and comparative phonology and a chapter on the shaping of phonological awareness by different writing systems. The authors and the editors devote this piece of work to Professor K.A. Jayaseelan, one of present-day India’s most influential linguists. 01 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/la.102.png 01 01 D502 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027233660.jpg 01 01 D504 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027233660.tif 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/la.102.hb.png 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/la.102.png 02 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/la.102.hb.png 03 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/la.102.hb.png 01 01 JB code la.102.01ack 06 10.1075/la.102.01ack ix ix 1 Miscellaneous 1 01 04 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.02bay 06 10.1075/la.102.02bay 1 11 11 Article 2 01 04 Introduction Introduction 1 A01 01 JB code 250077114 Josef Bayer Bayer, Josef Josef Bayer 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/250077114 2 A01 01 JB code 333077115 Tanmoy Bhattacharya Bhattacharya, Tanmoy Tanmoy Bhattacharya 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/333077115 3 A01 01 JB code 355077116 M.T. Hany Babu Babu, M.T. Hany M.T. Hany Babu 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/355077116 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.03cla 06 10.1075/la.102.03cla 13 13 1 Section header 3 01 04 Clause Structure Clause Structure 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.04bee 06 10.1075/la.102.04bee 15 28 14 Article 4 01 04 What is `Argument Sharing'? What is ‘Argument Sharing’? 01 04 A Case Study on Argument Sharing under VP-Serialization in Oriya A Case Study on Argument Sharing under VP-Serialization in Oriya 1 A01 01 JB code 565077117 Dorothee Beermann Beermann, Dorothee Dorothee Beermann Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/565077117 2 A01 01 JB code 815077118 Kalyanamalini Sahoo Sahoo, Kalyanamalini Kalyanamalini Sahoo Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/815077118 3 A01 01 JB code 989077119 Lars Hellan Hellan, Lars Lars Hellan Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/989077119 01 eng 30 00

The paper discusses some possible interpretations of the notion ‘argument sharing’ in the analysis of Oriya serial verb constructions (SVCs). The paper in particular addresses the notion of ‘token-sharing’. We argue that the concept of token-sharing, although, due to its rigour, theoretically the most interesting construct, cannot be maintained for object sharing in Oriya VP-serialization. We therewith aim at exposing salient properties both of the construction type and the notion itself.

01 01 JB code la.102.05boe 06 10.1075/la.102.05boe 29 40 12 Article 5 01 04 Pseudoclefts Pseudoclefts 01 04 a Fully Derivational Account a Fully Derivational Account 1 A01 01 JB code 75077120 Cedric Boeckx Boeckx, Cedric Cedric Boeckx Harvard University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/75077120 01 eng 30 00

This paper develops a syntactic account of pseudoclefts that is consonant with current attempts to develop a strictly derivational account of syntactic relations. In what follows, I show that recent proposals in the realm of the higher functional field, remnant movement, and binding conspire to yield a simple view on (specificational) pseudoclefts.

01 01 JB code la.102.06mad 06 10.1075/la.102.06mad 41 51 11 Article 6 01 04 The Cleft Question and the Question of Cleft The Cleft Question and the Question of Cleft 1 A01 01 JB code 27077121 P. Madhavan Madhavan, P. P. Madhavan CIEFL, Hyderabad 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/27077121 01 eng 30 00

This paper argues that in cleft constructions in Malayalam, the clefted constituent is (overtly) moved to the cleft focus, and that the ‘gap’ in the cleft clause is not created by movement of an empty operator as was proposed in Madhavan (1987) and some later studies. The cleft clause is shown to be non-finite; it has an Aspect Phrase dominating the vP, and no Tense node. This move solves the problem of moving a constituent out of the cleft clause without violating any constraint on movement. Non-copular clauses in general are argued to be in the domain of a Mood Phrase wherein resides finiteness. The paper also shows that the T node of the matrix clause of a cleft construction hosts a [+FOCUS] feature whereby it is able to attract an XP from within the clause. The idea in Jayaseelan (2000) that there is a Focus Phrase immediately above vP is integrated into the proposed analysis in such a way that the obligatory clefting of embedded interrogatives receives a principled explanation.

01 01 JB code la.102.07sri 06 10.1075/la.102.07sri 53 69 17 Article 7 01 04 Clausal Pied-piping and Subjacency Clausal Pied-piping and Subjacency 1 A01 01 JB code 731077122 K. Srikumar Srikumar, K. K. Srikumar Dr. B. R. Ambedkar University, Agra, India 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/731077122 01 eng 30 00

When question-words in Malayalam are subjected to long distance dependencies, direct extractions across finite clausal complements are restricted by complement/ non-complement asymmetry due to subjacency. However, clausal piedpiping rescues such long distance question-word dependencies. Long distance dependencies of question-words across infinitive complements, on the other hand, are possible adopting both strategies and are not affected by the complement/non-complement asymmetry. This state of affairs obtains largely because finite clausal complements are held on the left periphery of the matrix clause, which is an adjunct position, while infinitival clausal complements are held in situ. Therefore, direct extraction from the former is sensitive to subjacency, while from the latter, it is not. The present article looks at this phenomenon from the minimalist point of view in terms of the Minimal Link Condition (MLC).

01 01 JB code la.102.08mod 06 10.1075/la.102.08mod 71 71 1 Section header 8 01 04 Modification in DP Modification in DP 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.09kay 06 10.1075/la.102.09kay 73 105 33 Article 9 01 04 On the Syntax of Quantity in English On the Syntax of Quantity in English 1 A01 01 JB code 239077123 Richard S. Kayne Kayne, Richard S. Richard S. Kayne New York University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/239077123 01 eng 30 00

Many and few are adjectival modifiers of an unpronounced noun NUMBER and the same holds for much and little as modifiers of AMOUNT. This reflects a broader property of UG, namely that UG excludes the possibility that a single adjective could simultaneously express what is expressed by large/small and what is expressed by number. This property in turn can be seen as a special case of UG imposing a maximum of one interpretable syntactic feature per lexical item (Principle of Decompositionality). The analysis is extended to a few andquite a few, to numerous and to questions of scope and polarity.

01 01 JB code la.102.10bin 06 10.1075/la.102.10bin 107 107 1 Section header 10 01 04 Binding Binding 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.11gue 06 10.1075/la.102.11gue 109 125 17 Article 11 01 04 Coreference Violations `Beyond Principle B' Coreference Violations ‘Beyond Principle B’ 1 A01 01 JB code 349077124 Jacqueline Guéron Guéron, Jacqueline Jacqueline Guéron Université de Paris III - Sorbonne Nouvelle 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/349077124 01 eng 30 00

Jayaseelan (1992) aims to account for the fact that ‘inverse copula sentences’ such as My best friend is John may exclude coreference between a Name and a pronoun in the absence of the c-command configuration which triggers the application of Principle B of the Binding Theory. For example, the inverse copula sentence His teacher is John’s brother disallows coreference between his andJohn, while the corresponding predicative sentence, in which the structural relation between pronoun and name is identical, allows it: His brother is John’s teacher. Jayaseelan proposes an LF movement which creates a configuration subject to Principle B and which applies in a natural way to the inverse sentence but not to the corresponding canonical predicative sentence. I adopt Jay’s idea that LF movement provides the key to an account of coreference violations ‘beyond Principle B’ in the inverse copula sentence. I propose that the Focus constituent of the inverse sentence is preposed and subsequently 'deconstructed' into a Focus of Focus (F/F) and a presupposition of Focus (p/F). The rules which determine the interpretation of NPs at the syntaxsemantics interface then suffice to account for coreference violations both in the inverse copula sentence and in other sentence types.

01 01 JB code la.102.12reu 06 10.1075/la.102.12reu 127 142 16 Article 12 01 04 Perspectives on Binding Perspectives on Binding 1 A01 01 JB code 355077125 Eric J. Reuland Reuland, Eric J. Eric J. Reuland Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/355077125 01 eng 30 00

In this article I address the question as to why natural language has special principles governing the binding of pronouns and anaphors and the licensing of reflexive predicates. That is, why do we have principles such as conditions A, and B of the binding theory? Based on facts from Malayalam discussed by Jayaseelan (1997), I show that the role of licensing reflexivity and the obligation to be (locally) bound should be fundamentally distinguished. A crucial property of complex anaphors is that they allow the language system to express reflexivity, and yet prevent an arity violation from arising.

01 01 JB code la.102.13yad 06 10.1075/la.102.13yad 143 159 17 Article 13 01 04 Raising from a Tensed Clause and Linguistic Theory Raising from a Tensed Clause and Linguistic Theory 01 04 Evidence from Maithili Evidence from Maithili 1 A01 01 JB code 478077126 Yogendra P. Yadava Yadava, Yogendra P. Yogendra P. Yadava Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/478077126 01 eng 30 00

In Maithili there exists a rule which is analogous to the Subject-to-Subject Raising rule in English. This rule is interesting because it raises the subject of a tensed embedded clause, whereas the Subject-to-Subject Raising rule raises to the matrix subject position the subject of a tenseless embedded clause. The DPtrace in the former case apparently violates one of the principles of Universal Grammar, namely, the binding principle for anaphors, proposed in Chomsky (1981,1995), since it is not bound in its governing category. We demonstrate, however, that the DP-trace does obey the binding principle. What is required here is to investigate this phenomenon from the perspective of the parametric variation that distinguishes Maithili-type languages from English-type languages. This article consists of four main Sections. In Section 1, we analyze the raising construction in Maithili. We also look into the rule of i-insertion, which optionally applies to fill the empty subject position of the matrix IP, in case Subject-to-Subject Raising does not apply. In Section 2, we present evidence in support of the rule of Subject-to-Subject Raising in Maithili. Section 3 shows how the stipulation of this rule complies with the theta-criterion, proposed in Chomsky (1981). Section 4 is addressed to the detailed analysis of the binding relation that holds between a DP-trace and its antecedent. In this part, we argue that INFL in Maithili, unlike in English-type languages, is generated inside V and does not govern the subject DP. The subject DP is rather governed and Case-marked by the preceding COMP, though it does not happen in raising constructions, since we assume that a raising verb may optionally trigger CPdeletion. We also show that in Maithili-type languages the notion of ‘governing category’ must dispense with “accessible SUBJECT”, since AGR in these languages cannot be treated as accessible SUBJECT. Finally, we show how binding principle (A) holds for the antecedent/DP-trace relation in Maithili.

01 01 JB code la.102.14com 06 10.1075/la.102.14com 161 161 1 Section header 14 01 04 Complementizers and Complementation Complementizers and Complementation 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.15das 06 10.1075/la.102.15das 163 173 11 Article 15 01 04 The Ubiquitous Complementizer The Ubiquitous Complementizer 1 A01 01 JB code 439077127 Probal Dasgupta Dasgupta, Probal Probal Dasgupta University of Hyderabad 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/439077127 01 eng 30 00

Complement and adjunct clauses in Bangla often exhibit internal complementizers. Some of these, the present paper suggests, are particles base-generated in situ that covertly move their features to C at LF. This suggestion forms the core of a reasonably complete account of the placement of various clause particles relative to finite verbs in clause structure.

01 01 JB code la.102.16dav 06 10.1075/la.102.16dav 175 198 24 Article 16 01 04 Word Order, Parameters, and the Extended COMP Projection Word Order, Parameters, and the Extended COMP Projection 1 A01 01 JB code 534077128 Alice Davison Davison, Alice Alice Davison University of Iowa 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/534077128 01 eng 30 00

The structure of finite CP shows some unexpected syntactic variation in the marking of finite subordinate clauses in the Indic languages, which otherwise are strongly head-final. Languages with relative pronouns also have initial complementizers and conjunctions. Languages with final yes/no question markers allow final complementizers, either demonstratives or quotative participles. These properties define three classes, one with only final CP heads (Sinhala), one with only initial CP heads (Hindi, Punjabi, Kashmiri) and others with both possibilities. The lexical differences of final vs initial CP heads argue for expanding the CP projection into a number of specialized projections, whose heads are all final (Sinhala), all initial, or mixed. These projections explain the systematic variation in finite CPs in the Indic languages, with the exception of some additional restrictions and anomalies in the Eastern group.

01 01 JB code la.102.17bar 06 10.1075/la.102.17bar 199 214 16 Article 17 01 04 The Particle ne in Direct yes-no Questions The Particle ne in Direct yes-no Questions 1 A01 01 JB code 757077129 Madhumita Barbora Barbora, Madhumita Madhumita Barbora Tezpur University, Tezpur 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/757077129 01 eng 30 00

This paper examines the particle ne in direct yes-no questions in Assamese. The particle ne occurs in the clause final position. When overt it is optionally followed by a negative element nai ‘is not’ or the k-word ki ‘what’. Constituent wh-questions have an abstract Q morpheme in the C position. Our study shows that the yes-no questions too have an abstract Q morpheme in the C position. The particle ne is not a question particle but a [+wh] disjunctive marker. The negative nai and the k-wordki are not constituents of the Disjunctive Phrase. They occur outside the matrix clause and are constituents of the second clause, which is conjoined to the matrix clause by the disjunctive particle ne.

01 01 JB code la.102.18pho 06 10.1075/la.102.18pho 215 215 1 Section header 18 01 04 Phonology Phonology 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.19das 06 10.1075/la.102.19das 217 236 20 Article 19 01 04 Underspecification and the Phonology of *NC-Effects in Malayalam Underspecification and the Phonology of *NC̥-Effects in Malayalam 1 A01 01 JB code 160077130 Shyamal Das Das, Shyamal Shyamal Das Tripura University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/160077130 01 eng 30 00

The sequence of a nasal-plus-voiceless-obstruent (plosive) is a less favoured cluster cross-linguistically. Languages adopt various strategies to avoid such a cluster. These include nasal substitution, nasal deletion, post-nasal voicing, denasalization etc. The Dravidian language Malayalam exhibits post-nasal voicing to avoid NC̥. Interestingly, it also allows nasal gemination for the same purpose; and both the processes share identical domains: morpheme internal as well as across morphemes. Presumably this is a pointer towards some subtler facts at work inviting serious critical engagement. In course of the present study, it has been found that: (a) nasal gemination is a marked strategy to avoid NC̥ and is restricted to a limited set of morphemes; and (b) post-nasal voicing is a more productive and hence unmarked strategy in this language. A principled account, in terms of constraint interaction, of these discrete processes and their underlying functional unity emerges if the theory of underspecification is roped in while positing the input form. Additionally, some predictions follow automatically about the direction of language change.

01 01 JB code la.102.20vij 06 10.1075/la.102.20vij 237 247 11 Article 20 01 04 The Disyllabic Word Minimum The Disyllabic Word Minimum 01 04 Variations on a Theme in Bangla, Punjabi and Tamil Variations on a Theme in Bangla, Punjabi and Tamil 1 A01 01 JB code 549077131 K.G. Vijayakrishnan Vijayakrishnan, K.G. K.G. Vijayakrishnan CIEFL, Hyderabad 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/549077131 01 eng 30 00

In this article we examine the requirement that the minimal word be a disyllabic trochee being satisfied partially or fully in different ways in three unrelated languages spoken in India, namely, Punjabi, Bangla and Tamil. In Bangla, which does not have a phonemic vowel length distinction and where closed syllables count as bimoraic and heavy attracting prominence, monosyllables whether closed or open invariably have a long vowel. We argue that the monosyllabic lengthening is due to a catalectic syllable making these minimal words ‘virtual’ disyllables. Punjabi has a three-way distinction in syllable weight, a monomoraic light syllable, a bimoraic heavy syllable and a trimoraic superheavy syllable. Following the assumption in the literature, we assume that trimoraic syllables are virtual disyllables. We find that, by and large, monosyllables are trimoraic with a geminate final consonant augmenting the monosyllable to a superheavy status satisfying the disyllabic requirement. Finally, we examine an intriguing pattern of optional, final epenthesis in monosyllables in Tamil, once again arguing for a disyllabic word minimum. Between the three languages, we observe that the disyllabic minimality requirement is met in different ways, exhausting the three logical possibilities of stem augmentation, namely, vowel lengthening (in Bangla), consonant gemination (in Punjabi) and both consonant gemination and vowel epenthesis (in Tamil).

01 01 JB code la.102.21sai 06 10.1075/la.102.21sai 249 265 17 Article 21 01 04 Writing Systems and Phonological Awareness Writing Systems and Phonological Awareness 1 A01 01 JB code 652077132 Pingali Sailaja Sailaja, Pingali Pingali Sailaja University of Hyderabad 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/652077132 01 eng 30 00

This article deals with phonological awareness which is explicit or conscious knowledge of the phonological structure that speakers of a language exhibit. It seeks to establish whether biliterate speakers of Telugu and English who are exposed to an alphabetic writing system and a semi-syllabic writing system are able to manipulate words in terms of syllables and phonemes. This experimental study involves 30 native speakers of Telugu who also know English. The results show that the two languages in question are not treated alike by the speakers, although there is some evidence of transference from one language to another. It is apparent in many cases that rather than the sounds, the item that is processed mentally is a visual representation of the word. Moreover, each language seems to be processed in its own script although there is also evidence to show that the native language is more dominant and the second language is processed in the script of the native language.

01 01 JB code la.102.22lis 06 10.1075/la.102.22lis 267 270 4 Miscellaneous 22 01 04 List of contributors List of contributors 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.23bib 06 10.1075/la.102.23bib 271 274 4 Miscellaneous 23 01 04 Bibliography of K.A. Jayaseelan Bibliography of K.A. Jayaseelan 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.24ind 06 10.1075/la.102.24ind 275 277 3 Miscellaneous 24 01 04 Index of names Index of names 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.25ind 06 10.1075/la.102.25ind 279 280 2 Miscellaneous 25 01 04 Index of languages Index of languages 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.102.26ind 06 10.1075/la.102.26ind 281 282 2 Miscellaneous 26 01 04 Index of topics Index of topics 01 eng
01 JB code JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 https://benjamins.com 02 https://benjamins.com/catalog/la.102 Amsterdam NL 00 John Benjamins Publishing Company Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers onix@benjamins.nl 04 01 00 20070516 C 2007 John Benjamins Publishing Company D 2007 John Benjamins Publishing Company 02 WORLD 13 15 9789027233660 WORLD 09 01 JB 3 John Benjamins e-Platform 03 https://jbe-platform.com 29 https://jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027292452 21 01 00 Unqualified price 02 115.00 EUR 01 00 Unqualified price 02 97.00 GBP GB 01 00 Unqualified price 02 173.00 USD
297013348 03 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code LA 102 GE 15 9789027292452 06 10.1075/la.102 00 EA E133 10 01 JB code LA 02 JB code 0166-0829 02 102.00 01 02 Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 01 01 Linguistic Theory and South Asian Languages Linguistic Theory and South Asian Languages 1 B01 01 JB code 707059497 Josef Bayer Bayer, Josef Josef Bayer University of Konstanz 2 B01 01 JB code 849059498 Tanmoy Bhattacharya Bhattacharya, Tanmoy Tanmoy Bhattacharya University of Delhi 3 B01 01 JB code 427059499 M.T. Hany Babu Babu, M.T. Hany M.T. Hany Babu Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages, Hyderabad 01 eng 11 296 03 03 x 03 00 282 03 24 JB code LIN.GENER Generative linguistics 24 JB code LIN.SYNTAX Syntax 24 JB code LIN.THEOR Theoretical linguistics 10 LAN009000 12 CFK 01 06 02 00 The contributions to the present volume combine theoretical reasoning in syntax and phonology with a comparative research agenda in which South Asian languages figure prominently. 03 00 The South Asian languages, mainly Indo-Aryan and Dravidian, have become a focus of interest in the formal study of language as a natural consequence of the research program of the Principle and Parameters approach and an enforced interest in exploring the parametrical space of human language. The contributions to the present volume combine theoretical reasoning in syntax and phonology with a comparative research agenda in which South Asian languages figure prominently. The topics range from issues of clause structure, serial verb constructions, cleft- and question formation, to the question of what the proper syntactic format of modification should be, issues of binding theory and raising, and issues of complementation, the clausal periphery and clausal typing. The collection of articles concludes with two chapters on Dravidian and comparative phonology and a chapter on the shaping of phonological awareness by different writing systems. The authors and the editors devote this piece of work to Professor K.A. Jayaseelan, one of present-day India’s most influential linguists. 01 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/la.102.png 01 01 D502 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027233660.jpg 01 01 D504 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027233660.tif 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/la.102.hb.png 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/la.102.png 02 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/la.102.hb.png 03 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/la.102.hb.png 01 01 JB code la.102.01ack 06 10.1075/la.102.01ack ix ix 1 Miscellaneous 1 01 04 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements 01 01 JB code la.102.02bay 06 10.1075/la.102.02bay 1 11 11 Article 2 01 04 Introduction Introduction 1 A01 01 JB code 250077114 Josef Bayer Bayer, Josef Josef Bayer 2 A01 01 JB code 333077115 Tanmoy Bhattacharya Bhattacharya, Tanmoy Tanmoy Bhattacharya 3 A01 01 JB code 355077116 M.T. Hany Babu Babu, M.T. Hany M.T. Hany Babu 01 01 JB code la.102.03cla 06 10.1075/la.102.03cla 13 13 1 Section header 3 01 04 Clause Structure Clause Structure 01 01 JB code la.102.04bee 06 10.1075/la.102.04bee 15 28 14 Article 4 01 04 What is `Argument Sharing'? What is ‘Argument Sharing’? 01 04 A Case Study on Argument Sharing under VP-Serialization in Oriya A Case Study on Argument Sharing under VP-Serialization in Oriya 1 A01 01 JB code 565077117 Dorothee Beermann Beermann, Dorothee Dorothee Beermann Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 2 A01 01 JB code 815077118 Kalyanamalini Sahoo Sahoo, Kalyanamalini Kalyanamalini Sahoo Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 3 A01 01 JB code 989077119 Lars Hellan Hellan, Lars Lars Hellan Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim 01 01 JB code la.102.05boe 06 10.1075/la.102.05boe 29 40 12 Article 5 01 04 Pseudoclefts Pseudoclefts 01 04 a Fully Derivational Account a Fully Derivational Account 1 A01 01 JB code 75077120 Cedric Boeckx Boeckx, Cedric Cedric Boeckx Harvard University 01 01 JB code la.102.06mad 06 10.1075/la.102.06mad 41 51 11 Article 6 01 04 The Cleft Question and the Question of Cleft The Cleft Question and the Question of Cleft 1 A01 01 JB code 27077121 P. Madhavan Madhavan, P. P. Madhavan CIEFL, Hyderabad 01 01 JB code la.102.07sri 06 10.1075/la.102.07sri 53 69 17 Article 7 01 04 Clausal Pied-piping and Subjacency Clausal Pied-piping and Subjacency 1 A01 01 JB code 731077122 K. Srikumar Srikumar, K. K. Srikumar Dr. B. R. Ambedkar University, Agra, India 01 01 JB code la.102.08mod 06 10.1075/la.102.08mod 71 71 1 Section header 8 01 04 Modification in DP Modification in DP 01 01 JB code la.102.09kay 06 10.1075/la.102.09kay 73 105 33 Article 9 01 04 On the Syntax of Quantity in English On the Syntax of Quantity in English 1 A01 01 JB code 239077123 Richard S. Kayne Kayne, Richard S. Richard S. Kayne New York University 01 01 JB code la.102.10bin 06 10.1075/la.102.10bin 107 107 1 Section header 10 01 04 Binding Binding 01 01 JB code la.102.11gue 06 10.1075/la.102.11gue 109 125 17 Article 11 01 04 Coreference Violations `Beyond Principle B' Coreference Violations ‘Beyond Principle B’ 1 A01 01 JB code 349077124 Jacqueline Guéron Guéron, Jacqueline Jacqueline Guéron Université de Paris III - Sorbonne Nouvelle 01 01 JB code la.102.12reu 06 10.1075/la.102.12reu 127 142 16 Article 12 01 04 Perspectives on Binding Perspectives on Binding 1 A01 01 JB code 355077125 Eric J. Reuland Reuland, Eric J. Eric J. Reuland Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS 01 01 JB code la.102.13yad 06 10.1075/la.102.13yad 143 159 17 Article 13 01 04 Raising from a Tensed Clause and Linguistic Theory Raising from a Tensed Clause and Linguistic Theory 01 04 Evidence from Maithili Evidence from Maithili 1 A01 01 JB code 478077126 Yogendra P. Yadava Yadava, Yogendra P. Yogendra P. Yadava Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal 01 01 JB code la.102.14com 06 10.1075/la.102.14com 161 161 1 Section header 14 01 04 Complementizers and Complementation Complementizers and Complementation 01 01 JB code la.102.15das 06 10.1075/la.102.15das 163 173 11 Article 15 01 04 The Ubiquitous Complementizer The Ubiquitous Complementizer 1 A01 01 JB code 439077127 Probal Dasgupta Dasgupta, Probal Probal Dasgupta University of Hyderabad 01 01 JB code la.102.16dav 06 10.1075/la.102.16dav 175 198 24 Article 16 01 04 Word Order, Parameters, and the Extended COMP Projection Word Order, Parameters, and the Extended COMP Projection 1 A01 01 JB code 534077128 Alice Davison Davison, Alice Alice Davison University of Iowa 01 01 JB code la.102.17bar 06 10.1075/la.102.17bar 199 214 16 Article 17 01 04 The Particle ne in Direct yes-no Questions The Particle ne in Direct yes-no Questions 1 A01 01 JB code 757077129 Madhumita Barbora Barbora, Madhumita Madhumita Barbora Tezpur University, Tezpur 01 01 JB code la.102.18pho 06 10.1075/la.102.18pho 215 215 1 Section header 18 01 04 Phonology Phonology 01 01 JB code la.102.19das 06 10.1075/la.102.19das 217 236 20 Article 19 01 04 Underspecification and the Phonology of *NC-Effects in Malayalam Underspecification and the Phonology of *NC̥-Effects in Malayalam 1 A01 01 JB code 160077130 Shyamal Das Das, Shyamal Shyamal Das Tripura University 01 01 JB code la.102.20vij 06 10.1075/la.102.20vij 237 247 11 Article 20 01 04 The Disyllabic Word Minimum The Disyllabic Word Minimum 01 04 Variations on a Theme in Bangla, Punjabi and Tamil Variations on a Theme in Bangla, Punjabi and Tamil 1 A01 01 JB code 549077131 K.G. Vijayakrishnan Vijayakrishnan, K.G. K.G. Vijayakrishnan CIEFL, Hyderabad 01 01 JB code la.102.21sai 06 10.1075/la.102.21sai 249 265 17 Article 21 01 04 Writing Systems and Phonological Awareness Writing Systems and Phonological Awareness 1 A01 01 JB code 652077132 Pingali Sailaja Sailaja, Pingali Pingali Sailaja University of Hyderabad 01 01 JB code la.102.22lis 06 10.1075/la.102.22lis 267 270 4 Miscellaneous 22 01 04 List of contributors List of contributors 01 01 JB code la.102.23bib 06 10.1075/la.102.23bib 271 274 4 Miscellaneous 23 01 04 Bibliography of K.A. Jayaseelan Bibliography of K.A. Jayaseelan 01 01 JB code la.102.24ind 06 10.1075/la.102.24ind 275 277 3 Miscellaneous 24 01 04 Index of names Index of names 01 01 JB code la.102.25ind 06 10.1075/la.102.25ind 279 280 2 Miscellaneous 25 01 04 Index of languages Index of languages 01 01 JB code la.102.26ind 06 10.1075/la.102.26ind 281 282 2 Miscellaneous 26 01 04 Index of topics Index of topics 01 JB code JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 https://benjamins.com Amsterdam NL 00 John Benjamins Publishing Company Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers onix@benjamins.nl 04 01 00 20070516 C 2007 John Benjamins Publishing Company D 2007 John Benjamins Publishing Company 02 WORLD 13 15 9789027233660 WORLD 03 01 JB 17 Google 03 https://play.google.com/store/books 21 01 00 Unqualified price 00 115.00 EUR 01 00 Unqualified price 00 97.00 GBP 01 00 Unqualified price 00 173.00 USD