593005605 03 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code LA 135 Hb 15 9789027255181 06 10.1075/la.135 13 2008035987 00 BB 01 245 mm 02 164 mm 08 645 gr 10 01 JB code LA 02 0166-0829 02 135.00 01 02 Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 01 01 Time and Again Theoretical perspectives on formal linguistics. In honor of D. Terence Langendoen Time and Again: Theoretical perspectives on formal linguistics. In honor of D. Terence Langendoen 1 B01 01 JB code 350059258 William D. Lewis Lewis, William D. William D. Lewis Microsoft Research 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/350059258 2 B01 01 JB code 627059255 Simin Karimi Karimi, Simin Simin Karimi University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/627059255 3 B01 01 JB code 350059256 Heidi Harley Harley, Heidi Heidi Harley University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/350059256 4 B01 01 JB code 780059259 Scott O. Farrar Farrar, Scott O. Scott O. Farrar University of Washington 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/780059259 01 eng 11 280 03 03 xiv 03 00 265 03 01 22 410 03 2009 P121 04 Linguistics. 10 LAN009000 12 CFK 24 JB code LIN.PSYLIN Psycholinguistics 24 JB code LIN.SEMAN Semantics 24 JB code LIN.SYNTAX Syntax 24 JB code LIN.THEOR Theoretical linguistics 01 06 03 00 This volume is a collection of papers that highlights some recurring themes that have surfaced in the generative tradition in linguistics over the past 40 years. The volume is more than a historical take on a theoretical tradition; rather, it is also a "compass" pointing to exciting new empirical directions inspired by generative theory. In fact, the papers show a progression from core theoretical concerns to data-driven experimental investigation and can be divided roughly into two categories: those that follow a syntactic and theoretical course, and those that follow an experimental or applied path. Many of the papers revisit long-standing or recurring themes in the generative tradition, some of which seek experimental validation or refutation. The merger of theoretical and experimental concerns makes this volume stand out, but it is also forward looking in that it addresses the recent concerns of the creation and consumption of data across the discipline. 01 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/la.135.png 01 01 D502 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027255181.jpg 01 01 D504 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027255181.tif 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/la.135.hb.png 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/la.135.png 02 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/la.135.hb.png 03 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/la.135.hb.png 01 01 JB code la.135.01ack 06 10.1075/la.135.01ack vii vii 1 Miscellaneous 1 01 04 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.135.02lew 06 10.1075/la.135.02lew ix xiv 6 Article 2 01 04 Introduction Introduction 1 A01 01 JB code 979099801 William D. Lewis Lewis, William D. William D. Lewis Microsoft Research 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/979099801 2 A01 01 JB code 305099802 Simin Karimi Karimi, Simin Simin Karimi University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/305099802 3 A01 01 JB code 502099803 Scott O. Farrar Farrar, Scott O. Scott O. Farrar University of Washington 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/502099803 4 A01 01 JB code 110099804 Heidi Harley Harley, Heidi Heidi Harley University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/110099804 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.135.03syn 06 10.1075/la.135.03syn Section header 3 01 04 Part I. Syntax and semantics Part I. Syntax and semantics 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.135.04pos 06 10.1075/la.135.04pos 3 36 34 Article 4 01 04 1. Inverse reflexives 1. Inverse reflexives 1 A01 01 JB code 505099805 Paul M. Postal Postal, Paul M. Paul M. Postal New York University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/505099805 2 A01 01 JB code 587099806 John Robert Ross Ross, John Robert John Robert Ross University of North Texas 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/587099806 01 eng 30 00

This chapter discusses the principles that determine legitimate minimal domains for antecedents of reflexive forms. It offers novel critiques of the idea that these principles reduce to some elementary statement involving c‑command or analogs thereof, and proposes a relational account for certain documented constraints.

01 01 JB code la.135.05doo 06 10.1075/la.135.05doo 37 53 17 Article 5 01 04 2. On the nature of the approximative expression NUM-odd 2. On the nature of the approximative expression NUM-odd 1 A01 01 JB code 191099807 Sheila Dooley Dooley, Sheila Sheila Dooley University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/191099807 2 A01 01 JB code 59099808 Ferdinand Haan Haan, Ferdinand Ferdinand Haan University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/59099808 01 eng 30 00

In this paper, the morphology, syntax, semantics, and diachrony of expressions liketwenty-odd are described, based on the results of a corpus study which considers data from the British National Corpus, the Oxford English Dictionary, and Google. The -odd suffix appears most frequently with twenty, and in collocations with temporal nominals such as years, days, etc. Distributionally it appears to be a derivational suffix on numerals, occurring inside additional suffixation such as ordinal -th. It originated from the use of odd to denote a surplus or remainder, which usage has existed for several hundred years. It is distinct from other English approximatives, and approximatives in other languages, in that -odd expresses an indeterminate range above the cardinality of the modified numeral, but not below it, while other approximative expressions (like about) include the possibility that the actual number might be either above or below the reference number.

01 01 JB code la.135.06gar 06 10.1075/la.135.06gar 55 89 35 Article 6 01 04 3. Skating along the syntactic verge: Experimental pragmatics and understood elements of content 3. Skating along the syntactic verge: Experimental pragmatics and understood elements of content 1 A01 01 JB code 769099809 Merrill Garrett Garrett, Merrill Merrill Garrett University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/769099809 2 A01 01 JB code 979099810 Robert M. Harnish Harnish, Robert M. Robert M. Harnish University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/979099810 01 eng 30 00

This chapter discusses elements of communicative content that are not expressed by overt elements of a sentence. In the 1970s and 1980s, mostly inspired by the work of Grice, forms of ‘unexpressed elements of content’ not contemplated by linguistic theory of the time began to surface under a variety of labels, collectively called ‘impliciture’ here. It is argued in this chapter that recent experimental work suggests that certain forms of impliciture are tied to language via “standardization” which provides a pragmatic scenario that does not require access to potentially unbounded domains of general background information.

01 01 JB code la.135.07new 06 10.1075/la.135.07new 91 117 27 Article 7 01 04 4. Current challenges to the Lexicalist Hypothesis: An overview and a critique 4. Current challenges to the Lexicalist Hypothesis: An overview and a critique 1 A01 01 JB code 275099811 Frederick J. Newmeyer Newmeyer, Frederick J. Frederick J. Newmeyer University of Washington, University of British Columbia, and Simon Fraser University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/275099811 01 eng 30 00

In this chapter, arguments against several variants of the modern syntax-based analyses of deverbal nominalizations are presented, and the classic lexicalist approach deriving from Chomsky’s 1970 Remarks on nominalization is defended. The modern approaches of Alexiadou (2001), Fu, Roeper and Borer (2001), Harley and Noyer (1998), which revive in various forms the sentential Generative Semantics analyses of event nominals, are each considered and rejected in turn. In such approaches, argument-structure nominals contain some amount of verbal structure as a proper subpart. Yet, all such nominals exhibit surface syntactic patterns that resemble exactly those of nonderived nominals. The absence of verb-phrase syntax within nominalizations is a fundamental generalization about such nominals, and is very problematic for analyses which propose such substructure.

01 01 JB code la.135.08psy 06 10.1075/la.135.08psy Section header 8 01 04 Part II. Psycholinguistics Part II. Psycholinguistics 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.135.09cow 06 10.1075/la.135.09cow 121 134 14 Article 9 01 04 5. On the homogeneity of syntax: How similar do coordinates and subordinates look to the comprehension system? 5. On the homogeneity of syntax: How similar do coordinates and subordinates look to the comprehension system? 1 A01 01 JB code 669099812 Wayne Cowart Cowart, Wayne Wayne Cowart University of Southern Maine 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/669099812 2 A01 01 JB code 833099813 Tatiana Agupova Agupova, Tatiana Tatiana Agupova University of Southern Maine 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/833099813 01 eng 30 00

Our goal here is to explore an unusual approach to the long-standing problem of coordination in natural language — the problem of accommodating subordinate and coordinate structures within a consistent and empirically sound syntax. In what follows we’ll offer a brief overview of the problem and identify a central assumption about the syntax of coordinates (the Homogeneity Thesis) that seems to be very widely shared by investigators working on coordination regardless of their theoretical orientation. We will then review some recent experimental results that seem to clash with certain implications of the Homogeneity Thesis. Though the evidence reviewed here is far from definitive, we argue that serious consideration of alternatives to the Homogeneity Thesis is in order.

01 01 JB code la.135.10nic 06 10.1075/la.135.10nic 135 150 16 Article 10 01 04 6. The effect of case marking on subject-verb agreement errors in English 6. The effect of case marking on subject-verb agreement errors in English 1 A01 01 JB code 604099814 Janet L. Nicol Nicol, Janet L. Janet L. Nicol University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/604099814 2 A01 01 JB code 373099815 Ines Antón-Méndez Antón-Méndez, Ines Ines Antón-Méndez UiL OTS, University of Utrecht 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/373099815 01 eng 30 00

It is commonly assumed that the occurrence and distribution of processing errors offer a “window” into the architecture of cognitive processors. In recent years, psycholinguists have drawn inferences about syntactic encoding processes in language production by examining the distribution and rate of subject–verb agreement (SVA) errors in different contexts. To date, dozens of studies have used a sentence repetition-completion paradigm to elicit SVA errors. In this task, participants hear a sentence fragment (or “preamble”), repeat it, and provide a well-formed completion. These experiments have shown that when a singular head is modified by a phrase containing a plural NP (e.g. The bill for the accountants...), a significant number of SVA errors may occur. Several experiments have shown that, in English, the phonological form of words within a subject NP plays virtually no role in the rate of error occurrence. Yet recent data from our lab suggests that overt morphophonological case information does matter: speakers are more likely to produce the errorThe bill for the accountants were outrageous than The bill for them were outrageous. In this paper, we will present the results of this case-marking study and discuss the implications for models of language production.

01 01 JB code la.135.11lus 06 10.1075/la.135.11lus 151 175 25 Article 11 01 04 7. First language acquisition of coordination: The mud-puddle study and beyond 7. First language acquisition of coordination: The mud-puddle study and beyond 1 A01 01 JB code 12099816 Barbara Lust Lust, Barbara Barbara Lust Cornell University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/12099816 2 A01 01 JB code 308099817 Suzanne Flynn Flynn, Suzanne Suzanne Flynn MIT 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/308099817 3 A01 01 JB code 391099818 Yuchin Chien Chien, Yuchin Yuchin Chien California State University, San Bernardino 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/391099818 4 A01 01 JB code 305099819 Barbara Krawiec Krawiec, Barbara Barbara Krawiec Utica School District, New York 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/305099819 01 eng 30 00

In this chapter, we provide a brief overview of a history of studies of coordination. We then report the results of one experiment concerning the acquisition of coordination in English that has not before been reported, “The Mud-Puddle” study, and set it in the context of this history and our developing quest for understanding the nature of linguistic coordination and the fundamental competence that underlies its acquisition. This experiment was conducted by an honors student at Cornell at the time (Krawiec 1980); its data have been preserved and now reanalyzed. Its results, although preliminary, bear on the nature of the syntax-semantics interface that coordinate structures involve, integrate with certain current theoretical advances, and suggest future research possibilities.

01 01 JB code la.135.12mck 06 10.1075/la.135.12mck 177 187 11 Article 12 01 04 8. Frequency effects in children's syntactic and morphological development 8. Frequency effects in children's syntactic and morphological development 1 A01 01 JB code 59099820 Cecile McKee McKee, Cecile Cecile McKee University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/59099820 2 A01 01 JB code 256099821 Dana McDaniel McDaniel, Dana Dana McDaniel University of Southern Maine 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/256099821 01 eng 30 00

We have long loved Langendoen (1970) — a paper on the theoretical justification of “transformations, their effects on the structure of sentences, and the conditions under which they are optional or obligatory” (p. 102). In that paper, Langendoen argued that acceptability and grammaticality are “partially independent [and] partially dependent notions” (p. 103). We are struck by the implications of this contrast for language learning. If the learner’s grammar is a set of probabilistic patterns and not (also or instead) a set of grammatical rules, one might expect high frequency elements to be ‘grammatical’ and low frequency elements to be ‘ungrammatical.’ In other words, grammaticality and acceptability should be similar if frequency is the determining factor. But Langendoen (1970) hypothesized that grammatical competence contributes to grammaticality while processing factors contribute to acceptability. Our research shows clearer effects of frequency on the latter than the on former and thus relates to Langendoen’s observation.

This chapter explores the role of frequency in children’s syntactic and morphophonological development. One study compares relative clauses involving different extraction sites, which constructions vary considerably in their frequency of occurrence. Children’s production of these relatives suggests that frequency affects sentence planning, but their judgments of the same relatives are out of synchrony with the frequency rates. The other study presented here concerns the a and an forms of the indefinite article, which distinction is acquired relatively late even though the forms occur frequently. These studies show that frequency cannot be the whole story. We conclude that children’s mastery of a system of rules proceeds — at least to some extent — independently of frequency patterns in the input.

01 01 JB code la.135.13val 06 10.1075/la.135.13val 189 206 18 Article 13 01 04 9. Abstract linguistic representations and innateness: The development of determiners 9. Abstract linguistic representations and innateness: The development of determiners 1 A01 01 JB code 915099822 Virginia Valian Valian, Virginia Virginia Valian Hunter College and CUNY Graduate Center 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/915099822 01 eng 30 00

This paper uses the syntactic category of determiner to address the issue of innateness in language acquisition. Reviewing data from infants and toddlers, I propose that categories are innate and that children show continuity in category acquisition. As development proceeds, children learn the individual words in each category in the target language and the specific syntactic properties of those words, but they do not construct the categories themselves.

01 01 JB code la.135.14lan 06 10.1075/la.135.14lan Section header 14 01 04 Part III. Language as a Formal System Part III. Language as a Formal System 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.135.15ham 06 10.1075/la.135.15ham 209 225 17 Article 15 01 04 10. One-level finite-state phonology 10. One-level finite-state phonology 1 A01 01 JB code 733099823 Michael Hammond Hammond, Michael Michael Hammond University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/733099823 01 eng 30 00

Finite state approaches to phonology usually make use of transducers to model the mapping of input to output forms. This applies to both rule-based approaches and more recent approaches inspired by Optimality Theory. Here, we develop an alternative approach based on automata where phonological generalizations and lexical regularities are encoded as regular expressions and these expressions are combined by intersection and concatenation. The system that results captures the full range of phonological systems, but does so with simpler automata, rather than transducers. In addition, the resulting system bears interesting similarities to Optimality Theory. We also compare the approach to other finite state approaches.

01 01 JB code la.135.16bev 06 10.1075/la.135.16bev 227 232 6 Article 16 01 04 11. Biolinguistics today and Platonism yesterday 11. Biolinguistics today and Platonism yesterday 1 A01 01 JB code 12099824 Thomas G. Bever Bever, Thomas G. Thomas G. Bever University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/12099824 01 eng 30 00

This contribution expounds on ideas put forth by a group of New York City generative grammarians that language possesses certain essential features that are uncaused and adhere to an abstract ideal form. An analogy of the situation with language is made with certain natural properties of numbers. It is also noted that this situation contrasts with that of the functional structure of human color vision. This idea is viewed alongside recent work in biolinguistics and is compared to the neoplatonist view of language, namely that language is discovered by the child learner and not triggered. The main consequences of this idea are discussed both within the historical context and with respect to current theories on language acquisition.

01 01 JB code la.135.17sta 06 10.1075/la.135.17sta Section header 17 01 04 Part IV. Standards Part IV. Standards 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.135.18sim 06 10.1075/la.135.18sim 235 250 16 Article 18 01 04 12. Linguistics as a community activity: The paradox of freedom through standards 12. Linguistics as a community activity: The paradox of freedom through standards 1 A01 01 JB code 569099825 Gary F. Simons Simons, Gary F. Gary F. Simons SIL International 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/569099825 01 eng 30 00

The Internet has given us a new playing field for global collaboration. It could transform the practice of linguistics through universal access to huge quantities of digital language documentation and description. But this transformation can happen only if certain aspects of community practice are formalized by defining and adhering to shared standards. After expanding on the vision for what linguistics could be like in the twenty-first century, this essay attempts to clarify the role of standards by considering two case studies of life with and without standards — using solar time versus standard time, and using language names versus language identifiers. The essay then develops two metaphors that seek to put standards in a positive light: “linguistics as community” and “development as freedom.” The ultimate conclusion is that only by submitting to the constraints of shared standards will the community be free to develop the riches of knowledge it is seeking.

01 01 JB code la.135.19bat 06 10.1075/la.135.19bat 251 261 11 Article 19 01 04 13. Sherwin Cody's school of English 13. Sherwin Cody's school of English 1 A01 01 JB code 12099826 Edwin Battistella Battistella, Edwin Edwin Battistella Southern Oregon University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/12099826 01 eng 30 00

In this chapter Sherwin Cody’s well-known correspondence course is analyzed within a historical context and according to the norms of the early part of the 20th century. Details of the course are summarized, and several notable examples are given concerning the prescriptive rules for pronunciation, practical grammar, and grammatical correctness. The course itself and aspects of the successful marketing campaign are discussed. Cody’s prescriptivist and descriptivist approaches are evaluated according to early 20th-century society; it is argued that Cody’s course was influenced by several, sometimes opposing, factors. The views of language experts of the day, including educators and linguists, are taken into account.

01 01 JB code la.135.20ind 06 10.1075/la.135.20ind 263 265 3 Miscellaneous 20 01 04 Index Index 01 eng
01 JB code JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 https://benjamins.com 02 https://benjamins.com/catalog/la.135 Amsterdam NL 00 John Benjamins Publishing Company Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers onix@benjamins.nl 04 01 00 20090108 C 2009 John Benjamins Publishing Company D 2009 John Benjamins Publishing Company 02 WORLD WORLD US CA MX 09 01 JB 1 John Benjamins Publishing Company +31 20 6304747 +31 20 6739773 bookorder@benjamins.nl 01 https://benjamins.com 21 20 20 01 00 Unqualified price 02 JB 1 02 105.00 EUR 02 00 Unqualified price 02 88.00 01 Z 0 GBP GB US CA MX 01 01 JB 2 John Benjamins Publishing Company +1 800 562-5666 +1 703 661-1501 benjamins@presswarehouse.com 01 https://benjamins.com 21 20 20 01 00 Unqualified price 02 JB 1 02 158.00 USD
860007542 03 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code LA 135 Eb 15 9789027289629 06 10.1075/la.135 00 EA E107 10 01 JB code LA 02 0166-0829 02 135.00 01 02 Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 11 01 JB code jbe-all 01 02 Full EBA collection (ca. 4,200 titles) 11 01 JB code jbe-2015-all 01 02 Complete backlist (3,208 titles, 1967–2015) 05 02 Complete backlist (1967–2015) 11 01 JB code jbe-2015-la 01 02 Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today (vols. 1–226, 1980–2015) 05 02 LA (vols. 1–226, 1980–2015) 11 01 JB code jbe-2015-linguistics 01 02 Subject collection: Linguistics (2,773 titles, 1967–2015) 05 02 Linguistics (1967–2015) 11 01 JB code jbe-2015-psychology 01 02 Subject collection: Psychology (246 titles, 1978–2015) 05 02 Psychology (1978–2015) 01 01 Time and Again Theoretical perspectives on formal linguistics. In honor of D. Terence Langendoen Time and Again: Theoretical perspectives on formal linguistics. In honor of D. Terence Langendoen 1 B01 01 JB code 350059258 William D. Lewis Lewis, William D. William D. Lewis Microsoft Research 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/350059258 2 B01 01 JB code 627059255 Simin Karimi Karimi, Simin Simin Karimi University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/627059255 3 B01 01 JB code 350059256 Heidi Harley Harley, Heidi Heidi Harley University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/350059256 4 B01 01 JB code 780059259 Scott O. Farrar Farrar, Scott O. Scott O. Farrar University of Washington 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/780059259 01 eng 11 280 03 03 xiv 03 00 265 03 01 22 410 03 2009 P121 04 Linguistics. 10 LAN009000 12 CFK 24 JB code LIN.PSYLIN Psycholinguistics 24 JB code LIN.SEMAN Semantics 24 JB code LIN.SYNTAX Syntax 24 JB code LIN.THEOR Theoretical linguistics 01 06 03 00 This volume is a collection of papers that highlights some recurring themes that have surfaced in the generative tradition in linguistics over the past 40 years. The volume is more than a historical take on a theoretical tradition; rather, it is also a "compass" pointing to exciting new empirical directions inspired by generative theory. In fact, the papers show a progression from core theoretical concerns to data-driven experimental investigation and can be divided roughly into two categories: those that follow a syntactic and theoretical course, and those that follow an experimental or applied path. Many of the papers revisit long-standing or recurring themes in the generative tradition, some of which seek experimental validation or refutation. The merger of theoretical and experimental concerns makes this volume stand out, but it is also forward looking in that it addresses the recent concerns of the creation and consumption of data across the discipline. 01 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/la.135.png 01 01 D502 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027255181.jpg 01 01 D504 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027255181.tif 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/la.135.hb.png 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/la.135.png 02 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/la.135.hb.png 03 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/la.135.hb.png 01 01 JB code la.135.01ack 06 10.1075/la.135.01ack vii vii 1 Miscellaneous 1 01 04 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.135.02lew 06 10.1075/la.135.02lew ix xiv 6 Article 2 01 04 Introduction Introduction 1 A01 01 JB code 979099801 William D. Lewis Lewis, William D. William D. Lewis Microsoft Research 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/979099801 2 A01 01 JB code 305099802 Simin Karimi Karimi, Simin Simin Karimi University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/305099802 3 A01 01 JB code 502099803 Scott O. Farrar Farrar, Scott O. Scott O. Farrar University of Washington 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/502099803 4 A01 01 JB code 110099804 Heidi Harley Harley, Heidi Heidi Harley University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/110099804 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.135.03syn 06 10.1075/la.135.03syn Section header 3 01 04 Part I. Syntax and semantics Part I. Syntax and semantics 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.135.04pos 06 10.1075/la.135.04pos 3 36 34 Article 4 01 04 1. Inverse reflexives 1. Inverse reflexives 1 A01 01 JB code 505099805 Paul M. Postal Postal, Paul M. Paul M. Postal New York University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/505099805 2 A01 01 JB code 587099806 John Robert Ross Ross, John Robert John Robert Ross University of North Texas 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/587099806 01 eng 30 00

This chapter discusses the principles that determine legitimate minimal domains for antecedents of reflexive forms. It offers novel critiques of the idea that these principles reduce to some elementary statement involving c‑command or analogs thereof, and proposes a relational account for certain documented constraints.

01 01 JB code la.135.05doo 06 10.1075/la.135.05doo 37 53 17 Article 5 01 04 2. On the nature of the approximative expression NUM-odd 2. On the nature of the approximative expression NUM-odd 1 A01 01 JB code 191099807 Sheila Dooley Dooley, Sheila Sheila Dooley University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/191099807 2 A01 01 JB code 59099808 Ferdinand Haan Haan, Ferdinand Ferdinand Haan University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/59099808 01 eng 30 00

In this paper, the morphology, syntax, semantics, and diachrony of expressions liketwenty-odd are described, based on the results of a corpus study which considers data from the British National Corpus, the Oxford English Dictionary, and Google. The -odd suffix appears most frequently with twenty, and in collocations with temporal nominals such as years, days, etc. Distributionally it appears to be a derivational suffix on numerals, occurring inside additional suffixation such as ordinal -th. It originated from the use of odd to denote a surplus or remainder, which usage has existed for several hundred years. It is distinct from other English approximatives, and approximatives in other languages, in that -odd expresses an indeterminate range above the cardinality of the modified numeral, but not below it, while other approximative expressions (like about) include the possibility that the actual number might be either above or below the reference number.

01 01 JB code la.135.06gar 06 10.1075/la.135.06gar 55 89 35 Article 6 01 04 3. Skating along the syntactic verge: Experimental pragmatics and understood elements of content 3. Skating along the syntactic verge: Experimental pragmatics and understood elements of content 1 A01 01 JB code 769099809 Merrill Garrett Garrett, Merrill Merrill Garrett University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/769099809 2 A01 01 JB code 979099810 Robert M. Harnish Harnish, Robert M. Robert M. Harnish University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/979099810 01 eng 30 00

This chapter discusses elements of communicative content that are not expressed by overt elements of a sentence. In the 1970s and 1980s, mostly inspired by the work of Grice, forms of ‘unexpressed elements of content’ not contemplated by linguistic theory of the time began to surface under a variety of labels, collectively called ‘impliciture’ here. It is argued in this chapter that recent experimental work suggests that certain forms of impliciture are tied to language via “standardization” which provides a pragmatic scenario that does not require access to potentially unbounded domains of general background information.

01 01 JB code la.135.07new 06 10.1075/la.135.07new 91 117 27 Article 7 01 04 4. Current challenges to the Lexicalist Hypothesis: An overview and a critique 4. Current challenges to the Lexicalist Hypothesis: An overview and a critique 1 A01 01 JB code 275099811 Frederick J. Newmeyer Newmeyer, Frederick J. Frederick J. Newmeyer University of Washington, University of British Columbia, and Simon Fraser University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/275099811 01 eng 30 00

In this chapter, arguments against several variants of the modern syntax-based analyses of deverbal nominalizations are presented, and the classic lexicalist approach deriving from Chomsky’s 1970 Remarks on nominalization is defended. The modern approaches of Alexiadou (2001), Fu, Roeper and Borer (2001), Harley and Noyer (1998), which revive in various forms the sentential Generative Semantics analyses of event nominals, are each considered and rejected in turn. In such approaches, argument-structure nominals contain some amount of verbal structure as a proper subpart. Yet, all such nominals exhibit surface syntactic patterns that resemble exactly those of nonderived nominals. The absence of verb-phrase syntax within nominalizations is a fundamental generalization about such nominals, and is very problematic for analyses which propose such substructure.

01 01 JB code la.135.08psy 06 10.1075/la.135.08psy Section header 8 01 04 Part II. Psycholinguistics Part II. Psycholinguistics 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.135.09cow 06 10.1075/la.135.09cow 121 134 14 Article 9 01 04 5. On the homogeneity of syntax: How similar do coordinates and subordinates look to the comprehension system? 5. On the homogeneity of syntax: How similar do coordinates and subordinates look to the comprehension system? 1 A01 01 JB code 669099812 Wayne Cowart Cowart, Wayne Wayne Cowart University of Southern Maine 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/669099812 2 A01 01 JB code 833099813 Tatiana Agupova Agupova, Tatiana Tatiana Agupova University of Southern Maine 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/833099813 01 eng 30 00

Our goal here is to explore an unusual approach to the long-standing problem of coordination in natural language — the problem of accommodating subordinate and coordinate structures within a consistent and empirically sound syntax. In what follows we’ll offer a brief overview of the problem and identify a central assumption about the syntax of coordinates (the Homogeneity Thesis) that seems to be very widely shared by investigators working on coordination regardless of their theoretical orientation. We will then review some recent experimental results that seem to clash with certain implications of the Homogeneity Thesis. Though the evidence reviewed here is far from definitive, we argue that serious consideration of alternatives to the Homogeneity Thesis is in order.

01 01 JB code la.135.10nic 06 10.1075/la.135.10nic 135 150 16 Article 10 01 04 6. The effect of case marking on subject-verb agreement errors in English 6. The effect of case marking on subject-verb agreement errors in English 1 A01 01 JB code 604099814 Janet L. Nicol Nicol, Janet L. Janet L. Nicol University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/604099814 2 A01 01 JB code 373099815 Ines Antón-Méndez Antón-Méndez, Ines Ines Antón-Méndez UiL OTS, University of Utrecht 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/373099815 01 eng 30 00

It is commonly assumed that the occurrence and distribution of processing errors offer a “window” into the architecture of cognitive processors. In recent years, psycholinguists have drawn inferences about syntactic encoding processes in language production by examining the distribution and rate of subject–verb agreement (SVA) errors in different contexts. To date, dozens of studies have used a sentence repetition-completion paradigm to elicit SVA errors. In this task, participants hear a sentence fragment (or “preamble”), repeat it, and provide a well-formed completion. These experiments have shown that when a singular head is modified by a phrase containing a plural NP (e.g. The bill for the accountants...), a significant number of SVA errors may occur. Several experiments have shown that, in English, the phonological form of words within a subject NP plays virtually no role in the rate of error occurrence. Yet recent data from our lab suggests that overt morphophonological case information does matter: speakers are more likely to produce the errorThe bill for the accountants were outrageous than The bill for them were outrageous. In this paper, we will present the results of this case-marking study and discuss the implications for models of language production.

01 01 JB code la.135.11lus 06 10.1075/la.135.11lus 151 175 25 Article 11 01 04 7. First language acquisition of coordination: The mud-puddle study and beyond 7. First language acquisition of coordination: The mud-puddle study and beyond 1 A01 01 JB code 12099816 Barbara Lust Lust, Barbara Barbara Lust Cornell University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/12099816 2 A01 01 JB code 308099817 Suzanne Flynn Flynn, Suzanne Suzanne Flynn MIT 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/308099817 3 A01 01 JB code 391099818 Yuchin Chien Chien, Yuchin Yuchin Chien California State University, San Bernardino 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/391099818 4 A01 01 JB code 305099819 Barbara Krawiec Krawiec, Barbara Barbara Krawiec Utica School District, New York 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/305099819 01 eng 30 00

In this chapter, we provide a brief overview of a history of studies of coordination. We then report the results of one experiment concerning the acquisition of coordination in English that has not before been reported, “The Mud-Puddle” study, and set it in the context of this history and our developing quest for understanding the nature of linguistic coordination and the fundamental competence that underlies its acquisition. This experiment was conducted by an honors student at Cornell at the time (Krawiec 1980); its data have been preserved and now reanalyzed. Its results, although preliminary, bear on the nature of the syntax-semantics interface that coordinate structures involve, integrate with certain current theoretical advances, and suggest future research possibilities.

01 01 JB code la.135.12mck 06 10.1075/la.135.12mck 177 187 11 Article 12 01 04 8. Frequency effects in children's syntactic and morphological development 8. Frequency effects in children's syntactic and morphological development 1 A01 01 JB code 59099820 Cecile McKee McKee, Cecile Cecile McKee University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/59099820 2 A01 01 JB code 256099821 Dana McDaniel McDaniel, Dana Dana McDaniel University of Southern Maine 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/256099821 01 eng 30 00

We have long loved Langendoen (1970) — a paper on the theoretical justification of “transformations, their effects on the structure of sentences, and the conditions under which they are optional or obligatory” (p. 102). In that paper, Langendoen argued that acceptability and grammaticality are “partially independent [and] partially dependent notions” (p. 103). We are struck by the implications of this contrast for language learning. If the learner’s grammar is a set of probabilistic patterns and not (also or instead) a set of grammatical rules, one might expect high frequency elements to be ‘grammatical’ and low frequency elements to be ‘ungrammatical.’ In other words, grammaticality and acceptability should be similar if frequency is the determining factor. But Langendoen (1970) hypothesized that grammatical competence contributes to grammaticality while processing factors contribute to acceptability. Our research shows clearer effects of frequency on the latter than the on former and thus relates to Langendoen’s observation.

This chapter explores the role of frequency in children’s syntactic and morphophonological development. One study compares relative clauses involving different extraction sites, which constructions vary considerably in their frequency of occurrence. Children’s production of these relatives suggests that frequency affects sentence planning, but their judgments of the same relatives are out of synchrony with the frequency rates. The other study presented here concerns the a and an forms of the indefinite article, which distinction is acquired relatively late even though the forms occur frequently. These studies show that frequency cannot be the whole story. We conclude that children’s mastery of a system of rules proceeds — at least to some extent — independently of frequency patterns in the input.

01 01 JB code la.135.13val 06 10.1075/la.135.13val 189 206 18 Article 13 01 04 9. Abstract linguistic representations and innateness: The development of determiners 9. Abstract linguistic representations and innateness: The development of determiners 1 A01 01 JB code 915099822 Virginia Valian Valian, Virginia Virginia Valian Hunter College and CUNY Graduate Center 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/915099822 01 eng 30 00

This paper uses the syntactic category of determiner to address the issue of innateness in language acquisition. Reviewing data from infants and toddlers, I propose that categories are innate and that children show continuity in category acquisition. As development proceeds, children learn the individual words in each category in the target language and the specific syntactic properties of those words, but they do not construct the categories themselves.

01 01 JB code la.135.14lan 06 10.1075/la.135.14lan Section header 14 01 04 Part III. Language as a Formal System Part III. Language as a Formal System 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.135.15ham 06 10.1075/la.135.15ham 209 225 17 Article 15 01 04 10. One-level finite-state phonology 10. One-level finite-state phonology 1 A01 01 JB code 733099823 Michael Hammond Hammond, Michael Michael Hammond University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/733099823 01 eng 30 00

Finite state approaches to phonology usually make use of transducers to model the mapping of input to output forms. This applies to both rule-based approaches and more recent approaches inspired by Optimality Theory. Here, we develop an alternative approach based on automata where phonological generalizations and lexical regularities are encoded as regular expressions and these expressions are combined by intersection and concatenation. The system that results captures the full range of phonological systems, but does so with simpler automata, rather than transducers. In addition, the resulting system bears interesting similarities to Optimality Theory. We also compare the approach to other finite state approaches.

01 01 JB code la.135.16bev 06 10.1075/la.135.16bev 227 232 6 Article 16 01 04 11. Biolinguistics today and Platonism yesterday 11. Biolinguistics today and Platonism yesterday 1 A01 01 JB code 12099824 Thomas G. Bever Bever, Thomas G. Thomas G. Bever University of Arizona 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/12099824 01 eng 30 00

This contribution expounds on ideas put forth by a group of New York City generative grammarians that language possesses certain essential features that are uncaused and adhere to an abstract ideal form. An analogy of the situation with language is made with certain natural properties of numbers. It is also noted that this situation contrasts with that of the functional structure of human color vision. This idea is viewed alongside recent work in biolinguistics and is compared to the neoplatonist view of language, namely that language is discovered by the child learner and not triggered. The main consequences of this idea are discussed both within the historical context and with respect to current theories on language acquisition.

01 01 JB code la.135.17sta 06 10.1075/la.135.17sta Section header 17 01 04 Part IV. Standards Part IV. Standards 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.135.18sim 06 10.1075/la.135.18sim 235 250 16 Article 18 01 04 12. Linguistics as a community activity: The paradox of freedom through standards 12. Linguistics as a community activity: The paradox of freedom through standards 1 A01 01 JB code 569099825 Gary F. Simons Simons, Gary F. Gary F. Simons SIL International 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/569099825 01 eng 30 00

The Internet has given us a new playing field for global collaboration. It could transform the practice of linguistics through universal access to huge quantities of digital language documentation and description. But this transformation can happen only if certain aspects of community practice are formalized by defining and adhering to shared standards. After expanding on the vision for what linguistics could be like in the twenty-first century, this essay attempts to clarify the role of standards by considering two case studies of life with and without standards — using solar time versus standard time, and using language names versus language identifiers. The essay then develops two metaphors that seek to put standards in a positive light: “linguistics as community” and “development as freedom.” The ultimate conclusion is that only by submitting to the constraints of shared standards will the community be free to develop the riches of knowledge it is seeking.

01 01 JB code la.135.19bat 06 10.1075/la.135.19bat 251 261 11 Article 19 01 04 13. Sherwin Cody's school of English 13. Sherwin Cody's school of English 1 A01 01 JB code 12099826 Edwin Battistella Battistella, Edwin Edwin Battistella Southern Oregon University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/12099826 01 eng 30 00

In this chapter Sherwin Cody’s well-known correspondence course is analyzed within a historical context and according to the norms of the early part of the 20th century. Details of the course are summarized, and several notable examples are given concerning the prescriptive rules for pronunciation, practical grammar, and grammatical correctness. The course itself and aspects of the successful marketing campaign are discussed. Cody’s prescriptivist and descriptivist approaches are evaluated according to early 20th-century society; it is argued that Cody’s course was influenced by several, sometimes opposing, factors. The views of language experts of the day, including educators and linguists, are taken into account.

01 01 JB code la.135.20ind 06 10.1075/la.135.20ind 263 265 3 Miscellaneous 20 01 04 Index Index 01 eng
01 JB code JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 https://benjamins.com 02 https://benjamins.com/catalog/la.135 Amsterdam NL 00 John Benjamins Publishing Company Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers onix@benjamins.nl 04 01 00 20090108 C 2009 John Benjamins Publishing Company D 2009 John Benjamins Publishing Company 02 WORLD 13 15 9789027255181 WORLD 09 01 JB 3 John Benjamins e-Platform 03 https://jbe-platform.com 29 https://jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027289629 21 01 00 Unqualified price 02 105.00 EUR 01 00 Unqualified price 02 88.00 GBP GB 01 00 Unqualified price 02 158.00 USD
882013383 03 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code LA 135 GE 15 9789027289629 06 10.1075/la.135 00 EA E133 10 01 JB code LA 02 JB code 0166-0829 02 135.00 01 02 Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 01 01 Time and Again Time and Again 1 B01 01 JB code 350059258 William D. Lewis Lewis, William D. William D. Lewis Microsoft Research 2 B01 01 JB code 627059255 Simin Karimi Karimi, Simin Simin Karimi University of Arizona 3 B01 01 JB code 350059256 Heidi Harley Harley, Heidi Heidi Harley University of Arizona 4 B01 01 JB code 780059259 Scott O. Farrar Farrar, Scott O. Scott O. Farrar University of Washington 01 eng 11 280 03 03 xiv 03 00 265 03 24 JB code LIN.PSYLIN Psycholinguistics 24 JB code LIN.SEMAN Semantics 24 JB code LIN.SYNTAX Syntax 24 JB code LIN.THEOR Theoretical linguistics 10 LAN009000 12 CFK 01 06 03 00 This volume is a collection of papers that highlights some recurring themes that have surfaced in the generative tradition in linguistics over the past 40 years. The volume is more than a historical take on a theoretical tradition; rather, it is also a "compass" pointing to exciting new empirical directions inspired by generative theory. In fact, the papers show a progression from core theoretical concerns to data-driven experimental investigation and can be divided roughly into two categories: those that follow a syntactic and theoretical course, and those that follow an experimental or applied path. Many of the papers revisit long-standing or recurring themes in the generative tradition, some of which seek experimental validation or refutation. The merger of theoretical and experimental concerns makes this volume stand out, but it is also forward looking in that it addresses the recent concerns of the creation and consumption of data across the discipline. 01 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/la.135.png 01 01 D502 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027255181.jpg 01 01 D504 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027255181.tif 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/la.135.hb.png 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/la.135.png 02 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/la.135.hb.png 03 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/la.135.hb.png 01 01 JB code la.135.01ack 06 10.1075/la.135.01ack vii vii 1 Miscellaneous 1 01 04 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements 01 01 JB code la.135.02lew 06 10.1075/la.135.02lew ix xiv 6 Article 2 01 04 Introduction Introduction 1 A01 01 JB code 979099801 William D. Lewis Lewis, William D. William D. Lewis Microsoft Research 2 A01 01 JB code 305099802 Simin Karimi Karimi, Simin Simin Karimi University of Arizona 3 A01 01 JB code 502099803 Scott O. Farrar Farrar, Scott O. Scott O. Farrar University of Washington 4 A01 01 JB code 110099804 Heidi Harley Harley, Heidi Heidi Harley University of Arizona 01 01 JB code la.135.03syn 06 10.1075/la.135.03syn Section header 3 01 04 Part I. Syntax and semantics Part I. Syntax and semantics 01 01 JB code la.135.04pos 06 10.1075/la.135.04pos 3 36 34 Article 4 01 04 1. Inverse reflexives 1. Inverse reflexives 1 A01 01 JB code 505099805 Paul M. Postal Postal, Paul M. Paul M. Postal New York University 2 A01 01 JB code 587099806 John Robert Ross Ross, John Robert John Robert Ross University of North Texas 01 01 JB code la.135.05doo 06 10.1075/la.135.05doo 37 53 17 Article 5 01 04 2. On the nature of the approximative expression NUM-odd 2. On the nature of the approximative expression NUM-odd 1 A01 01 JB code 191099807 Sheila Ann Dooley Dooley, Sheila Ann Sheila Ann Dooley University of Arizona 2 A01 01 JB code 59099808 Ferdinand Haan Haan, Ferdinand Ferdinand Haan University of Arizona 01 01 JB code la.135.06gar 06 10.1075/la.135.06gar 55 89 35 Article 6 01 04 3. Skating along the syntactic verge: Experimental pragmatics and understood elements of content 3. Skating along the syntactic verge: Experimental pragmatics and understood elements of content 1 A01 01 JB code 769099809 Merrill Garrett Garrett, Merrill Merrill Garrett University of Arizona 2 A01 01 JB code 979099810 Robert M. Harnish Harnish, Robert M. Robert M. Harnish University of Arizona 01 01 JB code la.135.07new 06 10.1075/la.135.07new 91 117 27 Article 7 01 04 4. Current challenges to the Lexicalist Hypothesis: An overview and a critique 4. Current challenges to the Lexicalist Hypothesis: An overview and a critique 1 A01 01 JB code 275099811 Frederick J. Newmeyer Newmeyer, Frederick J. Frederick J. Newmeyer University of Washington, University of British Columbia, and Simon Fraser University 01 01 JB code la.135.08psy 06 10.1075/la.135.08psy Section header 8 01 04 Part II. Psycholinguistics Part II. Psycholinguistics 01 01 JB code la.135.09cow 06 10.1075/la.135.09cow 121 134 14 Article 9 01 04 5. On the homogeneity of syntax: How similar do coordinates and subordinates look to the comprehension system? 5. On the homogeneity of syntax: How similar do coordinates and subordinates look to the comprehension system? 1 A01 01 JB code 669099812 Wayne Cowart Cowart, Wayne Wayne Cowart University of Southern Maine 2 A01 01 JB code 833099813 Tatiana Agupova Agupova, Tatiana Tatiana Agupova University of Southern Maine 01 01 JB code la.135.10nic 06 10.1075/la.135.10nic 135 150 16 Article 10 01 04 6. The effect of case marking on subject-verb agreement errors in English 6. The effect of case marking on subject-verb agreement errors in English 1 A01 01 JB code 604099814 Janet L. Nicol Nicol, Janet L. Janet L. Nicol University of Arizona 2 A01 01 JB code 373099815 Ines Antón-Méndez Antón-Méndez, Ines Ines Antón-Méndez UiL OTS, University of Utrecht 01 01 JB code la.135.11lus 06 10.1075/la.135.11lus 151 175 25 Article 11 01 04 7. First language acquisition of coordination: The mud-puddle study and beyond 7. First language acquisition of coordination: The mud-puddle study and beyond 1 A01 01 JB code 12099816 Barbara Lust Lust, Barbara Barbara Lust Cornell University 2 A01 01 JB code 308099817 Suzanne Flynn Flynn, Suzanne Suzanne Flynn MIT 3 A01 01 JB code 391099818 Yuchin Chien Chien, Yuchin Yuchin Chien California State University, San Bernardino 4 A01 01 JB code 305099819 Barbara Krawiec Krawiec, Barbara Barbara Krawiec Utica School District, New York 01 01 JB code la.135.12mck 06 10.1075/la.135.12mck 177 187 11 Article 12 01 04 8. Frequency effects in children's syntactic and morphological development 8. Frequency effects in children's syntactic and morphological development 1 A01 01 JB code 59099820 Cecile McKee McKee, Cecile Cecile McKee University of Arizona 2 A01 01 JB code 256099821 Dana McDaniel McDaniel, Dana Dana McDaniel University of Southern Maine 01 01 JB code la.135.13val 06 10.1075/la.135.13val 189 206 18 Article 13 01 04 9. Abstract linguistic representations and innateness: The development of determiners 9. Abstract linguistic representations and innateness: The development of determiners 1 A01 01 JB code 915099822 Virginia Valian Valian, Virginia Virginia Valian Hunter College and CUNY Graduate Center 01 01 JB code la.135.14lan 06 10.1075/la.135.14lan Section header 14 01 04 Part III. Language as a Formal System Part III. Language as a Formal System 01 01 JB code la.135.15ham 06 10.1075/la.135.15ham 209 225 17 Article 15 01 04 10. One-level finite-state phonology 10. One-level finite-state phonology 1 A01 01 JB code 733099823 Michael Hammond Hammond, Michael Michael Hammond University of Arizona 01 01 JB code la.135.16bev 06 10.1075/la.135.16bev 227 232 6 Article 16 01 04 11. Biolinguistics today and Platonism yesterday 11. Biolinguistics today and Platonism yesterday 1 A01 01 JB code 12099824 Thomas G. Bever Bever, Thomas G. Thomas G. Bever University of Arizona 01 01 JB code la.135.17sta 06 10.1075/la.135.17sta Section header 17 01 04 Part IV. Standards Part IV. Standards 01 01 JB code la.135.18sim 06 10.1075/la.135.18sim 235 250 16 Article 18 01 04 12. Linguistics as a community activity: The paradox of freedom through standards 12. Linguistics as a community activity: The paradox of freedom through standards 1 A01 01 JB code 569099825 Gary F. Simons Simons, Gary F. Gary F. Simons SIL International 01 01 JB code la.135.19bat 06 10.1075/la.135.19bat 251 261 11 Article 19 01 04 13. Sherwin Cody's school of English 13. Sherwin Cody's school of English 1 A01 01 JB code 12099826 Edwin Battistella Battistella, Edwin Edwin Battistella Southern Oregon University 01 01 JB code la.135.20ind 06 10.1075/la.135.20ind 263 265 3 Miscellaneous 20 01 04 Index Index 01 JB code JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 https://benjamins.com Amsterdam NL 00 John Benjamins Publishing Company Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers onix@benjamins.nl 04 01 00 20090108 C 2009 John Benjamins Publishing Company D 2009 John Benjamins Publishing Company 02 WORLD 13 15 9789027255181 WORLD 03 01 JB 17 Google 03 https://play.google.com/store/books 21 01 00 Unqualified price 00 105.00 EUR 01 00 Unqualified price 00 88.00 GBP 01 00 Unqualified price 00 158.00 USD