Article published in:
Bavarian Syntax: Contributions to the theory of syntax
Edited by Günther Grewendorf and Helmut Weiß
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 220] 2014
► pp. 83110
References

References

Abraham, Werner & Wiegel, Anko
1993Reduktionsformen und Kasussynkretismus bei deutschen und niederländischen Pronomina. In Dialektsyntax, Werner Abraham & Josef Bayer (eds), 12–49. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
1992A-morphous Morphology. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993Wackernagel’s revenge: Clitics, morphology and the syntax of second position. Language 69: 68–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Axel, Katrin & Weiß, Helmut
2011 Pro-drop in the history of German – From Old High German to the modern dialects. In Null Pronouns, Melani Wratil & Peter Gallmann (eds), 21–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef
1984COMP in Bavarian Syntax. The Linguistic Review 3: 209–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Hans C.
2002The Texas German Dialect Project (TGDP). <http://​www​.tgdp​.org> (4 June 2014).Google Scholar
2003Tracing dialect death: The Texas German dialect project. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Julie Larson & Mary Paster (eds), 387–398. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
2009The Life and Death of Texas German. Durham NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bücherl, Rainald & Keel, William D.
1996The Catholic Bukovinians in Kansas and Their Bohemian German Dialect. In German Emigration from Bukovina to the Americas, William D. Keel & Kurt Rein (eds), 277–284.Lawrence KS: Max Kade Center for German-American Studies.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
1992On cliticization in Germanic languages. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 17: 65–99.Google Scholar
1999Pronouns in Germanic and Romanic languages: An overview. In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), 33–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Christl-Sorcan, Astrid & Eller, Nicole
2008 Iazd muasst deitschbehmisch redn, ned des Englisch! Deutschböhmische Dialekte in Kansas und Minnesota. Klagenfurter Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 34: 58–76.Google Scholar
Clark, Robin & Roberts, Ian
1993A computational model of language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 299–345.Google Scholar
den Besten, Hans
1983On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 3], Werner Abraham (ed.), 47–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eller, Nicole
2006Syntax des bairischen Basisdialekts im Böhmerwald. Regensburg: Regensburger Dialektforum.Google Scholar
Fuß, Eric
2004Diachronic clues to pro-drop and complementizer agreement in Bavarian. In Diachronic Clues to Synchronic Grammar [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 72], Eric Fuß & Carola Trips (eds), 59–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005The Rise of Agreement [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 81]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuß, Eric & Wratil, Melani
2013Der Nullsubjektzyklus. Etablierung und Verlust von Nullargumenten. In Sprachwandelvergleich, Jürg Fleischer & Horst Simon (eds),Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther
1988Aspekte der deutschen Syntax. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1992Theory and Description in Generative Syntax: A Case Study in West Flemish. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1997Verb second, the split CP and null subjects. In Early Dutch Finite Clauses. GenGenP 4(2): 133–175.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris
1997Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30: PF: Papers At the Interface, Benjamin Bruening, Yoonjung Kang, & Martha McGinnis (eds), 425–450. Cambridge MA: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.Google Scholar
Harbert, Wayne
2007The Germanic Languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle
1995Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keel, William. D.
1981On dialect mixture: The case of Ellis County (Kansas) Volga-German. In Proceedings of the Mid-America Linguistics Conference 1981, Tina Bennett-Kastor (ed.), 320–325. Wichita.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1973Elsewhere in phonology. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 93–106.New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1995The Indo-European origins of Germanic syntax. In Clause Structure and Language Change, Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts (eds), 140–170. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1985Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20: 303–318.Google Scholar
Lessiak, Primus
1963Die Mundart von Kärnten in Pernegg. Marburg: N.G. Elwert.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1997Shifting triggers and diachronic reanalyses. In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds), 253–272. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lunte, Gabriele M.
2006Besondere Dialektmerkmale der bairisch-deutschböhmischen Mundart von Ellis, Kansas, USA. In Sprachinselwelten – The World of Language Island, Nina Berend & Elisabeth Knipf-Komlósi (eds). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2007The Catholic Bohemian German of Ellis County, Kansas. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R.
2001Mood and Modality, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pohl, Heinz-Dieter
1989Kleine Kärntner Mundartkunde mit Wörterbuch. Klagenfurt: Heyn.Google Scholar
Rein, Kurt
1996Bukovina on the eve of emigration. In German Emigration from Bukovina to the Americas, William D. Keel & Kurt Rein (eds), 37–44. Lawrence KS: Max Kade Center for German-American Studies. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ronneberger-Sibold, Elke
1994Konservative Nominalflexion und “klammerndes Verfahren” im Deutschen. In Funktionale Untersuchungen zur deutschen Nominal- und Verbalmorphologie, Klaus Michael Köpcke (ed.), 115–130. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Szczepaniak, Renata
2009Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Tišerová, Pavla
2008Tschechien. In Handbuch der deutschen Sprachminderheiten in Mittel- und Osteuropa, Ludwig M. Eichinger, Albrecht Plewnia & Claudia Maria Riehl (eds), 171–242. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah
2001Language Contact. Edinburgh: EUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wackernagel, Jacob
1892Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung. Indogermanische Forschungen 1: 333–436.Google Scholar
Weerman, Fred
1989The V2 Conspiracy. A Synchronic and Diachronic Analysis of Verbal Positions in Germanic Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Weiß, Helmut
1998Die Syntax des Bairischen. Studien zur Grammatik einer natürlichen Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Inflected complementizers in Continental West Germanic dialects. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik (ZDL) 72(2): 148–166.Google Scholar
Wiesinger, Peter
1989Die Flexionsmorphologie des Verbums im Bairischen. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Wratil, Melani
2013Double agreement in the Alpine languages. In Synchrony and Diachrony. A Dynamic Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series 133], Anna Giacalone-Ramat, Caterina Mauri & Piera Molinelli (eds), 201–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwart, Jan-Wouter
1997Morphosyntax of Verb Movement. A Minimalist Approach to the Syntax of Dutch. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar