Article published in:Bavarian Syntax: Contributions to the theory of syntax
Edited by Günther Grewendorf and Helmut Weiß
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 220] 2014
► pp. 83–110
The rise and fall of double agreement
A comparison between Carinthian and Kansas Bukovina Bohemian
This paper provides a comparative description and diachronic analysis of the syntactically conditioned 1st person plural subject agreement allomorphies that can be observed in the Bavarian varieties Carinthian and Kansas Bukovina Bohemian. It is shown that these occurrences of double agreement have to be analyzed as a result of cognitive selection procedures that operate during language acquisition ensuring the choice of the most specific forms and the most economical structures that are compatible with the Primary Linguistic Data. In Carinthian as well as in Kansas Bukovina Bohemian 1st person plural double agreement emerged from the reanalysis of cliticized 1st person plural subject pronouns as C-oriented agreement markers. But it has taken different developmental paths in the respective varieties. Whereas it has been fully restored after a partial loss in Carinthian, it disappeared almost entirely in Kansas Bukovina Bohemian. In both varieties the individual change of double agreement has brought about not only a specialization of verbal paradigms but also a considerable economization of syntactic derivations and representations.
Published online: 26 November 2014
Abraham, Werner & Wiegel, Anko
Axel, Katrin & Weiß, Helmut
Boas, Hans C.
2002 The Texas German Dialect Project (TGDP). <http://www.tgdp.org> (4 June 2014).
Bücherl, Rainald & Keel, William D.
Christl-Sorcan, Astrid & Eller, Nicole
Clark, Robin & Roberts, Ian
den Besten, Hans
Fuß, Eric & Wratil, Melani
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle
Keel, William. D.
Lunte, Gabriele M.