Article published in:
Finiteness Matters: On finiteness-related phenomena in natural languages
Edited by Kristin Melum Eide
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 231] 2016
► pp. 144
References

References

Aboh, Enoch Oladé
2006Complementation in Saramaccan and Gungbe: The case of C-type particles. Natural language and Linguistic Theory 24: 1-55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adger, David
2007Three domains of finiteness: A minimalist perspective. In Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness. Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, 23-58.Google Scholar
Akmajian, Adrian
1984Sentence types and form-function fit. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2: 1-23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alboiu, Gabriela & Motapanyane, Virginia
2000The generative approach to Romanian grammar: An overview. In Comparative Studies in Romanian Syntax, Virginia Motapayane (ed.), 1-48. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena
1999EPP without Spec, IP. In Specifiers: Minimalist Approaches, David Adger, Susan Pintzuk, Bernadette Plunkett & George Tsoulas (eds), 93-109. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Amritavalli, Raghavachari
2014Separating tense and finiteness: Anchoring in Dravidian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32: 283-306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef
1984Comp in Bavarian syntax. The Linguistic Review 3: 209-274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina
2003On finiteness as logophoric anchoring. In Temps et points de vue/Tense and Point of View, Jacqueline Guéron & Liliane Tasmovski (eds), 213-246. Nanterre: Université Paris X.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek
1981Roots of Language. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
1984The Language Bioprogram Hypothesis. The Behavioral andBrain Sciences 7: 173-188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bisang, Walter
2001Finite vs. non finite languages. In Language Typology and Language Universals, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1400–1413. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter,Google Scholar
Blom, Elma
2007Modality, infinitives and finite bare verbs in Dutch and English child language. Language Acquisition 14(1): 75-113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blom, Elma & Baayen, Harald
2013The impact of verb form, sentence position, home language and L2 proficiency on subject-verb agreement in child L2 Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics 34(4): 777-811. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blom, Elma, Paradis, Johanne & Sorenson-Duncan, Tamara
2012Effects of input properties, vocabulary size and L1 on the development of third person singulars in child L2 English. Language Learning 62(3): 965-994. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blom, Elma & Vasić, Nada
2011The production and processing of determiner-noun agreement in child L2 Dutch. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1-3: 265-290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blom, Elma & Paradis, Johanne
2013Past tense production by English second language learners with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 56: 281-294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boser, Katharina, Lust, Barbara, Santelmann, Lynn & Whitman, John
1992The syntax of V2 in early child German grammar: The Strong Continuity Hypothesis. Proceedings of the Northeastern Linguistic Society 22: 51-66.Google Scholar
Byrne, Francis
1987Grammatical Relations in a Radical Creole. Verb Complementation in Saramaccan [Creole Language Library 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1973Conditions on transformations. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 232-285. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1980On binding. Linguistic Inquiry 11:1–46.Google Scholar
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89-115. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale. A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1-52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Clahsen, Harald & Penke, Martina
1992The acquisition of agreement morphology andits syntactic consequences: New evidence on German child language from the Simone-corpus. In The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition, Jürgen Meisel (ed.), 181-223. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clements, George Nick
1990The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology I, John Kingston & Mary Beckman (eds), 283-333. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976Aspect. Cambridge: CUP. Cowper, Elizabeth. 2005. The geometry of interpretable features: Infl in English and Spanish. Language 81(1): 10—46.Google Scholar
1986Tense in indirect speech, Folia Linguistica 20: 265-296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen
2010Ellipsis in Dutch Dialects. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Damonte, Federico
2002The complementizer layer in Saramaccan. In Current Issues in Generative Grammar. 10th Colloquium on Generative Grammar, Selected Papers, Manuel Leonetti, Olga Fernandez Soriano & Victoria Escandell Vidal (eds), 31—50. Alcalá de Henares: University of Alcalá de Henares.Google Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida & Uribe-Etxebarria, Myriam
2000The primitives of temporal relations. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 157-186. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004The syntax of time adverbs. In The Syntax of Time [Current Studies in Linguistics 37], Jacqueline Guéron & Jacqueline Lecarme (eds), 143-179. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
De Houwer, Annick
1990The Acquisition of Two Languages from Birth: A case Study. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
den Besten, Hans
1977/1983On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. Ms, University of Amsterdam. Published 1981 in Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanischen Linguistik 20, 1-78; republished in Werner Abraham (ed.). 1983. On the Formal Syntax of Westgermania [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 3], 47-131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen
2001Head-to-Head Merge in Balkan subjunctives and locality. In Comparative Syntax of Balkan Languages, María Luisa Rivero & Angela Ralli (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Eide, Kristin Melum
2005Norwegian Modals [Studies in Generative Grammar 74]. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
2009aTense, finiteness and the survive principle: Temporal chains in a crash-proof grammar. In Towards a Derivational Syntax: Survive-minimalism [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 144], Michael T. Putnam (ed.) 91-132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009bFiniteness: The haves and the have-nots. In Advances in Comparative Germanic Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 141], Artemis Alexiadou, Jorge Hankamer, Thomas McFadden, Justin Nuger & Florian Schäfer (eds), 357–390. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frege, Gottlob
1892Der Gedanke. Logische Untersuchungen, Günther Patzig (ed.). 1986(3), 30-53. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
George, Leland M. & Cornfilt, Jaklin
1981Finiteness and boundedness in Turkish. In Binding and Filtering, Frank Heny (ed.), 105-127. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1990Syntax. A Functional-typological Introduction, Vol. II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gretsch, Petra & Perdue, Clive
2007Finiteness in first and second language acquisition. In Nikolaeva Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness. Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, 432-484.Google Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes
2000Null modals in Germanic (and Romance): Infinitival exclamatives. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 14: 43-61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1985INFL, COMP and nominative case assignment in Flemish infinitivals. In Features and Projections, Pieter Muysken & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 123-137. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1992Theory and Description in Generative Syntax. A Case Study in West Flemish. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1996Verb second, the split CP and null subjects in early Dutch finite clauses. GenGenP. http://​ling​.auf​.net​/lingBuzz​/001059Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Ritter, Elizabeth
2002Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78(3): 482-526. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, Belma & Schwartz, Bonnie D.
1997Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Elizabeth Hughes, Mary Hughes & Annabel Greenhill (eds), 257–268. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars
1988Anaphora in Norwegian and the Theory of Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Hinzelin, Marc-Olivier
2003The acquisition of subjects in Bilingual children: Pronoun use in Portuguese-German children. In (In)Vulnerable Domains in Multilingualism [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 1], Natascha Müller (ed.), 107-137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2001The syntax of yes and no in Finnish. Studia Linguistica 55(2): 141-175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Null subjects and polarity focus. Studia Linguistica 61(3): 212-236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013The syntax of answers to polar questions in English and Swedish. Lingua 128: 31-50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Verb second. In Syntax –Theory and Analysis: An International Handbook, Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 342-382. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders, Nikanne, Urpo, Oraviita, Irmeli, Reime, Hannu & Trosterud, Trond
1993The structure of INFL and the finite clause in Finnish. In Case and Other Functional Categories in Finnish Syntax, Anders Holmberg & Urpo Nikanne (eds), 177-206. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders & Platzack, Christer
1988On the role of inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 42: 25-42.Google Scholar
1995The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert
1990As Time Goes By—Tense and Universal Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hulk, Aafke & Müller, Natascha
2000Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3: 227-244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, Tania & Wexler, Ken
2002Why is 'is' easier than 's'? Acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child L2-English learners. Second Language Research 18(2): 95-136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Josefsson, Gunlög
1999Non-finite root clauses in Swedish child language. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 63: 105-150.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
1992The present perfect puzzle. Language 68: 525-552. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1998Assertion and finiteness. In Issues in the Theory of Language Acquisition: Essays in Honor of Jürgen Weissenborn, Norbert Dittmar & Zvi Penner (eds), 225–245. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2006On finiteness. In Semantics in Acquisition, Veerle van Geenhoven (ed.), 245—272. Heidelberg: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Finiteness, Universal Grammar and the language faculty. In Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Keiko Nakamura & Seyda Ozcaliskan (eds), 333-344. New York NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Klima, Edward S. & Bellugi [-Klima], Urula
1966Syntactic regularities in the speech of children. In Psycholinguistic Papers, John Lyons & Roger J. Wales (eds), 183-208. Edinburgh: EUP. Also published in barbara lust & Claire Foley (eds). 2004. First Language Acquisition: The Essential Readings, 344-366. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
1994Finiteness. In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Ronald E. Asher (ed.), 1245-1248. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, Silvia
1990Complementizer ‘pa’. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 5: 39-52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2013Response particles as propositional anaphors. In Proceedings of SALT 23, Todd Snider (ed.), 1-18. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan
2004The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 811-877. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lasser, Ingeborg
1997Finiteness in Adult and Child German [MPI Series in Psycholinguistics 8]. Wageningen: Ponsen and Looijen.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
1998Variation in the Romance infinitive: The case of southern Calabrian inflected infinitive. Transactions of the Philological Society 96(1): 1-61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000A Comparative Syntax of the Dialects of Southern Italy: A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2007Diachrony and finiteness: Subordination in the dialects of southern Italy. In Finiteness. Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 335-431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lødrup, Helge
2009Animacy and long distance binding in Norwegian. Nordic Journal ofLinguistics 32: 111–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lohnstein, Horst
2000Satzmodus – kompositionell. Zur Parametrizierung der Modus-phrase im Deutshen. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
2001Sentence mood constitution and indefinite noun phrases. Theoretical Linguistics 27(2-3): 187—214. Special issue NP Interpretation and Information Structure, Klaus von Heusinger & Kerstin Schwabe (eds). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lohnstein, Horst & Bredel, Ursula
2004Inflectional morphology and sentence mood in German. In Horst Lohstein & Susanne Trissler (eds), Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery, 235—264. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maas, Utz
2004‘Finite’ and ‘nonfinite’ from a typological perspective. Linguistics 42(2): 359—385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Peter H.
1997The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas & Sundaresan, Sandhya
2014Finiteness in South Asian languages:An introduction. Natural language and Linguistic Theory 32: 1-27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, John
2005Defining Creole. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen
2001The simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: Early differentiation and subsequent development of grammars. In Trends in Bilingual Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research 1], Jasone Cenoz & Fred Genesee (eds), 11-41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko & Dijkhoff, Marta
1989On the so-called ‘infinitive’ in Atlantic Creoles. Lingua 77: 297-330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muysken, Pieter & Law, Paul
2001Creole studies: A theoretical linguist’s field guide. Glot International 5 (2): 47–57.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina
(ed.) 2007Finiteness. Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2007bIntroduction. In Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness. Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, 1-19.Google Scholar
2007cConstructional economy and nonfinite independent clauses. In Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), Finiteness. Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, 138-180.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Torrego, Esther
2001T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 355-426. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004Tense, case, and syntactic categories. In The Syntax of Time, Jacqueline Guéron & Jacqueline Lecarme (eds), 495-537. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2007The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic Derivation and Interpretation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 101], Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian & Wendy Wilkins (eds), 262 – 294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer
1995The loss of verb second in English and French. In Clause Structure and Language Change, Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts (eds), 200-226. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2010Den fantastiska grammatiken: En minimalistisk beskrivning av Svenskan. Stockholm: Norstedts.Google Scholar
Plunkett, Kim & Strömqvist, Sven
1990The acquisition of Scandinavian languages. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 59.Google Scholar
Polišenská, Daniela
2010Dutch children’s acquisition of verbal and adjectival inflection. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam. http://​www​.lotpublications​.nl​/publish​/issues​/Polisenska​/index​.html
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989Verb movement, UG and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365-424.Google Scholar
Prévost, Philippe
2003Truncation and missing surface inflection in initial L2 German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25: 65-97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raposo, Eduardo P.
1987Case theory and Infl-to-Comp: The inflected infinitive in European Portuguese. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 101-136.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans
1947Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
2006Interface Strategies: Optimal and Costly Computations. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya & Reuland, Eric
1993Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24(4): 657-720.Google Scholar
Reuland, Eric
2011Anaphora and Language Design. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reuland, Eric & Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigríður
1997Long distance binding in Icelandic: Syntax or discourse? In Atomism in Binding, Hans Bennis, Pierre Pica & Johan Rooryck (eds), 323–334. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth & Wiltschko, Martina
2005Anchoring utterances without tense. In West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 24, John Alderete, Chung-hye Han & Alexei Kochetov (eds), 345-351. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
2009Varieties of INFL: TENSE, LOCATION and PERSON. In Alternatives to Cartography, Jeroen van Craenenbroeck (ed.), 153-201. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014The composition of INFL. An exploration of tense, tenseless languages, and tenseless constructions. Natural Language and linguistic Theory 32: 1331-1386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1990On the anaphor agreement effect. Rivista di Linguistica 2: 27-42.Google Scholar
1996Residual verb second and the wh-criterion. In Parameters and Functional Heads, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 63-90. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Wh-movement: Moving on, Lisa Lai-shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 97-133. Cambridg, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Shlonsky, Ur
2006Satisfying the subject criterion by a non-subject: English locative inversion and heavy NP shift. In Phases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 341-361. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Strategies of subject extraction. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky's Minimalism and the View from Syntax-semantics, Hans-Martin Gärtner & Uli Sauerland (eds), 115-160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter,Google Scholar
Rohrbacher, Bernhard Wolfgang
1999Morphology-Driven Syntax: A Theory of V to I Raising and Pro-drop [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne
1993Pidgin and Creole Languages. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rouveret, Alain
1980Sur la notion de proposition finie: Gouvernement et inversion. Recherches Linguistiques 9: 76–140.Google Scholar
Roussou, Anna
2009In the mood for control. Lingua 119(12): 1811-1836. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trask, Robert Lawrence
1993A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Siegel, Muffy
1987Compositionality, case, and the scope of auxiliaries. Linguistics and Philosophy 10: 53-75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
1990Long distance reflexives and moods in Icelandic. In Modern Icelandic Syntax, Joan Maling & Annie Zaenen (eds), 309–346. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór
2004The syntax of person, tense, and speech features. Italian Journal of Linguistics 16: 219—251.Google Scholar
2010On EPP effects. Studia Linguistica 64:159–189.Google Scholar
2012Minimalist C/case. Linguistic Inquiry 43:191–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simonsen, Hanne G. & Bjerkan, Kirsten M.
1998Testing past tense inflection in Norwegian: A diagnostic tool for identifying SLI children? International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8(2): 251-270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Speas, Peggy & Tenny, Carol
2003Configurational properties and point-of-view roles. In Asymmetry in Grammar, Vol. I: Syntax and Semantics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 57], Anna Maria Di Scullio (ed.), 315-144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stowell, Tim
1995What do the present and past tenses mean? In Temporal Reference, Aspect and Actionality, Vol.1: Semantic and Syntactic Perspectives, Pier Marco Bertinetto, Valentina Bianchi, James Higginbotham & Mario Squartini (eds), 381-396. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier.Google Scholar
Sundaresan, Sandhya
& McFadden, Thomas 2009DP distribution and finiteness in Tamil and other languages: Selection vs case. Journal of South Asian Linguistics 2: 5-34.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna
2009Overt nominative subjects in infinitival complements in Hungarian. In Approaches to Hungarian 11: Papers from the 2007 NYU Conference, Marcel den Dikken & Robert M. Vago (eds), 251-276. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert
2006On the semantic motivation of syntactic verb movement to C in German. Theoretical Linguistics 32(3): 257-306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vasić, Nada & Blom, Elma
2011Production and processing of determiners in Turkish-Dutch L2 children. In BUCLD 35: Proceedings of the 35th annual Conference on Language Acquisition and Development, Nick Danis, Kate Mesh & Hyunsuk Sung (eds), 616-627. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Verrips, Maaike & Weissenborn, Jürgen
1992Routes to verb placement in early German and French: The independence of finiteness and agreement. In The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition, Jürgen Meisel (ed.), 283-331. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weerman, Fred
1989The V2 Conspiracy. A Synchronic and a Diachronic Analysis of Verbal Positions in Germanic Languages. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Weiss, Helmut
2005Inflected complementizers in continental West Germanic dialects. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 72(2): 148-166.Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth
1999Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. In Language Acquisition: Knowledge Representation and Processing, Antonella Sorace, Caroline Heycock & Richard Shillock (eds), special issue of Lingua , 23-79. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Yip, Virginia & Matthews, Stephen
2007The Bilingual Child: Early Development and Language Contact. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwart, Jan-Wouter
1993Dutch Syntax: A Minimalist Approach. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen [Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics 10].
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Reiner, Tabea
2019.  In Morphological Variation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 207],  pp. 283 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.