190016839 03 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code LA 232 Hb 15 9789027257154 06 10.1075/la.232 13 2016013265 00 BB 08 640 gr 10 01 JB code LA 02 0166-0829 02 232.00 01 02 Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 01 01 Inner-sentential Propositional Proforms Syntactic properties and interpretative effects Inner-sentential Propositional Proforms: Syntactic properties and interpretative effects 1 B01 01 JB code 352257216 Werner Frey Frey, Werner Werner Frey ZAS Berlin 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/352257216 2 B01 01 JB code 525257217 André Meinunger Meinunger, André André Meinunger ZAS Berlin 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/525257217 3 B01 01 JB code 297257218 Kerstin Schwabe Schwabe, Kerstin Kerstin Schwabe ZAS Berlin 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/297257218 01 eng 11 284 03 03 v 03 00 278 03 01 23 415 03 2016 P285 04 Grammar, Comparative and general--Propositional phrases. 04 Grammar, Comparative and general--Syntax. 04 German language--Grammar, Comparative--Dutch. 04 Dutch language--Grammar, Comparative--German. 10 LAN009000 12 CFK 24 JB code LIN.GENER Generative linguistics 24 JB code LIN.SEMAN Semantics 24 JB code LIN.SYNTAX Syntax 24 JB code LIN.THEOR Theoretical linguistics 01 06 02 00 This book deals with sentential proforms and their relationship to their associated clauses. 03 00 This book deals with sentential proforms and their relationship to their associated clauses. Sentential proforms are highly interesting from the point of view of grammatical theory, since their occurrence is determined not only by syntax, but also by prosody and semantics. The present volume contributes to a better understanding of the interfaces between these different levels. By providing syntactic, prosodic, semantic, psycholinguistic and corpus-based support, this book underpins the claim that there exist different sentential proform types in German and Dutch, that these proform types correlate with different verb classes, and that their associated related clauses are located in different syntactic positions. The present volume also looks at a Hungarian sentential proform construction, which is similar to the German(ic) structure, but, at the same time, is different in its licensing conditions. 01 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/la.232.png 01 01 D502 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027257154.jpg 01 01 D504 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027257154.tif 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/la.232.hb.png 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/la.232.png 02 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/la.232.hb.png 03 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/la.232.hb.png 01 01 JB code la.232.01sch 06 10.1075/la.232.01sch 1 22 22 Article 1 01 04 Sentential proforms Sentential proforms 01 04 An overview An overview 1 A01 01 JB code 281266081 Kerstin Schwabe Schwabe, Kerstin Kerstin Schwabe 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/281266081 2 A01 01 JB code 604266082 Werner Frey Frey, Werner Werner Frey 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/604266082 3 A01 01 JB code 645266083 André Meinunger Meinunger, André André Meinunger 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/645266083 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.232.02sud 06 10.1075/la.232.02sud 23 48 26 Article 2 01 04 Correlates of object clauses in German and Dutch Correlates of object clauses in German and Dutch 1 A01 01 JB code 926266084 Stefan Sudhoff Sudhoff, Stefan Stefan Sudhoff 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/926266084 01 eng 30 00 This paper deals with usages of the German pronoun es (and its counterpart het in Dutch) as a correlate of extraposed object clauses. It is argued (i) that es is the head of an argument DP and takes the embedded clause as its complement; (ii) that there are two types of matrix predicates, one of them being compatible with correlate-es, the other one incompatible; and (iii) that correlate-es has to be distinguished from an anaphoric use of the pronoun es that is possible in constructions with both types of matrix predicates, but has different contextual requirements. 01 01 JB code la.232.03axe 06 10.1075/la.232.03axe 49 72 24 Article 3 01 04 Correlative es vs. das in German Correlative es vs. das in German 01 04 An empirical perspective An empirical perspective 1 A01 01 JB code 338266085 Katrin Axel-Tober Axel-Tober, Katrin Katrin Axel-Tober 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/338266085 2 A01 01 JB code 385266086 Anke Holler Holler, Anke Anke Holler 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/385266086 3 A01 01 JB code 715266087 Helena Krause Krause, Helena Helena Krause 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/715266087 01 eng 30 00 In the last few decades, the role of correlative elements in recursive sentence embedding has received considerable attention. In the theoretical literature on German, it has been argued that the syntax of correlative constructions is not homogeneous and that one has to distinguish between so-called pro-form and placeholder constructions. In this paper, we give empirical evidence for distinguishing between these two uses, by focusing on two correlative lexemes: es and das. Furthermore, we present psycholinguistic and corpus-based support for the differentiation of two verb classes regarding the realizations of correlative elements. 01 01 JB code la.232.04fre 06 10.1075/la.232.04fre 73 104 32 Article 4 01 04 On properties differentiating constructions with inner-sentential pro-forms for clauses On properties differentiating constructions with inner-sentential pro-forms for clauses 1 A01 01 JB code 5266088 Werner Frey Frey, Werner Werner Frey 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/5266088 01 eng 30 00 The paper discusses various syntactic properties of different constructions featuring a dependent clause associated with a pro-form. The paper adopts the thesis of Pütz (19862) and Sudhoff (2003) that the pro-form construction with verbs of the class to which bedauern (‘to regret’) belongs and the pro-form construction with verbs of the class which contains behaupten (‘to claim’) have to be differentiated. With regard to the former it is argued that contrary to standard assumptions, the presence of the pro-form makes a syntactic and a semantic difference. Regarding the construction in which the pro-form has the function of a prepositional object the argumentation is different in that the very same syntax is present independent of whether the pro-form is lexically realised or not, whether the pro-form is unstressed or stressed, or whether it is reduced or not. However, a special interpretation – narrow focus on the dependent clause – arises when the prepositional part of the pro-form is stressed. For the construction with a dependent adverbial clause the presence or absence of a lexically realised pro-form is again crucial. Finally and most importantly, it is demonstrated that a further construction has to be distinguished. It features a psych-verb with an experiencer-object, es and a clausal argument. In this construction, es is not a pro-form for the clausal argument as such but an independent argument which is co-referential with the clause and encodes the causer of the emotion. 01 01 JB code la.232.05tru 06 10.1075/la.232.05tru 105 146 42 Article 5 01 04 Some distinctions in the right periphery of the German clause Some distinctions in the right periphery of the German clause 1 A01 01 JB code 156266089 Hubert Truckenbrodt Truckenbrodt, Hubert Hubert Truckenbrodt 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/156266089 01 eng 30 00 Right dislocation/afterthought (resuming a pronoun) obeys prosody and information structure restrictions not shared by extraposition (leaving a gap) in German. Right dislocation/afterthought requires that the preceding clause is an intonation phrase carrying sentence stress on its own. It also requires that no focus-background structure is built across the clause and the dislocated element. Neither requirement is present with extraposition. The syntactic analysis derives right dislocation/afterthought from full clauses by deletion. The separate clause is outside of the root sentence of Bruce Downing (1970), which is tentatively identified with the non-integrated clauses of Reis (1997) and Holler (2008). Earlier analyses are confirmed in a related case: What looks like the resumption of es ‘it’ by clauses (Germ. Korrelate) under certain matrix verbs seems to be syntactic extraposition from [DP es CP] instead. 01 01 JB code la.232.06zim 06 10.1075/la.232.06zim 147 170 24 Article 6 01 04 Phonological, morphosyntactic and semantic properties of es Phonological, morphosyntactic and semantic properties of es 1 A01 01 JB code 435266090 Ilse Zimmermann Zimmermann, Ilse Ilse Zimmermann 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/435266090 01 eng 30 00 The contribution deals with the German multifunctional item es and its suppletive forms dessen, dem and da(r). Their phonological, morphosyntactic and semantic lexical properties are considered and represented in corresponding lexical entries. The focus of attention is on the interrelation of the anaphoric and cataphoric functions of es and its role in sentence embedding. As far as possible, a unified syntactic and semantic analysis is given. As for the pro-form and the correlate es, I follow the differentiation of two matrix-predicate classes made by Sudhoff (2003) and try to add necessary distinctions and semantic considerations. For some types of matrix-predicates lexical representations are proposed. It is assumed that the correlate has an obligatory propositional argument, while the pro-forms es, dessen, dem, and da(r) occur separately or are accompanied by an apposition. The extraposition of the propositional argument of the correlate takes place for phonological and/or computational reasons and is not visible, semantically. In contrast, explicative constituents of pronouns and pro-forms can be base-generated right-dislocated to the matrix-sentence and are semantically correlated with their antecedent. The same seems true for cleft-constructions. It is discussed what it means to supply embedded clauses with nominal character. In this connection, a comparison is made between DPs with a pronominal head and DPs with a determiner and a lexical head with regard to their role in the embedding of clauses. 01 01 JB code la.232.07nol 06 10.1075/la.232.07nol 171 210 40 Article 7 01 04 On the formation of prepositional adverbs in Modern German On the formation of prepositional adverbs in Modern German 01 04 A case study on darunter A case study on darunter 1 A01 01 JB code 894266091 Andreas Nolda Nolda, Andreas Andreas Nolda 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/894266091 01 eng 30 00 In this paper, I defend the hypothesis that each prepositional adverb in Modern German is formed from an adverb and a preposition – and not from two adverbs, as recently suggested in the literature. As major support for this hypothesis, I show on the example of darunter that the intensions of the lexical meanings of non-idiomatic prepositional adverbs are compositionally built from the intensions of preposition meanings by combining them in an appropriate way with the intension of an adverb meaning. The proposed analysis, formulated within the general framework of Integrational Linguistics (IL), also provides a solution for the animacy problem of prepositional adverbs, i.e. the problem that many prepositional adverbs in Modern German do not phorically take up animated entities, in particular, persons. This restriction follows, it is argued, from a sortal restriction inherited from the preposition meaning. While syntactic semantics can accommodate preposition meanings in order to properly relate preposition complement interpretations, there is no such accommodation in the case of prepositional adverbs, their valence being lexically reduced by one. 01 01 JB code la.232.08sch 06 10.1075/la.232.08sch 211 240 30 Article 8 01 04 Sentential proforms and argument conditionals Sentential proforms and argument conditionals 1 A01 01 JB code 50266092 Kerstin Schwabe Schwabe, Kerstin Kerstin Schwabe 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/50266092 01 eng 30 00 The paper is about the relationship between German argument wenn-clauses and their proforms as in Lea bedauert es, wenn Mia Klavier spielt ‘Lea regrets it if Mia plays the piano’. Confirming and complementing Fabricius-Hansen’s (1980) view that these clauses are proper adverbials and simultaneously provide a propositional argument for a matrix predicate, the paper regards argument wenn-clauses as left- or right TP-adjuncts that m-command a sentential proform. It shows that the proform can also be pro if it represents an obligatory propositional argument. This pro is locally m-bound by the argument wenn-clause and itself locally m-binds an argument dass-clause. The latter is a right vP-adjunct and can be deleted if it is coreferential with the argument wenn-clause, if both are alike with respect to their information structural status, if they are identical with respect to their C’, and if they are adjacent. 01 01 JB code la.232.09bra 06 10.1075/la.232.09bra 241 270 30 Article 9 01 04 Rethinking clausal asymmetries Rethinking clausal asymmetries 01 04 Propositional pronoun insertion in Hungarian Propositional pronoun insertion in Hungarian 1 A01 01 JB code 468266093 Johan Brandtler Brandtler, Johan Johan Brandtler 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/468266093 2 A01 01 JB code 537266094 Valéria Molnár Molnár, Valéria Valéria Molnár 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/537266094 01 eng 30 00 This paper proposes a theoretically minimal analysis of cataphoric propositional pronoun insertion in complex sentences in Hungarian, based on the realization of the SpecCP in the embedded clause. In accordance with Chomsky (2008), we assume that the derivation of SpecCP results from the instantiation of the edge-feature in C. We argue that syntax universally provides two clause types: those with an edge-feature (EF) in C, and those lacking an edge-feature in C. As propositional pronoun insertion is dependent on the availability of SpecCP, it is only possible in [+EF]-clauses. In our modular framework, we regard the EF as semantically vacuous, although it can be associated with different semantic contents in different languages. In Hungarian, the semantic content of the EF can be rendered in terms of predicationality. As we demonstrate, pronoun insertion has information-structural effects in Hungarian, a fact that can be seen as an immediate consequence of the claimed correlation between the EF and predicationality. 01 01 JB code la.232.10nam 06 10.1075/la.232.10nam 271 272 2 Article 10 01 04 Name Index Name Index 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.232.11sub 06 10.1075/la.232.11sub 273 278 6 Article 11 01 04 Subject Index Subject Index 01 eng 01 JB code JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 https://benjamins.com 02 https://benjamins.com/catalog/la.232 Amsterdam NL 00 John Benjamins Publishing Company Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers onix@benjamins.nl 04 01 00 20160726 C 2016 John Benjamins D 2016 John Benjamins 02 WORLD WORLD US CA MX 09 01 JB 1 John Benjamins Publishing Company +31 20 6304747 +31 20 6739773 bookorder@benjamins.nl 01 https://benjamins.com 21 27 22 01 00 Unqualified price 02 JB 1 02 99.00 EUR 02 00 Unqualified price 02 83.00 01 Z 0 GBP GB US CA MX 01 01 JB 2 John Benjamins Publishing Company +1 800 562-5666 +1 703 661-1501 benjamins@presswarehouse.com 01 https://benjamins.com 21 27 22 01 00 Unqualified price 02 JB 1 02 149.00 USD 833017382 03 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code LA 232 GE 15 9789027266941 06 10.1075/la.232 13 2016024235 00 EA E133 10 01 JB code LA 02 JB code 0166-0829 02 232.00 01 02 Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 01 01 Inner-sentential Propositional Proforms Inner-sentential Propositional Proforms 1 B01 01 JB code 352257216 Werner Frey Frey, Werner Werner Frey ZAS Berlin 2 B01 01 JB code 525257217 André Meinunger Meinunger, André André Meinunger ZAS Berlin 3 B01 01 JB code 297257218 Kerstin Schwabe Schwabe, Kerstin Kerstin Schwabe ZAS Berlin 01 eng 11 284 03 03 v 03 00 278 03 24 JB code LIN.GENER Generative linguistics 24 JB code LIN.SEMAN Semantics 24 JB code LIN.SYNTAX Syntax 24 JB code LIN.THEOR Theoretical linguistics 10 LAN009000 12 CFK 01 06 02 00 This book deals with sentential proforms and their relationship to their associated clauses. 03 00 This book deals with sentential proforms and their relationship to their associated clauses. Sentential proforms are highly interesting from the point of view of grammatical theory, since their occurrence is determined not only by syntax, but also by prosody and semantics. The present volume contributes to a better understanding of the interfaces between these different levels. By providing syntactic, prosodic, semantic, psycholinguistic and corpus-based support, this book underpins the claim that there exist different sentential proform types in German and Dutch, that these proform types correlate with different verb classes, and that their associated related clauses are located in different syntactic positions. The present volume also looks at a Hungarian sentential proform construction, which is similar to the German(ic) structure, but, at the same time, is different in its licensing conditions. 01 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/la.232.png 01 01 D502 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027257154.jpg 01 01 D504 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027257154.tif 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/la.232.hb.png 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/la.232.png 02 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/la.232.hb.png 03 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/la.232.hb.png 01 01 JB code la.232.01sch 06 10.1075/la.232.01sch 1 22 22 Article 1 01 04 Sentential proforms Sentential proforms 01 04 An overview An overview 1 A01 01 JB code 281266081 Kerstin Schwabe Schwabe, Kerstin Kerstin Schwabe 2 A01 01 JB code 604266082 Werner Frey Frey, Werner Werner Frey 3 A01 01 JB code 645266083 André Meinunger Meinunger, André André Meinunger 01 01 JB code la.232.02sud 06 10.1075/la.232.02sud 23 48 26 Article 2 01 04 Correlates of object clauses in German and Dutch Correlates of object clauses in German and Dutch 1 A01 01 JB code 926266084 Stefan Sudhoff Sudhoff, Stefan Stefan Sudhoff 01 01 JB code la.232.03axe 06 10.1075/la.232.03axe 49 72 24 Article 3 01 04 Correlative es vs. das in German Correlative es vs. das in German 01 04 An empirical perspective An empirical perspective 1 A01 01 JB code 338266085 Katrin Axel-Tober Axel-Tober, Katrin Katrin Axel-Tober 2 A01 01 JB code 385266086 Anke Holler Holler, Anke Anke Holler 3 A01 01 JB code 715266087 Helena Krause Krause, Helena Helena Krause 01 01 JB code la.232.04fre 06 10.1075/la.232.04fre 73 104 32 Article 4 01 04 On properties differentiating constructions with inner-sentential pro-forms for clauses On properties differentiating constructions with inner-sentential pro-forms for clauses 1 A01 01 JB code 5266088 Werner Frey Frey, Werner Werner Frey 01 01 JB code la.232.05tru 06 10.1075/la.232.05tru 105 146 42 Article 5 01 04 Some distinctions in the right periphery of the German clause Some distinctions in the right periphery of the German clause 1 A01 01 JB code 156266089 Hubert Truckenbrodt Truckenbrodt, Hubert Hubert Truckenbrodt 01 01 JB code la.232.06zim 06 10.1075/la.232.06zim 147 170 24 Article 6 01 04 Phonological, morphosyntactic and semantic properties of es Phonological, morphosyntactic and semantic properties of es 1 A01 01 JB code 435266090 Ilse Zimmermann Zimmermann, Ilse Ilse Zimmermann 01 01 JB code la.232.07nol 06 10.1075/la.232.07nol 171 210 40 Article 7 01 04 On the formation of prepositional adverbs in Modern German On the formation of prepositional adverbs in Modern German 01 04 A case study on darunter A case study on darunter 1 A01 01 JB code 894266091 Andreas Nolda Nolda, Andreas Andreas Nolda 01 01 JB code la.232.08sch 06 10.1075/la.232.08sch 211 240 30 Article 8 01 04 Sentential proforms and argument conditionals Sentential proforms and argument conditionals 1 A01 01 JB code 50266092 Kerstin Schwabe Schwabe, Kerstin Kerstin Schwabe 01 01 JB code la.232.09bra 06 10.1075/la.232.09bra 241 270 30 Article 9 01 04 Rethinking clausal asymmetries Rethinking clausal asymmetries 01 04 Propositional pronoun insertion in Hungarian Propositional pronoun insertion in Hungarian 1 A01 01 JB code 468266093 Johan Brandtler Brandtler, Johan Johan Brandtler 2 A01 01 JB code 537266094 Valéria Molnár Molnár, Valéria Valéria Molnár 01 01 JB code la.232.10nam 06 10.1075/la.232.10nam 271 272 2 Article 10 01 04 Name Index Name Index 01 01 JB code la.232.11sub 06 10.1075/la.232.11sub 273 278 6 Article 11 01 04 Subject Index Subject Index 01 JB code JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 https://benjamins.com Amsterdam NL 00 John Benjamins Publishing Company Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers onix@benjamins.nl 04 01 00 20160726 C 2016 John Benjamins D 2016 John Benjamins 02 WORLD 13 15 9789027257154 WORLD 03 01 JB 17 Google 03 https://play.google.com/store/books 21 01 00 Unqualified price 00 99.00 EUR 01 00 Unqualified price 00 83.00 GBP 01 00 Unqualified price 00 149.00 USD 912016840 03 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code LA 232 Eb 15 9789027266941 06 10.1075/la.232 13 2016024235 00 EA E107 10 01 JB code LA 02 0166-0829 02 232.00 01 02 Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 11 01 JB code jbe-all 01 02 Full EBA collection (ca. 4,200 titles) 11 01 JB code jbe-2016 01 02 2016 collection (147 titles) 05 02 2016 collection 01 01 Inner-sentential Propositional Proforms Syntactic properties and interpretative effects Inner-sentential Propositional Proforms: Syntactic properties and interpretative effects 1 B01 01 JB code 352257216 Werner Frey Frey, Werner Werner Frey ZAS Berlin 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/352257216 2 B01 01 JB code 525257217 André Meinunger Meinunger, André André Meinunger ZAS Berlin 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/525257217 3 B01 01 JB code 297257218 Kerstin Schwabe Schwabe, Kerstin Kerstin Schwabe ZAS Berlin 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/297257218 01 eng 11 284 03 03 v 03 00 278 03 01 23 415 03 2016 P285 04 Grammar, Comparative and general--Propositional phrases. 04 Grammar, Comparative and general--Syntax. 04 German language--Grammar, Comparative--Dutch. 04 Dutch language--Grammar, Comparative--German. 10 LAN009000 12 CFK 24 JB code LIN.GENER Generative linguistics 24 JB code LIN.SEMAN Semantics 24 JB code LIN.SYNTAX Syntax 24 JB code LIN.THEOR Theoretical linguistics 01 06 02 00 This book deals with sentential proforms and their relationship to their associated clauses. 03 00 This book deals with sentential proforms and their relationship to their associated clauses. Sentential proforms are highly interesting from the point of view of grammatical theory, since their occurrence is determined not only by syntax, but also by prosody and semantics. The present volume contributes to a better understanding of the interfaces between these different levels. By providing syntactic, prosodic, semantic, psycholinguistic and corpus-based support, this book underpins the claim that there exist different sentential proform types in German and Dutch, that these proform types correlate with different verb classes, and that their associated related clauses are located in different syntactic positions. The present volume also looks at a Hungarian sentential proform construction, which is similar to the German(ic) structure, but, at the same time, is different in its licensing conditions. 01 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/la.232.png 01 01 D502 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027257154.jpg 01 01 D504 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027257154.tif 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/la.232.hb.png 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/la.232.png 02 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/la.232.hb.png 03 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/la.232.hb.png 01 01 JB code la.232.01sch 06 10.1075/la.232.01sch 1 22 22 Article 1 01 04 Sentential proforms Sentential proforms 01 04 An overview An overview 1 A01 01 JB code 281266081 Kerstin Schwabe Schwabe, Kerstin Kerstin Schwabe 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/281266081 2 A01 01 JB code 604266082 Werner Frey Frey, Werner Werner Frey 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/604266082 3 A01 01 JB code 645266083 André Meinunger Meinunger, André André Meinunger 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/645266083 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.232.02sud 06 10.1075/la.232.02sud 23 48 26 Article 2 01 04 Correlates of object clauses in German and Dutch Correlates of object clauses in German and Dutch 1 A01 01 JB code 926266084 Stefan Sudhoff Sudhoff, Stefan Stefan Sudhoff 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/926266084 01 eng 30 00 This paper deals with usages of the German pronoun es (and its counterpart het in Dutch) as a correlate of extraposed object clauses. It is argued (i) that es is the head of an argument DP and takes the embedded clause as its complement; (ii) that there are two types of matrix predicates, one of them being compatible with correlate-es, the other one incompatible; and (iii) that correlate-es has to be distinguished from an anaphoric use of the pronoun es that is possible in constructions with both types of matrix predicates, but has different contextual requirements. 01 01 JB code la.232.03axe 06 10.1075/la.232.03axe 49 72 24 Article 3 01 04 Correlative es vs. das in German Correlative es vs. das in German 01 04 An empirical perspective An empirical perspective 1 A01 01 JB code 338266085 Katrin Axel-Tober Axel-Tober, Katrin Katrin Axel-Tober 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/338266085 2 A01 01 JB code 385266086 Anke Holler Holler, Anke Anke Holler 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/385266086 3 A01 01 JB code 715266087 Helena Krause Krause, Helena Helena Krause 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/715266087 01 eng 30 00 In the last few decades, the role of correlative elements in recursive sentence embedding has received considerable attention. In the theoretical literature on German, it has been argued that the syntax of correlative constructions is not homogeneous and that one has to distinguish between so-called pro-form and placeholder constructions. In this paper, we give empirical evidence for distinguishing between these two uses, by focusing on two correlative lexemes: es and das. Furthermore, we present psycholinguistic and corpus-based support for the differentiation of two verb classes regarding the realizations of correlative elements. 01 01 JB code la.232.04fre 06 10.1075/la.232.04fre 73 104 32 Article 4 01 04 On properties differentiating constructions with inner-sentential pro-forms for clauses On properties differentiating constructions with inner-sentential pro-forms for clauses 1 A01 01 JB code 5266088 Werner Frey Frey, Werner Werner Frey 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/5266088 01 eng 30 00 The paper discusses various syntactic properties of different constructions featuring a dependent clause associated with a pro-form. The paper adopts the thesis of Pütz (19862) and Sudhoff (2003) that the pro-form construction with verbs of the class to which bedauern (‘to regret’) belongs and the pro-form construction with verbs of the class which contains behaupten (‘to claim’) have to be differentiated. With regard to the former it is argued that contrary to standard assumptions, the presence of the pro-form makes a syntactic and a semantic difference. Regarding the construction in which the pro-form has the function of a prepositional object the argumentation is different in that the very same syntax is present independent of whether the pro-form is lexically realised or not, whether the pro-form is unstressed or stressed, or whether it is reduced or not. However, a special interpretation – narrow focus on the dependent clause – arises when the prepositional part of the pro-form is stressed. For the construction with a dependent adverbial clause the presence or absence of a lexically realised pro-form is again crucial. Finally and most importantly, it is demonstrated that a further construction has to be distinguished. It features a psych-verb with an experiencer-object, es and a clausal argument. In this construction, es is not a pro-form for the clausal argument as such but an independent argument which is co-referential with the clause and encodes the causer of the emotion. 01 01 JB code la.232.05tru 06 10.1075/la.232.05tru 105 146 42 Article 5 01 04 Some distinctions in the right periphery of the German clause Some distinctions in the right periphery of the German clause 1 A01 01 JB code 156266089 Hubert Truckenbrodt Truckenbrodt, Hubert Hubert Truckenbrodt 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/156266089 01 eng 30 00 Right dislocation/afterthought (resuming a pronoun) obeys prosody and information structure restrictions not shared by extraposition (leaving a gap) in German. Right dislocation/afterthought requires that the preceding clause is an intonation phrase carrying sentence stress on its own. It also requires that no focus-background structure is built across the clause and the dislocated element. Neither requirement is present with extraposition. The syntactic analysis derives right dislocation/afterthought from full clauses by deletion. The separate clause is outside of the root sentence of Bruce Downing (1970), which is tentatively identified with the non-integrated clauses of Reis (1997) and Holler (2008). Earlier analyses are confirmed in a related case: What looks like the resumption of es ‘it’ by clauses (Germ. Korrelate) under certain matrix verbs seems to be syntactic extraposition from [DP es CP] instead. 01 01 JB code la.232.06zim 06 10.1075/la.232.06zim 147 170 24 Article 6 01 04 Phonological, morphosyntactic and semantic properties of es Phonological, morphosyntactic and semantic properties of es 1 A01 01 JB code 435266090 Ilse Zimmermann Zimmermann, Ilse Ilse Zimmermann 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/435266090 01 eng 30 00 The contribution deals with the German multifunctional item es and its suppletive forms dessen, dem and da(r). Their phonological, morphosyntactic and semantic lexical properties are considered and represented in corresponding lexical entries. The focus of attention is on the interrelation of the anaphoric and cataphoric functions of es and its role in sentence embedding. As far as possible, a unified syntactic and semantic analysis is given. As for the pro-form and the correlate es, I follow the differentiation of two matrix-predicate classes made by Sudhoff (2003) and try to add necessary distinctions and semantic considerations. For some types of matrix-predicates lexical representations are proposed. It is assumed that the correlate has an obligatory propositional argument, while the pro-forms es, dessen, dem, and da(r) occur separately or are accompanied by an apposition. The extraposition of the propositional argument of the correlate takes place for phonological and/or computational reasons and is not visible, semantically. In contrast, explicative constituents of pronouns and pro-forms can be base-generated right-dislocated to the matrix-sentence and are semantically correlated with their antecedent. The same seems true for cleft-constructions. It is discussed what it means to supply embedded clauses with nominal character. In this connection, a comparison is made between DPs with a pronominal head and DPs with a determiner and a lexical head with regard to their role in the embedding of clauses. 01 01 JB code la.232.07nol 06 10.1075/la.232.07nol 171 210 40 Article 7 01 04 On the formation of prepositional adverbs in Modern German On the formation of prepositional adverbs in Modern German 01 04 A case study on darunter A case study on darunter 1 A01 01 JB code 894266091 Andreas Nolda Nolda, Andreas Andreas Nolda 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/894266091 01 eng 30 00 In this paper, I defend the hypothesis that each prepositional adverb in Modern German is formed from an adverb and a preposition – and not from two adverbs, as recently suggested in the literature. As major support for this hypothesis, I show on the example of darunter that the intensions of the lexical meanings of non-idiomatic prepositional adverbs are compositionally built from the intensions of preposition meanings by combining them in an appropriate way with the intension of an adverb meaning. The proposed analysis, formulated within the general framework of Integrational Linguistics (IL), also provides a solution for the animacy problem of prepositional adverbs, i.e. the problem that many prepositional adverbs in Modern German do not phorically take up animated entities, in particular, persons. This restriction follows, it is argued, from a sortal restriction inherited from the preposition meaning. While syntactic semantics can accommodate preposition meanings in order to properly relate preposition complement interpretations, there is no such accommodation in the case of prepositional adverbs, their valence being lexically reduced by one. 01 01 JB code la.232.08sch 06 10.1075/la.232.08sch 211 240 30 Article 8 01 04 Sentential proforms and argument conditionals Sentential proforms and argument conditionals 1 A01 01 JB code 50266092 Kerstin Schwabe Schwabe, Kerstin Kerstin Schwabe 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/50266092 01 eng 30 00 The paper is about the relationship between German argument wenn-clauses and their proforms as in Lea bedauert es, wenn Mia Klavier spielt ‘Lea regrets it if Mia plays the piano’. Confirming and complementing Fabricius-Hansen’s (1980) view that these clauses are proper adverbials and simultaneously provide a propositional argument for a matrix predicate, the paper regards argument wenn-clauses as left- or right TP-adjuncts that m-command a sentential proform. It shows that the proform can also be pro if it represents an obligatory propositional argument. This pro is locally m-bound by the argument wenn-clause and itself locally m-binds an argument dass-clause. The latter is a right vP-adjunct and can be deleted if it is coreferential with the argument wenn-clause, if both are alike with respect to their information structural status, if they are identical with respect to their C’, and if they are adjacent. 01 01 JB code la.232.09bra 06 10.1075/la.232.09bra 241 270 30 Article 9 01 04 Rethinking clausal asymmetries Rethinking clausal asymmetries 01 04 Propositional pronoun insertion in Hungarian Propositional pronoun insertion in Hungarian 1 A01 01 JB code 468266093 Johan Brandtler Brandtler, Johan Johan Brandtler 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/468266093 2 A01 01 JB code 537266094 Valéria Molnár Molnár, Valéria Valéria Molnár 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/537266094 01 eng 30 00 This paper proposes a theoretically minimal analysis of cataphoric propositional pronoun insertion in complex sentences in Hungarian, based on the realization of the SpecCP in the embedded clause. In accordance with Chomsky (2008), we assume that the derivation of SpecCP results from the instantiation of the edge-feature in C. We argue that syntax universally provides two clause types: those with an edge-feature (EF) in C, and those lacking an edge-feature in C. As propositional pronoun insertion is dependent on the availability of SpecCP, it is only possible in [+EF]-clauses. In our modular framework, we regard the EF as semantically vacuous, although it can be associated with different semantic contents in different languages. In Hungarian, the semantic content of the EF can be rendered in terms of predicationality. As we demonstrate, pronoun insertion has information-structural effects in Hungarian, a fact that can be seen as an immediate consequence of the claimed correlation between the EF and predicationality. 01 01 JB code la.232.10nam 06 10.1075/la.232.10nam 271 272 2 Article 10 01 04 Name Index Name Index 01 eng 01 01 JB code la.232.11sub 06 10.1075/la.232.11sub 273 278 6 Article 11 01 04 Subject Index Subject Index 01 eng 01 JB code JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 https://benjamins.com 02 https://benjamins.com/catalog/la.232 Amsterdam NL 00 John Benjamins Publishing Company Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers onix@benjamins.nl 04 01 00 20160726 C 2016 John Benjamins D 2016 John Benjamins 02 WORLD 13 15 9789027257154 WORLD 09 01 JB 3 John Benjamins e-Platform 03 https://jbe-platform.com 29 https://jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027266941 21 01 00 Unqualified price 02 99.00 EUR 01 00 Unqualified price 02 83.00 GBP GB 01 00 Unqualified price 02 149.00 USD