Part of
Boundaries, Phases and Interfaces: Case studies in honor of Violeta Demonte
Edited by Olga Fernández-Soriano, Elena Castroviejo Miró and Isabel Pérez-Jiménez
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 239] 2017
► pp. 2546
Asudeh, Ash
2002Richard III. Chicago Linguistic Society 38: 31–46.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1961Syntactic blends and other matters. Language 37: 366–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
1997Subjects and clause structure. In The New Comparative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 33–63. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2004Towards a cartography of subject positions. In The Structure of CP and IP, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 115–165. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Carstens, Vicki
2011Hyperactivity and hyperagreement in Bantu. Lingua 121: 721–741. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstens, Vicki & Diercks, Michael
2013Parameterizing case and activity: Hyper-raising in Bantu. NELS 40 Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, 99–118. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Coppock, Elizabeth
2010Parallel grammatical encoding in sentence production: Evidence from syntactic blends. Language and Cognitive Processes 25: 38–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Danckaert, Lieven; D’Hulster, Tijs & Haegeman, Liliane
2016Deriving idiolectal variation: English wh-raising. In Theoretical Approaches to Linguistic Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 234], Ermenegildo Bidese, Federica Cognola & Manuela Caterina Moroni (eds), 145–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2008Extraction du sujet, réallocation de cas et localité. Cycnos 17. [URL] Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1980Extensions of binding and Case-marking. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 75–96.Google Scholar
1981On certain differences between French and English. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 349–371.Google Scholar
1995Agreement and verb morphology in three varieties of English. In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, Hubert Haider, Susan Olsen & Sten Vikner (eds), 159–165. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimball, John & Aissen, Judith
1971I think, you think, he think. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 241–246.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard & Sobin, Nicholas
2000The who/whom puzzle: On the preservation of an archaic feature. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 343–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1982Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1991Proper head government and the definition of A-positions. GLOW Newsletter 26: 46–47.Google Scholar
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Wh-Movement: Moving On, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 97–133. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Shlonsky, Ur
2006Satisfying the Subject Criterion by a non subject: English locative inversion and heavy NP shift. In Phases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 341–361. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Strategies of subject extraction. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds), 115–160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór
2012Minimalist C/case. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 191–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur
2014Subject positions, subject extraction, EPP, and the subject criterion. In Locality, Enoch Oladé Aboh, Maria Teresa Guasti & Ian Roberts (eds), 58–85. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

den Dikken, Marcel
2018. Secondary predication and the distribution of raising to object. Acta Linguistica Academica 65:1  pp. 87 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.