Cover not available
Part of
Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages
Edited by Annika Hübl and Markus Steinbach
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 247] 2018
► pp. 275–308

Between narrator and protagonist in fables of German Sign Language

| University of Hamburg
| University of Göttingen

Sign languages have the unique property of simultaneously transmitting information in various ways. Within perspective taking and role shift, a signer may use various articulators such as the hands, the body, and the face to simultaneously represent different protagonists and/or the narrator. This paper discusses data from German Sign Language (DGS) with regard to parallel perspectivation in role shift, in particular action role shift found in the DGS data set of the Aesop fables. We categorize the different types of parallel perspectivation and investigate classifiers within action role shift as a phenomenon at the gesture-sign interface.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Role shift in sign languages
    • 2.1Terminology
    • 2.2Quotation role shift
    • 2.3Action role shift
  • 3.Parallel perspectivation within action role shift in fables of German Sign Language
    • 3.1State of the art
      • 3.1.1Upper body parts as linguistic devices for simultaneous perspectivations
      • 3.1.2Classifiers
    • 3.2Methodology and data
    • 3.3Types of parallel perspectivation
    • 3.4Simultaneously layered additions by the narrator within action role shift
  • 4.A unified account for role shift
    • 4.1Action role shift at the gesture-grammar interface
    • 4.2Integrating A-RS in an agreement analysis
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 May 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.247.12her
References
Aarons, D., Bahan, B., Kegl, J. & Neidle C.
1994 Subjects and agreement in American Sign Language. In Perspectives on Sign Language Structure. Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research , Vol. 1, I. Ahlgern, B. Bergman & M. Brennan (eds), 13–27. Durham: International Sign Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Aarons, D. & Morgan, R. Z.
2003 Classifier predicates and the creation of multiple perspectives in South African Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 3(2): 125–156.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anand, P. & Nevins, A.
2004 Shifty Operators in Changing Contexts. SALT XIV 20-37, 20–37.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, M., Meir, I., Padden, C. & Sandler, W.
2003 Classifier constructions and morphology in two sign languages. In Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages, K. Emmorey (ed.), 53–84. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Benedicto, E. & Brentari, D.
2004 Where did all the arguments go? Argument-changing properties of classifiers in ASL. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22: 743–810.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. & Gerrig, R. J.
1990 Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66: 764–805.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G. G.
2006 Agreement. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cormier, K., Smith S. & Zwets, M.
2011 Show and tell: Framing and narrating constructed action in signed and spoken languages. Paper presented at Complex Sentences and Beyond in Sign and Spoken Languages, Lichtenberg-Kolleg, Georg-August-Universitat Göttingen.Google Scholar
Cormier, K., Smith, S. & Zwets, M.
2013 Framing constructed action in British Sign Language narratives. Journal of Pragmatics 55: 119–139.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cormier, K., Smith, S. & Sevcikova, Z.
2015 Rethinking constructed action. Sign Language & Linguistics 18(2): 167–204.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, O., Mesch, J., Waters, D., Nonhebel, A., van der Kooij, E., Woll, B. & Bergmann, B.
2007 Sharing sign language data online. Experiences from the ECHO project. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12(4): 535–562.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, K.
2015 Quotation, demonstration, and iconicity. Linguistics & Philosophy 38(6): 477–520.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dudis, P. G.
2004 Body partitioning and real-space blends. Cognitive Linguistics 15(2): 223–238.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duncan, S.
2003 Gesture in language. Issues for sign language research. In Perspectives on Classifiers constructions in Sign Languages, K. Emmorey (ed.), 259–268. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Earis, H. & Cormier, K.
2013 Point of view in British Sign Language and spoken English narrative discourse: The example of ‘The Tortoise and the Hare’. Language and Cognition 5(4): 313–343.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eccarius, P. & Brentari, D.
2007 Symmetry and dominance: A cross-linguistic study of signs and classifier constructions. Lingua 117: 1169–1201.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckardt, R.
2012 Particles as speaker indexicals in free indirect discourse. In Particles, L. Hogeweg & E. McCready (eds), 99–119. Special issue of Sprache und Datenverarbeitung.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K.
2003 Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K., Bellugi, U., Frederici A. & Horn, P.
1995 Effects of age of acquisition in grammatical sensitivity: Evidence from on-line and off-line tasks. Applied Psycholinguistics 16, 1–23.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, E.
1993 Space in Danish Sign Language. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
1995 Point of view expressed through shifters. In Language, Gesture, and Space, K. Emmorey & J. Reilly (eds), 133–154. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M.
1996 Blending as a central process of grammar. In Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, Goldberg, A. (ed.), 113–130, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. & Kollien, S.
2010 Gibt es Constructed Action in Deutscher Gebärdensprache und in Deutsch (in der Textsorte Bedeutungserklärung)? Das Zeichen 86: 502–510.Google Scholar
Geurts, B. & Maier E.
2005 Quotation in context. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17(1): 109–128.Google Scholar
Graumann, C F.
2002 Explicit and implicit perspectivity. In Perspective and Perspectivation in Discourse [Human Cognitive Processing 9], C. F. Graumann & W. Kallmeyer (eds), 25–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graumann, C. F. & Kallmeyer, W.
2002 Perspective and perspectivation in discourse. An introduction. In Perspective and Perspectivation in Discourse [Human Cognitive Processing 9], C. F. Graumann & W. Kallmeyer (eds), 1–11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grose, D., Wilbur, R., & Schalber, K.
2007 Events and telicity in classifier predicates: A reanalysis of body part classifier predicates in ASL. Lingua 117: 1258–1284.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Günthner, S.
1999 Polyphony and the ‘layering of voices’ in reported dialogues: An analysis of the use of prosodic devices in everyday reported speech. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 685–708.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 Perspectivity in reported dialogues. The contextualization of evaluative stances in reconstructing speech. In Perspective and Perspectivation in Discourse [Human Cognitive Processing 9], C. F. Graumann & W. Kallmeyer (eds), 347–374. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, A. & Steinbach, M.
2010 Eine neue Perspektive auf Role Shift in Deutscher Gebärdensprache (DGS). Perspektivwechsel als nichtmanuelles Kongruenzphänomen. Das Zeichen 84: 112–119.Google Scholar
2012 Quotation in sign languages. A visible context shift. In Quotatives. Cross-linguistic and Cross-disciplinary Perspectives [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 15], I. Buchstaller & I. van Alphen (eds), 203–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hübl, A.
2013 Role shift, indexicals and beyond – New evidence from German Sign Language. In Proceedings from the 13th meeting of the Texas Linguistics Society , L. C. Geer (ed.), 1–11.
2014 Context shift (im)possible – Indexicals in German Sign Language. In Proceedings of ConSOLE XXI, M. Kohlberger, B. Kate & E. Dutton (eds), 171–183. Leiden: Sole.Google Scholar
Hübl, A. & Steinbach, M.
2012 Quotation across modalities. Shifting contexts in sign and spoken languages. Paper presented at the workshop Quotation: Perspectives from Philosophy and Linguistics, Bochum.Google Scholar
Janzen, T.
2004 Space rotation, perspective shift, and verb morphology in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics 15(2): 149–174.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kegl, J.
1986 Clitics in American Sign Language. In Syntax and Semantics 19: The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, H. Borer (ed.), 285–309. New York. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Keyser R. & Larson-Hall, J.
2005 What does the critical period really mean? In Handbook of Bilingualism. Psycholinguistic Approaches, J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (eds), 88–108. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Leeson, L. & Saeed, J. I.
2007 Conceptual blending and the windowing of attention in simultaneous constructions in Irish Sign Language. In Simultaneity in Signed Languages. Form and Function, M. Vermeerbergen, L. Leeson & O. Crasborn (eds), 55–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddell, S. K.
1980 American Sign Language Syntax. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1995 Real, surrogate, and token space: Grammatical consequences in ASL. In Language, Gesture, and Space, K. Emmorey & J. Reilly (eds), 19–41. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
1998 Grounded blends, gestures, and conceptual shifts. Cognitive Linguistics 9(3): 283–314.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Grammar, Gesture, and Meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddell, S. K. & Metzger, M.
1998 Gesture in sign language discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 657–697.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D.
1995 The point of view predicate in American Sign Language. In Language, Gesture, and Space, K. Emmorey & J. Reilly (eds), 155–170. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2012 Utterance reports and constructed action. In Sign Language. An International Handbook, R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds), 365–387. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D. & Klima, E.S.
1990 Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory. In Theoretical issues in sign language research, S. D. Fischer & P. Siple (eds), 191–210. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maier, E.
2015 Quotation and unquotation in free indirect discourse. Mind & Language 30(3): 345–373.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meir, I., Padden, C. A., Aronoff, M. & Sandler, W.
2007 Body as subject. Journal of Linguistics 43: 531–563.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Metzger, M.
1995 Constructed dialogue and constructed action in American Sign Language. In Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities, C. Lucas (ed.), 255–271. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Morford, J. P.
2004 Der Altersfaktor im Gebärdenspracherwerb: Eine Neuinterpretation. Das Zeichen 66: 85–88.Google Scholar
Morgan, G.
1999 Event packaging in British Sign Language discourse. In Story Telling and Conversation. Discourse in Deaf Communities, E. A. Winston (ed.), 27–58. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, G. & Woll, B.
2002 Directions in Sign Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 The development of reference switching encoded through body classifiers in British Sign Language. In Perspectives on Classifiers Constructions in Sign Languages, K. Emmorey (ed.), 297–310. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2007 Understanding sign language classifiers through a polycomponential approach. Lingua 117: 1159–1168.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padden, C.
1986 Verbs and role-shifting in American Sign Language. In Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching, C. Padden (ed.), 44–57. Silver Spring MD: National Association of the Deaf.Google Scholar
Parrill, F.
2010 Viewpoint in speech-gesture integration: Linguistic structure, discourse structure, and event structure. Language and Cognitive Processes 25(5): 650–668.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perniss, P.
2007a Achieving spatial coherence in German Sign Language narratives: The use of classifiers and perspective. Lingua 117: 1315–1338.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007b Locative functions of simultaneous perspective constructions in German Sign Language narratives. In Simultaneity in Signed Languages. Form and Function [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 281], M. Vermeerbergen, L. Leeson & O. Crasborn (eds), 27–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfau, R. & Quer, J.
2010 Nonmanuals. Their grammatical and prosodic roles. In Sign Languages, D. Brentari (ed.), 381–402. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pyers, J. E. & Senghas, A.
2007 Reported action in Nicaraguan and American Sign Languages. Emerging versus established systems. In Visible Variation. Comparative Studies on Sign Language Structure, P. Perniss, R. Pfau & M. Steinbach (eds), 279–302. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Quasthoff, U. M.
2002 Global and local aspects of perspectivity. In Perspective and Perspectivation in Discourse [Human Cognitive Processing 9], C. F. Graumann & W. Kallmeyer (eds), 323–346. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quer, J.
2005 Context shift and indexical variables in sign languages. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistics Theory 15, E. Georgala & J. Howell (eds), 152–168. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
2011 Reporting and quoting in signed discourse. In Understanding Quotation, E. Brendel, J. Meibauer & M. Steinbach (eds), 277–302. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quinto-Pozos, D.
2007 Can constructed action be considered obligatory? Lingua 117(7): 1285–1314.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quinto-Pozos, D. & Mehta, S.
2010 Register variation in mimetic gestural complements to signed language. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 557–584.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Randow, S.
2016 Sprachlernerfahrungen erwachsener hörender L2-/M2-Lerner_innen bezüglich Constructed Action in Deutscher Gebärdensprache – Teil I: Ausgangslage und Methode. Das Zeichen 30(102): 116–127.Google Scholar
Schembri, A., Jones, C. & Burnham, D.
2005 Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: Evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners’ gestures without speech. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10(3): 272–290.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schick, B.
1990 Classifier predicates in American Sign Language. International Journal of Sign Linguistics 1: 15–40.Google Scholar
Schlenker, P.
2017 Super monsters I. Attitude and Action Role Shift in sign languages. Semantics and Pragmatics. 10(9).DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speas, M. & Tenny, C.
2003 Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Asymmetry in Grammar [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 57], A. M. di Sciullo (ed.), 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stec, K., Huiskes, M. & Redeker, G.
2016 Multimodal quotation: Role shift practices in spoken narratives. Journal of Pragmatics 104: 1–17.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Supalla, T.
1986 The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Noun Classes and Categorization [Typological Studies in Language 7], C. Craig (ed.), 181–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sutton-Spence, R.
2007 Mouthings and simultaneity in British Sign Language. In Simultaneity in Signed Languages. Form and Function [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 281], M. Vermeerbergen, L. Leeson & O. Crasborn (eds), 147–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, D.
20072. Talking Voices. Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winston, E. A.
1991 Spatial referencing and cohesion in an American Sign Language text. Sign Language Studies 73: 397–410.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zucchi, S.
2004 Monsters in the visual mode? Ms, Università degli Studi di Milano.Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, I.
2003 Classifiying Hand Configurations in Nederlandse Gebarentaal. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
2012 Classifiers. In Sign Language. An International Handbook, R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds), 158–185. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Hübl, Annika, Emar Maier & Markus Steinbach
2019. To shift or not to shift. Sign Language & Linguistics 22:2 ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Maier, Emar & Markus Steinbach
2022. Perspective Shift Across Modalities. Annual Review of Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Müller, Anke
2022. Image superimposition in signed language discourse and in motion pictures. In Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems [Iconicity in Language and Literature, 18], ► pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Steinbach, Markus
2016. Mouthing and demonstrating in bimodal contexts. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6:6 ► pp. 828 ff. DOI logo
Steinbach, Markus
2023. Angry lions and scared neighbors: Complex demonstrations in sign language role shift at the sign-gesture interface. Linguistics 61:2 ► pp. 391 ff. DOI logo
Vandenitte, Sébastien
2022. Making Referents Seen and Heard Across Signed and Spoken Languages: Documenting and Interpreting Cross-Modal Differences in the Use of Enactment. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Vandenitte, Sébastien
2023. When referents are seen and heard. In Reference [Studies in Language Companion Series, 228], ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.