Miscellaneous in:
From Pseudo-relatives to Causative Constructions: Scandinavian languages as a case study
Mara Frascarelli and Giorgia Di Lorenzo
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 278] 2022
► pp. 119130
Abbagnano, Nicola
(ed.) 1961Dizionario di Filosofia. Torino: UTET.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2018Word-class changing derivations in typological perspective. In Language at Large. Essays on Syntax and Semantics, Alexandra Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds), 221–289. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Aissen, Judith L.
1974The Syntax of Causative Construction. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Alexiadou, Artemis
1997Adverb Placement. A Case Study in Antisymmetric Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou
2004Voice morphology in the causative-inchoative Alternation: Evidence for a non unified structural analysis of unaccusatives. In The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-lexicon Interface, Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Martin Everaert (eds), 115–136. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer
2006The properties of anticausatives cross-linguistically. In Phases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 187–212. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Schäfer, Florian
2015External Arguments in Transitivity Alternations: A Layering Approach. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alsina, Alex
1992On the argument structure of causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 517–555.Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter M. & Letuchiy, Alexander B.
2009The syntax and semantics of event structure and Adyghe causatives. Ms, lingBuzz/000811.Google Scholar
Baker, Carl Leroy
1970Double negatives. Linguistic Inquiry 1: 169–186.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark
1988Incorporation. A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bandle, Oskar, Braunmüller, Kurt, Jahr, Ernst Håkon, Karker, Allan, Naumann, Hans-Peter & Teleman, Ulf
(eds) 2005The Nordic Languages: An International Handbook of the History of the North Germanic Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Barwise, Jon
1981Scenes and other situations. The Journal of Philosophy 78: 369–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef
1986The role of event expression in grammar. Studies in Language 10: 1–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
1990Generalized Verb Movement. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
2004Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina
1999Consequences of Antisymmetry: Headed Relative Clauses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000The raising analysis of relative clauses: A reply to Borsley. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 123–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002aHeaded relative clauses in generative syntax – Part I. Glot International 6(7): 197–204.Google Scholar
2002bHeaded relative clauses in generative syntax – Part II. Glot International 6(8): 235–247.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Bocci, Giuliano
2012Should I stay or should I go? Optional focus movement in Italian. In Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 9, Christopher Piñon (ed.), 1–16. Paris: EISS.Google Scholar
Brandtler, Johan
2010The Evaluability Hypothesis. The Syntax and Semantics of Polarity Item Licensing in Swedish. PhD dissertation, Lund University.
Burzio, Luigi
1986Italian Syntax. A Government and Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Buyssens, Eric
1959Negative contexts. English Studies 40: 163–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
1985Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Guasti, Maria Teresa
(eds) 1995Syntax and Semantics, Vol. XXVIII: Small Clauses. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf
1937The Logical Syntax of Language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Carnie, Andrew, Harley, Heidi & Dooley, Sheila Ann
(eds) 2006Verb First. On the Syntax of Verb-initial Languages [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 73]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cerbasi, Donato
1998aLe costruzioni causative in italiano, spagnolo e portoghese. In Sintassi storica. Atti del XXX Congresso SLI, Paolo Ramat & Elisa Roma (eds), 457–468. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
1998bThe causee in Romance and Germanic causative constructions. Languages in Contrast 2: 161–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
1976Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (eds), 27–55. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
1997Semantica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro & McConnell-Ginet, Sally
1990Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1970Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick Jacobs & Peter Rosenbaum (eds), 184–221. Waltham MA: Blaisdell.Google Scholar
1977On Wh-movement. In Formal Syntax, Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds), 71–132. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1986Barriers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1993Bare phrase structure. In Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program. Principles and Parameters in Syntactic Theory, Gert Webelhuth (ed.), 383–439. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures, Vol 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2005Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin, Carlos Peregrín Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1992The pseudo-relative and Acc-ing constructions after verbs of perception. Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 1–31. Venice: Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
1995The pseudo-relative and ACC-ing constructions after verbs of perception. In Italian Syntax and Universal Grammar, Guglielmo Cinque (ed.), 244–275. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2001aRestructuring and the order of aspectual and root modal heads. In Current studies in Italian syntax. Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Gugliemo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 137–155. Amsterdam: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001bRestructuring and functional structure. Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 45–127. Venice: Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter
1983The grammatical role of the causee in the universal grammar. Italian Journal of American Linguistics 49: 115–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1975Causatives and universal grammar. Transactions of the Philological Society 73(1): 1–32.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1976The syntax of causative constructions: Cross-language similarities and divergences. In The Grammar of Causative Constructions, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 261–312. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1981Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela
2000aCorpus di italiano parlato. Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.Google Scholar
2000bEnunciato e frase. In Enunciato e frase, illocuzione e modalità. Saggi. Laboratorio Linguistico del Dipartimento di Italianistica (LABLITA), Emanuela Cresti (ed.), 11–28. Florence: University of Florence.Google Scholar
2000cPer una nuova definizione di frase. In Enunciato e frase, illocuzione e modalità. Saggi. Laboratorio Linguistico del Dipartimento di Italianistica (LABLITA), Emanuela Cresti (ed.), 29–59. Florence: University of Florence.Google Scholar
Del Gobbo, Francesca
2003Appositives at the Interface. PhD dissertation, University of California at Irvine.
Deutscher, Guy
2009Nominalization and the origin of subordination. In Syntactic Complexity. Diachrony, Acquisition, Neurocognition, Evolution [Typological Studies in Language 85], Talmy Givón & Masayoshi Shibatani (eds), 199–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel
2006Relators and Linkers: The Syntax of Predication, Predicate Inversion, and Copulas. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Lorenzo, Giorgia
2011La subordinata come oggetto complesso: La causative nelle lingue scandinave. PhD dissertation, University of Roma Tre.
Doron, Edit
1994The discourse function of appositives. Proceedings of IATL 9: 53–62.Google Scholar
Dowty, David R.
1972On the syntax and semantics of the atomic predicate CAUSE. In Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, Paul M. Peranteau, Judith N. Levi & Gloria C. Phares (eds), 62–74. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar
1979Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Egerland, Verner
1998The affectdeness constraint and AspP. Studia Linguistica 52: 19–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabet
1980Wh-constructions in Swedish and the relevance of subjacency. Proceedings of NELS 10. Cahiers Linguistiques d’Ottawa 9: 98–108.Google Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabet & Ejerhed Eva
(eds) 1982Readings on Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi
1973On the Nature of Island Constraints. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Foley, William A. & Van Valin Jr, Robert D.
1984Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi
2007Causation, obligation and argument structure: On the nature of little v. Linguistic Inquiry 38(2): 197–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara
2004L’interpretazione del focus e la portata degli operatori sintattici. In Il Parlato Italiano [Atti del Convegno Nazionale B06], Federico Albano Leoni, Francesco Cutugno, Massimo Pettorino & Renata Savy (eds). Napoli: M. D’Auria–CIRASS.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2006Phases of Interpretation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Subjects, topics and the interpretation of referential pro: An interface approach to the linking of (null) pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 691–734. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Narrow focus, clefting and predicate inversion. Lingua 120(9): 2121–2147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Dislocations and framings. In Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax, Elisabeth Star & Andreas Dufter (eds), 472–501. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018The interpretation of pro in consistent and partial NS languages: A comparative interface analysis. In Null-Subjects in Generative Grammar. A Synchronic and Diachronic Perspective, Federica Cognola & Jan Casalicchio (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara, Bonvino, Elisabetta & Pietrandrea, Paola
2007Semantica, sintassi e prosodia di alcuni avverbi nel parlato spontaneo. In La comunicazione parlata. Atti del Convegno Internazionale, Tomo I, Massimo Pettorino, Antonella Giannini, Marianna Vallone & Renata Savy (eds), 547–586. Napoli: Liguori Editore.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Carella, Giorgio
2019Topic chains and the interpretation of null subjects: The acquisition of discourse-related strategies in Italian. The Linguistic Review 36: 637–674. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Stortini, Tania
2019Focus constructions, verb types and the SV/VS order in Italian: An acquisitional study from a syntax-prosody perspective. Lingua 227: 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gärtner, Hans Martin
2002On the force of V2 declaratives. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 33–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Jeanne & Raposo, Eduardo
1986Clause union, the Stratal Uniqueness Law and the chômeur relation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4: 295–331.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gili-Fivela, Barbara, Avesani, Cinzia, Barone, Marco, Bocci, Giuliano, Crocco, Carla, D’Imperio, Mariapaola, Giordano, Rosa, Marotta, Giovanna, Savio, Michelina & Sorianello, Patrizia
2015Varieties of Italian and their intonational phonology. In Intonational Variation in Romance, Sonia Frota & Pilar Prieto (eds), 140–197. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra
1991La struttura interna dei sintagmi nominali. In Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, Vol. I: La frase. I sintagmi nominale e preposizionale, Lorenzo Salvi Giampaolo & Anna Cardinaletti (eds), 273–314. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1976Some constraints on Bantu causativization. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 1–40. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1980The binding hierarchy and the typology of omplements. Studies in Language 4: 333–377. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Multiple routs to clause union: The diachrony of complex verbs phrases. In Syntactic Complexity. Diachrony, Acquisition, Neurocognition, Evolution [Typological Studies in Language 85], Talmy Givón & Masayoshi Shibatani (eds), 81–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graffi, Giorgio
1980Su alcune costruzioni pseudo-relative. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 5: 117–139.Google Scholar
1994Sintassi. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
2019What are ‘pseudo-relatives’? In Di tutti i colori. Studi linguistici per Maria Grossmann, Roberta D’Alessandro, Gabriele Iannàccaro, Diana Passino & Anna M. Thornton (eds), 115–131. halshs-02060688f.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane B.
1979Complement selection and the Lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 270–326.Google Scholar
1990Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa
1988La pseudorelative et les phenomenes d’accord. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 13: 35–57.Google Scholar
1993Causative and Perception verbs. A Comparative Study. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1991Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1995The Syntax of Negation. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John
1985Natural Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi B.
2008On the causative construction. In The Oxford Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, Shigeru Miyagawa & Mamoru Saito (eds), 20–53. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C., & Campbell, Lyle
1995Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1997Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hatcher, Anna G.
1944Je le vois sourire; Je le vois qui sourit; Je le vois souriant. Modern Language Quarterly 5: 275–301. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, Einar
1976The Scandinavian Languages. An Introduction to Their History. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene
1982The Semantics of Definites and Indefinites Noun Phrases. PhD Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Heine, Bernd
2009From nominals to clausal morphosyntax: Complexity via expansion. In Syntactic Complexity. Diachrony, Acquisition, Neurocognition, Evolution [Typological Studies in Language 85], Talmy Givón & Masayoshi Shibatani (eds), 23–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2007The Genesis of Grammar: A Reconstruction. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars & Platzack, Christer
1999Pronouns in Scandinavian languages: An overview. In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 123–142. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, James T.
1983The logic of perceptual reports: An extensional alternative to situation semantics. The Journal of Phylosophy LXXX: 100–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland
2006Scrambling, Remnant Movement and Restructuring in West Germanic. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
1986Word Order and Syntactic Features in the Scandinavian Languages and English. PhD dissertation, University of Stockholm.
1999Remarks on Holmberg’s Generalization. Studia Linguistica 5: 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders & Platzack, Christer
1995The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2005The Scandinavian languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, Guglielmo Cinque & Richard S. Kayne (eds), 420–458. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1985The iconicity of the universal categories ‘noun’ and ‘verb’. In Iconicity in Syntax [Typological Studies in Language 6], John Haiman (ed.), 151–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1969An interpretive theory of negation. Foundations of Language 5: 218–241.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
1975French Syntax. The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1978Le condizioni sul legamento, il collocamento dei clitici e lo spostamento a sinistra dei quantificatori. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 3: 147–171.Google Scholar
1981Binding quantifiers, clitics and control. In Binding and Filtering, Frank Heny (ed.), 191–211. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
1984Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991Romance clitics, verb movement, and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 647–686.Google Scholar
1992Italian negative infinitival imperatives and clitic climbing. In Hommages à Nicolas Ruwet, Liliane Tasmowsky & Anne Zribi-Hertz (eds), 300–312. Ghent: Communication and Cognition.Google Scholar
1994The Antisymmetry of Sintax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2005Movement and Silence. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006On the parameters and on principles of pronunciation. In Organizing Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Cover, Riny Huybregts, Ursula Kleinhenz & Jay Koster (eds), 289–299. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Comrie, Bernard
1977Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–99.Google Scholar
1979Data on the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy. Language 55: 333–351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klima, Edward S.
1964Negation in English. In The Structure of Language, Jerry A. Fodor & Jerrold J. Katz (eds), 246–323. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, Jaklin
1997Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1995The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items. Linguistic Analysis 25: 209–257.Google Scholar
2007Basic notions of information structure. In Interdisciplinary Studies of Information Structure 6, Caroline Féry & Manfred Krifka (eds). Potsdam: University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1995Negative polarity items in Japanese and English. Harward Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 165–197.Google Scholar
Kush, Dave & Lindahl, Filippa
2011On the escapability of islands in Scandinavian. Paper presented at Linguistic Society of America (LSA) 2011, Pittsburgh PA.
Kush, Dave, Omaki, Akira & Hornstein, Norbert
2013Microvariation in islands? In Experimental Syntax and Island Effects, John Sprouse & Norbert Hornstein (eds), 239–264. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laka, Itziar
1990Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Richard K.
1988On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1995Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1998Morphology and lexical semantics. In Andrew Spencer & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), Handbook of Morphology, Andrew Spencer & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), 248–271. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lundin, Katarina
2003Small Clauses in Swedish. PhD dissertation, University of Lund.
Maling, Joan & Zaenen, Annie
1982A phrase structure account of Scandinavian extraction phenomena. In The Nature of Syntactic Representation, Pauline Jacobson & Geoffrey K. Pullum (ed.), 229–282. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1984On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995The minimalist program. In Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program, Gert Webelhuth (ed.), 351–382. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Meinunger, André
2006On the discourse impact of subordinate clauses. In The Architecture of Focus, Valéria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds), 459–487. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Moro, Andrea
1997The Raising of Predicates. Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Dynamic Antisymmetry: Movement as a Symmetry Breaking Phenomenon [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 38]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Moulton, Keir & Nino Grillo
2015Pseudo-relatives. Big and direct. In Proceedings of the Forty-fifth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, Thuy Bui & Deniz Özyıldız (eds), 193–202. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Nedyalkov, Vladimir P. & Silnitsky, Georgij G.
1973The typology of morphological and lexical causative. In Trends in Soviet Theoretical Linguistics, Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), 1–32. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel
1986Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1992Language Diversity in Time and Space. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1978Complementizer-trace phenomena and the Nominative Island Conditions. The Linguistic Review 1: 297–344.Google Scholar
1982Paths and Categories. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
1980The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Podlesskaya, Vera I.
1993Causatives and causality: Towards a semantic typology of causal relations. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), 165–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar
Preminger, Omer
2009Breaking agreements: Distinguishing agreement and clitic-doubling by their failures. Linguistic Inquiry 40(4): 619–666. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Puglielli, Annarita
1981Frase dichiarativa. In Studi Somali, 2: Sintassi della lingua somala, Annarita Puglielli (ed.), 3–44. Roma: Ministero AA EE.Google Scholar
Puglielli, Annarita & Frascarelli, Mara
2005A comparative analysis of restrictive and appositive relative clauses in Cushitic languages. In Contributions to the IGG XXX, Laura Brugè, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, Walter Schweikert & Giuseppina Turano (eds), 279–303. Venice: Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
2011Linguistic Analysis: From Data to Theory. [Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 220]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina
2008Introducing Arguments, Ch. III: Causatives. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew
1975Pseudo-relatives and the unity of Subject Raising. Archivum Linguisticum VI: 32–64.Google Scholar
Ramat, Paolo & Ricca, Davide
1998Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 187–285. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian C.
2003The first phase syntax. Ms, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
2008Verb Meaning and the Lexicon. A First-Phase Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raposo, Eduardo
1989Prepositional infinitival constructions in European Portuguese. In The Null Subject Parameter, Osvaldo Jaeggli & Ken Safir (eds), 227–305. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rawoens, Gudrun
2008Kausativa verbkonstruktioner i svenskan och nederländskan. PhD dissertation, University of Gent.
Rebushi, Georges
2002Coordination et subordination. Deuxième partie: Vers la co-jonction généralisée. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris XCVII(1): 37–94.Google Scholar
Rebuschi, Georges
2003Generalizing the antisymmetric analysis of coordination to nominal modification. Lingua 115: 445–459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans
1947Elements of Sumbolic Logic. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1995Interface strategies. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics. University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
2002The theta system–An overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28(3): 229–290.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1986Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557.Google Scholar
1990Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar. Handbook in Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Direct perception, government and thematic sharing. In Comparative Syntax and Language Acquisition, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 203–227. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2004Locality and left periphery. In Structures and Beyond The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Adriana Belletti (ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Roberts, Ian
1989Complex inversion in French. Probus 1: 1–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Craige
1996Information structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. In OSUWPL, Vol. 49: Papers in Semantics, Jae Hak Yoon & Andreas Kathol (eds), 91–136. The Ohio State University, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1991Excorporation and minimality. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 209–218.Google Scholar
Rouveret, Alain & Vergnaud, Jean Roger
1980Specifying reference to the subject: French causatives and conditions on representations. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 97–202.Google Scholar
Sandfeld, Kristian
1936Syntaxe du français contemporain. Les propositions subordonnées. Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
Scarano, Antonietta
2002Frasi relative e pseudorelative in italiano. Sintassi, semantica e articolazione dell’informazione. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Schwarze, Christoph
1974Les constructions du type ‘Je le vois qui arrive. In Actes du Colloque Franco-Allemand de Grammaire transformationnelle, I: Etudes de syntax, Christian Rohrer & Nicolas Ruwet (eds), 18–30. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1975A Linguistic Study of Causative Constructions. Bloomington IN: IULC.Google Scholar
1976The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions, Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 1–40. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2002The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation [Typological Studies in Language 48]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Árman
1989Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic. In a comparative GB Approach. PhD dissertation, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.
2001Case: Abstract vs. morphological. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 67: 103–151.Google Scholar
2004Meaningful silence, meaningless sounds. In Linguistic Variation Yearbook, Vol. 4, Pierre Pica & Johan Rooryck (eds), 235–259. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2010Conditions on argument drop. Ms, LingBuzz/000671.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Árman & Maling, Joan
2012Silent heads. In Functional Heads, Laura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds), 368–378. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simone, Raffaele & Cerbasi, Donato
2001Types and diachronic evolution of causative constructions in Romance languages. Romanische Forschungen 113: 441–473.Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung
1996Causatives and Causation. A Universal-Typological Perspective. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret J.
1990Phrase Structure in Natural Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Andrew
1991Morphological Theory. An Introduction to Word Structure in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique
1988A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for C constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 425–449.Google Scholar
Starke, Michal
1995On the format for small clauses. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. XXVIII: Small Clauses, Anna Cardinaletti & Maria T. Guasti (eds), 237–269. San Diego CA:, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stowell, Tim A.
1981Origins of Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Strudsholm, Erling
1999Relative situazionali in italiano moderno: Una reinterpretazione della cosiddetta pseudorelativa sulla base di un approccio combinato, formale e funzionale [Romanistische Linguistik 3]. Münster: Stollfuß Medien.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2004On the edge. In Peripheries. Syntactic Edges and Their Effects [SNLT 56], David Adger, Cécile De Cat & George Tsoulas (eds), 259–287. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1976Semantic causative types. In The Grammar of Causative Constructions [Syntax and Semantics 6], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 43–129. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald
1981On the theoretical interpretation of a class of ‘marked’ extractions. In The Theory of Markedness in Generative Grammar, Adriana Belletti, Luciana Brandi & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 475–516. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur
1979On Complementation in Icelandic. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
2007The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Travis, Lisa
2000Event structure in syntax. In Events as Grammatical Objects: The Converging Perspectives of Lexical Semantics and Syntax, Carol Tenny & James Pustejovsky (eds), 145–185. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Trutkowski, Ewa
2016Topic Drop and Null Subjects in German. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan
1994Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 79–123.Google Scholar
Vergnaud, Jean Roger
1974French Relative Clauses. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Viberg, Åke
2015Sensation, perception and cognition. Swedsh in a typological-contrastive perspective. Functions of Language 22(1): 96–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vikner, Sten
1994Scandinavian object shift and West Germanic scrambling. In Studies on Scrambling, Norbert Corver & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 487–517. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
de Vries, Mark
2002The Syntax of Relativization. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
Wessen, Elias
1972Le lingue nordiche. Naples: Istituto Orientale di Napoli.Google Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn, Bentzen, Kristine & Hróarsdóttir, Þorbjörg
2007Rethinking Scandinavian verb movement. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 10: 203–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1980Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203–238.Google Scholar
1994Thematic Structures [Linquistic Inquiry Monographs 23]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella
1997aNegation and verb movement. In The New Comparative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 214–245. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1997bNegation and Clausal Structure: A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2001Sentential negation. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds), 511–535. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeijstra, Hedde
2004Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University (LOT Publications).
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa
1985The relation between morphophonology and morphosyntax: The case of Romance causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 247–289.Google Scholar
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter
1995The Morphosyntax of Verb Moment: A Minimalist Approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
2005Verb second as a function of Merge. In The Function of Function Words and Functional Categories [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 78], Marcel den Dikken & Christina Tortora (eds), 11–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The Syntax of Dutch. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwarts, Frans
1995Nonveridical contexts. Linguistic Analysis 25: 286–312.Google Scholar