Article published in:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 8:2 (2018) ► pp. 163192
References

References

Antoniou, K., & Katsos, N.
(2017) The effect of childhood multilingualism and bilectalism on implicature understanding. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 787–833. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barner, D., Chow, K., & Yang, S.
(2009) Finding one’s meaning: A test of the relation between quantifiers and integers in language development. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 195–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barner, D., Brooks, N., & Bale, A.
(2011) Accessing the unsaid: The role of scalar alternatives in children’s pragmatic inference. Cognition, 188, 87–96.Google Scholar
Bott, L. & Noveck, I.
(2004) Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 433–456. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breheny, R., Katsos, N., & Williams, J.
(2006) Are generalized scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences. Cognition, 100, 434–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carston, R.
(1998) Informativeness, relevance and scalar implicature. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (Eds.), Relevance theory: Applications and implications (pp. 179–236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G.
(2004) Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and beyond (Vol. 3, pp. 39–103), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Broaden your views: implicatures of domain widening and the “logicality” of language. Linguistic Inquiry, 37, 535–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Guasti, M. T., Gualmini, A., & Meroni, L.
(2001) The acquisition of disjunction: Evidence for a grammatical view of scalar implicatures. In A. H. -J. Do, L. Dominguez, & A. Johansen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 157–168). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Chierchia, G., Fox, D., & Spector, B.
(2012) Scalar implicature as a grammatical phenomenon. In P. Portner, C. Maienborn, & K. von Heusinger (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning (pp. 2297–2331). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L. & Hathorn, J.
(2005) Quelque chose … de remarquable in English – French acquisition: mandatory, informationally encapsulated computations in second language interpretation. Second Language Research, 21(4), 291–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L., Sprouse, R. A., & Meyer, T.
(2005)  Was für N interrogatives and quantifier scope In English-German interpretation. In L. Dekydtspotter, R. A. Sprouse, & A. Liljestrand (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (pp. 86–95). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
De Neys, W. & Schaeken, W.
(2007) When people are more logical under cognitive load: Dual task impact on scalar implicature. Experimental Psychology, 54, 128–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dupuy, L., Stateva, P., Andreetta, S., Cheylus, A., Déprez, V., van der Henst, J. B., Jayez, J., Stepanov, A., & Reboul, A.
(2018) Pragmatic abilities in bilinguals: The case of scalar implicatures. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism (Published online: 16 Jan 2018). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, A., Scrafton, S., Duckworth, A., & Handley, S.
(2004) The story of some: everyday pragmatic inference by children and adults. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(2), 121–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, D.
(2007) Free choice and the theory of scalar implicatures. In U. Sauerland & P. Stateva (Eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics, (pp. 71–120). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, M.
(1995) Quantity, volubility, and some varieties of discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, 83–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P.
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Guasti, M. T., Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Foppolo, F., Gualmini, A., & Meroni, L.
(2005) Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(5), 667–696. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, L.
(1988) The categorial status of modals and L2 acquisition. In S. Flynn & W. O’Neil (Eds.), Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (pp. 252–276). Boston: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, R. & Chan, Y.
(1997) The partial availability of UG in SLA: the failed functional features hypothesis. Second Language Research, 13(3), 187–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirschberg, J.
(1985) A theory of scalar implicature. Doctoral dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Horn, L. R.
(1972) On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. Doctoral dissertation. Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
(1997) All John’s children are as bald as the king of France: existential import and the geometry of opposition. Proceedings from the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 155–179). Chigago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Huang, Y. T. & Snedeker, J.
(2009) On-line interpretation of scalar quantifiers: Insight into the semantic-pragmatics interface. Cognitive Psychology, 50, 376–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S.
(2000) Presumptive meaning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, M.
(2009) L2 Acquisition of scalar implicatures: Interpretation at the syntax/pragmatics interface. Paper presented at the 10th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition (GASLA) conference, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, U.S.A.
Miller, D.
(2017) Combining behavioral and neurolinguistic methodologies to investigate Spanish scalar indefinites among mono- and bilinguals: An event-related potential study. Doctoral dissertation. University of Reading.Google Scholar
Miller, D., Giancaspro, D., Iverson, M., Rothman, J. and Slabakova, R.
(2016) Not just algunos, but indeed unos L2ers can acquire scalar implicatures in L2 Spanish. In A. A. de la Fuente, E. Valenzuela & C. Martínez Sanz (Eds.). Language acquisition beyond parameters. Studies in honour of Juana M. Liceras, (pp. 125–145). Studies in Bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benajmins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milsark, G.
(1977) Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis, 3, 1–29.Google Scholar
Musolino, J. & Lidz, J.
(2002) Preschool logic: truth and felicity in the acquisition of quantification. In B. Skarabela, S. Fish, & A. H. -J. Do (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 406–416). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Noveck, I.
(2001) When children are more logical than adults: experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition, 78, 165–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Noveck, I. A. & Posada, A.
(2003) Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study. Brain and Language, 85, 203–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A. & Musolino, J.
(2003) Scalar implicatures: experiments at the syntax semantics interface. Cognition, 86, 253–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P. & White, L.
(2000) Missing surface inflection or impairment? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16(2), 103–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R.
(2010) Scalar implicatures in second language acquisition. Lingua, 120, 2444–2462. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. L.
(1980) Quantifiers and question answering in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30, 191–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D.
(1995) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Storto, G. & Tanenhaus, M.
(2005) Are scalar implicatures computed online? In E. Maier, C. Bary, & J. Huitink (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 9 (pp. 431–445). Nijmegen: Nijmegen Centre for Semantics.Google Scholar
Sudo, M. & Kiritani, S.
(1997) Comparison of acoustic features in perception of English articles between native speaker of English and Japanese learners. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan, 1, 51–57.Google Scholar
Tavano, E. & Kaiser, E.
(2009) The cost of being cooperative: Evidence of effort in the processing of scalar implicature. Proceedings from the 45th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 593–607). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
von Fintel, K. & Matthewson, L.
(2008) Universals in semantics. The Linguistic Review, 25(1–2), 139–201.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. & Sperber, D.
(2004) Relevance theory. In L. Horn & G. Ward, (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 607–632). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Fekete, István, Petra Schulz & Esther Ruigendijk
2018. Exhaustivity in single bare <i>wh</i>-questions: A differential-analysis of exhaustivity. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1  pp. 96 ff. Crossref logo
Feng, Shuo & Jacee Cho
2019. Asymmetries Between Direct and Indirect Scalar Implicatures in Second Language Acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology 10 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.