Article published in:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 3:1 (2013) ► pp. 2647
References

References

Andersen, R.
(1983) Transfer to somewhere. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 177–201). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Beard, R.
(1987) Morpheme order in a lexeme-based morphology. Lingua, 72, 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1988) On the separation of derivation from morphology: Toward a lexeme/morpheme-based morphology. Quaderni di Semantica, 9, 3–59.Google Scholar
(1993) Simultaneous and dual derivation in word formation. Language, 69, 716–741. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bedore, L., & Leonard, L.
(1998) Specific language impairment and grammatical morphology: A discriminant function analysis. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 41, 1185–1192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R.
(1990) The logical problem of language learning. Linguistic Analysis, 20, 3–49.Google Scholar
Blom, E.
(2008) Testing the domain-by-age model: Inflection and placement of Dutch verbs. In B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective (pp. 271–300). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chondrogianni, V.
(2008) Comparing child and adult L2 acquisition of the Greek DP: Effects of age and construction. In B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective (pp. 97–142). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Muysken, P.
(1986) The availability of Universal Grammar to adult and child learners — A study of the acquisition of German word-order. Second Language Research, 2, 93–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Eisenbeiss, S., & Vainikka, A.
(1994) The seeds of structure. In T. Hoekstra & B.D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 85–118). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conti-Ramsden, G.
(2003) Processing and linguistic markers in young children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 46, 1029–1037. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R., & Larson-Hall, J.
(2005) What does the critical period really mean? In J.F. Kroll & A.M.B. De Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 88–108). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dulay, H.C., & Burt, M.K.
(1974) Natural sequences in child second language strategies. Language Learning, 24, 37–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eubank, L.
(1993/94) On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development. Language Acquisition, 3, 183–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Negation in early German-English interlanguage: More valueless features in the L2 initial state. Second Language Research, 12(1), 73–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Felix, S.
(1991) The accessibility of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (Ed.), Point-counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 89–104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.[ p. 44 ] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., & Selinker, L.
(1983) Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gavruseva, E.
(2002) Is there primacy of aspect in child L2 English? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 109–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004).Root infinitives in child second language English: An aspectual features account. Second Language Research, 20(4), 335–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gavruseva, L., & Lardiere, D.
(1996) The emergence of extended phrase structure in child L2 acquisition. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes, & A. Zukowski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 20 (pp. 225–236). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Geçkin, V., & Haznedar, B.
(2008) The morphology/syntax interface in child L2 acquisition: Evidence from verbal morphology. In B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective (pp. 237–267). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grondin, N., & White, L.
(1996) Functional categories in child L2 acquisition of French. Language Acquisition, 1, 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T.
(2005) Comprehension and production of French object clitics by child second language learners and children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 363–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, G.
(2001) Tense morphology and verb-second in Swedish L1 children, L2 children and children with SLI. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 85–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M., & Marantz, A.
(1993) Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S.J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20 (pp. 111–176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haznedar, B.
(1997) L2 acquisition by a Turkish-speaking child: Evidence for L1 influence. In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Boston University Conference on Language Development, 21 (pp. 245–256). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2001) The acquisition of the IP system in child L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) The status of functional categories in child second language acquisition: Evidence from the acquisition of CP. Second Language Research, 19, 1–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B., & Schwartz, B.D.
(1997) Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Boston University Conference on Language Development, 21 (pp. 257–268). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Herschensohn, J.
(2000) The second time around: Minimalism and L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hulk, A., & Müller, N.
(2000) Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 227–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyams, N.
(1992) The genesis of clausal structure. In J. Meisel (Ed.), The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition (pp. 372–400). Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamson, N.
(2003) Maturational constraints in SLA. In C.J. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539–588). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T.
(2008) Progressive aspect in child L2-English. In B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective (pp. 17–53). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., & Wexler, K.
(2002) Why is ‘is’ easier than ‘-s’?: Acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child second language learners of English. Second Language Research, 18, 95–136.[ p. 45 ] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jia, G.
(2003) The acquisition of the English plural morpheme by native Mandarin Chinesespeaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1297–1311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jia, G., & Fuse, A.
(2007) Acquisition of English grammatical morphology by nativeMandarinspeaking children and adolescents: Age-related differences. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 50, 1280–1299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakshmanan, U.
(1991) Morphological uniformity and null subjects in child second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (Ed.), Point-counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language acquisition (pp. 305–338). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993/94) The boy for the cookie — Some evidence for the non-violation of the case filter in child second language acquisition. Language Acquisition, 3, 51–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1994) Universal grammar in child L2 acquisition: Morphological uniformity and null subjects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Child second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 377–399). Sheffield, UK: Emerald Publishers.Google Scholar
Lakshmanan, U., & Selinker, L.
(1994) The status of CP and the tensed complementizer that in the developing L2 grammars of English. Second Language Research, 10, 25–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D.
(1998a) Case and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state. Second Language Research, 14, 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998b) Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research, 14, 359–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marinis, T., & Chondrogianni, V.
(2010) Production of tense marking in successive bilingual children: When do they converge with their monolingual peers? International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 19–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B.
(1978) Second language acquisition in childhood. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Meisel, J.M.
(1997) The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: Contrasting first and second language development. Second Language Research, 13, 227–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Child second language acquisition or successive first language acquisition. In B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition (pp. 55–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mobaraki, M., Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M.
(2008) The status of subjects in early child L2 English. In B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective (pp. 209–236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Orgassa, A., & Weerman, F.
(2008) Dutch gender in specific language impairment and second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 24, 333–364. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J.
(2004) On the relevance of specific language impairment to understanding the role of transfer in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 67–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Grammatical morphology in children learning English as a second language: Implications of similarities with specific language impairment. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in the Schools, 36, 172–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Tense as a clinical marker in English L2 acquisition with language delay/impairment. In E. Gavruseva & B. Haznedar (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective (pp. 337–356). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., & Crago, M.
(2000) Tense and temporality: A comparison between children learning a second language and children with SLI. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 43, 834–848.[ p. 46 ] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Comparing L2 and SLI grammars in French: Focus on DP. In P. Prévost & J. Paradis (Eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts: Focus on functional categories (pp. 89–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., Rice, M., Crago, M., & Marquis, J.
(2008) The acquisition of tense in English: Distinguishing child L2 from L1 and SLI. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, D., & Wexler, K.
(1993) The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language, 69, 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P.
(1997) Truncation and root infinitives in second language acquisition of French. In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 21 (pp. 453–464). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2008) Truncation in child L2 acquisition: Evidence from verbless utterances. In B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective (pp. 177–207). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P., & White, L.
(2000) Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16, 103–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radford, A.
(1990) Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rice, M.L., & Wexler, K.
(1996) Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 39, 1236–1257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Test of early grammatical impairment. New York: Psyhological Corporation.Google Scholar
Rice, M.L., Wexler, K., & Cleave, P.
(1995) Specific language impairment as a period of Extended Optional Infinitive. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 38, 850–863. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L.
(1993/94) Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition, 3, 371–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1994) Early null subjects and root null subjects. In T. Hoekstra & B.D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 151–176). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B.D.
(1992) Testing between UG-based and problem-solving models of SLA: Developmental sequence data. Language Acquisition, 2, 1–19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Child L2 acquisition: Paving the way. In B. Beachley, A. Brown, & F. Conlin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Boston University Conference on Language Development, 27 (pp. 26–50). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B.D., & Eubank, L.
(1996) Introduction: What is the ‘L2 initial state?’ Second Language Research, 12, 1–5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B.D., & Sprouse, R.
(1996) L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., & Paoli, S.
(2004) Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax-pragmatic interface: Subjects and objects in English-Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 183–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R.
(2008) Meaning in the second language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Serratrice, L.
(2009) Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Revisiting the processing versus representation distinction. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 195–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, S.
(2005) Child L2, adult L2, child L1: Differences and similarities. A study on the acquisition of direct object scrambling in Dutch. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utrecht, The Netherlands, LOT.[ p. 47 ]
(2008) Comparing child L2 development with adult L2 development: How to measure L2 proficiency. In B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective (pp. 301–333). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, A.
(1993/94) Case in the development of English syntax. Language Acquisition, 3, 257–325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M.
(1994) Direct access to X-bar theory: Evidence from Korean and Turkish adults learning German. In T. Hoekstra & B.D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in Generative Grammar (pp. 265–316). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Gradual development of L2 phrase structure. Second Language Research, 12, 7–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) The roots of syntax and how they grow. Organic grammar, the basic variety and processibility theory. In S. Unsworth, A. Sorace, T. Parodi, & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Paths of development in L1 and L2 acquisition (pp. 77–106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Minimalism vs. Organic Syntax. In S. Karimi, V. Samiian, & W.K. Wilkins (Eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture (pp. 319–338). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K.
(1994) Optional Infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivations. In D. Lightfoot & N. Hornstein (Eds.), Verb movement (pp. 305–350). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, L.
(2003) Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Grammatical theory: Interfaces and L2 knowledge. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 49–68). Sheffield: Emerald Publishers.Google Scholar
Zdorenko, T., & Paradis, J.
(2008) The acquisition of articles in child L2 English: Fluctuation, transfer or both? Second Language Research, 24, 227–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Articles in child L2 English: When L1 and L2 acquisition meet at the interface. First Language, 31, 1–25.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

Alonso, Jorge González, Jason Rothman, Denny Berndt, Tammer Castro & Marit Westergaard
2017. Broad scope and narrow focus: On the contemporary linguistic and psycholinguistic study of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism 21:6  pp. 639 ff. Crossref logo
Bayram, Fatih, Jason Rothman, Michael Iverson, Tanja Kupisch, David Miller, Eloi Puig-Mayenco & Marit Westergaard
2019. Differences in use without deficiencies in competence: passives in the Turkish and German of Turkish heritage speakers in Germany. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 22:8  pp. 919 ff. Crossref logo
Annick De Houwer & Lourdes Ortega
2018.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingualism, Crossref logo
FLETA GUILLÉN, M. TERESA
2020. Construyendo puentes entre Educación Infantil y Primaria para la enseñanza bilingüe en inglés. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages 7:1  pp. 24 ff. Crossref logo
Puig-Mayenco, Eloi, Ian Cunnings, Fatih Bayram, David Miller, Susagna Tubau & Jason Rothman
2018. Language Dominance Affects Bilingual Performance and Processing Outcomes in Adulthood. Frontiers in Psychology 9 Crossref logo
Rothman, Jason, Jorge González Alonso & Eloi Puig-Mayenco
2019.  In Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer, Crossref logo
ROTHMAN, JASON, DREW LONG, MICHAEL IVERSON, TIFFANY JUDY, ANNE LINGWALL & TUSHAR CHAKRAVARTY
2016. Older age of onset in child L2 acquisition can be facilitative: evidence from the acquisition of English passives by Spanish natives. Journal of Child Language 43:3  pp. 662 ff. Crossref logo
Rothman, Jason & Roumyana Slabakova
2018. THE GENERATIVE APPROACH TO SLA AND ITS PLACE IN MODERN SECOND LANGUAGE STUDIES. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40:2  pp. 417 ff. Crossref logo
Sadiq, Raghad Baker, Nadire Cavus & Dogan Ibrahim
2021. Mobile application based on CCI standards to help children learn English as a foreign language. Interactive Learning Environments 29:3  pp. 442 ff. Crossref logo
Sherkina-Lieber, Marina
2020. A classification of receptive bilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 10:3  pp. 412 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.