Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
Vol. 3:1 (2013) ► pp.26–47

Child second language acquisition from a generative perspective

| Boğaziçi University

This chapter reviews current work on child second language acquisition from a generative perspective. The primary goal is to identify characteristics of child L2 acquisition in relation to child first language (L1) acquisition and adult second language (L2) acquisition and to discuss its contribution to these sister fields both in typical and atypical domains. The chapter is organized into three sections, covering L1 influence in child L2 acquisition, the acquisition of functional architecture in child L2 acquisition, and the issue of morphological variability. Also included in the last section are the relatively new and fast developing areas of research in atypical child L2 acquisition research.

Keywords: child L2 acquisition, L1 influence in L2 acquisition, functional categories, morphological variability
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background on L1 and L2 acquisition
  • 3.L1 influence in child L2 acquisition
  • 4.Functional categories
  • 5.The morpho-syntax interface: Morphological variability
  • 6.Typical vs. atypical child L2 acquisition
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 February 2013
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.3.1.02haz
References
Andersen, R
(1983) Transfer to somewhere. In S. Gass & L. Selinker (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning (pp. 177–201). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Beard, R
(1987) Morpheme order in a lexeme-based morphology. Lingua, 721, 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988) On the separation of derivation from morphology: Toward a lexeme/morpheme-based morphology. Quaderni di Semantica, 91, 3–59.Google Scholar
(1993) Simultaneous and dual derivation in word formation. Language, 691, 716–741. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bedore, L., & Leonard, L
(1998) Specific language impairment and grammatical morphology: A discriminant function analysis. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 411, 1185–1192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R
(1990) The logical problem of language learning. Linguistic Analysis, 201, 3–49.Google Scholar
Blom, E
(2008) Testing the domain-by-age model: Inflection and placement of Dutch verbs. In B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective (pp. 271–300). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chondrogianni, V
(2008) Comparing child and adult L2 acquisition of the Greek DP: Effects of age and construction. In B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective (pp. 97–142). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., & Muysken, P
(1986) The availability of Universal Grammar to adult and child learners — A study of the acquisition of German word-order. Second Language Research, 21, 93–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Eisenbeiss, S., & Vainikka, A
(1994) The seeds of structure. In T. Hoekstra & B.D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 85–118). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conti-Ramsden, G
(2003) Processing and linguistic markers in young children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 461, 1029–1037. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R., & Larson-Hall, J
(2005) What does the critical period really mean? In J.F. Kroll & A.M.B. De Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 88–108). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dulay, H.C., & Burt, M.K
(1974) Natural sequences in child second language strategies. Language Learning, 241, 37–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eubank, L
(1993/94) On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development. Language Acquisition, 31, 183–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) Negation in early German-English interlanguage: More valueless features in the L2 initial state. Second Language Research, 12(1), 73–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felix, S
(1991) The accessibility of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (Ed.), Point-counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language (pp. 89–104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., & Selinker, L
(1983) Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gavruseva, E
(2002) Is there primacy of aspect in child L2 English? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 51, 109–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004).Root infinitives in child second language English: An aspectual features account. Second Language Research, 20(4), 335–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavruseva, L., & Lardiere, D
(1996) The emergence of extended phrase structure in child L2 acquisition. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes, & A. Zukowski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 201 (pp. 225–236). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Geçkin, V., & Haznedar, B
(2008) The morphology/syntax interface in child L2 acquisition: Evidence from verbal morphology. In B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective (pp. 237–267). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grondin, N., & White, L
(1996) Functional categories in child L2 acquisition of French. Language Acquisition, 11, 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T
(2005) Comprehension and production of French object clitics by child second language learners and children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 261, 363–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, G
(2001) Tense morphology and verb-second in Swedish L1 children, L2 children and children with SLI. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 41, 85–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, M., & Marantz, A
(1993) Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S.J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 201 (pp. 111–176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haznedar, B
(1997) L2 acquisition by a Turkish-speaking child: Evidence for L1 influence. In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Boston University Conference on Language Development, 211 (pp. 245–256). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2001) The acquisition of the IP system in child L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 231, 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) The status of functional categories in child second language acquisition: Evidence from the acquisition of CP. Second Language Research, 191, 1–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B., & Schwartz, B.D
(1997) Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Boston University Conference on Language Development, 211 (pp. 257–268). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Herschensohn, J
(2000) The second time around: Minimalism and L2 acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulk, A., & Müller, N
(2000) Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 31, 227–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyams, N
(1992) The genesis of clausal structure. In J. Meisel (Ed.), The acquisition of verb placement: Functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition (pp. 372–400). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamson, N
(2003) Maturational constraints in SLA. In C.J. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539–588). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T
(2008) Progressive aspect in child L2-English. In B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective (pp. 17–53). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., & Wexler, K
(2002) Why is ‘is’ easier than ‘-s’?: Acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child second language learners of English. Second Language Research, 181, 95–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jia, G
(2003) The acquisition of the English plural morpheme by native Mandarin Chinesespeaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 461, 1297–1311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jia, G., & Fuse, A
(2007) Acquisition of English grammatical morphology by nativeMandarinspeaking children and adolescents: Age-related differences. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 501, 1280–1299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakshmanan, U
(1991) Morphological uniformity and null subjects in child second language acquisition. In L. Eubank (Ed.), Point-counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the second language acquisition (pp. 305–338). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993/94) The boy for the cookie — Some evidence for the non-violation of the case filter in child second language acquisition. Language Acquisition, 31, 51–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Child second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 377–399). Sheffield, UK: Emerald Publishers.Google Scholar
Lakshmanan, U., & Selinker, L
(1994) The status of CP and the tensed complementizer that in the developing L2 grammars of English. Second Language Research, 101, 25–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, D
(1998a) Case and tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state. Second Language Research, 141, 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998b) Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research, 141, 359–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marinis, T., & Chondrogianni, V
(2010) Production of tense marking in successive bilingual children: When do they converge with their monolingual peers? International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 121, 19–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B
(1978) Second language acquisition in childhood. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Meisel, J.M
(1997) The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: Contrasting first and second language development. Second Language Research, 131, 227–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Child second language acquisition or successive first language acquisition. In B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition (pp. 55–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mobaraki, M., Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M
(2008) The status of subjects in early child L2 English. In B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective (pp. 209–236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Orgassa, A., & Weerman, F
(2008) Dutch gender in specific language impairment and second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 241, 333–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J
(2004) On the relevance of specific language impairment to understanding the role of transfer in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 251, 67–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Grammatical morphology in children learning English as a second language: Implications of similarities with specific language impairment. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in the Schools, 361, 172–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Tense as a clinical marker in English L2 acquisition with language delay/impairment. In E. Gavruseva & B. Haznedar (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective (pp. 337–356). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., & Crago, M
(2000) Tense and temporality: A comparison between children learning a second language and children with SLI. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 431, 834–848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Comparing L2 and SLI grammars in French: Focus on DP. In P. Prévost & J. Paradis (Eds.), The acquisition of French in different contexts: Focus on functional categories (pp. 89–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., Rice, M., Crago, M., & Marquis, J
(2008) The acquisition of tense in English: Distinguishing child L2 from L1 and SLI. Applied Psycholinguistics, 291, 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, D., & Wexler, K
(1993) The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language, 691, 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P
(1997) Truncation and root infinitives in second language acquisition of French. In E. Hughes, M. Hughes, & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 211 (pp. 453–464). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2008) Truncation in child L2 acquisition: Evidence from verbless utterances. In B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective (pp. 177–207). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P., & White, L
(2000) Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 161, 103–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radford, A
(1990) Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rice, M.L., & Wexler, K
(1996) Toward tense as a clinical marker of specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 391, 1236–1257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001) Test of early grammatical impairment. New York: Psyhological Corporation.Google Scholar
Rice, M.L., Wexler, K., & Cleave, P
(1995) Specific language impairment as a period of Extended Optional Infinitive. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 381, 850–863. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L
(1993/94) Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition, 31, 371–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994) Early null subjects and root null subjects. In T. Hoekstra & B.D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 151–176). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B.D
(1992) Testing between UG-based and problem-solving models of SLA: Developmental sequence data. Language Acquisition, 21, 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Child L2 acquisition: Paving the way. In B. Beachley, A. Brown, & F. Conlin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Boston University Conference on Language Development, 271 (pp. 26–50). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B.D., & Eubank, L
(1996) Introduction: What is the ‘L2 initial state?’ Second Language Research, 121, 1–5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B.D., & Sprouse, R
(1996) L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research, 121, 40–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., & Paoli, S
(2004) Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax-pragmatic interface: Subjects and objects in English-Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 71, 183–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R
(2008) Meaning in the second language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Serratrice, L
(2009) Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Revisiting the processing versus representation distinction. The International Journal of Bilingualism, 131, 195–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, S
(2005) Child L2, adult L2, child L1: Differences and similarities. A study on the acquisition of direct object scrambling in Dutch. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utrecht, The Netherlands, LOT.
(2008) Comparing child L2 development with adult L2 development: How to measure L2 proficiency. In B. Haznedar & E. Gavruseva (Eds.), Current trends in child second language acquisition: A generative perspective (pp. 301–333). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, A
(1993/94) Case in the development of English syntax. Language Acquisition, 31, 257–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M
(1994) Direct access to X-bar theory: Evidence from Korean and Turkish adults learning German. In T. Hoekstra & B.D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in Generative Grammar (pp. 265–316). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) Gradual development of L2 phrase structure. Second Language Research, 121, 7–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) The roots of syntax and how they grow. Organic grammar, the basic variety and processibility theory. In S. Unsworth, A. Sorace, T. Parodi, & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Paths of development in L1 and L2 acquisition (pp. 77–106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007) Minimalism vs. Organic Syntax. In S. Karimi, V. Samiian, & W.K. Wilkins (Eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture (pp. 319–338). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K
(1994) Optional Infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivations. In D. Lightfoot & N. Hornstein (Eds.), Verb movement (pp. 305–350). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, L
(2003) Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Grammatical theory: Interfaces and L2 knowledge. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 49–68). Sheffield: Emerald Publishers.Google Scholar
Zdorenko, T., & Paradis, J
(2008) The acquisition of articles in child L2 English: Fluctuation, transfer or both? Second Language Research, 241, 227–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Articles in child L2 English: When L1 and L2 acquisition meet at the interface. First Language, 311, 1–25.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 13 other publications

Alonso, Jorge González, Jason Rothman, Denny Berndt, Tammer Castro & Marit Westergaard
2017. Broad scope and narrow focus: On the contemporary linguistic and psycholinguistic study of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism 21:6 ► pp. 639 ff. DOI logo
Bayram, Fatih, Grazia Di Pisa, Jason Rothman & Roumyana Slabakova
2021. Current Trends and Emerging Methodologies in Charting Heritage Language Grammars. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 545 ff. DOI logo
Bayram, Fatih, Jason Rothman, Michael Iverson, Tanja Kupisch, David Miller, Eloi Puig-Mayenco & Marit Westergaard
2019. Differences in use without deficiencies in competence: passives in the Turkish and German of Turkish heritage speakers in Germany. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 22:8 ► pp. 919 ff. DOI logo
Annick De Houwer & Lourdes Ortega
2018. The Cambridge Handbook of Bilingualism, DOI logo
Fleta Guillén, M. Teresa
2020. Construyendo puentes entre Educación Infantil y Primaria para la enseñanza bilingüe en inglés. EuroAmerican Journal of Applied Linguistics and Languages 7:1 ► pp. 24 ff. DOI logo
Haznedar, Belma
2023. Teaching and Assessment in Young Learners' Classrooms. In Handbook of Research on Perspectives in Foreign Language Assessment [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 136 ff. DOI logo
Puig-Mayenco, Eloi, Ian Cunnings, Fatih Bayram, David Miller, Susagna Tubau & Jason Rothman
2018. Language Dominance Affects Bilingual Performance and Processing Outcomes in Adulthood. Frontiers in Psychology 9 DOI logo
Rothman, Jason, Jorge González Alonso & Eloi Puig-Mayenco
2019. Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer, DOI logo
ROTHMAN, JASON, DREW LONG, MICHAEL IVERSON, TIFFANY JUDY, ANNE LINGWALL & TUSHAR CHAKRAVARTY
2016. Older age of onset in child L2 acquisition can be facilitative: evidence from the acquisition of English passives by Spanish natives. Journal of Child Language 43:3 ► pp. 662 ff. DOI logo
Rothman, Jason & Roumyana Slabakova
2018. THE GENERATIVE APPROACH TO SLA AND ITS PLACE IN MODERN SECOND LANGUAGE STUDIES. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40:2 ► pp. 417 ff. DOI logo
Sadiq, Raghad Baker, Nadire Cavus & Dogan Ibrahim
2021. Mobile application based on CCI standards to help children learn English as a foreign language. Interactive Learning Environments 29:3 ► pp. 442 ff. DOI logo
Sherkina-Lieber, Marina
2020. A classification of receptive bilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 10:3 ► pp. 412 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Research Approaches to Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 373 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.