Commentary published In:
Epistemological issue with keynote article “The illusion of language acquisition” by William O’Grady[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3:3] 2013
► pp. 341–344
[Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 3:3] 2013
► pp. 341–344
Commentary
Whose ease of processing?
References
Arnold, J.E., Wasow, T., Asudeh, A., & Alrenga, P
(2004) Avoiding attachment ambiguities: The role of constituent ordering. Journal of Memory and Language, 511, 55–70. 
Bever, T.G
(1970) The cognitive basis for linguistic structure. New York: Wiley.
Fedorenko, E., Gibson, E., & Rohde, D
(2006) The nature of working memory capacity in sentence comprehension: Evidence against domain-specific working memory resources. Journal of Memory and Language, 541, 541–553.
Ferreira, V.S
(2008) Ambiguity, accessibility, and a division of labor for communicative success. Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory. 491, 209–246.
Frazier, L., & Fodor, J.D
(1978) The sausage-machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 61, 291–325.
Gordon, P.C., Hendrick, R., & Levine, W.H
(2002) Memory load interference in syntactic processing. Psychological Science, 131, 425–430.
Han, C., Lidz, J., & Musolino, J
(2007) V-raising and grammar competition in Korean: Evidence from negation and quantifiers scope. Linguistic Inquiry, 381, 1–48.
Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A
(1992) A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 991, 122–149.
MacDonald, M.C., Pearlmutter, N.J., & Seidenberg, M.S
(1994) Lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 1011, 676–703.
Sedivy, J., Tanenhaus, M.K., Chambers, C.G., & Carlson, G.N
(1999) Achieving incremental interpretation through contextual representation: Evidence from the processing of adjectives. Cognition. 711, 109–147.
Tanenhaus, M.K., Spivey-Knowlton, M., Eberhard, K., & Sedivy, J
(1995) Integration of visual and linguistic information during spoken language comprehension. Science, 2681, 1632–1634.