References

References

Grüter, T., Lieberman, M., & Gualmini, A.
(2010) Acquiring the scope of disjunction and negation in L2: A bidirectional study of learners of Japanese and English. Language Acquisition 17, 127–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J.
(2004) Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O.
(1933) Essentials of English grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Lee, S.
(2009) Interpreting scope ambiguity in first and second language processing: Universal quantifiers and negation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar
O’Grady, W.
(2005) Syntactic carpentry: An emergentist approach to syntax. Mahah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(2010) Rethinking rules and representations: Binding in Korean and English. In Sang-Oak, L. (Ed.), Contemporary Korean linguistics: International perspective (pp. 118– 148). Seoul: Thaehaksa.Google Scholar
(2012) Three factors in the design and acquisition of language. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 3, 493–499.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T.
(2006) Interface strategies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Reuland, E.
(2011) Anaphora and language design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sprouse, J., Wagers, M., & Phillips, C.
(2012) A test of the relation between working-memory capacity and syntactic island effects. Language 88, 82–123. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, S., Gualmini, A., & Helder, C.
(2008) Children’s interpretation of indefinites in sentences containing negation: A reassessment of the cross-linguistic picture. Language Acquisition 15, 315–328.[ p. 383 ] CrossrefGoogle Scholar