References
Baker, M.C
(2008) The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In T. Biberauer (Ed.), The limits of syntactic variation, (pp. 351–373). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berwick, R.C., & Chomsky, N
(2011) The biolinguistic program: The current state of its evolution and development. In A.M. Di Sciullo, & C. Boeckx (Eds.), The biolinguistic enterprise: New perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty, (pp. 19–41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Biberauer, T.
(Ed.) (2008) The limits of syntactic variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A., Roberts, I., & Sheehan, M.
(Eds.) (2010) Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boeckx, C
(2011) Approaching parameters from below. In A.M. Di Sciullo, & C. Boeckx (Eds.), The biolinguistic enterprise: New perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty, (pp. 205–221). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borer, H
(1984) Parametric syntax: Case studies in semitic and Romance languages. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camacho, J. A
(2013) Null subjects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N
(1995) The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2008) On phases. In C. Otero, et al.. (Eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory (pp. 134–166). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culbertson, J., Smolensky, P., & Wilson, C
(2013) Cognitive biases, linguistic universals, and constraint–based grammar learning. Topics in cognitive Science, 51, 392–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallego, A. J
(2011) Parameters. In C. Boeckx (Ed.), Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grinstead, J
(2004) Subjects and interface delay in child Spanish and Catalan. Language, 80(1), 40–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haider, H
(2012) The VO-OV split of Germanic languages. In H. Haider (Eds.), Symmetry breaking in syntax (pp. 97–135). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, A., & Roberts, I
(2009) Introduction: Parameters in minimalist theory. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts, & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory (pp. 1–57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, F.J
(2005) Possible and probable languages: A generative perspective on linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, M
(2008) Two kinds of variation in a minimalist system. Linguistische Arbeits Berichte, 871, 133–162.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L
(2006) Grammatically-based target-inconsistencies in child language. In eK.U. Deen, J. Nomura, B. Schulz, & B.D. Schwartz (Eds.), The Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition|North America (pp. 19–49). University of Connecticut Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 4.Google Scholar
Pearl, L., & Lidz, J
(2013) Parameters in Language Acquisition. In C. Boeckx, & K. Grohmann (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of biolinguistics (pp. 129–159). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, T
(2006) Interface strategies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I.M.
this volume). Early, late or very late? Timing acquisition and bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism.
Valian, V
(1991) Syntactic subjects in the early speech of American and Italian children. Cognition, 401, 21–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, C
(2012) Computational models of syntactic acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 31, 205–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar