Cover not available
Part of
Narrative Absorption
Edited by Frank Hakemulder, Moniek M. Kuijpers, Ed S. Tan, Katalin Bálint and Miruna M. Doicaru
[Linguistic Approaches to Literature 27] 2017
► pp. 217–249

Chapter 11
Forms of absorption that facilitate the aesthetic and explanatory effects of literary reading

 | University of Alberta
 | University of Alberta
Rather than articulating a univocal conception of absorption, we provide a theoretical rationale for the Absorption-like States Questionnaire (ASQ), an instrument that incorporates alternative conceptions of absorption based upon contrasts between forms of (1) attention (sustained concentration and attentional reorienting); (2) embodied space (peri-personal and extra-personal space); (3) self-other relations (pre-enactive empathy and cognitive perspective-taking); and (4) verisimilitude (generalizing realism and self-implicating givenness). Structural equation modeling indicated that, in conjunction with open reflection, a type of absorption called expressive enactment distinctively predicted aesthetic outcomes. In contrast, also in conjunction with open reflection, a type of absorption called integrative comprehension distinctively predicted explanatory outcomes.
Keywords: absorption, attention, empathy, verisimilitude, embodiment, situation models, aesthetic attitude, sublime feeling, structural equation models
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Contrasting assumptions about absorption-like states
    • 1.2Aesthetic attitude (re-visited)
      • 1.2.1Open reflection
      • 1.2.2Performative explication
    • 1.3Identifying specific sources of tension in theories of absorption
      • 1.3.1Sustained concentration and attentional reorienting
        • ASQ Attention items
      • 1.3.2Peri-personal and extra-personal space
        • ASQ embodied space items
      • 1.3.3Pre-enactive empathy and cognitive perspective-taking
        • ASQ self-other relation items
      • 1.3.4Self-implicating givenness and generalizing realism
        • ASQ verisimilitude items
    • 1.4Different forms of absorption
      • Open reflection
      • Integrative Comprehension, Expressive Enactment, Reactive Engagement
      • 1.4.1Aesthetic and explanatory reading outcomes
        • Aesthetic outcomes
        • Explanatory outcomes
  • 2.Discussion
    • 2.1Research prospects
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 9 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.27.12kui
References (129)
References
Andringa, E. (1996). Effects of “narrative distance” on readers’ emotional involvement and response. Poetics, 23, 431–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beardsley, M. C. (1981). Aesthetics: Problems in the philosophy of criticism (2nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Becker, A. H. (1997). Emergent and common features influence metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(4), 243–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bezdek, M. A., Foy, J. E., & Gerrig, R. J. (2013). “Run for it!” Viewers’ participatory responses to film narratives. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 409–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Black, M. (1962). Models and metaphors: Studies in language and philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., & Taylor, H. A. (2011). Better you than I: Perspectives and emotion simulation during narrative comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(5), 659–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bullough, E. (1912). ‘Psychical distance’ as a factor in art and as an aesthetic principle. British Journal of Psychology, 5, 87–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12(4), 321–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carota, F., Moseley, R., & Pulvermüller, F. (2012). Body-part-specific representations of semantic noun categories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24(6), 1492–1509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cazeaux, C. (2007). Kant, cognitive metaphor and continental philosophy. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, D. J. (2002). On sense and intension. Nous, 36(s16), 135–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, T. (2012). Thinking of others: On the talent for metaphor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cardellicchio, P., Sinigaglia, C., & Costantini, M. (2013). Grasping affordances with the other’s hand: A TMS study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(4), 455–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cupchik, G. C. (2002). The evolution of psychical distance as an aesthetic concept. Culture & Psychology, 8(2), 155–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crowell, S. (2005). Phenomenology is the poetic essence of philosophy: Maurice Natanson on the rule of metaphor. Research in Phenomenology, 35(1), 270–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 85.Google Scholar
De Hoop, H., & Hogeweg, L. (2014). The use of second person pronouns in a literary work. Journal of Literary Semantics, 43(2), 109–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Young, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dickie, G. (1964). The myth of the aesthetic attitude. American Philosophical Quarterly, 1(1), 56–65. Retrieved from: <[URL]>
Djikic, M., & Oatley, K. (2014). The art in fiction: From indirect communication to changes of the self. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 498–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Moldoveanu, M. C. (2013). Opening the closed mind: The effect of exposure to literature on the need for closure. Creativity Research Journal, 25(2), 149–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellamil, M., Dobson, C., Beeman, M., & Christoff, K. (2012). Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process. NeuroImage, 59(2), 1783–1794. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fenner, D. E. W. (1996). The aesthetic attitude. Atlantic Highlands, N.J: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 340–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fialho, O. (2012). Self-modifying experiences in literary reading: A model for reader response. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Fletcher, A. & Monterosso, J. (2016). The science of free-indirect discourse: An alternate cognitive effect. Narrative 24(1), 82–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forgács, B., Bohrn, I., Baudewig, J., Hofmann, M. J., Pléh, C., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012). Neural correlates of combinatorial semantic processing of literal and figurative noun noun compound words. NeuroImage, 63(3), 1432–1442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forsey, J. (2007). Is a theory of the sublime possible? Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 65(4), 381–389. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, T., & Koch, S. C. (2014). Embodied affectivity: On moving and being moved. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2012). Neurons, neonates and narrative. In A. Foolen, U. M. Lüdtke, T. P. Racine, & J. Zlatev (Eds.), Moving ourselves, moving others: Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consciousness and language (pp. 167–196). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, S., & Hutto, D. (2008). Primary interaction and narrative practice (pp. 17–38). In J. Zlatev, T. Racine, C. Sinha, & E. Itkonen (Eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2009). Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1), 20–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geniusas, S. (2012). The origins of the horizon in Husserl’s phenomenology. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gendlin, E. T. (1992). The primacy of the body, not the primacy of perception. Man and World, 25(3), 341–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997). Experiencing and the creation of meaning: A philosophical and psychological approach to the subjective. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Gineste, M. -D., Indurkhya, B., & Scart, V. (2000). Emergence of features in metaphor comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(3), 117–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
(2011). Conscious and unconscious processes in readers’ narrative experiences. In G. Olson (Ed.), Current trends in narratology (Vol. 27, pp. 37–60). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J., & Jacovina, M. E. (2009). Reader participation in the experience of narrative. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 223–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2012). Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex, 48(7), 905–922. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97(1), 3–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (2004). Sight unseen. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 94(101), 371–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of personality and social psychology, 79(5), 701. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, M. C., Brock, T. C., & Kaufman, G. F. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hintikka, J. (2003). The notion of intuition in Husserl. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 224(2), 57–79. Retrieved from: <[URL]>
Hohwy, J., & Paton, B. (2010). Explaining away the body: Experiences of supernaturally caused touch and touch on non-hand objects within the rubber hand illusion. PLoS ONE, 5(2), e9416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunt, R. A., & Vipond, D. (1985). Crash-testing a transactional model of literary reading. Reader: Essays in Reader-Oriented Theory, Criticism, and Pedagogy, 14, 23–39.Google Scholar
(1986). Evaluations in literary reading. Text, 6, 53–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E. (1962). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. (W. R. B. Gibson, Trans.) New York, NY: Collier Books.Google Scholar
(1983). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy (first book). (F. Kersten, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Ihde, D. (2007). Listening and voice: Phenomenologies of sound (2nd ed.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Ingarden, R. (1961). Aesthetic experience and aesthetic object. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 21(3), 289–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Towards a neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading. In R. M. Willems (Ed.), Towards a cognitive neuroscience of natural language use (pp. 135–159). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
(2015). Neurocognitive poetics: Methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 186. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Jones, L. L., & Estes, Z. (2005). Metaphor comprehension as attributive categorization. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(1), 110–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemmerer, D., Castillo, J. G., Talavage, T., Patterson, S., & Wiley, C. (2008). Neuroanatomical distribution of five semantic components of verbs: Evidence from fMRI. Brain and Language, 107(1), 16–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemp, G. (1999). The aesthetic attitude. British Journal of Aesthetics, 39(4), 392–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kivy, P. (2006). The performance of reading: An essay in the philosophy of literature. Malden, MA; Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koelsch, S., Jacobs, A. M., Menninghaus, W., Liebal, K., Klann-Delius, G., et al. (2015). The quartet theory of human emotions: An integrative and neurofunctional model. Physics of Life Reviews, 13, 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Konečni, V. J. (2008). Does music induce emotion? A theoretical and methodological analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 115–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koriat, A. (2000). The feeling of knowing: Some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control. Consciousness and Cognition, 9(2), 149–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klatzky, R. (1998). Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In C. Freske, C. Habel & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge (pp. 1–17). Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopman, E. M, & Hakemulder, F. (2015). Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: A theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 9(1), 79–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotovych, M., Dixon, P., Bortolussi, M., & Holden, M. (2011). Textual determinants of a component of literary identification. Scientific Study of Literature, 1(2), 260–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kreitler, H., & Kreitler, S. (1972). Psychology of the arts. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Kuijpers, M. M., Hakemulder, F., Tan, E. S., & Doicaru, M. M. (2014). Exploring absorbing reading experiences: Developing and validating a self-report scale to measure story world absorption. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(1), 89–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., Busink, R. Miall, D. S., Cey, R. (2003). Withdrawing to engage: How literary reading penetrates consciousness. Paper presented at a workshop on the theme “How Literature Enters Life II,” Utrecht, The Netherlands, June 26–28.
Kuiken, D., Campbell, P., & Sopčák, P. (2012). The Experiencing Questionnaire: Locating exceptional reading moments. Scientific Study of Literature, 2(2), 243–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., Miall, D. S., & Sikora, S. (2004). Forms of self-implication in literary reading. Poetics Today, 25(2), 171–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., & Oliver, M. B. (2013). Aesthetic engagement during moments of suffering. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(2), 294–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, D., & Sharma, R. (2013). Effects of loss and trauma on sublime disquietude during literary reading, Scientific Study of Literature, 3(2), 240–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lishner, D. A., Batson, C. D., & Huss, E. (2011). Tenderness and sympathy: Distinct empathic emotions elicited by different forms of need. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(5), 614–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mangen, A., & Kuiken, D. (2014). Lost in an iPad: Narrative engagement on paper and tablet. Scientific Study of Literature, 4(2), 150–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEwan, I. (2008). On Chesil Beach. Toronto: Vintage Canada.Google Scholar
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maranesi, M., Bonini, L., & Fogassi, L. (2014). Cortical processing of object affordances for self and others’ action. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Hanich, J., Wassiliwizky, E., Kuehnast, M., & Jacobsen, T. (2015). Towards a psychological construct of being moved. PloS One, 10(6), DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22, 389–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moseley, R., Carota, F., Hauk, O., Mohr, B., & Pulvermüller, F. (2012). A role for the motor system in binding abstract emotional meaning. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 1634–1647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Natanson, M. A. (1998). The erotic bird: Phenomenology in literature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nell, V. (1988). Lost in a book: The psychology of reading for pleasure. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Oatley, K. (2011). Such stuff as dreams: The psychology of fiction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oliver, M. B., & Woolley, J. K. (2011). Tragic and poignant entertainment. In The Routledge handbook of emotions and mass media (pp. 134–157). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ortony, A. (1979). Beyond literal similarity. Psychological Review, 86(3), 161–180. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Panksepp, J., & Biven, L. (2012). The archaeology of mind: Neuroevolutionary origins of human emotions (1st ed.). New York, NY: W. W Norton.Google Scholar
Pavani, F., & Castiello, U. (2003). Binding personal and extra-personal space through body shadows. Nature Neuroscience, 7(1), 14–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perry, A., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. (2013). Understanding emotional and cognitive empathy: A neuropsychological perspective. In S. Baron-Cohen, M. Lombardo, & H. Tager-Flusberg (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental social neuroscience (pp. 178–190). Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petersen, S. E., & Posner, M. I. (2012). The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35(1), 73–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perrone-Bertolotti, M., Kujala, J., Vidal, J. R., Hamame, C. M., Ossandon, et al. (2012). How silent is silent reading? Intracerebral evidence for top-down activation of temporal voice areas during reading. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(49), 17554–17562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Przyrembel, M., Smallwood, J., Pauen, M., & Singer, T. (2012). Illuminating the dark matter of social neuroscience: Considering the problem of social interaction from philosophical, psychological, and neuroscientific perspectives. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raz, G., Jacob, Y., Gonen, T., Winetraub, Y., Flash, T., Soreq, E., & Hendler, T. (2014). Cry for her or cry with her: Context-dependent dissociation of two modes of cinematic empathy reflected in network cohesion dynamics. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 30–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1981). The rule of metaphor: Multi-disciplinary studies of the creation of meaning in language. (R. Czerny, K. McLaughlin, & J. Costello, Trans.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Scheff, T. (1979). Catharsis in healing, ritual, and drama. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Segal, E. M. (1995). Narrative comprehension and the role of deictic shift theory. In J. F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder, & L. Hewitt (Eds.) Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective (pp 3–17). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Seilman, U., & Larsen, S. F. (1989). Personal resonance to literature: A study of remindings while reading. Poetics, 18(1–2), 165–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sikora, S., Kuiken, D., & Miall, D. S. (2011). Expressive reading: A phenomenological study of readers’ experience of Coleridge’s “The rime of the ancient mariner.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(3), 258–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2010). Confusion and interest: The role of knowledge emotions in aesthetic experience. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(2), 75–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silvia, P. J., & Nusbaum, E. C. (2011). On personality and piloerection: Individual differences in aesthetic chills and other unusual aesthetic experiences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(3), 208–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sircello, G. (1993). How is a theory of the sublime possible? Journal of Aesthetics & Art Criticism, 51(4), 541–550. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. D., Zakrzewski, A. C., Herberger, E. R., Boomer, J., Roeder, J. L., Ashby, F. G., & Church, B. A. (2015). The time course of explicit and implicit categorization. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(7), 2476–2490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sopčák, P. (2007). ‘Creation from nothing’: A foregrounding study of James Joyce’s drafts for Ulysses. Language and Literature, 16(2), 183–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Epiphanies of finitude: A phenomenological study of existential reading. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Sowa, R. (2011). Deictic abstractions: On the occasional references to ideal objectivities producible with the words “this” and “thus.” Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 42(1), 5–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spunt, R. P., & Lieberman, M. D. (2011). An integrative model of the neural systems supporting the comprehension of observed emotional behavior. Neuroimage, 59, 3050–3059. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stolnitz, J. (1960). Aesthetics and philosophy of art criticism. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
(1978). “The aesthetic attitude” in the rise of modern aesthetics. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 36(4), 409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stern, D. N. (2010). Forms of vitality: Exploring dynamic experience in psychology, the arts, psychotherapy, and development. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stueber, K. R. (2012). Varieties of empathy: Neuroscience and the narrativist challenge to the contemporary theory of mind debate. Emotion Review, 4(1), 55–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tellegen, A. & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 268–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tourangeau, R., & Rips, L. (1991). Interpreting and evaluating metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(4), 452–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tourangeau, R., & Sternberg, R. J. (1982). Understanding and appreciating metaphors. Cognition, 11(3), 203–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsunemi, K., & Kusumi, T. (2011). The effect of perceptual and personal memory retrieval on story comprehension. Psychologia, 54, 119–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Peer, W. (1986). Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Vega-Moreno, R. (2004). Metaphor interpretation and emergence. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 16, 297–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vipond, D., & Hunt, R. A. (1984). Point-driven understanding: Pragmatic and cognitive dimensions of literary leading. Poetics: International Review for the Theory of Literature, 13(3), 261–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walter, H. (2012). Social cognitive neuroscience of empathy: Concepts, circuits, and genes. Emotion Review, 4(1), 9–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wild, T. C., Kuiken, D., & Schopflocher, D. (1995). The role of absorption in experiential involvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(3), 569–579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willems, R. M., Toni, I., Hagoort, P., & Casasanto, D. (2010). Neural dissociations between action verb understanding and motor imagery. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(10), 2387–2400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zentner, M., Grandjean, D., & Scherer, K. R. (2008). Emotions evoked by the sound of music: Characterization, classification, and measurement. Emotion, 8(4), 494–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zunshine, L. (2006). Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. (1999). Situation models: The mental leap into imagined worlds. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 15–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Time in language, situation models, and mental simulations. Language Learning, 58, 13–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014). Embodiment and language comprehension: Reframing the discussion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(5), 229–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Ghasseminejad, Melina & María-Ángeles Martínez
2024. Secondary storyworld possible selves: narrative response and cultural (un)predictability. Frontiers of Narrative Studies 10:1 ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Ready, Jonathan L.
2023. Immersion, Identification, and the Iliad, DOI logo
Vanhees, Claudio, Mathea Simons & Vanessa Joosen
2023. Hyperlink desirability in adolescent fiction: location and absorption. Computer Assisted Language Learning 36:3 ► pp. 486 ff. DOI logo
Errington, Patrick J., Melissa Thye, Daniel Mirman & Thomas Holtgraves
2022. Difficulty and pleasure in the comprehension of verb-based metaphor sentences: A behavioral study. PLOS ONE 17:2 ► pp. e0263781 ff. DOI logo
Price, Hazel
2022. The year’s work in stylistics 2021. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 31:4 ► pp. 519 ff. DOI logo
Sopcak, Paul, Don Kuiken & Shawn Douglas
2022. Existential reflection and morality. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Kuijpers, Moniek M.
2021. Chapter 12. Postscript. In Style and Reader Response [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 36], ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Kuijpers, Moniek M.
2021. Exploring the dimensional relationships of story world absorption. Scientific Study of Literature 11:2 ► pp. 266 ff. DOI logo
Kuiken, Don, Shawn Douglas & Moniek Kuijpers
2021. Openness to experience, absorption-like states, and the aesthetic, explanatory, and pragmatic effects of literary reading. Scientific Study of Literature 11:2 ► pp. 148 ff. DOI logo
Deane, Paul
2020. Building and Justifying Interpretations of Texts: A Key Practice in the English Language Arts. ETS Research Report Series 2020:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Mak, Marloes, Clarissa de Vries, Roel M. Willems, Rolf Zwaan & Valentina Bambini
2020. The Influence of Mental Imagery Instructions and Personality Characteristics on Reading Experiences. Collabra: Psychology 6:1 DOI logo
Bruhn, Mark J.
2018. Target First. Poetics Today 39:4 ► pp. 703 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.