Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Phonological Theory and Development: In honor of Daniel A. Dinnsen
Edited by Ashley W. Farris-Trimble and Jessica A. Barlow
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 56] 2014
► pp. 133–154

The role of phonological context in children’s overt marking of ‘-s’ in two dialects 
of American English

 | San Diego State University
 | San Diego State University
We consider the role of preceding and following phonological context in the variable marking of monosegmental English plural and 3rd-person singular morphemes by African-American English speaking children (Study 1), and by younger children speaking a more mainstream variety of American English (Study 2). Results of both studies show that overt marking was favored in utterance-final contexts and with plurals, consistent with prior research findings. However, preceding consonant contexts favored the overt marking of the morphemes, contrary to prior research findings. We discuss these findings in terms of syllable organization and morphophonological complexity, and offer suggestions for future research to further delineate the specific contributions of phonological context to the overt marking of morphemes in child language.
Published online: 29 April 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.56.12bar
References (76)
References
Barlow, J.A. 2001. The structure of /s/-sequences: Evidence from a disordered system. Journal of Child Language 28: 291–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barlow, J.A. & Gierut, J.A. 1999. Optimality theory in phonological acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42:1482–1498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barlow, J.A. & Keare, A.R. 2008. Acquisition of final voicing: An acoustic and theoretical account. In Indiana University Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 6: Phonological Opacity Effects in Optimality Theory , A.W. Farris-Trimble & D.A. Dinnsen (eds), 81–97. Bloomington IN: IULC Publications.Google Scholar
Beckman, M. & Edwards, J. 1990. Lengthening and shortening and the nature of prosodic constituency. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology, I: Between the Grammar and the Physics of Speech , J. Kingston & M. Beckman (eds), 152–178. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Blevins, J. 1995. The syllable in phonological theory. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory , J.A. Goldsmith (ed.), 206–244. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Borowsky, T. 1989. Structure preservation and the syllable coda in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7:145–166. DOI logo
Brown, R. 1973. A First Language: The Early Stages . Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camarata, S.M. & Gandour, J. 1985. Rule invention in the acquisition of morphology by a language-impaired child. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 50: 40–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casali, R.F. 1996. Resolving Hiatus, PhD dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
Clements, G.N. 1990. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology, I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech , J. Kingston & M.E. Beckman (eds), 283–333. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Clements, G.N. & Keyser, S.J. 1983. CV Phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Colina, S. 1997. Identity constraints and Spanish resyllabification. Lingua 103: 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dalal, R.H. & Loeb, D.F. 2005. Imitative production of regular past tense -ed by English-speaking children with specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 40: 67–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, S. 1998. Syllable contact in Optimality Theory. Korean Journal of Linguistics 23: 181–211.Google Scholar
De Jong, D. 1990. The syntax-phonology interface and French liaison. Linguistics 28: 57–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, J. & de Villiers, P. 1973. A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2:267–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demuth, K., Culbertson, J. & Alter, J. 2006. Word-minimality, epenthesis, and coda licensing in the acquisition of English. Language & Speech 49:137–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ettlinger, M. & Zapf, J. 2011. The role of phonology in children’s acquisition of the plural. Language Acquisition 18: 294–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fudge, E.C. 1969. Syllables. Journal of Linguistics 5: 253–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fujimura, O. & Lovins, J. 1978. Syllables as concatenative phonetic units. In Syllables and Segments , A. Bell & J.B. Hooper (eds), 107–120. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Gerken, L. 1996. Prosodic structure in young children’s language production. Language 72: 683–712. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerken, L. & McGregor, K.K. 1998. An overview of prosody and its role in normal and disordered child language. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 7: 38–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giegerich, H.J. 1992. English Phonology: An Introduction . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gierut, J.A. 1999. Syllable onsets: Clusters and adjuncts in acquisition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 42:708–726. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, J. 1990. Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology . Cambridge MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, J.A. 2011. The syllable. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory , J.A. Goldsmith, J. Riggle & A.C.L. Yu (eds), 164–196. Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, A.D. 2003. Extrasyllabic consonants and onset well-formedness. In The Syllable in Optimality Theory , C. Féry & R.v.d. Vijver (eds), 238–253. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, L.J. 2002. African American English: A Linguistic Introduction . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guy, G. 1991. Contextual conditioning in variable lexical phonology. Language Variation and Change 3: 223–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, M. & Vergnaud, J.-R. 1980. Three dimensional phonology. Journal of Linguistic Research 1: 83–105.Google Scholar
Hoover, J.R., Storkel, H.L. & Rice, M.L. 2012. The interface between neighborhood density and optional infinitives: normal development and Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Child Language 39: 835–862. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, L.I., Leonard, L.B. & Swanson, L. 1999. Some differences between English plural noun inflections and third singular verb inflections in the input: The contributions of frequency, sentence position, and duration. Journal of Child Language 26: 531–543. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Itô, J. 1986. Syllable Theory in Prosodic Phonology, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution . Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1968. Child Language, Aphasia and Phonological Universals . The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B.W. & Morris, S.R. 2007. Clinical implications of the effects of lexical aspect and phonology on children’s production of the regular past tense. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 23:287–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, V.E. 2005. Comprehension of third person singular /s/ in AAE-speaking children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 36: 116–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keare, A.R. 2009. The Role of Phonological Context in the Omission of Plural, Possessive, and 3rd Person Singular Morphemes in AAE-Speaking Children. MA thesis, San Diego State University.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. 1985. Some consequences of lexical phonology. Phonology 6: 285–303.Google Scholar
Kirk, C. & Demuth, K. 2005. Asymmetries in the acquisition of word-initial and word-final consonant clusters. Journal of Child Language 32: 709–734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kisseberth, C. 1970. On the functional unity of phonological rules. Linguistic Inquiry 1: 291–306.Google Scholar
Labov, W. 1997. Resyllabification. In Variation, Change, and Phonological Theory [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 146], F. Hinskens, R. van Hout & W.L. Wetzels (eds), 145–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk . Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Marshall, C.R. & van der Lely, H.K.J. 2007. The impact of phonological complexity on past tense inflection in children with Grammatical-SLI. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 9: 191–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J.J. & Prince, A.S. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18, J.N. Beckman, L.W. Dickey & S. Urbanczyk (eds), 249–384. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Miller, J. & Iglesias, A. 2004. Systematic Analysis of Language Transcripts (SALT), English & Spanish . Madison WI: Language Analysis Lab, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Moran, M.J. 1993. Final consonant deletion in African American children speaking Black English: A closer look. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 24:161–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munson, J. & Ingram, D. 1985. Morphology before syntax: A case study from language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 12: 681–684. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oetting, J.B. & Horohov, J.E. 1997. Past-tense marking by children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 40: 62–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oetting, J.B. & McDonald, J.L. 2002. Methods for characterizing participants’ nonmainstream dialect use in child language research. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 45: 505–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polite, E.J. 2008. The Influence of Frequency- and Contextually-Related Factors on the Use of Regular Noun Plural -s by Children with Specific Language Impairment. PhD dissertation, Purdue University.Google Scholar
2011. The contribution of part-word phonological factors to the production of regular noun plural -s by children with and without specific language impairment. First Language 31: 425–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Price, P.J., Ostendorf, M., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. & Fong, C. 1991. The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of American 90: 2956–2970. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, A.S. & Smolensky, P. 2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar . Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pruitt, S.L. 2006. Grammatical Morphology of Children Reared in Poverty: Implications for Specific Language Impairment. PhD dissertation, Louisiana State University.Google Scholar
Pruitt, S.L. & Oetting, J.B. 2009. Past tense marking by African American English-speaking children reared in poverty. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52: 2–15. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Pruitt, S.L., Oetting, J.B. & Hegarty, M. 2011. Passive participle marking by African American English-speaking children reared in poverty. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 54: 598–607. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Redmond, S.M. 2003. Children’s productions of the affix -ed in past tense and past participle contexts. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 46:1095–1109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rickford, J.R. 1999. African American English: Features, Evolution, Educational Implications . Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rothman, J. & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. 2012. Linguistic interfaces and language acquisition in childhood: Introduction to the special issue. First Language 32: 3–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, E.O. 1982. The syllable. In The Structure of Phonological Representations , H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (eds), 337–383. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Senturia, M.B. 1998. A Prosodic Theory of Hiatus Resolution. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Song, J.Y., Sundara, M. & Demuth, K. 2009. Phonological constraints on children’s production of English third person singular -s . Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52: 623–642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stemberger, J.P. 2007. Children’s overtensing errors: Phonological and lexical effects on syntax. Journal of Memory and Language 57: 49–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stemberger, J.P. & Bernhardt, B.H. 1997. Phonological constraints and morphological development. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development , E. Hughes, M. Hughes & A. Greenhill (eds), 603–614. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Stockman, I.J. 1996. Phonological development and disorders in African American children. In Communication Development and Disorders in African American Children: Research, Assessment, and Intervention , A.G. Kamhi, K.E. Pollock & J.L. Harris (eds), 117–153. Baltimore MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Sundara, M., Demuth, K. & Kuhl, P.K. 2011. Sentence-position effects on children’s perception and production of English third person singular -s. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 54: 55–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Theodore, R.M., Demuth, K. & Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. 2010. An acoustic examination of the effects of word frequency and utterance position on 2-year-olds’ production of 3rd person singular -s . In Proceedings of the 13th Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology , M. Tabain, J. Fletcher, D. Grayden, J. Hajek & A. Butcher (eds), 158–161. Melbourne, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology AssociationGoogle Scholar
2011. Acoustic evidence for positional and complexity effects on children’s production of plural -s. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 54: 539–548. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. Segmental and positional effects on children’s coda production: Comparing evidence from perceptual judgments and acoustic analysis. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 26: 755–773. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E.R. 2007. Phonological and phonetic characteristics of African American Vernacular English. Language and Linguistics Compass 1:450–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weismer, G., Dinnsen, D.A. & Elbert, M. 1981. A study of the voicing distinction associated with omitted, word-final stops. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 46: 320–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiltshire, C.R. 2003. Beyond codas: Word and phrase-final alignment. In The Syllable in Optimality Theory , C. Féry & R.v.d. Vijver (eds), 254–270. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, W. 1969. A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech . Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
2005. African American English. In Clinical Sociolinguistics , M.J. Ball (ed), 87–100. Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfram, W. & Thomas, E.R. 2002. The Development of African American English . Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Combiths, Philip N., Jessica A. Barlow, Irina Potapova & Sonja Pruitt-Lord
2017. Influences of Phonological Context on Tense Marking in Spanish–English Dual Language Learners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 60:8 ► pp. 2199 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.