Chapter published in:
Studies in Chinese and Japanese Language Acquisition: In honor of Stephen Crain
Edited by Mineharu Nakayama, Yi-ching Su and Aijun Huang
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 60] 2017
► pp. 165196


Aoun, J. & Li, Y.-H. A.
2003Essays on the Representational and Derivational Nature of Grammar: The Diversity of Wh-constructions. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Beck, S.
1996Quantified structures as barriers for LF-movement. Natural Language Semantics 4: 1–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S. & Kim, S.
1997On WH- and operator in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6: 339–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G., Fox, D. & Spector, B.
2012Scalar implicature as a grammatical phenomenon. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 3, C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger & P. Porter (eds), 2297–2331. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
2000Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crain, S. & McKee, C.
1985The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. In Proceedings of NELS 16, S. Berman, J.-W. Choe & J. McDonough (eds), 94–111. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Cresti, D.
1995Extraction and reconstruction. Natural Language Semantics 3: 79–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
den Besten, H.
1983On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania [Linguistik Akuell/Linguistics Today 2], W. Abraham (ed.), 47–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drozd, K. F.
2001Children’s weak interpretations of universally quantified questions. In Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, M. Bowman & S.C. Levinson (eds), 340–376. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drozd, K.F. & van Loosbroek, E.
1999Weak quantification, plausible dissent, and the development of children’s pragmatic role of pragmatic competence. In Proceeding of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield & C. Tano (eds), 184–195. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J.D. & Sag, I.
1982Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 355–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fukui, N.
1984Studies on Japanese anaphora I: The adjunct subject hypothesis and ‘zibun’. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
Goro, T.
2007Scope Interpretation in First Language Acquisition. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Hankamer, J. & Sag, I.
1976Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 391–428.Google Scholar
Hattori, N., Ayano, S., Herrick, D., Stringer, D. & Sugisaki, K.
2006Topics in child Japanese. In Proceedings of the 7th Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, Y. Otsu (ed.), 103–119. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, N.
2005EPP materialized first, agree later: Wh-questions, subjects and MO-phrases. Scientific Approaches to Language, 4: 33–80.Google Scholar
Hayashishita, J.-R.
2004Syntactic and Non-syntactic Scope. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Höhle, T.
1991On reconstruction and coordination. In Representation and Derivation in the Theory of Grammar, H. Haider & K. Netter (eds), 139–197. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoji, H.
1985Constraints and Configurational Structures in Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Horn, L.R.
1989A Natural History of Negation. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
1972Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J.
1980Lexical decomposition in Montague Grammar. Theoretical Linguistics 7: 121–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuno, S.
1983Shin Nihon Bunpoo Kenkyuu (New Study of Japanese Grammar). Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Lechner, W.
1996On semantic and syntactic reconstruction. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 57–59, F. Menz & M. Prinzhorn (eds), 63–100. Vienna: University of Vienna, WLG.Google Scholar
1998Two kinds of reconstruction. Studia Linguistica 52: 276–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
May, R.
1977The Grammar of Quantification. PhD. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Meisel, J.M.
1986Word order and case marking in early child language. Evidence from simultaneous acquisition of two first languages: French and German. Linguistics 24: 123–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990INFL-ection: Subjects and subject-verb agreement. In Two First Languages. Early Grammatical Development in Bilingual Children, J. Meisel (ed), 237–298. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Meisel, J.M. & Müller, N.
1992Finiteness and verb placement in early child grammars: Evidence from simultaneous acquisition of French and German in bilinguals. In The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition, J.M. Meisel (ed), 109–138. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miyagawa, S.
2010Why Agree? Why Move? Unifying Agreement-based Discourse Configurational Languages. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Musolino, J. & Lidz, J.
2006Why children are’t universally successful with quantification. Linguistics 44: 817–852. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nakanishi, K.
2008Prosody and scope interpretations of the topic marker wa in Japanese. In Topic and Focus: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Intonation and Meaning, C.-M. Lee, M. Gordon & D. Buring (eds), 177–193. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Noveck, I.A.
2001When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition 78: 164–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rullmann, H.
1995Maximality in the Semantics of Wh-construction. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
Safir, K.
1986Relative clauses in a theory of binding and levels. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 663–689.Google Scholar
Saito, M.
2007Notes on East Asian argument ellipsis. Language Research 43: 203–227.Google Scholar
2011Two notes on feature inheritance: A parametric variation in the distribution of the EPP. Nanzan Linguistics 7: 43–61.Google Scholar
Sano, T.
2004Scope relations of QP’s and scrambling in the acquisition of Japanese. In the Proceedings of GALA 2003, J. van Kampen & S. Baauw (eds), 421–431. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B.D. & Vikner, S.
1996The verb always leaves IP in V2 clauses. Parameters and Functional Heads: Essays in Comparative Syntax, A. Belletti & L. Rizzi (eds.), 11–62. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Shibata, Y.
2013Obligatory wide scope as anti-reconstruction effects. In Proceedings of GLOW in Asia IX 2012: The poster session, N. Goto, K. Otaki, A. Sato & K. Takita (eds). http://​faculty​.human​.mie​-u​.ac​.jp​/~glow​_mie​/glow​_IX​_index​.html (30 July 2015).Google Scholar
2014Negative structure in Japanese. In Proceedings of the 37th Penn Linguistics Colloquium, S. Kwon (ed), 291–299. Philadelphia PA: Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
2015Negative structure and object movement in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 24: 217–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sugisaki, K.
2007The configurationality parameter in the Minimalist Program: A view from child Japanese. In Proceedings of the 31th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, H. Caunt-Nulton, S. Kulatilake & I-hao Woo (eds), 597–608. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
2009Argument ellipsis in child Japanese: A preliminary report. In Proceedings of the 10th Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, Y. Otsu (ed), 291–312. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
2013Argument ellipsis in acquisition. Nanzan Linguistics 9: 147–171.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, A.
2004Positive polarity − negative polarity. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 409–452 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ueda, Y.
2002Subject Positions, Ditransitives, and Scope in Minimalist Syntax: A Phase-based Approach. PhD dissertation, Kanda University of International Studies.Google Scholar
Viau, J., Lidz, J. & Musolino, J.
2010Priming of abstract logical representations in 4-year-olds. Language Acquisition 17: 26–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yamashita, H.
2009Toward a better understanding of Japanese scramblings: On the A- and A’-properties. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics, S. Tatevosov (ed), 303–315. Moscow: MAKS Press.Google Scholar