Article in:
The Syllable and its Prosody in Chinese
Edited by Lian-Hee Wee, Feng Wang and Yuan Liang
[Language and Linguistics 23:1] 2022
► pp. 20–46

Syllable isochrony and the prosodic features of stop syllables in Cantonese

| The Education University of Hong Kong
Cantonese is a syllable-timed language: that is, the syllable is the isochronous unit of speech. However, in Cantonese, there is a type of closed syllable with the stop codas [-p], [-t], or [-k] (i.e. syllables with the so called “entering-tones”) which sound much shorter than other syllables. On the surface, the shorter duration of stop syllables and the general prosodic feature of syllable-isochrony seem to conflict. This study conducted acoustic investigations of stop syllables in Cantonese in different contexts (i.e. in isolated form, in disyllabic words, and in disyllabic words located at the beginning, middle, and final positions of sentences). The results showed that stop syllables alone are shorter than non-stop syllables in various contexts. However, in disyllabic words or in sentences, there is a supplementary lengthening effect immediately after the stop syllables: there is more acoustic blank, and in some circumstances the initial of the following syllable is lengthened. Therefore, we propose that the phonetic realization of syllable isochrony is beyond the syllable itself in Cantonese. The results and discussions of this study may also shed light on the problem of the disappearance of “entering tones” from various Chinese dialects.
Keywords: syllable isochrony, stop syllable, entering tone, prosodic feature, Cantonese
References

References

Abercrombie, David
1967 Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, George D.
1975 Speech rhythm: Its relation to performance universals and articulatory timing. Journal of Phonetics 3(2). 75–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Robert S.
1979 Alveolarization in Cantonese: A case of lexical diffusion. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 7(1). 132–141.Google Scholar
1995 Syllable and word in Cantonese. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 6(4). 245–306.Google Scholar
Bauer, Robert S. & Benedict, Paul K.
1997 Modern Cantonese phonology. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary E.
1992 Evidence for speech rhythms across languages. In Tohkura, Yohichi & Vatikiotis-Bateson, Eric & Sagisaka, Yoshinori (eds.), Speech perception, production and linguistic structure, 457–463. Tokyo: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Edwards, Jan
1987 The phonological domains of final lengthening. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 81(S1). S67–S67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David
2018 Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.0.37). (http://​www​.praat​.org/) (Accessed 2018-03-14.)
Cao, Jianfen
2000 Rhythm of spoken Chinese: Linguistic and paralinguistic evidences. In Editorial Committee of ICSLP 2000 (ed.), Sixth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 2000), vol. 2, 357–360. Beijing: ISCA Archive.Google Scholar
[ p. 44 ]
2003 Jiyu yufa xinxi de hanyu yunlv jiegou yuce [Prediction of prosodic organization based on grammatical information]. Zhongwen Xinxi Xuebao [Journal of Chinese Information Processing] 17(3). 41–46.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren
2006[1930] A system of “tone-letters”. In Wu, Zongji & Chao, Xinna (eds.), Linguistic essays by Yuenren Chao, vol. 30, 98–103. Beijing: The Commercial Press. (First published in 1930.)Google Scholar
Cheung, Hung-nin Samuel
2002 21 shiji de xianggang yueyu: Yige xin yuyin xitong de xingcheng [Cantonese of the 21st century: Formation of a new phonological system in the Hong Kong language]. Jinan Xuebao (Zhexue Shehui Kexue Ban) [Jinan Journal (Philosophy & Social Science Edition)] 24(2). 25–40.Google Scholar
Cheung, Kwan-hin
1986 The phonology of present-day Cantonese. London: University College London. (Doctoral dissertation.)
1994 Yueyu yuyin de yinchang danwei [The duration unit of Cantonese sounds], In Shan, Zhouyao (ed.), Diyijie Guoji Yuefangyan Yantaohui lunwenji [Procceedings of the First Yue Conference], 79–85. Hong Kong: Modern Education Research Society.Google Scholar
Cheung, Kwan-hin & Zhang, Ling
2010 Yueyu yinjie yanchang dui yunfu yunwei shichang de yinxiang [The effect of syllable lengthening: On the duration of syllable nucleus and coda in Cantonese]. In Cheung, Hung-nin Samuel & Chang, Song Hing (eds.), Diachronic change and language contact dialects in Southeast China (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 24), 145–161. Berkeley: Project on Linguistic Analysis.Google Scholar
Dauer, R. M.
1983 Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics 11(1). 51–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Chene, Brent & Anderson, Stephen R.
1979 Compensatory lengthening. Language 55(3). 505–535. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dellwo, Volker
2006 Rhythm and speech rate: A variation coefficient for ∆C. In Karnowski, Pawel & Szigeti, Imre (eds.), Language and language-processing, 231–241. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gess, Randall
1998 Compensatory lengthening and structure preservation revisited. Phonology 15(3). 353–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grabe, Esther & Low, Ee Ling
2002 Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. In Gussenhoven, Carlos & Warner, Natasha (eds.), Laboratory phonology VII , 515–546. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, Oi-kan Yue
1972 Phonology of Cantonese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce
1989 Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic inquiry 20(2). 253–306.Google Scholar
Jeng, Jing-Yi
2005 Butong yanyu sudu, fayu danwei he fayu weizhi dui guoyu yinduan shichang de yingxiang [The influence of speaking rate, utterance unit and position on segmental duration of Mandarin], Nanda Xuebao (Renwen yu Shehui Lei) [Journal of National University of Tainan (Humanities and Social Sciences)] 39(1). 161–185.Google Scholar
2008 Butong yanyu sudu xia guoyu yunlü de jishi dengshixing [The timing isochrony of spoken Mandarin at different speaking rates] Zhonghua Xinli Xuekan [Chinese Journal of Psychology] 50(1). 1–19.Google Scholar
2011 Huayu yuju chansheng yu zhijue de jishi texing [The speech timing characteristics of Mandarin sentence production and perception]. Zhonghua Xinli Xuekan [Chinese Journal of Psychology] 53(3). 323–347.Google Scholar
[ p. 45 ]
Kavitskaya, Darya
2014 Compensatory lengthening: Phonetics, phonology, diachrony. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
2011 Compensatory lengthening. In Cairns, Charles E. & Raimy, Eric (eds.), Handbook of the syllable, 31–69. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Laver, John
1994 Principles of phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Light, Timothy
1977 The Cantonese final: An exercise in indigenous analysis. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 5(1). 75–102.Google Scholar
Lin, Hua & Wang, Qian
2007 Mandarin rhythm: An acoustic study. Journal of Chinese Language and Computing 17(3). 127–140.Google Scholar
Mariano, Paolo
2011 Rhythm typology: Acoustic and perceptive studies. Torino: University of Turin. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Mok, Peggy Pik-Ki
2008 On the syllable-timing of Cantonese and Beijing Mandarin. In Bao, Huaiqiao & Shen, Jiaxuan (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Phonetics Conference of China (PCC 2008) and the International Symposium on Phonetic Frontiers (ISPF 2008), 148–154. Beijing: Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Peng, Gang
2006 Temporal and tonal aspects of Chinese syllables: A corpus-based comparative study of Mandarin and Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguisitcs 34(1). 134–154.Google Scholar
Perry, Conrad & Wong, Richard Kwok-Shing & Matthews, Stephen
2009 Syllable timing and pausing: Evidence from Cantonese. Language and Speech 52(1). 29–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L.
1945 The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ramus, Franck & Nespor, Marina & Mehler, Jacques
1999 Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition 73(3). 265–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roach, Peter
1982 On the distinction between stress-timed languages and syllable-timed languages. In Crystal, David (ed.), Linguistic controversies: Essays in linguistic theory and practice in honour of F.R. Palmer, 73–79. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Shi, Feng & Mai, Yun
2003 Guangzhouhua chang [a] he duan [ɐ] yuanyin de tingbian shiyan廣州話長[a]和短[ɐ]元音的聽辨實驗 [Perceptual test on long [a] and short[ɐ] in Cantonese]. Zhongguo Yuwen Yanjiu [Studies in Chinese Linguistics] 2. 50–59.Google Scholar
Song, Yidan
2009 Nanjing fangyan zhong de rusheng housewei shiyan yanjiu [On experiment of entering tone of Nanjing dialect]. Nanjing Shifan Daxue Wenxueyuan Xuebao [Jounal of School of Chinese Language and Culture, Nanjing Normal University] 2009(2). 166–172.Google Scholar
The Linguistic Society of Hong Kong
1993 The Jyutping scheme. (https:/​/web​.archive​.org​/web​/20130426050642​/http://​www​.lshk​.org​/node​/47) (Accessed 2019-02-14.)
Wong, Puisan & Chan, Hoi-Yin
2018 Acoustic characteristics of highly distinguishable Cantonese entering and non-entering tones. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 143(2). 765–779. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Ling
2010 Guangzhouhua changduan yuanyin de yuyin shiyan xin tan [Long and short vowels in Cantonese: A revisit with new experiments]. Fangyan [Dialect] 2010(2). 134–144.Google Scholar
2016 Intonation effects on Cantonese lexical tones in speaking and singing. Munich: LINCOM GmbH.Google Scholar
2017 Yueyu shengdiao yu jiangshi yingao [Hong Kong Cantonese lexical tones and declining intonation]. Yuyan Kexue [Linguistic Sciences] 16(2). 182–192.Google Scholar
[ p. 46 ]
Zhu, Xiaonong & Jiao, Lei & Yan, Zhicheng & Hong Ying
2008 Rusheng yanhua santu [Three ways of Rusheng sound change]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language] 2008(4). 324–338.Google Scholar