Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 18:2 (2017) ► pp.269295
References
Aoshima, Sachiko, Colin Phillips, & Amy Weinberg
2004Processing filler-gap dependencies in a head-final language. Journal of Memory and Language 51.1:23–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro, Stephen Crain, Maria Teresa Guasti, Andrea Gualmini, & Luisa Meroni
2001The acquisition of disjunction: Evidence for a grammatical view of scalar implicatures. Proceedings of the 25th Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD 25), Vol. 11, ed. by Anna H.-J. Do, Laura Domínguez & Aimee Johansen, 157–168. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro, Maria Teresa Guasti, Andrea Gualmini, Luisa Meroni, Stephen Crain, & Francesca Foppolo
2004Semantic and pragmatic competence in children’s and adults’ comprehension of ‘or’. Experimental Pragmatics, ed. by Ira A. Noveck & Dan Sperber, 283–300. Basingstoke, Hampshire & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, Stephen
2008The interpretation of disjunction in universal grammar. Language and Speech 51.1-2:151–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, Stephen, & Cecile McKee
1985The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. Proceedings of NELS 15, ed. by Stephen Berman, Jae-Woong Choe & Joyce McDonough, 94–110. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Crain, Stephen, & Rosalind Thornton
1998Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Experiments on the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2006Acquisition of syntax and semantics. Handbook of Psycholinguistics (2nd edition), ed. by Matthew J. Traxler & Morton Ann Gernsbacher, 1073–1110. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, Stephen, Takuya Goro, & Rosalind Thornton
2006Language acquisition is language change. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35.1:31–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, Stephen, Amanda Gardner, Andrea Gualmini, & Beth Rabbin
2002Children’s command of negation. Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, ed. by Yukio Otsu, 71–95. Tokyo: Hituzi Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter W., & Ray Jackendoff
2010Quantitative methods alone are not enough: Response to Gibson and Fedorenko. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14.6:234–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Edward, & Evelina Fedorenko
2010Weak quantitative standards in linguistics research. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14.6:233–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013The need for quantitative methods in syntax and semantics research. Language and Cognitive Processes 28.1-2:88–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Edward, & H.-H. Iris Wu
2013Processing Chinese relative clauses in context. Language and Cognitive Processes 28.1-2:125–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Edward, Steven T. Piantadosi, & Evelina Fedorenko
2013Quantitative methods in syntax/semantics research: A response to Sprouse and Almeida (2013). Language and Cognitive Processes 28.3:229–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
2003Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7.5:219–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goro, Takuya, & Sachie Akiba
2004The acquisition of disjunction and positive polarity in Japanese. WCCFL 23: Proceedings of the 23rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. by Vineeta Chand, Ann Kelleher, Angelo J. Rodríguez & Benjamin Schmeiser, 251–264. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Gualmini, Andrea, & Stephen Crain
2002Why no child or adult must learn de Morgan’s laws. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD 26), Vol. 11, ed. by Barbora Skarabela, Sarah Fish & Anna H.-J Do, 243–254. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
2004Operator conditioning. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD 28), Vol. 11, ed. by Alejna Brugos, Linnea Micciulla & Christine E. Smith, 232–243. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Gualmini, Andrea, Stephen Crain, Luisa Meroni, Gennaro Chierchia, & Maria Teresa Guasti
2001At the semantics/pragmatics interface in child Language. Proceedings of SALT XI, ed. by Rachel Hastings, Brendan Jackson & Zsofia Zvolenszky, 231–247. Ithaca: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa, Gennaro Chierchia, Stephen Crain, Francesca Foppolo, Andrea Gualmini, & Luisa Meroni
2005Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures. Language and Cognitive Processes 20.5:667–696. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hsiao, Franny, & Edward Gibson
2003Processing relative clauses in Chinese. Cognition 90.1:3–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hsu, Chun-chieh Natalie
2006Issues in Head-Final Relative Clauses in Chinese–Derivation, Processing and Acquisition. Newark: University of Delaware dissertation.Google Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren, Adam Kilgarriff, Yiching Wu, Chih-Ming Chiu, Simon Smith, Pavel Rychly, Ming-Hong Bai, & Keh-Jiann Chen
2005Chinese sketch engine and the extraction of grammatical collocations. Proceedings of the Fourth SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing, October 14–15, 2005, ed. by Chu-Ren Huang & Gina-Anne Levow, 48–55. Jeju: IJCNLP-05.Google Scholar
Jing, Chunyuan
2008Pragmatic Computation in Language Acquisition: Evidence from Disjunction and Conjunction in Negative Context. College Park: University of Maryland dissertation.Google Scholar
Jing, Chun-Yuan, Stephen Crain, & Ching-Fen Hsu
2005The interpretation of focus in Chinese: child vs. adult language. Proceedings of the 6th Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, ed. by Yukio Otsu, 165–190. Tokyo: Hituzi Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Just, Marcel A., Patricia A. Carpenter, & Jacqueline D. Woolley
1982Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 111.2:228–238.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Pavel Rychly, Pavel Smrz, & David Tugwell
2004The sketch engine. Proceedings of EURALEX 2004, July 6–10, 2004, ed. by Geoffrey Williams & Sandra Vessier, 105–116. Lorient: Université de Bretagne Sud.Google Scholar
Lin, Chien-Jer Charles
2006Grammar and Parsing: A Typological Investigation of Relative-Clause Processing. Tucson: University of Arizona dissertation.Google Scholar
Liu, Chin-Ting Jimbo
2014Conjunctive entailment of disjunction in individuals with Asperger syndrome: A semantic or pragmatic deficit? Paper presented at the 16th Annual International Conference of the Japanese Society for Language Sciences (JSLS 2014), June 28–29, 2014. Saitama: Bunkyo University.
Liu, Chin-Ting Jimbo, & Hsiu-Fen Hélène Lee
2014Modality and children’s scope understanding. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 43.5:487–506. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers, James
2009aSyntactic judgment experiments. Language and Linguistics Compass 3.1:406–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009bThe design and analysis of small-scale syntactic judgment experiments. Lingua 119.3:425–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Testing adjunct and conjunct island constraints in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 13.3:437–470.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara H., Alice ter Meulen, &d Robert E. Wall
1990Mathematical Methods in Linguistics. Dordrecht & Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Phillips, Colin
2009Should we impeach armchair linguists? Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 171, ed. by Shoishi Iwasaki, Hajime Holi, Patrica M. Clancy & Sung-Ock Sohn, 49–64. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Rohde, Doug
2001–2003Linger. Available at [URL] (accessed November 11 2013).
Scontras, Gregory, & Edward Gibson
2011A quantitative investigation of the imperative-and-declarative construction in English. Language 87.4:817–829. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sprouse, Jon
2007Continuous acceptability, categorical grammaticality, and experimental syntax. Biolinguistics 11:123–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sprouse, Jon, & Diogo Almeida
2013The empirical status of data in syntax: A reply to Gibson and Fedorenko. Language and Cognitive Processes 28.3:222–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Su, Yi Esther
2013Scalar implicatures and downward entailment in child Mandarin. Journal of East Asian Linguistic 22.2:167–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Su, Yi (Esther), & Stephen Crain
2013Children’s knowledge of disjunction and universal quantification in Mandarin Chinese. Language and Linguistics 14.3: 599–631.Google Scholar
Su, Yi (Esther), Peng Zhou, & Stephen Crain
2012Downward entailment in child Mandarin. Journal of Child Language 39.5:957–990. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Syrett, Kristen, & Jeffrey Lidz
2009QR in child grammar: Evidence from antecedent-contained deletion. Language Acquisition 16.2:67–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna
2002Hungarian disjunctions and positive polarity. Approaches to Hungarian, Vol. 81, ed. by Istvan Kenesei & Peter Siptar, 217–241. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2000First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics 11.1-2:61–82.Google Scholar
2003Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Trueswell, John C., Irina Sekerina, Nicole M. Hill, & Marian L. Logrip
1999The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition 73.2:89–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Liu, Chin-Ting & Li-Mei Chen
2019. Comprehending conjunctive entailment of disjunction among individuals with Asperger syndrome. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Surányi, Balázs & Gulás, Máté
2022. A diszjunkció mint Pozitív Polaritású Elem. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 9:1  pp. 185 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.