Review in:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 4:2 (2022) ► pp. 379394
References
Birch, David & L. Michael O Toole
1988 (eds.). Functions of style. London and New York: Pinter.Google Scholar
Bowcher, Wendy L. & Jennifer Y. Liang
(eds.) 2016Society in language, language in society: Essays in honour of Ruqaiya Hasan. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butt, David
2004How our meanings change: School contexts and semantic evolution. In Geoff Williams & Annabelle Lukin (eds.), The development of language: Functional perspectives on species and individuals, 217–240. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cloran, Carmel
1994Rhetorical units and decontextualization: An enquiry into some relations of context, meaning, and grammar. Nottingham: Department of English Studies, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Firth, John R.
1957 [1951]Modes of meaning: Essays and studies. In Papers in linguistics: 1934–1951. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, Richard
1981Mind in science: A history of explanations of psychology and physics. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1967Intonation and grammar in British English. The Hague and Paris: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1971Linguistic function and literary style: An enquiry into the language of William Golding’s ‘The Inheritors’. In Seymour Chatman (ed.), Literary style: A symposium, 330–368. New York: Oxford University Press. Reprinted in Michael A. K. Halliday, Linguistic studies of text and discourse, volume 2 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 88–125. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
1973Towards a sociological semantics. Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold. Reprinted in Michael A. K. Halliday, On language and linguistics, volume 31 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 323–354. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2002aThe linguistic study of literary texts. In Proceedings of the ninth international congress of linguistics, 3021–307. Edited by Horace Lunt. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. Reprinted in Michael A. K. Halliday, Linguistic studies of text and discourse, volume 2 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 5–22. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2002bThe de-automatization of grammar: from Priestley’s An Inspector Calls . In Michael A. K. Halliday, Linguistic studies of text and discourse, volume 2 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 126–148. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. and William S. Greaves
2008Intonation in the grammar of English. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya
1964A linguistic study of contrasting features in the style of two contemporary English prose writers. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
1968aLinguistics and the study of literature. Etudes de Linguistique Appliquée 51.106–121.Google Scholar
1968bGrammatical cohesion in spoken and written English, part one. Programme in Linguistics and English teaching Paper 7. London: University College London and Longmans.Google Scholar
1971Rime and reason in literature. In Seymour Chatman (ed.), Literary style: A symposium, 299–329. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1975The place of stylistics in the study of verbal art. In Håkan Ringbom (ed.), Style and text: Studies presented to Nils Erik Enkvist, 4–62. Amsterdam: Skriptor.Google Scholar
1985Linguistics, language and verbal art. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
1988The analysis of one poem: Theoretical issues in practice. In David Birch & Michael O’Toole (eds.), Functions of style, 45–73, London, New York: Pinter.Google Scholar
1996On teaching literature across cultural distances. In Joyce E. James (ed.), The language – culture connection, 34–63. Singapore: RELC.Google Scholar
1999Speaking with reference to context. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics: Systemic perspectives, 219–328. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Reprinted in Ruqaiya Hasan, Context in the system and process of language, volume 4 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 247–354. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. Sheffield: Equinox. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005a Language, society and consciousness, volume 1 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. Sheffield: Equinox eBooks Publishing.Google Scholar
2005bSemiotic mediation and three exotropic theories: Vygotsky, Halliday and Bernstein. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Language, society and consciousness, volume 1 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 130–156. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. Sheffield: Equinox eBooks Publishing.Google Scholar
Hasan Ruqaiya
2005cThe implication of semantic distance for language in education. In Anvita Abbi (ed.), Studies in bilingualism. New Delhi: Bahri Publications. Reprinted in Ruqaiya Hasan, Language and education, volume 3 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 73–98. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya
2007Private pleasure, public discourse: Reflections on engaging with literature. In Donna R Miller and Monica Turci (eds.). Language and verbal art revisited: Linguistic approaches to the study of literature, 13–40. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2011Language and education: Learning and teaching in society, volume 3 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1987Language in literature. Edited by Krystyna Pomorska & Stephen Rudy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
2014 [1973]Main trends in the science of language (revised edition). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kellogg, David
2016Metaphoric, metonymic, eclectic, or dialectic? A commentary on “Neoformation: A dialectical approach to developmental change”. Mind, Culture, and Activity 24 (4). 381–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Thinking of feeling: Hasan, Vygotsky, and some ruminations on the development of narrative sensibility in children. Language and Education 31 (4). 374–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kozulin, Alex
1999Vygotsky’s psychology. A biography of ideas. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen
1996Reading images: the grammar of visual design. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lukin, Annabelle
2002Examining poetry: A corpus based enquiry into literary criticism. PhD thesis. Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University.
Matejka, Ladislev and Krystyna Pomorska
(eds.) 1978Readings in Russian poetics: Formalist and structuralist views. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Donna R. & Monica Turci
(eds.) 2007Language and verbal art revisited: Linguistic approaches to the study of literature. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Miller, Donna R. & Paul Bayley
(eds.) 2016Hybridity in systemic functional linguistics: Grammar, text and discursive context. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Miller, Donna R.
2017Language as purposeful: Functional varieties of text (2nd edition). In Functional grammar studies for non-native speakers of English. Bologna: AMSActa/AlmaDL. http://​amsacta​.unibo​.it​/id​/eprint​/5504
Mukařovský, Jan
1977The word and verbal art. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
O’Toole, Michael L.
1982Structure, style and interpretation in the Russian short story. New Haven: Yale University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Russian literary theory: From the formalists to Lotman. In Neil Cornwell (ed.), The Routledge companion to Russian literature, 163–173. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2011[1994]The language of displayed art (2nd edition). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Toole, Michael L. & Ann Shukman
(eds.) 1975–1981Russian poetics in translation, volumes 1–81. Oxford: Holden Books Ltd.Google Scholar
(eds.) 1977Russian poetics in translation, volume 4: Formalist theory. Oxford: Holdan Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Shklovsky, Viktor
1925 [1990]Theory of prose. Elmwood Park: Dalkey Archive Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, Peter
1984Russian formalism: A metapoetics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Wallace
1984 [1960]The necessary angel. Essays on reality and the imagination. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Striedter, Jurij
1989Literary structure, evolution and value: Russian formalism and Czech structuralism reconsidered. Cambridge, MA. & London: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tynjanov, Jurij
1978On literary evolution. In Ladislav Matejka and Krystyna Pomorska (eds.), Readings in Russian poetics: Formalist and structuralist views. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef
1966The linguistic school of Prague. An introduction to its theory and practice. Bloomington & London. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Vaihinger, Hans
1924 [1911]The philosophy of ‘as if’: A system of the theoretical, practical and religious fictions of mankind. Translated by Charles K. Ogden. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wegener, Rebekah, Stella Neumann and Antje Oesterle
(eds.) 2018On verbal art. Ripples in a timeless world: Essays in honour of Ruqaiya Hasan. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Williams, Geoff
2004Ontogenesis and grammatics: Functions of metalanguage in pedagogical discourse. In Geoff Williams & Annabelle Lukin (eds.), The development of language: Functional perspectives on species and individuals, 241–267. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2005Grammatics in schools. Continuing discourse on language: Functional perspectives (volume 11). Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), 281–310. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Williams, Geoff & Annabelle Lukin
(eds.) 2004The development of language: Functional perspectives on species and individuals. London & New York. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Wittegenstein, Ludwig
1953Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar