Theme as point of departure in English and Spanish academic writing and casual conversation
Towards a generalisation
This paper describes and compares the realisations, functions and interrelations of Theme as point of departure (POD), i.e. Theme stripped of any reference to “what the clause is about”, in two languages — English and Spanish — and two genres — academic writing and casual conversation. The ultimate goal is to find out which POD characteristics are (a) generalisable across both genres and both languages; (b) generalisable across both genres (but language-dependent); (c) generalisable across both languages (but genre-specific); and (d) genre-specific and language-specific. Among other things, the contrastive analysis reveals that POD is highly determined by metafunctional interplay, PODs in casual conversation reflecting the interpersonally-driven nature of this genre and cross-linguistic contrasts reflecting different pressures of interpersonal meaning on textual organisation.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data and methodology
- 3.The view from below
- 4.The view from above
- 5.The view from roundabout
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (71)
References
Alarcos Llorach, Emilio. 1987. Estudios de gramática funcional del español (3rd edition). Madrid: Gredos.
Andreau, Laura. 2020. Verbos derivados de saber y decir como marcadores discursivos en fragmentos descriptivos de la conversación coloquial. In Lucas Gagliardi, Dolores Álvarez Garriga & Lucía Zanfardini (coords.), Punto de encuentro: Estudios sobre el lenguaje, 211–232. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
Arús-Hita, Jorge. 2022b. Theme as point of departure in English and Spanish casual conversation: A contrastive study. Language, Context and Text 4(2). 197–226.
Arús-Hita, Jorge, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady. 2019. Looking into Theme: Three kinds of thematic meaning. Paper delivered at the 29th European systemic functional linguistics conference. Universidad Politécnica de Leiria, Portugal, 3–5 July.
Banks, David. 2008. The development of scientific writing. Linguistic features and historical context. Sheffield: Equinox.
Banks, David. 2017. The extent to which the passive voice is used in the scientific journal article, 1985–2015. Functional Linguistics 4(12). 1–17.
Bhatia, Vijay K. 2014. A generic view of academic discourse. In John Flowerdew (ed.), Academic discourse, 31–49. London: Routledge.
Bowen, Neil & Nathan Thomas. 2020. Manipulating texture and cohesion in academic writing: A keystroke logging study. Journal of Second Language Writing 501. 100773. (26 December, 2023.)
Briz Gómez, Antonio. 2001. El español coloquial en la conversación. Barcelona: Ariel.
Camps, Ana & Monserrat Castelló. 2013. La escritura académica en la universidad. Revista de Docencia Universitaria 11(1). 17–36.
Davies, Mark. 2004. BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). [URL] (26 December, 2023.)
Diwakar Grandhi, Rama Satya. 2018. Every new beginning comes from some other beginning’s end. Weblog. [URL] (11 April, 2024.)
Eggins, Suzanne & Diana Slade. 1997. Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassell.
Fang, Zhihui. 2021. Demystifying academic writing: Genres, moves, skills, and strategies. London: Routledge.
Ferrari, Carolina. 2020. Metáforas gramaticales y tipos textuales en la conversación coloquial. In Lucas Gagliardi, Dolores Álvarez Garriga & Lucía Zanfardini (coords.), Punto de encuentro: Estudios sobre el lenguaje, 171–192. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
Flores Figueroa, Claudia. 2005. Análisis sistémico-funcional de la estructura de conversaciones en inglés y en español. MA thesis. Universidad de Chile.
Flowerdew, John. 2014. Academic discourse. London: Routledge.
Gordillo-Alfonso, Adriana. 2017. La escritura científica: Una revisión temática. Signo y Pensamiento 36(71). 54–66.
Granato, Luisa. 2020. Introducción a la interacción verbal. In Lucas Gagliardi, Dolores Álvarez Garriga & Lucía Zanfardini (coords.), Punto de encuentro: Estudios sobre el lenguaje, 67–94. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
Granato, Luisa & Guillermina Piatti. 2010. Some remarks on thematic and information structure in casual conversation. In Proceedings of V coloquio argentino de la IADA, 157–168. La Plata, Argentina.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. An introduction to functional grammar (1st edition). London: Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1996. On grammar and grammatics. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Carmel Cloran & David Butt (eds.), Functional descriptions: Theory into practice, 1–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Halliday, M. A. K. & J. R. Martin. 2003. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London: Routledge.
Hyland, Ken. 2009. Academic discourse: English in a global context. London: Continuum.
Hyland, Ken & Marina Bondi (eds.). 2006. Academic discourse across disciplines [
Linguistic insights. Studies in linguistics and communication, vol. 42]. Bern: Peter Lang.
Ignatieva, Natalia. 2008. Descripción sistémico-funcional de la escritura académica estudiantil en español. Núcleo 251. 173–195.
Ignatieva, Natalia, Daniel Rodríguez Vergara, Victoria Zamudio Jasso & Guillermo Jiménez Sánchez. 2023. ¿Cómo escriben los estudiantes universitarios en las humanidades? Un estudio sistémico funcional de la escritura académica. Mexico: UNAM.
Knight, Naomi K. 2010. Laughing our bonds off: Conversational humour in relation to affiliation. PhD dissertation. University of Sydney, Australia.
Laboratorio de Lingüística Informática. 1992. CORLEC, Corpus Oral de Referencia del Español Contemporáneo. Departamento de Lingüística, Lenguas Modernas, Lógica y Filosofía de la Ciencia, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Lavid, Julia, Jorge Arús-Hita & Juan R. Zamorano. 2010. Systemic functional grammar of Spanish: A contrastive study with English. London: Continuum.
Leong, Alvin Ping. 2005. Talking themes: The thematic structure of talk. Discourse Studies 7(6). 701–732.
Leong, Alvin Ping, Audrey Lin Lin Toh & Soo Fun Chin. 2018. Examining structure in scientific research articles: A study of thematic progression and thematic density. Written Communication 35(3). 286–314.
Lucantonio, Damian. 2007. Developing diversity in oral communication. Bulletin of the University of Electro-Communications 20(1–2). 55–66.
Martin, J. R. 1992a. Theme, method of development and existentiality: The price of reply. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics 61. 147–184.
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1992. Interpreting the textual metafunction. In Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice, 37–81. London & New York: Pinter.
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1995. Lexicogrammatical cartography: English systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers.
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2004. Descriptive motives and generalisations. In Alice Caffarel, J. R. Martin & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen (eds.), Language typology: A functional perspective, 537–673. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Diana Slade. 2010. Analysing conversation. In Ruth Wodak, Barbara Johnstone & Paul Kerswill (eds.), The Sage handbook of sociolinguistics, 375–395. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore & Washington DC: SAGE.
McEnery, Tony & Andrew Wilson. 2001. Corpus linguistics (2nd edition). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Montemayor-Borsinger, Ann. 2009. Tema: Una perspectiva funcional de la organización del discurso. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.
Moore, Nicholas. 2011. Modelling the flow of discourse in a corpus of written academic English. In Nicholas Groom (ed.), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2011 Conference ‘Discourse and Corpus Linguistics’. [URL] (26 December, 2023.)
Moyano, Estela. 2021. La función de Tema en español: Sus medios de realización desde la perspectiva trinocular de la Lingüística Sistémico-Funcional. Revista Signos 56(106). 487–517.
Narbona Jiménez, Antonio. 2015. Sintaxis del español coloquial. Sevilla: Editorial Universidad de Sevilla.
O’Grady, Gerard. 2016. Given/New: what do the terms refer to? A first (small) step. In Ben Clarke & Jorge Arús-Hita (eds.), The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause, special issue of English Text Construction 9(1). 9–32.
Parodi, Giovanni (ed.). 2008. Géneros académicos y géneros profesionales. Accesos discursivos para saber y hacer. Valparaíso: Ediciones Universitarias de Valparaíso.
Parodi, Giovanni & Gina Burdiles (eds.). 2015. Leer y Escribir en contextos académicos y profesionales: géneros, corpus y métodos. Santiago: Ariel.
Piatti, Guillermina. 2020. Oralidad y sintaxis. In Lucas Gagliardi, Dolores Álvarez Garriga & Lucía Zanfardini (coords.), Punto de encuentro: Estudios sobre el lenguaje, 121–153. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
Placci, Graciela & Andrea Garófolo. 2015. Análisis del discurso académico desde una perspectiva sistémico-funcional: Una propuesta didáctica para cursos disciplinares en la universidad. In Actas del Congreso Nacional Cátedra UNESCO Subsede Rosario: La lectura y la escritura en las sociedades del siglo XXI. [URL] (26 December, 2023.)
Quiroz, Beatriz. 2018. Negotiating interpersonal meanings in Spanish: Reasoning about mood. Functions of Language 25(1) (Special Issue on Interpersonal Meaning). 130–158.
Rodríguez Medina, María Jesús. 2002. Los anglicismos de frecuencia sintácticos en español: estudio empírico. RAEL. Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada, 149–170.
Salager-Meyer, F., M. Ángeles Alcaraz Ariza & Nahirana Zambrano. 2003. The scimitar, the dagger and the glove: Intercultural differences in the rhetoric of criticism in Spanish, French and English medical discourse (1930–1995). English for Specific Purposes 221. 223–247.
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1981. The diffusion of Object-Verb agreement in Spanish. Papers in Romance 31. 163–176.
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne Marie. 2014. Systemic-functional approaches to discourse. In Klaus P. Schneider & Anne Barron (eds.), Pragmatics of discourse, 125–164. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Slade, Diana. 1996. The texture of casual conversation in English. PhD dissertation. University of Sydney, Australia.
Teich, Elke, Stefania Degaetano-Ortlieb, Peter Fankhauser, Hannah Kermes & Ekaterina Lapshinova-Koltunski. 2016. The linguistic construal of disciplinarity: A data-mining approach using register features. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67(7). 1668–1678.
Teruya, Kazuhiro. 2007. A systemic functional grammar of Japanese. London & New York: Continuum.
Thompson, Geoff & Susan Thompson. 2009. Theme, subject and the unfolding of text. In Gail Forey and Geoff Thompson (eds.), Text type and texture, 45–69. Sheffield: Equinox.
Valero-Garcés, Carmen. 1996. Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Spanish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes 15(4). 279–294.
Val.Es.Co. 1996[1994]. Corpus de Conversación Coloquial — Universidad de Valencia/ /Universidad de Alicante.
Vázquez, Graciela E. 2001. El discurso académico español: cuestiones preliminares de didactización a través de materiales multimedia y unidades didácticas para el autoaprendizaje. ELUA. Estudios de Lingüística, Anexo 11. 337–347.
Ventola, Eija. 1979. The structure of casual conversation in English. Journal of Pragmatics 3(3–4). 267–298.
Weil, Henri. 1844. De l’ordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. Paris: Didier Érudition.
Zárate Fabián, Mario Clemente. 2017. La escritura académica: Dificultades y necesidades en educación superior. Educación Superior 2(1). 46–54.