Article published In:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 4:1 (2022) ► pp.6183
Atkinson, Dwight
1999Scientific discourse in sociohistorical context: The philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Banks, David
1994Writ in water: Aspects of the scientific journal article. Brest: ERLA, Université de Bretagne Occidentale.Google Scholar
2008aThe development of scientific writing: Linguistic features and historical context. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2008bThe significance of thematic structure in the scientific journal article, 1700–1980. In Nina Nørgard (ed.), Systemic functional linguistics in use. Odense Working Papers in Language and Communications, 29. [URL]
2016On the (non)necessity of the hybrid category behavioural process. In Donna R. Miller & Paul Bayley (eds.), Hybridity in systemic functional linguistics: Grammar, text and discursive context, 21–40. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
2017The birth of the academic article: Le Journal des Sçavans and the Philosophical Transactions 1665–1700: Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
2018The effects of revolution and war on academic discourse, 1785–1835, Textes & Contextes, 13 (2). [URL]
2019aSFL and diachronic studies. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 410–432. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019bA systemic functional grammar of English: A simple introduction. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2021Turbulent periods and the development of the scientific research article 1735–1835. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 22 (1). Available online 27.08.2021. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barber, Charles L.
1962Some measureable characteristics of modern scientific prose. In Frank Behre (ed.), Contributions to English syntax and philology, 21–43. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Cooray, Mahiinda
1967The English passive voice. English Language Teaching 21 (3). 203–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degaetano-Ortlieb, Stephania & Elke Teich
2018Using relative entropy for detection and analysis of periods of diachronic linguistic change. In Alex Beatrice, Setphania Degaetano-Ortlie, Anna Feldman, Anna Kazantseva, Nils Reiter & Stan Szpakowicz (eds.), Proceedings of workshop on computational linguistics for cultural heritage: Social sciences, humanities and literature, 22–33. Santa Fe: New Mexico.Google Scholar
Ding, Daniel D.
2002The passive voice and social values in science. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 32 (2). 137–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dušková, Libuša
1971On some functional and stylistic aspects of the passive voice in present-day English. Philologica Pragensia 141. 117–143.Google Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne
1994An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Gross, Alan G., Joseph E. Harmon & Michael Reidy
2002Communicating science: The scientific article from the 17th century to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1978Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
1987Language and the order of nature. In Nigel Fabb, Derek Attridge, Alan Durant & Colin MacCabe (eds.), The linguistics of writing: Arguments between language and literature, 135–154. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Reprinted in Michael A. K. Halliday, On language and linguistics, volume 3 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 116–138. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum 2003.Google Scholar
1988On the language of physical science. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Registers of written English: Situational factors and linguistic features, 162–178. London: Pinter. Reprinted in Michael A. K. Halliday & James R. Martin 1993 Writing science. Literacy and discursive power, 54–68. London: Falmer Press, and in Michael A. K. Halliday 2004 The language of science, 140–158. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1998Things and relations: Regrammaticising experience as technical knowledge. In James R. Martin & Robert Veel (eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science, 185–235. London: Routledge. Reprinted in Michael A. K. Halliday 2004 The language of science, 49–101. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1989Some grammatical problems in scientific English. In Michael A. K. Halliday 2004a The language of science, 159–180. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2004b [1997]On the grammar of scientific English. In Michael A. K. Halliday 2004 The language of science, 181–198. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2004c [1999]The grammatical construction of scientific knowledge: The framing of the English clause. In Michael A. K. Halliday 2004 The language of science, 102–134. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. Revised by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2014Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). Abingdon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hassan
1989Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective (2nd edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & James R. Martin
1993Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney D.
1971The sentence in written English: A syntactic study based on an analysis of scientific texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, Gerold Schneider & Elena Seoane
2016The use of the be-passive in academic Englishes: Local versus global usage in an international language. Corpora 11 (1). 29–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne, Melanie Röthlisberger & Elena Seoane
2021Predicting voice alternation across academic Englishes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17 (1). 189–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2001Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes 20 (3). 207–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002Options of identity in academic writing? ELT Journal 56 (4). 351–358. [URL]. DOI logo
2010Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 91. 116–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2016Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance. Written Communication 33 (3). 251–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2017Is academic writing becoming more informal? English for Specific Purposes 451. 40–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Feng (Kevin) Jiang
2018“In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse. English for Specific Purposes 511. 18–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kermes, Hannah, Stefania Degaetano-Ortieb, Ashraf Khamis, Jörg Knappen & Elke Teich
2016The Royal Society Corpus: From uncharted data to corpus. In Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Marko Grobelnik, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Helene Mazo, Asuneion Moreno, Jan Odijk & Stelios Piperidis (eds.), Proceedings of the tenth international conference on language resources and evaluation. Portorož, Slovenia, 1928–1931.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & David Rose
2008Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Moskowich, Isabel & Begoña Crespo
Rubino, Raphael, Stephania Degaetano-Ortlieb, Elke Teich & Josef van Genabith
2016Modelling diachronic change in scientific writing with information density. In Yuji Matsumoto & Rachmi Prasad (eds.), Proceedings of COLING 2016, 750–761. Osaka, Japan.Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, Françoise
1999From “Mr. Guthrie is profoundly mistaken…” to “Our data do not seem to confirm the results of a previous study on…”: A diachronic study of polemicity in academic writing (1810–1995). Iberica. Revista de la Asociasión Europea de Lenguas para Fines Especificos 11. 5–28.Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, Françoise & Nahirana Zambrano
Seoane, Elena
2006Changing styles: On the recent evolution of scientific British and American English. In Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Dieter Kastovsky, Nikelaus Ritt & Herbert Schendl (eds.), Syntax, style and grammatical norms: English from 1500–2000, 191–209. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Seoane, Elena & Marianne Hundt
2018Voice alternation and authorial presence: Variation across disciplinary areas in academic English. Journal of English Linguistics 46 (1). 3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seoane, Elena & Lucia Loureiro-Porto
2005On the colloquialization of scientific British and American English. ESP Across Cultures 21. 106–116.Google Scholar
Seoane, Elena & Christopher Williams
2006Changing the rules: A comparison of recent trends in English in academic scientific discourse and prescriptive legal discourse. In Marina Dossena & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Diachronic perspectives on domain-specific English, 255–276. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma & Päivi Pahta
(eds.) 2011Medical writing in early modern English, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teich, Elke, Stenfania Degaetano-Ortlieb, Peter Fankhauser, Hannah Kermes & Ekaterina Lapshinova-Koltunski
2016The linguistic construal of disciplinarity: A data-mining approach using register features. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67 (7). 1668–1678. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff
2004Introducing functional grammar (2nd edition). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Valle, Ellen
1999A collective intelligence: The life sciences in the Royal Society as a scientific discourse community, 1665–1965. Turku: Anglicana Turuensia.Google Scholar