Cover not available
Article published In:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 4:2 (2022) ► pp.304–334

A transitivity-based exploration of a wrongful conviction for arson and murder

The case of Kristine Bunch

ORCID logo | Granada University, Spain | Simon Fraser University , Canada

Well-known cases of wrongful convictions (e.g. Central Park Five, Steven Avery, Amanda Knox), although merely the tip of the iceberg, serve to highlight flaws inherent in justice systems worldwide (cf. Garrett 2011). Many innocent people are having their freedom taken away without reason. One such lesser-known, though very significant, case is that of Kristine Bunch, who was wrongfully convicted of arson and murdering her son, resulting in her wrongful imprisonment for 17 years. To examine how Kristine represents her miscarriage of justice discursively, I examine transitivity patterns (Halliday & Matthiessen 2014) in a semi-structured interview with her and, in doing so, aim to create awareness of some probable key language processes in wrongful convictions more generally.

Keywords: exoneration, family support, innocence, Kristine Bunch, legal support, oral narrative, prison life, transitivity, tunnel vision, wrongful convictions
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Background to the case of Kristine Bunch
    • 3.2Dataset
    • 3.3Methodology
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1What do the transitivity patterns in Kristine’s discourse reveal about how she represents herself?
    • 4.2Which discursive roles does Kristine assign to others who, in one way or another, were involved in or accountable for her wrongful conviction?
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 29 September 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.22002.bar
References
Adams, William C.
2015 Conducting semi-structured interviews. In Kathryn E. Newcomer, Harry P. Hatry & Joseph S. Wholey (eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation: Essential texts for nonprofit and public leadership and management (4th edition). 492–505. New Jersey: John Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allen, Karen & Daniel F. Wozniak
2010 The language of healing: Women’s voices in healing and recovering from domestic violence. Social Work in Mental Health 9 (1). 37–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartley, Leanne
2018 “Justice demands that you find this man not guilty”: A transitivity analysis of the closing arguments of a rape case that resulted in a wrongful conviction. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 281. 480–495. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2020 “Please make your verdict speak the truth”: Insights from an appraisal analysis of the closing arguments from a rape trial. Text & Talk 40 (4). 421–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika
2008 Emotion talk across corpora. London: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Lisa
2015 The social construction of wrongful convictions in Canadian news coverage. Unpublished MA thesis. The University of Guelph. [URL]. (Retrieved on 10 June, 2021).
Benítez-Castro, Miguel-Ángel & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
2019 Rethinking Martin & White’s affect taxonomy: A psychologically-inspired approach to the linguistic expression of emotion. In John L. Mackenzie & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), Emotion in discourse, 301–331. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bletzer, Keith V. & Mary P. Koss
2010 Narrative constructions of sexual violence as told by female rape survivors in three populations of the southwestern United States: Scripts of coercion, scripts of consent. Cross-Cultural Studies in Health and Illness 231. 113–156.Google Scholar
Bock, Zannie
2009 Construals of agency in the testimony of Colin de Souza. In Stef Slembrouck, Miriam Taverniers & Mieke van Herreweghe (eds.), From will to well: Studies in linguistics offered to Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, 43–53. Ghent: Academia Press.Google Scholar
Bock, Zannie & Paul Duncan
2006 Transitivity and the narrator’s role in selected TRC testimonies. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics PLUS 341. 35–54.Google Scholar
Bonventre, Catherine L.
2020 Wrongful convictions and forensic science. WIREs Forensic Sci 31. DOI logo. (Retrieved on 8 September, 2021).Google Scholar
Brants, Chrisje
2013 Tunnel vision, belief perseverance and bias confirmation: Only human? In C. Ronald Huff & Martin Killias (eds.), Wrongful convictions and miscarriages of justice: Causes and remedies in North American and European criminal justice systems, 161–192. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
California Innocence Project
2021 [URL]. (Retrieved on 10 June, 2021).
Carlson, Eve B. & Constance J. Dalenberg
2000 A conceptual framework for the impact of traumatic experiences. Trauma, Violence & Abuse 1 (1). 4–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christianson, Scott
2004 Innocent: Inside wrongful conviction cases. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Clow, Kimberley A., Amy M. Leach & Rose Ricciardelli
2012 Life after wrongful conviction. In Brian L. Cutler (ed.), Conviction of the innocent: Lessons from psychological research, 327–341. Washington: American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clow, Kimberley A. & Amy M. Leach
2015 Stigma and wrongful conviction: All exonerees are not perceived equal. Psychology, Crime & Law 21 (2). 172–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cole, Simon A.
2012 Forensic science and wrongful convictions: From exposer to contributor to corrector. New England Law Review 461. 711–736.Google Scholar
Covey, Russell
2012 Police misconduct as a cause of wrongful convictions. Washington University Law Review 90 (4). 1133–1189.Google Scholar
Cross, William E. & Anne Galletta
2013 Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. New York & London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Danet, Brenda
1980 Language in the courtroom. In Howard Giles, W. Peter Robinson & Phillip M. Smith (eds.), Language: Social psychological perspectives, 367–376. Oxford: Pergamon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Fina, Anna & Alexandra Georgakopoulou
2012 Analysing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drizin, Steven A. & Beth A. Colgan
2004 Tales from the juvenile confession front. In G. Daniel Lassiter (ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment. Perspectives in law & psychology, 127–162. Boston, MA: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eades, Diana
2010 Sociolinguistics and the legal process. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Derek & Jonathon Potter
1992 Discursive psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Felton-Rosulek, Laura
2010 Prosecution and defense closing speeches: The creation of contrastive closing arguments. In Alison Johnson & Malcolm Coulthard (eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics, 218–230. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Findley, Keith A.
2012 Tunnel vision. In Brian L. Cutler (ed.), Conviction of the innocent: Lessons from psychological research, 303–323. Washington: American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Footitt, Hilary
2002 Women, Europe and the new languages of politics. London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Brandon L.
2011 Convicting the innocent: Where criminal prosecutions go wrong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gould, Jon B. & Richard A. Leo
2010 One hundred years later: Wrongful convictions after a century of research. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 100 (3). 825–868.Google Scholar
Grebler, Gillian
2005 “And then what did she say?” Making confession statements believable and compelling (even when they are false). Paper presented at the International Association of Forensic Linguists 7th Biennial Conference on Forensic Linguistics/Language and Law. Cardiff University (1st – 4th July, 2005).Google Scholar
Gross, Samuel R., Kristen Jacoby, Daniel J. Matheson, Nicholas Montgomery & Sujata Patil
2005 Exonerations in the United States 1989 through 2003. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 95 (2). 523–560.Google Scholar
Gwilliams, Laura & Lise Fontaine
2015 Indeterminacy in process type classification. Functional Linguistics 2 (8). 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1985 An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2014 Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Jonathon J. Webster
2014 Text linguistics: The how and why of meaning. United Kingdom: Equinox.Google Scholar
Hattingh, Natalie
2011 A systemic functional analysis of two truth and reconciliation commission testimonies: Transitivity and genre. Unpublished Master Thesis. University of Western Cape. [URL]. (Retrieved on 15 February, 2022).
Haworth, Kate
2012 Language of police interviews. In Carol A. Chapelle (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, 3079–3084. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heffer, Chris
2020 All bullshit and lies?: Insincerity, irresponsibility, and the judgment of untruthfulness. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Kelsey S. & Lora M. Levett
2018 Investigating predictors of true and false guilty pleas. Law and Human Behavior 421. 427–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heydon, Georgina
2005 The language of police interviewing: A critical analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huff, Ronald C., Ayre Rattner & Edward Sagarin
1996 Convicted but innocent: Wrongful conviction and public policy. California: Sage Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Innocence Canada
2021 [URL]. (Retrieved on 14 May, 2021).
Johnson, David T.
2020 The culture of capital punishment in Japan. Palgrave advances in criminology and criminal justice in Asia. Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Leo, Richard A.
2008 Police interrogation and American justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 False confessions: Causes, consequences and implications. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 371. 332–343.Google Scholar
Levy, Inna & Eyal Eckhaus
2020 Rape narratives analysis through natural language processing: Survivor self-label, narrative time span, faith, and rape terminology. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy 12 (6). 635–642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makani, Bharat
2018 Voices of the condemned: A comparative study of the testimonies of death row exonerees and slave narratives. Law, Culture and the Humanities 14 (1). 140–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marsili, Neri
2020 Lying, speech acts, and commitment. Synthese. [URL]. (Retrieved on 18 March, 2021).
Martin, James R. & David Rose
2007 Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White
2005 The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Natapoff, Alexandra
2009 Snitching: Criminal informants and the erosion of American justice. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Neale, Amy
2002 More delicate TRANSITIVITY: Extending the process type system networks for English to include full semantic classifications. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Cardiff University. [URL]. (Retrieved on 1 May, 2013).
Norris, Robert J., Catherine L. Bonventre, Allison D. Redlich, James R. Acker & Carmen Lowe
2017 Preventing wrongful convictions: An analysis of state investigation reforms. Criminal Justice Policy Review 30 (4). 597–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Michael, Michele Zappavigna & Casey Whitelaw
2008 A survey of process type classification over difficult cases. In Carys Jones & Eija Ventola (eds.), From language to multimodality: New developments in the study of ideational meaning, 47–64. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Michael
2020 UAM Corpus Tool 5.0. [URL]. (Retrieved on 10 February, 2021).
Pezdek, Kathy
2012 Fallible eyewitness memory and identification. In Brian L. Cutler (ed.), Conviction of the innocent: Lessons from psychological research, 105–124. Washington: American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Redlich, Allison D.
2010 The susceptibility of juveniles to false confessions and false guilty pleas. Rutgers Law Review 62 (4). 943–957.Google Scholar
Reichart, Brian
2016 Tunnel vision: Causes, effects, and mitigation strategies. Hofstra Law Review 45 (2). 451–477.Google Scholar
Rizzelli, Lucrezia
2019 Linguistic features of false confessions and confessions not in dispute: A corpus analysis. Unpublished MA Thesis. City of University New York (CUNY). [URL] (Retrieved on 1 March, 2022).
Scherr, Kyle C., Allison D. Redlich & Saul M. Kassin
2020 Cumulative disadvantage: A psychological framework for understanding how innocence can lead to confession, wrongful conviction, and beyond. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, Dan
2012 In doubt: The psychology of the criminal justice process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, David
1992 Lying, liars and language. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (3). 623–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Statham, Simon
2016 Redefining trial by media: Towards a critical forensic linguistic interface. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stygall, Gail
1994 Trial language: Differential discourse processing and discursive formation. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
The Innocence Project
2021 [URL]. (Retrieved on 14 May, 2021).
Thompson, William C.
2008 Beyond bad apples: Analyzing the role of forensic science in wrongful convictions. Southwestern University Law Review 371. 971–994.Google Scholar
Van Der Kolk, Bessel A.
2002 Trauma and memory. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 52 (1). 52–64.Google Scholar
Warden, Rob
2004 The snitch system: How snitch testimony sent Randi Steidl and other innocent Americans to death row. Centre on wrongful convictions. Northwestern University School of Law, [URL]. (Retrieved on 9 May, 2021).