Cover not available
Case report published In:
Language, Culture and Society
Vol. 1:2 (2019) ► pp.168–193
Report

The senator’s discriminatory intent

Presenting probative legal evidence of unconstitutional verbal animus

| University of California at Los Angeles

This is a critical analysis of the discourse of an elected state official in the years leading up to the passage of arguably racist legislation. It was submitted to a U.S. court of law to support the plaintiffs’ claim that since the legislator publicly expressed racial bias against the groups of people affected by the law, then his legislation should be voided because the United States Constitution requires that laws treat citizens equally. The fact that critical discourse analytic findings have been entered into the U.S. courts leads to the question whether such analyses of public pronouncements May ever be permitted to serve as legally probative evidence.

Keywords: critical discourse analysis, conceptual metaphor theory, immigration, racism, legal system, public discourse, expert legal report
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Equal Protection Clause
  • 3.Political setting
  • 4.Theory
  • 5.Data
  • 6.Method
  • 7.CDA of the senator’s discourse
    • 7.1The senator’s leading analogy: nation as law
    • 7.2Immigrant metaphors
      • 7.2.1 immigrant as invader
      • 7.2.2 immigrant as destroyer
      • 7.2.3 immigrant as criminal
      • 7.2.4 immigrant as alien
    • 7.3The senator’s narrative
  • 8.Testing the senator’s rhetorical devices in a larger corpus
  • 9.The senator conflates all Latinos
  • 10.Conclusion
    • Epilogue
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 22 October 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.00015.san
References

References

Baugh, J.
(2018) Linguistics in pursuit of justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berg, C. R.
(2002) Latino images in film. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Blee, K. M.
(2005) Racial violence in the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies 28(4), 599–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blumstein, J. F.
(1983) Defining and proving race discrimination: Purpose vs. results approach from the Voting Rights Act. Virginia Law Review, 69(4), 633–714. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J.
(2006) Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse & Society, 17(5), 563–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Peralta, M.
(2018) Metaphor and ideology: Conceptual structure and conceptual content in Spanish political discourse. Discourse & Communication, 12(2), 128–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dirven, R.
(1994) Metaphor and nation: Metaphors Afrikaners live by. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Frymer, P.
(2005) Racism revised: Courts, labor law, and the institutional construction of racial animus. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 373–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gans, J.
(2008) Immigrants in Arizona: Fiscal and economic impacts. Tucson, AZ: Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.
(2013) Why do some people dislike conceptual metaphor theory? Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1–2),15–36.Google Scholar
Goatly, A.
(2007) Washing the brain: Metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grady, J.
(1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary stress. Berkeley, CA: University of California Berkeley dissertation.Google Scholar
Kobick, J.
(2010) Discriminatory intent reconsidered: Folk concepts of intentionality and equal protection jurisprudence. Harvard Civil Rights-C.L.L. Review, 451, 517–562.Google Scholar
Kövesces, Z.
(2000) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krzyzanowski, M., & Wodak, R.
(2011) The politics of exclusion: Debating migration in Austria. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E.
(2000) Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Landau, M. J., Robinson, M., & Meier, B.
(Eds.) (2013) The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Musolff, A.
(2004) Metaphor and political discourse. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Metaphor, nation and the holocaust: The concept of the body politic. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Otoole, M.
(9 September 2010) Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce discusses illegal immigration, SB 1070, and elections (Interview). LAND Latin America News Dispatch. [URL]> (1 August 2018).
Pillai, K. G. J.
(2001) Shrinking domain of invidious intent. William & Mary Bill Rights Journal, 9(3).Google Scholar
Pompa, Leon
(1990) Vico: A study of the ‘New Science’ (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R.
(2005) Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santa Ana, O.
(1999) Like an animal I was treated: Anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse. Discourse & Society, 10(2), 191–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002) Brown tide rising: Metaphoric representations of Latinos in contemporary public discourse. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
(2004) When language plays proxy for race. Language Magazine: Journal of Communication & Education, 3(8), 15–17.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, O., López, L. & Munguía, E.
(2010) Framing peace as violence: U.S. television news depictions of the 2007 Los Angeles police attack on immigrant rights marchers. Aztlán, 35(1), 69–101.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, O.
(2013) Juan in a Hundred: Representation of Latinos on network news. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, O., Treviño, S. L., Bailey, M., Bodossian, K. & de Necochea, A.
(2007) A May to remember: Adversarial images of immigrants in U.S. newspapers during the 2006 policy debate. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 4(1), 207–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santa Ana, O., Juárez, M., Reséndez, M., Hernández, J., Gaytán, O., Cerón, K., Gómez, C. & Hirose, Y.
under review). The President’s verbal animus against immigrants.
Said, E.
(1987) Orientalism. New York, NY: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R.
(1992) The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selmi, M.
(1997) Proving intentional discrimination: The reality of Supreme Court rhetoric. Georgetown Law Journal, 861, 279–350.Google Scholar
Steen, G.
(2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 231, 213–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) The cognitive-linguistic revolution in metaphor studies. In J. Taylor & J. Littlemore (Eds.), Companion to cognitive linguistics. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
(2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T. A.
(1987) Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
(1991) Racism and the press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
(1993) Elite discourse and racism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, T.
(2009) Discourse as the recontextualization of social practice: A guide. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 21, 144–161.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M., & Potter, J.
(1992) Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Winter, S. L.
(1988) The metaphor of ‘standing’ and the problem of self-governance. Stanford University Law Review, 401, 1371–1516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989) Transcendental nonsense, metaphoric reasoning, and the cognitive strikes law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1371, 1105–1237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1990) Bull Durham and the uses of theory. Stanford University Law Review, 421, 639–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R.
(2008) ‘Us’ and ‘them’: Inclusion/exclusion – Discrimination via discourse. In G. Delanty, P. Jones, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Migration, identity, and belonging (pp. 54–78). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R., & Reisigl, M.
(2003) Discourse and racism. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 372–397). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zinn, H.
(21 October 2005) Don’t despair about the Supreme Court. The Progressive. [URL]> (7 October 2018).

Case Law and Statutes

Arizona Rev. Stat. Ann. § 11–1051.

Brock v. Pierce County, 476 U.S. 253, 263 (1986).

Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Title VII (1968), Pub. L. 89–10.

Federal Energy Administration v. Algonquin SNG, Inc., 426 U.S. 548, 564 (1976).

Lau v. Nichols, 414 U.S. 563 (1974).

‘No Child Left Behind’. Pub. L. 107–110.

Trump v. Hawaii, 138 S.Ct. 2392, 2441 n.6 (2018) (Sotormayor, J., dissenting).

Valle del Sol v. Whiting, No. 2:10-CV-01061-SRB (D. Ariz.).

Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corporation, 429 U.S. 252, 267 (1977).

Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Ana, Otto Santa, Marco Antonio Juárez, Magaly Reséndez, John Hernández, Oscar Gaytán, Kimberly Cerón, Celeste Gómez & Roberto Solís
2020. Making Our Nation Fear the Powerless. In Language in the Trump Era, ► pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
Chávez, Alex E.
2021. Gender, Ethno-Nationalism, and the Anti-Mexicanist Trope. Journal of American Folklore 134:531 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Janet McIntosh & Norma Mendoza-Denton
2020. Language in the Trump Era, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 august 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.