In this piece, the authors question whether critical language research, in its complex collection of researcher
choices, is possible beyond the discursive imaginary of critical academic scholarship. In other words, how do (allegedly)
anticolonial efforts re-orient towards contribution to the imperial record? We present three vignettes, through which we grapple
with the notion that researcher choice exists within the solipsism of academia. In doing so, we frame research and scholarship as
a collection of choices, which we believe are better understood as a collection of fraught dilemmas. These dilemmas recognize that
all academic scholarship production and its processes are birthed from, and serve, an epistemology of hierarchical social
configurations, which serve empire maintenance and expansion. As critical language scholars who bring overlapping and distinct
sociopolitical, geographic, and methodological positionalities, these autoethnographic narrative vignettes allow us to begin to
see the landscape of researcher choice in the processes and projects of accumulating knowledge production. We identify imperial
straightening devices for legitimization into the imperial archive and examine how they work to orient and re-orient critical
language scholars towards the ideological and material production of the imperial archive.
Accomplices not allies: Abolishing the ally industrial
complex. On nonprofit-certified “white allies” and privilege
theory. (2015). Revolutionary solidarity: A critical reader for
accomplices (pp. 35–43). [zine].
n.p.
Ahmed, S. (2006). Orientations:
Toward a queer phenomenology. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay
Studies, 12(4), 543–574.
Ahmed, S. (2007a). Multiculturalism
and the promise of happiness. New
Formations, 63(1), 121–137.
Ahmed, S. (2007b). A
phenomenology of whiteness. Feminist
Theory, 8(2), 149–168.
Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. Duke University Press.
Burns, K. (2010). Into
the archive: Writing and power in colonial
Peru. Duke: Duke University Press.
Castro-Gómez, S. (2007). The
missing chapter of empire: Postmodern reorganization of coloniality and post-Fordist
capitalism. Cultural
Studies, 21(2–3), 428–448.
Chang, H., Ngunjiri, F., & Hernandez, K. A. C. (2016). Collaborative
autoethnography. London: Routledge.
Cushing-Leubner, J. (2020a). Discourse
and whiteness. In Z. Casey. (Ed.), Encyclopedia
of critical whiteness studies in
education (pp. 133–143). Boston: Brill Sense.
Cushing-Leubner, J. (2020b). Heritage
language education: A holistic view. In S. Laviosa & M. González Davies. (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of translation and
education (pp. 303–321). London: Routledge.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A
thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Bloomsbury (UK): Bloomsbury Publishing.
Du Bois, W. E. B. (1933/2014). Black
reconstruction in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Garbisch, A. J. (2021). Constructing
identity by writing roots into life: A poetic-narrative autoethnography. Journal of Poetry
Therapy, 34(1), 37–47.
Gopinath, G. (2018). Unruly
visions: The aesthetic practices of queer
diaspora. Durham: Duke University Press.
Gordon, A. F. (2008). Ghostly
matters: Haunting and the sociological
imagination. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Gramsci, A. (1999). Selections
from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci (Q. Hoare and G. Nowell Smith. trans.). London: The Electric Book Company, Ltd.
Hanauer, D. I. (2012). Growing
up in the unseen shadow of the Kindertransport. Qualitative
Inquiry, 18(10), 845–851.
Heller, M., & McElhinny, B. (2017). Language,
capitalism, colonialism: Toward a critical
history. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
la paperson. (2017). A third university is
possible. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lin, A. (2015). Preface:
Can a spider weave its way out of the web that it is being woven into, just as it
weaves? In H. Zhang, P. W. K. Chan, & K. Kenway. (Eds.), Asia
as method in education studies: A defiant research
imagination (xxi–xv). London: Routledge.
Linkon, S., & Mullen, B. (1995). Gender,
race, and place: Teaching working-class students in Youngstown. The Radical
Teacher, 461, 27–32.
Lowe, L. (2007). The
worldliness of intimacy. In D. Ganguly, & N. Curthoys. Edward
Said: The legacy of a public
intellectual (pp. 121–151). Academic Monographs.
Lowe, L. (2015). The
intimacies of four continents. Durham: Duke University Press.
McElhinny, B. (2019). Acknowledging. Language, Culture and Society, 1(1), 132–140.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). The
phenomenology of perception (trans. Colin Smith). London: Routledge.
Mignolo, W. D. (2009). Epistemic
disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom. Theory, Culture &
Society, 26(7–8), 159–181.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological
research: Analyses and examples. Phenomenological Research
Methods, 120–154.
Mungwini, P., Creller, A., Monahan, M. J., & Murdock, E. G. (2019). Why
epistemic decolonization?Journal of World
Philosophies, 4(2), 70–105.
Myers, K. (2014, November). The
intimacy of three settler nations: Colonialism, race, and child welfare. Gazillion
Voices.
Nagar, R. (2014). Muddying
the waters: Coauthoring feminisms across scholarship and
activism. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
O’brien, J. M. (2010). Firsting
and lasting: Writing Indians out of existence in New
England. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Pieratos, N. A., Manning, S. S., & Tilsen, N. (2021). Land
back: A meta narrative to help indigenous people show up as movement
leaders. Leadership, 17(1), 47–61.
Rådesjö, M. (2018). Learning
and growing from ‘communities of practice’: Autoethnographic narrative vignettes of an aspiring educational researcher’s
experience. Reflective
Practice, 19(1), 68–80.
Richards, T. (1993). The
imperial archive: Knowledge and the fantasy of empire. New York: Verso.
Rivera Cusicanqui, S. (2012). Ch’ixinakax utxiwa: A reflection on the practices and discourses of decolonization. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 111(1), 95–109.
Rosiek, J. L., Snyder, J., & Pratt, S. L. (2020). The
new materialisms and Indigenous theories of non-human agency: Making the case for respectful anti-colonial
engagement. Qualitative
Inquiry, 26(3–4), 331–346.
Russell, M. (2019). Capitalism
and disability: Selected writings by Marta
Russell. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
Said, E. W. (2012). Culture
and imperialism. New York: Vintage.
Saldaña, J. (2021). Gay-Tex-Mex:
Autoethnographic Vignettes. Cultural Studies↔ Critical
Methodologies, 21(2), 143–145.
Siefert, B., Salas, S., & D’Amico, M. M. (2018). Problematizing
deficit representations of in-service teachers. TESOL
Journal, 9(2), 397–400.
Silko, L. M. (2006). Ceremony. New York: Penguin.
Simpson, A. (2007). On
ethnographic refusal: Indigeneity, “voice,” and colonial
citizenship. Junctures, 91, 67–80.
Simpson, L. B. (2017). As
we have always done: Indigenous freedom through radical
resistance. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Smith, L. T. (2015). Decolonizing
knowledge: Toward a critical indigenous research justice praxis. Research Justice:
Methodologies for Social Change, 205–210.
Stoler, A. L. (2002). Colonial
archives and the arts of governance. Archival
Science, 2(1–2), 87–109.
TallBear, K. (2017). Beyond
the life/not-life binary: A feminist-indigenous reading of cryopreservation, interspecies thinking, and the new
materialisms. In J. Radin & E. Kowal. (Eds.), Cryopolitics:
Frozen life in a melting
world (pp. 179–202). Boston: MIT Press.
Tuck, E. (2011). Rematriating
curriculum studies. Journal of Curriculum and
Pedagogy, 8(1), 34–37.
Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2014). R-words:
Refusing research. In D. Paris & M. Winn. (Eds.), Humanizing
research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and
communities (pp. 223–247). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (Eds.). (2018). Toward
what justice?: Describing diverse dreams of justice in
education. London: Routledge.
Verene, D. P. (1991). The
new art of autobiography: An essay on the life of Giambattista Vico, written by
himself. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Virtanen, T., Silander, C. & Pietilä, M. (2014). National
steering and profiling of academic research in Finland and
Sweden. In T. Aarrevaara & E. Berg. (Eds.), Higher
education and research in academe: Who should
pay? (pp. 29–40). Luleå tekniska universitet.
Wa Thiong’o, N. (1992). Decolonising
the mind: The politics of language in African
literature. Nairobi: East African Publishers.
Wolfe, P. (2006). Settler
colonialism and the elimination of the Native. Journal of Genocide
Research, 8(4), 387–409.
Cited by (8)
Cited by eight other publications
Bagga-Gupta, Sangeeta
2024. What and Why of Equity for Whom and Where. Analytical Engagement with Languaging Promises-in-Policy and Policy-as-Participation. In Language Policy as Practice, ► pp. 79 ff.
Gibson, Andrew G. & Taina Saarinen
2024. What If Academia Was Not a Gladiator Fight? Reflections on Trying to Change the Discourse From Competition to Community Building. In Building Communities in Academia, ► pp. 141 ff.
Engman, Mel, Johanna Ennser-Kananen & Taina Saarinen
2023. A Diffractive Reading. In New Materialist Explorations into Language Education, ► pp. 175 ff.
Lozenski, Brian D. & Anita P. Chikkatur
2023. Bending time: lessons from critical, community-engaged, liberatory research. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 8
M. Engman, Mel, Johanna Ennser-Kananen & Jenna Cushing-Leubner
2023. Mapping (Metaphorical) Journeys in and Against the Academy. In Constructing Postdigital Research [Postdigital Science and Education, ], ► pp. 39 ff.
Amundsen, Diana
2022. Indigenous and older adult higher education students: Challenging systemic and linear transitions for inclusion. International Journal of Educational Research Open 3 ► pp. 100148 ff.
Benswait, Ahmad Jaber & Miguel Pérez-Milans
2022. Pressing times, losing voice: critique and transformative spaces in higher education. London Review of Education 20:1
MacKenzie, Alison, Mel Engman & Orla McGurk
2022. Overt and symbolic linguistic violence: plantation ideology and language reclamation in Northern Ireland. Teaching in Higher Education 27:4 ► pp. 489 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.