Article published In:
Integrating dialogue
Edited by Răzvan Săftoiu and Adrian Pablé
[Language and Dialogue 8:1] 2018
► pp. 4365
References
Aijmer, Karin
2005 “ Just and Multifunctionality.” In Context-Historical, Social, Linguistic Studies in Celebration of Toril Swan, ed. by Kevin McCafferty, Tove Bull and Kristin Killie (eds), 31–47. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Baron, Naomi
2008Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boardmann, Mark
2005The Language of Websites. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bondi, Marina
2016 “Textbooks.” In The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes, ed. by Ken Hyland and Philip Shaw, 323–334. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
forthcoming (a). “Dialogicity in Written Language Use: Variation across Expert Action Games.” In From Pragmatics to Dialogue ed. by Edda Weigand and Istvan Kovecses Amsterdam Benjamins DOI logo
forthcoming (b). “ Try to prove me wrong: Engaging Multiple Audiences in Blogs.” Discourse, Context and Media.
2017 “Corpus Linguistics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 46–61. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bondi, Marina and Corrado Seidenari
2012 “ and now i’m finally of the mind to say i hope the whole ship goes down…: Markers of Subjectivity and Evaluative Phraseology in Blogs.” In Corpus Linguistics and Variation in English, ed. by Joybrato Mukherjee and Magnus Huber, 17–27. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bondi, Marina and Giuliana Diani
2015 “ I am wild about cabbage: Evaluative ‘Semantic Sequences’ and Cross-linguistic (Dis)continuities.” Nordic Journal of English Studies (NJES) 14(1): 116–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camarero, Jesús
2011Integrational semiology and epistemocentrism”. Language Sciences 331. 662–666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craig, Robert and Alena Sanusi
2000 “ I’m just saying: Discourse Markers of Standpoint Continuity.” Argumentation 141: 425–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garzone, Giuliana, Gina Poncini and Paola Catenaccio
(eds) 2007Multimodality in Corporate Communication. Web Genres and Dicursive Identity. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Gil-Salmon, Luz and Carmen Soler-Monreal
2014Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grieve, Jack, Douglas Biber, Eric Friginal and Tatiana Nekrasova
2010 “Variation among Blogs: A Multi-dimensional Analysis.” In Genres on the Web, ed. by Alexander Mehler, Serge Sharoff and Marina Santini, 303–322. Netherlands: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Groom, Nicholas
2010 “Closed-class Keywords and Corpus-driven Discourse Analysis.” In Keyness in Text, ed. By Marina Bondi and Michael Scott, 59–78. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Roy
1986The Origins of Writing. Duckworth: London.Google Scholar
1989 “How does writing restructure thought?Language and Communication 9(2/3): 99–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998Introduction to Integrational Linguistics. Oxford. Pergamon.Google Scholar
2000Rethinking Writing. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Herring, Susan, Dieter Stein and Tuija Virtanen
(eds) 2013Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan, Lois Ann Scheidt, Elijah Wright and Sabrina Bonus
2005 “Weblogs as a Bridging Genre.” Information Technology and People 18(2): 142–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutton, Christopher, Adrian Pablé and David Bade
2011 “Roy Harris and Integrational Linguistics”. Language Sciences 331: 475–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutton, Christopher
2011 “The politics of the language myth: reflections of the writings of Roy Harris”. Language Sciences 331: 503–510. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krishnamurthy, Sandeep
2002 “The Multidimensionality of Blog Conversations: The Virtual Enactment of September 11”, paper presented at the Association of Internet Researchers Conference 3.0, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Kuteeva, M.
2016 “Research Blogs, Wikis and Tweets.” In The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes, ed. by ken Hyland and Philip Shaw, 431–443. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Luzón, Maria José
2011 “ Interesting Post, but I Disagree: Social Presence and Antisocial Behaviour in Academic Weblogs.” Applied Linguistics 32(5): 517–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “ Your Argument is Wrong: A Contribution to the Study of Evaluation in Academic Weblogs.” Text and Talk 32(2): 145–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Public Communication of Science in Blogs: Recontextualizing Scientific Discourse for a Diversified Audience.” Written Communication 30(4): 428–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, Anna
2013 “Hybridism, Edutainment, and Doubt: Science Blogging Finding its Feet.” Nordic Journal of English Studies 13(1): 7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Molina, Clara and Manuela Romano
2012 “ Just Revisited: Panchronic and Contrastive Insights.” International Journal of English Studies 12(1): 17–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers, Greg
2010The Discourse of Blogs and Wikis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
1991But, Only, Just. Focusing Adverbial Change in Modern English: 1500–1900. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Puschmann, Cornelius
2013 “Blogging.” In Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. by Susan Herring, Dieter Stein and Tuija Virtanen, 83–108. Berlin: DeGruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “A Digital Mob in the Ivory Tower? Context Collapse in Scholarly Communication Online.” In Discourse in and through the Media, ed. by Marina Bondi, Silvia Cacchiani and Davide Mazzi, 22–45. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Quiggin, John
2011 “Economic Blogs.” Economic Papers 30(4): 437–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Jan
2007 “Blogging Practices: An Analytical Framework.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12(4): 1409–1427. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Michael
2012WordSmith Tools version 6. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya
1986 “Prediction and Economic Theory.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 407 (1832) (Predictability in Science and Society): 3–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siles, Ignacio
2011 “The Rise of Blogging: Articulation as a Dynamic of Technological Stabilization.” New Media and Society 14(5): 781–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John
2004Trust the Text. Language, Corpus and Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth
1988 “Is Internal Semantic-pragmatic Reconstruction Possible?” In Rhetorica, Phonologica, Syntactica, ed. by Christine Brooke-Rose, Jacek Fisiak and Theo Vennemann, 128–144. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Warschauer, Mark and Douglas Grimes
2007 “Audience, Authorship, and Artifact: The Emergent Semiotics of Web 2.0Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 271: 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda
2009Language as Dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Dialogue: the Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “How to verify a theory of language.” Language and Dialogue 6(3): 349–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco
2015 “Interactions with Readers through Online Specialized Genres: Specificity or Adaptability?” In Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres, ed. by Luz Gil-Salmon and Carmen Soler-Monreal, 189–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 16 other publications

Bondi, Marina
2022. Dialogicity in Individual and Institutional Scientific Blogs. Publications 10:1  pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Bondi, Marina & Jessica Jane Nocella
2023. Variations of polyphony in blogs. Language and Dialogue 13:1  pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Diani, Giuliana
2021. ‘In this post, I argue that…’: constructing argumentative discourse in scholarly law blog posts. European Journal of English Studies 25:3  pp. 369 ff. DOI logo
Freddi, Maria
2020. BLURRING THE LINES BETWEEN GENRES AND AUDIENCES: INTERACTION IN SCIENCE BLOGS. Discourse and Interaction 13:2  pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Lorés, Rosa
2023. Dual voices, hybrid identities: the recontextualization of research in digital dissemination scientific discourse . Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 93  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Luzón, María-José & Carmen Pérez-Llantada
2019. Chapter 1. Connecting traditional and new genres. In Science Communication on the Internet [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 308],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Malavasi, Donatella
2021. Metadiscourse in Academic Research Articles Versus Blogs: Paul Krugman as a Case Study. In Metadiscourse in Digital Communication,  pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Sokół, Małgorzata
2019. “Tetanus? Who Cares About Tetanus?”: Audience Engagement and Co-participation in Medical Blogs. In Specialized Discourses and Their Readerships [The M.A.K. Halliday Library Functional Linguistics Series, ],  pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka
2020. “So you know ehn … ” The use of bilingual interjections in Nigerian English. Intercultural Pragmatics 17:2  pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka
2022. ‘Mehn! This wins the award’. English Today 38:3  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Unuabonah, Foluke Olayinka & Florence Oluwaseyi Daniel
2020. Haba! Bilingual interjections in Nigerian English: A corpus-based study. Journal of Pragmatics 163  pp. 66 ff. DOI logo
Yus, Francisco
2019. An outline of some future research issues for internet pragmatics. Internet Pragmatics 2:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Zou, Hang (Joanna) & Ken Hyland
2020. “Think about how fascinating this is”: Engagement in academic blogs across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 43  pp. 100809 ff. DOI logo
Zou, Hang (Joanna) & Ken Hyland
2020. Managing evaluation: Criticism in two academic review genres. English for Specific Purposes 60  pp. 98 ff. DOI logo
Zou, Hang (Joanna) & Ken Hyland
2021. A tale of two genres: Engaging audiences in academic blogs and Three Minute Thesis presentations. Australian Journal of Linguistics 41:2  pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Zou, Hang (Joanna) & Ken Hyland
2024. “Let's start with the basics of the virus”: Engaging the public in two forms of explainers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 68  pp. 101353 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.