Article published in:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 10:2 (2020) ► pp. 215240
References

References

Aphek, Edna and Yishai Tobin
1990The Semiotics of Fortune-Telling. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Avtgis, Theodore
1998 “Locus of control and persuasion, social influence, and conformity: A meta-analytic review.” Psychological Reports 83 (3): 899–903. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beach, Wayne A.
1993 “Transitional regularities for ‘casual’ “Okay” usages.” Journal of Pragmatics 19: 325–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 236 ]
Bongelli, Ramona, Ilaria Riccioni, and Andrzej Zuczkowski
2018a “Epistemic stance negotiation: Some examples from Italian conversations.” Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 135: 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018b “Questions and epistemic stance in Italian conversations.” Ampersand 5: 29–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chauvin, Bruno and Etienne Mullet
2018 “Individual differences in paranormal beliefs: The differential role of personality aspetcs.” Current psychology: 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cialdini, Robert B.
1983Influence. The Psychology of persuasion. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
2004 “The science of persuasion.” Scientific American Mind 14 (1): 70–77.Google Scholar
Delorme, Arnaud, Julie Beishel, Leena Michel, Mark Boccuzzi, Dean Radin and Paul J. Mills
2013 “Electrocortical activity associated with subjective communication with deceased.” Frontiers in Psychology 4: 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drinkwater, Kenneth, Andrew Denovan, Neil Dagnall and Andrew Parker
2018 “The Australian Sheep-Goat Scale: An Evaluation of Factor Structure and Convergent Validity.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enoksen, Anette Einan and Paul Dickerson
2018 “That proves my point: How mediums reconstrue disconfirmation in medium-sitter interactions.” British Journal of Social Psychology 57: 386–403. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayano, Kaoru
2011 “Claiming epistemic primacy: Yo-marked assessments in Japanese.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada and Jakob Steensig, 58–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Question design in conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, eds. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 395–414. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wyley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
2012a “Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012b “The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 30–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John and Geoffrey, Raymond G.
2005 “The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 15–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
2010 “Questioning in medicine”. In “Why Do You Ask?”: the Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse, ed. by Alice Freed and Susan Ehrlich, 42–68. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John and Geoffrey Raymond
2012 “Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions.” In Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by Jan P. de Ruiter, 179–192. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jorgensen, Danny L.
1984 “Divinatory Discourse.” Symbolic Interaction 7 (2): 135–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kamio, Akio
1997Territory of Information. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 237 ]
Labov, William and David Fanshel
1977Therapeutic Discourse, Psychoterapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lamont, Peter, Claudia Coelho and Andrew Mckinlay
2009 “Explaining the unexplained: Warranting disbelief in the paranormal.” Discourse Studies 11 (5): 543–559. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Seung-Hee
2014 “Response design in conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by John Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 415–432. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2014 “Action formation and ascription.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by John Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 103–130. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Linell, Per and Thomas Luckman
1991 “Asymmetries in dialogue: some conceptual preliminaries”. In Asymmetries in Dialogue, ed. by Ivana Marková and Klaus Foppa, 1–20. Hemel Hempsted: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Locke, Terry
2004Critical Discourse Analysis. New York/London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Milgram, Stanley
1963 “Behavioural study of obedience.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67: 371–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2013 “Displaying, contesting and negotiating epistemic authority in social interaction: Descriptions and questions in guided visits.” Discourse Studies 15 (5): 597–626. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohashi, Yasushi, Robin Wooffitt, Clare Jackson and Yumi Nixon
2013 “Discourse, culture, and extraordinary experiences: Observations from a comparative, qualitative analysis of Japanese and UK English accounts of paranormal phenomena.” Western Journal of Communication 77(4): 466–488. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petty, Richard E. and John T. Cacioppo
1984 “The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1): 69–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1986Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey
2003 “Grammar and social organization: Yes/No interrogatives and the structure of responding.” American Sociological Review 68 (6): 939–967. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Riccioni, Ilaria, Ramona Bongelli, Gill Philip and Andrzej Zuczkowski
2018 “Dubitative questions and epistemic stance.” Lingua, 207: 71–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1980 “Preliminaries to preliminaries: “Can I ask you a question?”.” Sociological Inquiry 50: 104–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction. London: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simmonds-Moore, Christine A.
2016 “An interpretative phenomenological analysis exploring synesthesia as an exceptional experience: Insights for consciousness and cognition.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 13(4): 303–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
2005 “Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 38(2): 131–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 238 ]
2014 “Sequence organization.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by John Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 191–209. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig
2011The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Anna
2016 “Rational Thinkink and Belief in Psychic Abilities: It Depends on Level of Involvement.” Psychological Reports 118 (1): 74–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storm, Lance, Ken Drinkwater and Anthony L. Jinks
2017 “A Question on Belief: An Analysis of Item Content in Paranormal Belief Questionnnaires.” Journal of Scientific Exploration 31 (2): 187–230.Google Scholar
Szczyrbak, Magdalena
2018 “Knowing, Unknowing or Believing? Epistemic Stance in Donald Tusk’s Testimony in the Trial on the Polish Air Force Tu-154 Air Crash.” Studies in Polish Linguistics 13 (34): 209–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A.
2004 “Critical Discourse Analysis”. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen and Heide Hamilton, 352–371. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wales, Katie
2009 “Unnatural conversation in unnatural conversations: speech reporting in the discourse of spiritual mediumship.” Language and Literature 18 (4): 347–356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willett, Thomas
1988 “A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality.” Studies in Language 12 (1): 51–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Wendy
2000 “Attitude change. Persuasion and social influence.” Annual Review of Psychology 51: 539–570. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wooffitt, Robin
2000 “Some properties of interactional organisation of displays of paranormal cognition in psychic-sitter interaction.” Sociology 34 (3): 457–479.Google Scholar
2001a “Researching psychic practioners: Conversation analysis.” In Discourse as Data. A Guide for Analysis, ed. by Margaret Wetherell, Stephanie Taylor and Simeon J. Yates, 49–92. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
2001b “A socially organized basis for displays of cognition: Procedural orientation to evidential turns in psychic-sitter interaction.” British Journal of Social Psychology 40: 545–563. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006The language of mediums and psychics. Burlington, USA: Ashgate.Google Scholar
2007 “Epistemic authority and neutrality in the discourse of psychic practitioners: Toward a naturalistic parapsychology.” Journal of Parapsychology 71 (1/2): 69–104.Google Scholar
Wooffitt, Robin, Nicola Holt and Simone Allistone
2010 “Introspection as institutional practice: Reflections on the attempt to capture conscious experience in a parapsychology experiment.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 7(1): 5–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wooffitt, Robin, Clare Jackson, Darren Reed, Yasushi Ohashi and Isaac Hughes
2013 “Self-identity, authenticity and the other: The spirits and audience management in stage mediumship.” Language and Communication 33: 93–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zuczkowski, Andrzej, Ramona Bongelli, and Ilaria Riccioni
2017Epistemic Stance in Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar