Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 11:3 (2021) ► pp.355–378

Communicating communication

The recursive expertise of communication experts

 | The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
 | The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
Recent years saw the rise of communication experts, operating in various contexts and enjoying high levels of popularity. The paper examines this expertise asking: What kind of expertise do communication experts hold? What is the communication they are expert in? And what can scholars of communication learn from experts who practice it professionally? Based on in-depth interviews with communication experts, we analyze what they believe are the components of their expertise and the reliance of this expertise on communication to communicate itself. We examine this recursive nature of expertise in communication by highlighting the relationship between these experts and laypeople, offering an explanation for the popularity of the former specifically in the era of “the death of expertise”.
Keywords: communication experts, communication culture, communication recursivity, communication skills, expertise
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.On expertise
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Communicating communication
    • 4.1Professional knowledge
    • 4.2Personal experience
    • 4.3Personal traits
    • 4.4Personal biography
  • 5.Discussion: Recursivity and communication expertise
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 7 September 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00101.fia
References (63)
References
Agrawal, Arun. 1995. “Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge: Some Critical Comments”. Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor 3 (3): 1–6.Google Scholar
Austin, John Langshaw. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich and Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim. 2018. The Normal Chaos of Love. Frankfurt am Main: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert N., Richard Madsen, William M. Sullivan, Ann Swidler, and Steven M. Tipton. 2007. Habits of the Heart, With a New Preface: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Besley, John C. and Andrea H. Tanner. 2011. “What Science Communication Scholars Think About Training Scientists to Communicate”. Science Communication 33 (2): 239–263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blackman, Lisa. 2004. “Self-help, Media Cultures and the Production of Female Psychopathology”. European Journal of Cultural Studies 7 (2): 219–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brownell, Sara E., Jordan V. Price, and Lawrence Steinman. 2013. “Science Communication to the General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students This Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training”. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education 12 (1): E6–E10.Google Scholar
Bubela, Tania, Matthew C. Nisbet, Rick Borchelt, Fern Brunger, Cristine Critchley, Edna Einsiedel, Gail Geller et al. 2009. “Science Communication Reconsidered”. Nature Biotechnology 27 (6): 514–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burgman, Mark, Anna Carr, Lee Godden, Robin Gregory, Marissa McBride, Louisa Flander, and Lynn Maguire. 2011. “Redefining Expertise and Improving Ecological Judgment”. Conservation Letters 4 (2): 81–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. 2000. Good to Talk?: Living and Working in a Communication Culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Carbaugh, Donal A. 1988. Talking American: Cultural Discourses on Donahue. New York: Ablex.Google Scholar
Carbaugh, Donal. 2013. “On Dialogue Studies”. Journal of Dialogue Studies 1 (1): 9–28.Google Scholar
Carr, E. Summerson. 2010. “Enactments of Expertise”. Annual Review of Anthropology 391: 17–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, Briankle G. 1996. Deconstructing Communication: Representation, Subject, and Economies of Exchange. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Chi, Michelene T. H. 2006. “Two Approaches to the Study of Experts’ Characteristics”. In The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, ed. by K. Anders Ericsson, Robert R. Hoffman, Aaron Kozbelt, and A. Mark Williams, 21–30. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Harry M., and Robert Evans. 2007. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crawford, Mary. 2004. “Mars and Venus Collide: A Discursive Analysis of Marital Self-Help Psychology”. Feminism & Psychology 14 (1): 63–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Steven. 1995. “The Construction of Lay Expertise: AIDS Activism and the Forging of Credibility in the Reform of Clinical Trials”. Science, Technology, & Human Values 20 (4): 408–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. Anders. 2006. “The Influence of Experience and Deliberate Practice on the Development of Superior Expert Performance”. In The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, ed. by K. Anders Ericsson, Robert R. Hoffman, Aaron Kozbelt, and A. Mark Williams, 683–703. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
K. Anders Ericsson, Ralf T. Krampe, and Clemens Tesch-Römer. 1993. “The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance”. Psychological Review 100 (3): 363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. Anders and Neil Charness. 1994. “Expert Performance: Its Structure and Acquisition”. American Psychologist 49 (8): 725. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Robert. 2008. “The Sociology of Expertise: the Distribution of Social Fluency”. Sociology Compass 2 (1): 281–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evetts, Julia, Harald A. Mieg, and Ulrike Felt. 2006. “Professionalization, Scientific Expertise, and Elitism: A Sociological Perspective”. In The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, ed. by Ericsson, K. Anders, Robert R. Hoffman, Aaron Kozbelt, and A. Mark Williams, 105–123. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Funtowicz, Silvio O. and Jerome R. Ravetz. 1993. “Science for the Post-Normal Age”. Futures 25 (7): 739–755. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1992. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gladwell, Malcolm. 2008. Outliers: The Story of Success. New York: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Glaser, Robert and Michelene T. Chi. 2014. “Overview”. In The Nature of Expertise, ed. by Michelene T. Chi, Robert Glaser, and Marshall J. Farr, xv-xxviii1. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Ervin. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Royston, Stan X. Li, Rajshree Prakash, and David L. Deephouse. 2005. “Reputation, Diversification, and Organizational Explanations of Performance in Professional Service Firms”. Organization Science 16 (6): 661–673. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartelius, E. Johanna. 2010. “Wikipedia and the Emergence of Dialogic Expertise”. Southern Communication Journal 75 (5): 505–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1972. “On Communicative Competence”. In Sociolinguistics: Selected Readings ed. by J. B. Pride and Janet Holmes, 269–293. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Illouz, Eva. 2003. Oprah Winfrey and the Glamour of Misery: An Essay on Popular Culture. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. London: Polity.Google Scholar
. 2008. Saving the Modern Soul: Therapy, Emotions, and the Culture of Self-Help. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
John, Nicholas A. 2017. The Age of Sharing. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Kaneh-Shalit, Tamar. 2017. “‘The Goal Is Not to Cheer You Up’: Empathetic Care in Israeli Life Coaching”. Ethos 45 (1): 98–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katriel, Tamar. 1990. “‘Griping’ as a Verbal Ritual in Some Israeli Discourse”. In Cultural Communication and Intercultural Contact, ed. by Donal A. Carbaugh, 99–114. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. 2004. Dialogic Moments: From Soul Talks to Talk Radio in Israeli Culture. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
. 2016. “The Metapragmatics of Direct Utterances”. In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, ed. by Alessandro Capone and Jacob L. Mey, 745–766. Chan: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katriel, Tamar and Gerry Philipsen. 1981. ““What We Need is Communication”: ‘Communication’ as a Cultural Category in Some American Speech”. Communication Monographs 48 (4): 301–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krippendorff, Klaus. 1994. “A Recursive Theory of Communication”. Communication Theory Today, ed. by David Crowley and David Mitchell, 78–104. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Tania. 2008. Smart Living: Lifestyle Media and Popular Expertise. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Nichols, Tom. 2017. The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and why It Matters. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perera, Ajith H., C. Ashton Drew, and Chris J. Johnson. 2012. “Experts, Expert Knowledge, and Their Roles in Landscape Ecological Applications”. In Expert Knowledge and Its Application in Landscape Ecology, ed. by Ajith H. Perera, C. Ashton Drew and Chris J. Johnson, 1–10. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, John D. 1999. Speaking Into the Air: The History of the Idea of Communication. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfister, Damien Smith. 2011. “Networked Expertise in the Era of Many-To-Many Communication: On Wikipedia and Invention”. Social Epistemology 25 (3): 217–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinchevski, Amit. 2005. By Way of Interruption: Levinas and the Ethics of Communication. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Radford, Tim. 2011. “Of Course Scientists Can Communicate”. Nature News 469 (7331), 445–445. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant. 2001. “Editorial: On Demarcating the Space Between ‘Lay Expertise’ and ‘Expert Laity’. Text. Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 21 (1–2): 3–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schön, Donald A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Book Inc.Google Scholar
Sorial, Sarah. 2017. “The Legitimacy of Pseudo-Expert Discourse in the Public Sphere”. Metaphilosophy 48 (3): 304–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stern, Paul C. and Fineberg, Harvey V. 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Hazel. 2005. “A Critical Decision Interview Approach to Capturing Tacit Knowledge: Principles and Application”. International Journal of Knowledge Management 1 (3): 25–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Eliciting Tacit Knowledge Using the Critical Decision Interview Method“. In Knowledge Management in Modern Organizations, ed. by Murray E. Jennex, 285–301. Hershey, Pa.: IGI Global. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Treem, Jeffrey W. 2012. “Communicating Expertise: Knowledge Performances in Professional-Service Firms”. Communication Monographs 79 (1): 23–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walton, Douglas. 1997. Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2010. Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “IADA History. The Unity of Dialogue and its Multiple Faces”. Language and Dialogue 7(1): 63–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woodstock, Margaret L. 2002. Cure without Communication: Self-help Books and Popular Notions of Self and Communication, 1860–2000 [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Pennsylvania.
Wortham, Stanton, Katherine Mortimer, Kathy Lee, Elaine Allard, and Kimberly Daniel White. 2011. “Interviews as Interactional Data”. Language in Society 40 (1): 39–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wynne, Brian. 1996. “May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide”. In Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, ed. by Scott Lash, Bronislaw Szerszynski and Brian Wynne, 44–83. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Zeitz, Colleen M. 1997. “Some Concrete Advantages of Abstraction: How Experts’ Representations Facilitate Reasoning”. In Expertise in Context: Human and Machine, ed. by Paul J. Feltovich, Kenneth M. Ford and Robert R. Hoffman, 43–65. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Fialkoff, Yonatan & Amit Pinchevski
2024. Skilling communication: The discourse and metadiscourse of communication in self-help books. The Communication Review 27:2 ► pp. 148 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.