Article published in:
Constructing and Negotiating Identity in Dialogue
Edited by Răzvan Săftoiu
[Language and Dialogue 5:1] 2015
► pp. 7–22

Identity as a dialogic concept

| University of Münster, Germany
Identity has been investigated from different perspectives and there are therefore numerous ways of interpreting this concept. Basically it seems to be a method of categorizing people. We are however not only a slot in a bureaucratic system but social and dialogic human beings. As social individuals we can think about social consequences, and as dialogic individuals we can demonstrate our own supposed identity and evaluate the alleged identity of our fellow human beings in dialogue. ‘The side we are on’ leaves its mark not only on how we evaluate actions and events but also on how we refer to people. In this way identity is constructed and negotiated in dialogue. The paper analyses various authentic texts in order to demonstrate the dialogic nature of the concept.
Keywords: identity construction, dialogue, speech act of identifying, role, purpose of action, evaluation, demonstrations, status function
Published online: 23 June 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.5.1.01wei
References
Appiah, Kwame Anthony
2005 The Ethics of Identity. Princeton: Princeton University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J
1982 Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Richard
1996 Social Identity. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, John E
2004 Language and Identity. National, Ethnic, Religious. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger
1991 Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Măda, Stanca, and Răzvan Săftoiu
(eds) 2012 Professional Communication across Languages and Cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, Bronisław
1923 “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages. A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism.” In The Meaning of Meaning, ed. by Charles K. Ogden, and Ivor A. Richards, 296–336. London: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Norris, Sigrid
2013 Identity in (Inter)action. Introducing Multimodal Analysis. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Norton, Bonny
2013 Identity and Language Learning: Extending the Conversation (2nd ed.). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Omoniyi, Tope, and Goodith White
(eds) 2006 The Sociolinguistics of Identity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Searle, John R
1969 Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992 “Conversation.” In (On) Searle on Conversation, ed. by John R. Searle et al., 7–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda
2006 “Argumentation: The Mixed Game.” Argumentation 20 (1): 59–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, Etienne
1998 Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Kohn, Ayelet
2021. Self-representation of people with disabilities. Language and Dialogue 11:1 ► pp. 59 ff. Crossref logo
Săftoiu, Răzvan
2017. Categoria etnică din perspectivă lingvistică. Diacronia :5 Crossref logo
Săftoiu, Răzvan
2017. The ethnic category from a linguistic perspective. Diacronia :5 Crossref logo
Weigand, Edda
2015. Dialogue in the stream of life. Language and Dialogue 5:2 ► pp. 197 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.