Article published In:
Language and DialogueVol. 5:3 (2015) ► pp.355–380
Identity as a resource to shape mediation in dialogic interaction
This article examines how mediators contribute to formulating a particular type of interactivity by bringing to the forefront institutionally appropriate identities of participants. An existing collection of 18 transcripts from audio recordings of mediation sessions at a mediation center in the western United States serves as a source of interactional data. The study shows that mediators act as designers to construct mediation as a collaborative activity. They invoke identities as an exercise in articulating what is possible in this interaction and exerting control over interactants. Mediators are not just doing what is appropriate for this institutional context; their actions are an act of constructing identities out of what is available there. Participants can act in different ways (e.g., as an ex-husband and an ex-wife). However, relative to the institutional agenda of the meeting, they are encouraged to perform in the capacity of parents and to be collaborators.
Keywords: communication design, Collaboration, institutional talk, identity, deliberation, mediation
References
Aakhus, Mark
2003 “Neither Naïve nor Normative Reconstruction: Dispute Mediators, Impasse, and the Design of Argumentation.” Argumentation: An International Journal on Reasoning 171: 265–290. 
2007 “Communication as Design.” Communication Monographs 741: 112–117.
Aakhus, Mark, and Sally Jackson
2005 “Technology, Interaction, and Design.” In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Kristine Fitch and Robert Sanders, 411–435. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Baraldi, Claudio, and Federico Farini
2011 “Dialogic Mediation in International Groups of Adolescents.” Language and Dialogue 11: 207–232.
Clark, Herbert H
1996 “Joint Activities.” In Using Language, 29–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Donohue, William
1991 Communication, Marital Dispute, and Divorce Mediation. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
1992 “Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eemeren, Frans H. van
2010 Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse: Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fraser, Bruce
2001 “The Mediator as Power Broker.” In Negotiation and Power in Dialogic Interaction, ed. by Edda Weigand and Marcelo Dascal, 19–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Garcia, Angela
1991 “Dispute Resolution without Disputing: How the Interactional Organization of Mediation Hearings Minimizes Argument.” American Sociological Review 561: 818–835.
Garcia, Angela, Kristie Vise, and Stephen Paul Whitaker
2002 “Disputing Neutrality: A Case Study of a Bias Complaint during Mediation.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 201: 205–230.
Glenn, Phillip
2010 “A Mediator’s Dilemma: Acknowledging or Disregarding Stance Displays.” Negotiation Journal 261: 155–162.
Goldberg, Rachel M
2009 “How our Worldviews Shape our Practice.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 261: 405–431.
Greatbatch, David, and Robert Dingwall
1991 “Argumentative Talk in Divorce Mediation Sessions.” American Sociological Review 621: 151–170.
Heisterkamp, Brian L
2006 “Taking the Footing of a Neutral Mediator.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 231: 301–315.
Hundsnurscher, Franz
2001 “The Grammar of Bargaining.” In Negotiation and Power in Dialogic Interaction, ed. by Edda Weigand and Marcelo Dascal, 77–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Hutchby, Ian
2001 Conversation and Technology: From the Telephone to the Internet. Cambridge: Polity.
Jacobs, Scott
1994 “Language and Interpersonal Communication.” In Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, ed. by Mark L. Knapp and Gerald R. Miller, 199–228. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2002 “Maintaining Neutrality in Dispute Mediation: Managing Disagreement while Managing not to Disagree.” Journal of Pragmatics 341: 1403–1426.
2005 “Finding Available Means to Put Things Right.” In
Engaging Argument. Selected Papers from the 2005 National Communication Association/American Forensic Association Summer Conference on Argumentation
, ed. by Patricia Riley, 416–425. Washington, DC: National Communication Association.
Jacobs, Scott, and Mark Aakhus
2002 “What Mediators Do with Words: Implementing Three Models of Rational Discussion in Dispute Mediation.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 201:177–204.
Keltner, John W.S
1987 Mediation: Toward a Civilized System of Dispute Resolution. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.
Lerner, Gene H., and Celia Kitzinger
2007 “Extraction and Aggregation in the Repair of Individual and Collective Self-Reference.” Discourse Studies 91: 526–557.
Levinson, Stephen C
1992 “Activity Types and Language.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Littlejohn, Stephen W., and Karen A. Foss
2009 Encyclopedia of Communication Theory, Vol. 11. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
Maier, Robert
2001 “Negotiation and Identity.” In Negotiation and Power in Dialogic Interaction, ed. by Edda Weigand and Marcelo Dascal, 225–237. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Raiffa, Howard, John Richardson, and David Metcalfe
2002 Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Sacks, Harvey
1992 Lectures on Conversation, Vol. 11. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Sacks, Harvey, and Emanuel A. Schegloff
1979 “Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and Their Interaction.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 15–21. New York, NY: Irvington Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1992 “On Talk and its Institutional Occasions.” In Talk at Work, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 101–136. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
1996 “Some Practices for Referring to Persons in Talk-in-Interaction: A Partial Sketch of a Systematics.” In Studies in Anaphora, ed. by Barbara A. Fox, 437–485. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
2007 “Categories in Action: Person-Reference and Membership Categorization.” Discourse Studies 91: 433–461.
Shon, Donald A., and Martin Rein
1994 Frame Reflection: Towards the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversion. New York: Basic Books.
Tracy, Karen
2011 “What’s in a Name? Stance Markers in Oral Argument about Marriage Laws.” Discourse and Communication 51: 1–23.
Tracy, Karen, and Anna Spradlin
1994 ““Talking like a Mediator”: Conversational Moves of Experienced Divorce Mediators.” In New Directions in Mediation: Communication Research and Perspectives, ed. by Joseph P. Folger and Tricia S. Jones, 110–132. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Van De Mieroop, Dorien
2011 “Identity Negotiations in Narrative Accounts about Poverty.” Discourse and Society 221: 565–591.
Vasilyeva, Alena
2012a “Argumentation in the Context of Mediation Activity.” Journal of Argumentation in Context 11: 209–233.
2012b “Topics as Indication of Being On-task/Off-task.” Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 31: 61–82.
Walton, Douglas
1998 The New Dialectic: Conversational Context of Argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Weigand, Edda
White, Cindy H., and Robert R. Agne
2009 “Communication Practices of Coaches during Mediator Training: Addressing Issues of Knowledge and Enactment.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 271: 83–105.
Whitehead, Kevin, and Gene H. Lerner
2009 “When are Persons “White”? On Some Practical Asymmetries of Racist Reference in Talk-in-Interaction.” Discourse and Society 201: 613–641.
Cited by
Cited by 15 other publications
Bijnen, Emma van
García-Gómez, Antonio
Greco, Sara & Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria
2021. Mediators’ reframing as a constitutive element of a reconciliatory argumentative style. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:1 ► pp. 73 ff. 
Innocenti, Beth
2022. Cultivating contexts for deliberative argumentation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 11:3 ► pp. 394 ff.
Jahiu, Edona
2021. Social power and epistemic authority in workplace: Professional assessments. SSRN Electronic Journal
McKeon, Kerry, Betty Merchant, Juan Niño, Christopher Flanagan-Gonzales & Saleha Sultan
2022. Not theirs, but ours: South Texas superintendents take a stance on immigrant students. Multicultural Education Review 14:2 ► pp. 120 ff.
Vasilyeva, Alena L
2017. Practices of topic and dialogue activity management in dispute mediation. Discourse Studies 19:3 ► pp. 341 ff.
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2016. Interpersonal-Communication and Language-and-Social-Interaction Approaches to Studying Conflict. TIPA. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage :32
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2016. Confrontation and collaboration in the course of the election debate. Language and Dialogue 6:3 ► pp. 370 ff.
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2017. The Role of References in Custody Mediation. TIPA. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage :33
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2017. Strategic maneuvering in dispute mediation. Argumentation and Advocacy 53:3 ► pp. 234 ff.
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2018. The facilitator’s communicative actions to construct meetings in a semi-informal educational
context. Language and Dialogue 8:3 ► pp. 414 ff.
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2019. Language ideology and identity construction in public educational meetings. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 12:2 ► pp. 146 ff.
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
Vasilyeva, Alena L.
2023. Debaters’ actions to manage interaction in the context of the debate talk show. Language and Dialogue 13:2 ► pp. 229 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.