The present study offers an underlying theoretical framework for examining political speeches from a rhetorical perspective. This framework is based on systemic functional linguistics developed by Halliday (most recently updated by Halliday and Matthiessen 2014), and includes discourse structures suggested by later authors. We suggest that the interpersonal stratum of meaning, through which we manage social relations, represents a powerful resource for creating a dialogue with the audience in order to recruit it to a politician’s call for action. To address this issue, we analyzed ten speeches delivered by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to five different international audiences. We examined strategies that foster dialogic interaction with the audience, by directly addressing them, or otherwise acknowledging their presence. The interpersonal strategies we identified combine into larger domains which we term forming social bonds, building a consensus and revealing ideology. These strategies may be salient because they tap into various aspects of the audience’s experience and identity: the social, affective, and ideological spheres.
2013“We Believe the Iranian Nation Can: The Manifestation of Power in Iranian Televised Presidential Debates.”Language & Communication 33 (1): 8–25.
Aristotle
1982Rhetoric. Trans. John. H. Freese. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Austin, John L
1962How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bard, Mitchell
“United Nations: The U.N’s Relations with Israel”[URL] (Retrieved Dec. 21, 2015).
Bateson, Gregory
1953“The Position of Humour in Human Communication.” In Cybernetics, ninth conference, ed. by Geinz von Foerster, 1–47. New York: Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation.
Bull, Peter and Ofer Feldman
2011“Invitations to Affiliative Audience Responses in Japanese Political Speeches.”Journal of Language and Social Psychology 301: 158–176.
Bussman, Hadumod
1998“Phatic Communication.” In Routledge Dictionary of Language and Linguistics, ed. by Hadumod Bussman, Transl. by Gregory Trauth and Kerstin Kazzazi, 358. London: Routledge.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2005Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chilton, Paul
1990“Politeness, Politics, and Diplomacy.”Discourse & Society 1(2), 201–224.
Chilton, Paul
2004Analyzing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge.
Chilton, Paul and Christina Schäffner
1997“Discourse and Politics.” In Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Vol. 2: Discourse as Social Interaction, ed. by T. van Dijk, 206–230. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publication.
Clark, Herbert H. and Thomas B. Carlson
1982“Hearers and Speech Acts.”Language 58 (2): 332–373.
Cutler, Richard H
1995“Distributed Presence and Community in Cyberspace.”Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century 3 (2), 12).
de Cillia, Rudolf, Martin Reisigl, and Ruth Wodak
1999“The Discursive Construction of National Identities.”Discourse & Society 10 (2): 149–173.
Dik, Simon, C
1997The Theory of Functional Grammar: Complex and Derived Constructions. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Emrich, Cynthia G., Holly H. Brower, Jack Feldman and Howard Garland
2001“Images in Words: Presidential Rhetoric, Charisma, and Greatness.”Administrative Science Quarterly 46 (3): 527–557.
Ensink, Titus
1996.”The Footing of a Royal Address: An Analysis of Representativeness in Political Speech, Exemplified in Queen Beatrix’ Address to the Knesset on March 28, 1995.”Current Issues in Language and Society 3 (3): 205–233.
2014“Critical Discourse Analysis of Barack Obama’s 2012 Speeches: Views from Systemic Functional Linguistics and Rhetoric.”Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4 (6): 1178–1187.
Kondowe, Wellman
2014“Interpersonal Metafunctions in Bingu wa Mutharika’s Second-Term Political Discourse: A Systemic Functional Grammatical Approach.”International Journal of Linguistics, 6 (3): 70–84.
Lewin, Beverly A. and Hadara Perpignan
2012“Recruiting the Reader in Literary Criticism.”Text & Talk 32 (6): 751–772.
2005The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Morreall, John
1990Prepared versus Spontaneous Humour. Unpublished manuscript.
Myers-Roy, Alice
1981“The Function of Irony in Discourse.”Text 1 (4): 407–423.
Neuman, Yair and Iris Tabak
2003“Inconsistency as an Interactional Problem: A Lesson from Political Rhetoric.”Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32 (3): 251–267.
Norrick, Neal R
1994“Involvement and Joking in Conversation.”Journal of Pragmatics 221: 409–430.
Reisigl, Martin
2010“Rhetoric of Political Speeches.” In Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Veronika Koller, 243–269. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Reyes, Antonio
2011“Palin vs Biden: The Right for Credibility in Political Discourse.”Issues in Political Discourse Analysis 3 (1): 75–94.
Rourke, Liam, Terry Anderson, Randy Garrison and Walter Archer
1999“Assessing Social Presence in Asynchronous Text-Based Computer Conferencing.”International Journal of E-Learning and Distance Education 14 (2): 50–71.
Short, John, Ederyn Williams, and Bruce Christie
1976The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. Toronto, ON: Wiley.
Tannen, Deborah
1989Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, Geoff
2000Introducing Functional Grammar. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 august 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.