Cover not available
Article published In:
Dialogue and Ethics
Edited by Ronald C. Arnett and François Cooren
[Language and Dialogue 7:1] 2017
► pp. 63–79

IADA history

The unity of dialogue and its multiple faces

| University of Münster (Germany)
IADA History not only refers to the series of conferences and workshops which have been organized since the foundation of the Association but also to the discussions about a unified concept of dialogue which accompanied IADA’s activities during the last three decades. On the one hand, there is the basic question of what constitutes dialogue, while on the other hand there are multiple approaches which claim to be acknowledged as dialogic approaches. If we do not want to accept the plurality of models in the sense of ‘anything goes’ we need to address the difficult issue of how far individual models can contribute to an investigation of dialogue as a complex whole.
Keywords: IADA history, unity of dialogue, concepts of dialogue, interdisciplinarity, methodologies of dialogue analysis, dialogic turn
Article outline
  • 1.The idea of dialogue and the foundation of the Association
  • 2.The unity of dialogue dividing up into multiple faces
  • 3.The interdisciplinary nature of dialogue
  • 4.Methodological differences
    • 4.1Speech act theory and dialogue
    • 4.2Conventions versus principles of probability
    • 4.3Action versus transfer of information
    • 4.4Cooperation on common ground versus reaching out for power
    • 4.5Dialogue as relationship
    • 4.6Separating parts or integrating components of dialogue
    • 4.7The issue of empirical ‘data’
    • 4.8The role of context
  • 5.Looking for the point of the dialogic turn
  • 6.Towards the unity of dialogue
  • References
Published online: 29 June 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.7.1.05wei
References
Arnett, Ronald
2014 “Civic Dialogue: Attending to Locality and Recovering Monologue.” Journal of Dialogue Studies 2 (2): 71–92.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L.
1962 How to Do Things with Words. The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. London etc.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arnett, Ronald
forthc.). “Language as the Originative House of Dialogic Ethics.” In Language and Dialogue: A Handbook of Key Issues in the Field ed. by Edda Weigand New York Routledge
Carbaugh, Donal
2013 “On Dialogue Studies.” Journal of Dialogue Studies 1 (1): 9–28.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1959 “Review: B.F. Skinner: Verbal Behavior. New York 1957.” Language 351: 26–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cissna, Kenneth N. and Rob Anderson
2008 “Dialogic Rhetoric, Coauthorship, and Moments of Meeting.” In Dialogue and Rhetoric, ed. by Edda Weigand, 39–53. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996 Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François
2010 Action and Agency in Dialogue. Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R.
1976 The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2004 Recontextualizing Context. Grammaticality Meets Appropriateness. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, Rita, Jörg Meibauer and Petra B. Schumacher
(eds) 2012 What is a context? Linguistic Approaches and Challenges. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frawley, William
1987 “Review Article: van Dijk (ed.). Handbook of Discourse Analysis, I-IV.” Language 631: 361–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von
1827/1963 “Ueber den Dualis.” In W. von Humboldt. Schriften zur Sprachphilosophie. Vol. 31, ed. by Andreas Flitner and Klaus Giel, 113–143. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Hundsnurscher, Franz
1980 “Konversationsanalyse versus Dialoggrammatik.” In Akten des VI. Internationalen Germanisten-Kongresses. Basel. 1980. Part 2, ed. by Heinz Rupp and Hans-Gert Roloff, 89–95. Bern etc.: Lang.Google Scholar
1992 “Does a Dialogic View of Language Amount to a Paradigm Change in Linguistics: Language as Dialogue.” In Methodologie der Dialoganalyse, ed. by Sorin Stati and Edda Weigand, 1–14. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kretschmar, Jr., William A.
2014 Language and Complex Systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lumsden, Charles J. and Edward O. Wilson
2005 Genes, Mind, and Culture: The Coevolutionary Process. New Jersey: World Scientific. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1972 “Chomsky’s Revolution in Linguistics.” The New York Review of Books XVII, June 291: 16–24.Google Scholar
1992 “Conversation.” In (On) Searle on Conversation, ed. by John R. Searle et al., 7–30. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert A.
1962 “The Architecture of Complexity: Hierarchic Systems.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 1061: 467–482.Google Scholar
Stati, Sorin
1982 Il dialogo. Considerazioni di linguistica pragmatica. Napoli: Liguori.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen
2001 Return to Reason. Cambridge, Mass./London: Cambrigde University Press.Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda
1989 Sprache als Dialog. Sprechakttaxonomie und kommunikative Grammatik. 2nd, rev. ed. 2003 Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991 “The Dialogic Principle Revisited: Speech Acts and Mental States.” In Dialoganalyse III. Referate der 3. Arbeitstagung, Bologna 1990, ed. by Sorin Stati, Edda Weigand and Franz Hundsnurscher, vol. 11, 75–104. Tübingen: Niemeyer. − Reprinted in Edda Weigand 2009 Language as Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 21–44. – Reprinted in Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, ed. by Alessandro Capone and Jacob L. Mey, 209–232. Cham etc.: Springer.Google Scholar
2004 “Empirical Data and Theoretical Models. Review Article on Eerdmans, Susan L., Prevignano, Carlo L., and Paul J. Thibault (eds), Language and Interaction. Discussions with John J. Gumperz.” Pragmatics & Cognition 121: 375–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “The Sociobiology of Language.” In Dialogue and Culture, ed. by Marion Grein and Edda Weigand, 27–49. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Language as Dialogue. From Rules to Principles of Probability, ed. by Sebastian Feller. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Rationality of Performance.” Philosophia Scientiæ 18 (3): 247–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “How to Verify a Theory of Dialogue.” Language and Dialogue 61: 349–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weller, Paul
2013 “Editorial Introduction.” Journal of Dialogue Studies 1 (1): 5–7.Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O.
1999 Consilience. The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 9 other publications

Cañada, Maria Dolors & Carmen López-Ferrero
2019. Oral discourse competence-in-performance. Language and Dialogue 9:2 ► pp. 236 ff. DOI logo
Cooren, François
2018. Review of Weigand (2017): The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue. Language and Dialogue 8:3 ► pp. 468 ff. DOI logo
Dolata-Zaród, Anna
2021. Text operators as dialogical mechanisms in judgments of the French Court of Cassation. Language and Dialogue 11:2 ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Dollar, Natalie J.
2021. Engaging contested community issues. Language and Dialogue 11:1 ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam
2018. Saying “Yes” and “No” to requests. Language and Dialogue 8:2 ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Fialkoff, Yonatan & Amit Pinchevski
2021. Communicating communication. Language and Dialogue 11:3 ► pp. 355 ff. DOI logo
Linell, Per
2017. Dialogue, dialogicality and interactivity. Language and Dialogue 7:3 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Létourneau, Alain
2019. Dialogue considered as a social ensemble of voices. Language and Dialogue 9:3 ► pp. 333 ff. DOI logo
Weigand, Edda
2021. Language and dialogue in philosophy and science. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:4 ► pp. 533 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.