Article published in:
Dialogue and Ethics
Edited by Ronald C. Arnett and François Cooren
[Language and Dialogue 7:1] 2017
► pp. 6379
References

References

Arnett, Ronald
2014 “Civic Dialogue: Attending to Locality and Recovering Monologue.” Journal of Dialogue Studies 2 (2): 71–92.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L.
1962How to Do Things with Words. The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. London etc.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arnett, Ronald
forthc.). “Language as the Originative House of Dialogic Ethics.” In Language and Dialogue: A Handbook of Key Issues in the Field ed. by Edda Weigand New York Routledge
Carbaugh, Donal
2013 “On Dialogue Studies.” Journal of Dialogue Studies 1 (1): 9–28.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1959 “Review: B.F. Skinner: Verbal Behavior. New York 1957.” Language 35: 26–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cissna, Kenneth N. and Rob Anderson
2008 “Dialogic Rhetoric, Coauthorship, and Moments of Meeting.” In Dialogue and Rhetoric, ed. by Edda Weigand, 39–53. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François
2010Action and Agency in Dialogue. Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R.
1976The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 78 ]
Fetzer, Anita
2004Recontextualizing Context. Grammaticality Meets Appropriateness. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, Rita, Jörg Meibauer and Petra B. Schumacher
(eds) 2012What is a context? Linguistic Approaches and Challenges. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frawley, William
1987 “Review Article: van Dijk (ed.). Handbook of Discourse Analysis, I-IV.” Language 63: 361–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von
1827/1963 “Ueber den Dualis.” In W. von Humboldt. Schriften zur Sprachphilosophie. Vol. 3, ed. by Andreas Flitner and Klaus Giel, 113–143. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Hundsnurscher, Franz
1980 “Konversationsanalyse versus Dialoggrammatik.” In Akten des VI. Internationalen Germanisten-Kongresses. Basel. 1980. Part 2, ed. by Heinz Rupp and Hans-Gert Roloff, 89–95. Bern etc.: Lang.Google Scholar
1992 “Does a Dialogic View of Language Amount to a Paradigm Change in Linguistics: Language as Dialogue.” In Methodologie der Dialoganalyse, ed. by Sorin Stati and Edda Weigand, 1–14. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Kretschmar, Jr., William A.
2014Language and Complex Systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lumsden, Charles J. and Edward O. Wilson
2005Genes, Mind, and Culture: The Coevolutionary Process. New Jersey: World Scientific. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1972 “Chomsky’s Revolution in Linguistics.” The New York Review of Books XVII, June 29: 16–24.Google Scholar
1992 “Conversation.” In (On) Searle on Conversation, ed. by John R. Searle et al., 7–30. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Herbert A.
1962 “The Architecture of Complexity: Hierarchic Systems.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106: 467–482.Google Scholar
Stati, Sorin
1982Il dialogo. Considerazioni di linguistica pragmatica. Napoli: Liguori.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen
2001Return to Reason. Cambridge, Mass./London: Cambrigde University Press.Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda
1989Sprache als Dialog. Sprechakttaxonomie und kommunikative Grammatik. 2nd, rev. ed. 2003 Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
1991 “The Dialogic Principle Revisited: Speech Acts and Mental States.” In Dialoganalyse III. Referate der 3. Arbeitstagung, Bologna 1990, ed. by Sorin Stati, Edda Weigand and Franz Hundsnurscher, vol. 1, 75–104. Tübingen: Niemeyer. − Reprinted in Edda Weigand 2009 Language as Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 21–44. – Reprinted in Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, ed. by Alessandro Capone and Jacob L. Mey, 209–232. Cham etc.: Springer.Google Scholar
2004 “Empirical Data and Theoretical Models. Review Article on Eerdmans, Susan L., Prevignano, Carlo L., and Paul J. Thibault (eds), Language and Interaction. Discussions with John J. Gumperz.” Pragmatics & Cognition 12: 375–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 “The Sociobiology of Language.” In Dialogue and Culture, ed. by Marion Grein and Edda Weigand, 27–49. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Language as Dialogue. From Rules to Principles of Probability, ed. by Sebastian Feller. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 79 ]
2010Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Rationality of Performance.” Philosophia Scientiæ 18 (3): 247–268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 “How to Verify a Theory of Dialogue.” Language and Dialogue 6: 349–369. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weller, Paul
2013 “Editorial Introduction.” Journal of Dialogue Studies 1 (1): 5–7.Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O.
1999Consilience. The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Cañada, Maria Dolors & Carmen López-Ferrero
2019. Oral discourse competence-in-performance. Language and Dialogue 9:2  pp. 236 ff. Crossref logo
Cooren, François
2018. Review of Weigand (2017): The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue. Language and Dialogue 8:3  pp. 468 ff. Crossref logo
Dollar, Natalie J.
2021. Engaging contested community issues. Language and Dialogue 11:1  pp. 125 ff. Crossref logo
El-Dakhs, Dina Abdel Salam
2018. Saying “Yes” and “No” to requests. Language and Dialogue 8:2  pp. 235 ff. Crossref logo
Linell, Per
2017. Dialogue, dialogicality and interactivity. Language and Dialogue 7:3  pp. 301 ff. Crossref logo
Létourneau, Alain
2019. Dialogue considered as a social ensemble of voices. Language and Dialogue 9:3  pp. 333 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.