Cover not available
Article published In:
Language Ecology
Vol. 3:1 (2019) ► pp.28–57

The ecology of variation and change in the context of language attrition

ʔuzãʔ (Chichimec) vowels

 | Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, México
Language attrition arises in sociocultural niches which are less than optimal for the survival of a speech community. Analogously to what happens with species in nature, the risk of extinction and the evolution of their systems are determined by internal and external conditions as well by the extent of their impact over the population. Changes in the vitality and maintenance of the language and transformations of its structural properties are partly a response to broader and more general socio-historical factors. This paper discusses striking differences of the phonological system of contemporary ʔuzãʔ (Otomanguean) with respect to descriptions made at the beginning of the 20th century. A detailed phonetic description of the variation and change of the sound patterns in ʔuzãʔ are explained as a function of a general process of language obsolescence. It is claimed that the same ecological predictors of extinction for natural species account for the decline of the language.
Keywords: language attrition, evolutionary linguistics, language change
Article outline
  • 1.Prolegomenon
  • 2.Introduction
    • 2.1Social context and language endangerment
    • 2.2Anthropogenic factors of language attrition
  • 3.Previous description and research
  • 4.Methods, language data and recording protocol
  • 5.Overview of the ʔuzãʔ sound system
    • 5.1The phonetic properties of ʔuzãʔ vowels
    • 5.2Vowels
    • 5.3Oral vowels
    • 5.4Oral breathy vowels
    • 5.5Oral laryngealized vowels
    • 5.6Nasal vowels
      • 5.6.1Variation and vowel space
      • 5.6.2Nasal coarticulation
  • 6.Summary and discussion
    • 6.1Oral vowel space: Witnessing sound change in progress
    • 6.2Non-modal vowels
    • 6.3Nasal vowels
  • 7.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/le.17008.ave
References (64)
References
Austin, P. K., ed. 2010. Lectures in Language Documentation and Description. Language Documentation and Description 71. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
Austin, P. K. and J. Sallabank, eds. 2011. The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge Books Online. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avelino, H. 2016. A cross-linguistic study of laryngeal contrast: Phonation and tone. In H. Avelino, M. Coller, and L. Wetzels, eds. Laryngeal Features in Languages of the Americas. Languages of the America. Leiden/ Boston: Brill. 10–50.Google Scholar
Avelino, H., M. Coller, and L. Wetzels, eds. 2016. Laryngeal Features in Languages of the Americas. Languages of the Americas. Leiden/ Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Baayen, R., R. Piepenbrock, and L. Gulikers. 1995. CELEX. LDC96L14. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Blankenship, B. 2002. The timing of nonmodal phonation in vowels. Journal of Phonetics 301: 163–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. and D. Weenink. 2015. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer (version 5.1.13).Google Scholar
Cardillo, M., G. M. Mace, J. L. Gittleman, K. E. Jones, J. Bielby, and A. Purvis. 2008. The predictability of extinction: Biological and external correlates of decline in mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 275(1641): 1441–1448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D. 2002. Language Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. L. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, 1st ed., Volume 11. London: John Murray. [URL]
Davies, T. J., S. A. Fritz, R. Grenyer, C. D. Orme, J. Bielby, O. R. Bininda-Emonds, M. Cardillo, K. E. Jones, J. L. Gittleman, G. M. Mace, and A. Purvis. 2008. Phylogenetic trees and the future of mammalian biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 Suppl 11: 11556–11563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Angulo, J. 1933. The Chichimeco language (Central Mexico). International Journal of American Linguistics 7(3/4): 152–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diamond, J. 2005. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. Penguin Group.Google Scholar
Dirección General de Educación Indígena. 2014. Educación básica indígena: gestión con resultados. Technical report. Mexico City.Google Scholar
Esposito, C. M. 2010. The effects of linguistic experience on the perception of phonation. Journal of Phonetics 38(2): 303–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. 2009. Dying Words: Endangered Languages and What They Have to Tell Us. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garellek, M. 2011. The timing and sequencing of coarticulated non-modal phonation in English and White Hmong. Journal of Phonetics 40(1): 152–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garellek, M. and P. Keating. 2011. The acoustic consequences of phonation and tone interactions in Jalapa Mazatec. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 411: 185–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gippert, J., N. Himmelmann, and U. Mosel, eds. 2006. Essentials of Language Documentation. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs, Number 178. Berlin; Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, M. K. and P. Ladefoged. 2001. Phonation types: A cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics 29(4): 383–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grenoble, L. A. and L. Furbee, eds. 2010. Language Documentation: Practice and Values. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grenoble, L. A. and L. J. Whaley, eds. 1998. Endangered Languages: Language Loss and Community Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammarström, H., R. Forkel, M. Haspelmath, and S. Bank. 2015. Glottolog (version 2.4). Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany. [URL]. Accessed 2018-06-08.
Heine, B. and M. Brenzinger. 2003. UNESCO Red Book of Endangered Languages. UNESCO.Google Scholar
Herrera Zendejas, E. 2009. Formas sonoras: mapa fónico de las lenguas mexicanas. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. P. 2006. Language documentation: What is it and what is it good for? In J. Gippert, N. P. Himmelmann, and U. Mosel, eds. Essentials of Language Documentation. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs, Number 178. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 1–30.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática. 2010. Censo de población y vivienda 2010.Google Scholar
Keating, P., C. Esposito, M. Garellek, S. ud Dowla Khan, and J. Kuan. 2011. Phonation contrasts across languages. Proceedings of ICPhS 2011, 1046–1049.Google Scholar
Keating, P., J. Kuang, C. Esposito, M. Garellek, and S. ud Dowla Khan. 2012 Phonation in nine languages. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131(4): 3347–3347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köpke, B. 2007. Language Attrition: Theoretical Perspectives. Studies in Bilingualism. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. 2010. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol 2. Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P. 1988. Discussion of phonetics: A note on some terms for phonation types. In Osamu Fujimura, ed. Vocal Physiology: Voice Production, Mechanisms and Functions. New York: Raven Press, Ltd. 373–375.Google Scholar
Lastra, Y. 1970. El conejo y el coyote, cuento chichimeco. Tlalocan. Revista de Fuentes para el Conocimiento de las Culturas Indígenas de México (6): 115–118.Google Scholar
1971. Dos fiestas chichimecas. Anales de Antropología (8): 203–212.Google Scholar
1999. La vitalidad del chichimeco jonaz. In Y. Lastra and A. Harzfeld, eds. Las causas sociales de la desaparición y del mantenimiento de las lenguas en las Naciones de América. Hermosillo: Universidad de Sonora. 51–76.Google Scholar
2009a. Towards a study of language variation and change in Jonaz Chichimec. In J. N. Stanford and D. R. Preston, eds. Variation in Indigenous Minority Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 153–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009b. Vocabulario piloto chichimeco. Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, Mexico City: UNAM.Google Scholar
2011. Dos cambios fonológicos en curso en chichimeco. In P. M. Butragueño, ed. Realismo en el análisis de corpus orales: Primer Coloquio de Cambio y Variación Lingüística, Cátedra Jaime Torres Bodet. Estudios de Lingüística. México City: El Colegio de México. 83–92.Google Scholar
2012. Recent changes in Chichimec. In O. Hitomi, C. Stroh, and A. Urdze, eds. More Morphologies, Contributions to the Festival of Languages, Volume 351 of Diversitas Linguarum, 23–35. Bremen: Universittsverlag Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
2014. La morfología verbal del chichimeco según Angulo y la actual. In P. M. Butragueño and L. Orozco, eds. Argumentos cuantitativos y cualitativos en sociolingüística. Segundo Coloquio de Cambio y Variación lingüística. México City: El Colegio de México. 521–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Los hablantes de chichimeco jonaz a través de la historia. UniverSOS 121: 14–91.Google Scholar
Lastra de Suárez, Y. 1984. Chichimeco jonaz. In N. A. McQuown, ed. Linguistics. Volume 2 of Supplement to the Handbook of Middle American Languages. Austin: University of Texas Press. 20–42.Google Scholar
Levy, E. S. 2009. On the assimilation-discrimination relationship in American English adults’ French vowel learning. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126(5): 2670–2682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, B. and I. Maddieson. 1988. Phonetic universals in consonant systems. In C. Li and L. M. Hyman, eds. Language, Speech and Mind. London: Routledge. 62–78.Google Scholar
Martinet, A. 1955. Économie des changements phonétiques. Traité de phonologie diachronique, Volume X1 of Bibliotheca Romanica, Manualia et Commentationes. Berne: A. Fracke.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. S. and C. B. Vigouroux. 2017. Individuals, populations, and timespace: Perspectives on the ecology of language revisited. Language Ecology 1(1): 75–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nettle, D. and S. Romaine. 2002. Vanishing Voices: The Extinction of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palancar, E. L. and H. Avelino. 2015. Inflectional complexity and verb classes in Chichimec. In E. L. Palancar, M. Baerman, and T. Feist, eds. Inflectional Complexity: New Lights from the Oto-Manguean Languages of Mexico. [URL]. Accessed 2017-05-17.
Price, S. A. and J. L. Gittleman. 2007. Hunting to extinction: Biology and regional economy influence extinction risk and the impact of hunting in artiodactyls. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 274(1641): 1845–1851. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Purvis, A. 2008. Phylogenetic approaches to the study of extinction. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 391: 301–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Purvis, A., M. Cardillo, R. Grenyer, and B. Collen. 2005. Correlates of extinction risk: Phylogeny, biology, threat and scale. In A. Purvis, J. L. Gittleman, and T. Brooks, eds. Phylogeny and Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 295–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, J. D. 2003. Life histories and extinction risk. In T. M. Blakburn and K. J. Gaston, eds. Macroecology: Concepts and Consequences. The 43rd Annual Symposium of the British Ecological Society, held at the University of Birmingham, 17–19 April 2002. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 195–217.Google Scholar
Reznick, D. N. and R. E. Ricklefs. 2009. Darwin’s bridge between microevolution and macroevolution. Nature 457(7231): 837–842. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robins, R. H. and E. M. Uhlenbeck, eds. 1991. Endangered Languages. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Romero Castillo, M. 1958. Los fonemas del chichimeco-jonaz. Análes del Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia XI1: 289–297.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S. 2011. Language Attrition. Key Topics in Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scicon R&D Inc. 2015. Pcquirer and x16 series hardware system. [URL]
Seliger, H. and R. Vago. 1991. First Language Attrition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverman, D., B. Blankenship, P. Kirk, and P. Ladefoged. 1995. Phonetic structures in Jalapa Mazatec. Anthropological Linguistics, 70–88.Google Scholar
Soriano, Fray Guadalupe. 1767. Tratado del Arte y unión de los idiomas otomí y pame; vocabularios de los idiomas pame, otomí, mexicano y jonaz. Yolanda Lastra, ed. 2012. Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Soustelle, J. 1937. La famille Otomí-Pame du Mexique Central. Paris: Institute D’Ethnologie.Google Scholar
Sutherland, W. J. 2003. Parallel extinction risk and global distribution of languages and species. Nature 423: 276–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vitousek, P. M., M.H.A., J. Lubchenco, and J. M. Melillo. 1997. Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science 277(5325): 494–499. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woodbury, A. C. 2011. Language documentation. In P. K. Austin and J. Sallabank, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages. Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 159–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Jin, Xianping, Minsheng Fan & Li Wang
2023. 2023 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), ► pp. 138 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.