Cover not available
Article published In:
Language Ecology
Vol. 3:1 (2019) ► pp.28–57

The ecology of variation and change in the context of language attrition

ʔuzãʔ (Chichimec) vowels

| Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, México

Language attrition arises in sociocultural niches which are less than optimal for the survival of a speech community. Analogously to what happens with species in nature, the risk of extinction and the evolution of their systems are determined by internal and external conditions as well by the extent of their impact over the population. Changes in the vitality and maintenance of the language and transformations of its structural properties are partly a response to broader and more general socio-historical factors. This paper discusses striking differences of the phonological system of contemporary ʔuzãʔ (Otomanguean) with respect to descriptions made at the beginning of the 20th century. A detailed phonetic description of the variation and change of the sound patterns in ʔuzãʔ are explained as a function of a general process of language obsolescence. It is claimed that the same ecological predictors of extinction for natural species account for the decline of the language.

Keywords: language attrition, evolutionary linguistics, language change
Article outline
  • 1.Prolegomenon
  • 2.Introduction
    • 2.1Social context and language endangerment
    • 2.2Anthropogenic factors of language attrition
  • 3.Previous description and research
  • 4.Methods, language data and recording protocol
  • 5.Overview of the ʔuzãʔ sound system
    • 5.1The phonetic properties of ʔuzãʔ vowels
    • 5.2Vowels
    • 5.3Oral vowels
    • 5.4Oral breathy vowels
    • 5.5Oral laryngealized vowels
    • 5.6Nasal vowels
      • 5.6.1Variation and vowel space
      • 5.6.2Nasal coarticulation
  • 6.Summary and discussion
    • 6.1Oral vowel space: Witnessing sound change in progress
    • 6.2Non-modal vowels
    • 6.3Nasal vowels
  • 7.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/le.17008.ave
References

References

Austin, P. K.
ed. 2010 Lectures in Language Documentation and Description. Language Documentation and Description 71. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
Austin, P. K. and J. Sallabank
eds. 2011 The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge Books Online. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avelino, H.
2016 A cross-linguistic study of laryngeal contrast: Phonation and tone. In H. Avelino, M. Coller, and L. Wetzels, eds. Laryngeal Features in Languages of the Americas. Languages of the America. Leiden/ Boston: Brill. 10–50.Google Scholar
Avelino, H., M. Coller, and L. Wetzels
eds. 2016 Laryngeal Features in Languages of the Americas. Languages of the Americas. Leiden/ Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Baayen, R., R. Piepenbrock, and L. Gulikers
1995 CELEX. LDC96L14. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Blankenship, B.
2002 The timing of nonmodal phonation in vowels. Journal of Phonetics 301: 163–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. and D. Weenink
2015 Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer (version 5.1.13).Google Scholar
Cardillo, M., G. M. Mace, J. L. Gittleman, K. E. Jones, J. Bielby, and A. Purvis
2008 The predictability of extinction: Biological and external correlates of decline in mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 275(1641): 1441–1448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D.
2002 Language Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. L.
1871 The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, 1st ed., Volume 11. London: John Murray. [URL]
Davies, T. J., S. A. Fritz, R. Grenyer, C. D. Orme, J. Bielby, O. R. Bininda-Emonds, M. Cardillo, K. E. Jones, J. L. Gittleman, G. M. Mace, and A. Purvis
2008 Phylogenetic trees and the future of mammalian biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 Suppl 11: 11556–11563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Angulo, J.
1933 The Chichimeco language (Central Mexico). International Journal of American Linguistics 7(3/4): 152–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diamond, J.
2005 Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. Penguin Group.Google Scholar
Dirección General de Educación Indígena
2014 Educación básica indígena: gestión con resultados. Technical report. Mexico City.Google Scholar
Esposito, C. M.
2010 The effects of linguistic experience on the perception of phonation. Journal of Phonetics 38(2): 303–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, N.
2009 Dying Words: Endangered Languages and What They Have to Tell Us. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garellek, M.
2011 The timing and sequencing of coarticulated non-modal phonation in English and White Hmong. Journal of Phonetics 40(1): 152–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garellek, M. and P. Keating
2011 The acoustic consequences of phonation and tone interactions in Jalapa Mazatec. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 411: 185–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gippert, J., N. Himmelmann, and U. Mosel
eds. 2006 Essentials of Language Documentation. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs, Number 178. Berlin; Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, M. K. and P. Ladefoged
2001 Phonation types: A cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics 29(4): 383–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grenoble, L. A. and L. Furbee
eds. 2010 Language Documentation: Practice and Values. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grenoble, L. A. and L. J. Whaley
eds. 1998 Endangered Languages: Language Loss and Community Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammarström, H., R. Forkel, M. Haspelmath, and S. Bank
2015 Glottolog (version 2.4). Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany. [URL]. Accessed 2018-06-08.
Heine, B. and M. Brenzinger
2003 UNESCO Red Book of Endangered Languages. UNESCO.Google Scholar
Herrera Zendejas, E.
2009 Formas sonoras: mapa fónico de las lenguas mexicanas. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. P.
2006 Language documentation: What is it and what is it good for? In J. Gippert, N. P. Himmelmann, and U. Mosel, eds. Essentials of Language Documentation. Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs, Number 178. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 1–30.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática
2010 Censo de población y vivienda 2010.Google Scholar
Keating, P., C. Esposito, M. Garellek, S. ud Dowla Khan, and J. Kuan
2011 Phonation contrasts across languages. Proceedings of ICPhS 2011, 1046–1049.Google Scholar
Keating, P., J. Kuang, C. Esposito, M. Garellek, and S. ud Dowla Khan
2012 Phonation in nine languages. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131(4): 3347–3347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Köpke, B.
2007 Language Attrition: Theoretical Perspectives. Studies in Bilingualism. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
2010 Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol 2. Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P.
1988 Discussion of phonetics: A note on some terms for phonation types. In Osamu Fujimura, ed. Vocal Physiology: Voice Production, Mechanisms and Functions. New York: Raven Press, Ltd. 373–375.Google Scholar
Lastra, Y.
1970 El conejo y el coyote, cuento chichimeco. Tlalocan. Revista de Fuentes para el Conocimiento de las Culturas Indígenas de México (6): 115–118.Google Scholar
1971 Dos fiestas chichimecas. Anales de Antropología (8): 203–212.Google Scholar
1999 La vitalidad del chichimeco jonaz. In Y. Lastra and A. Harzfeld, eds. Las causas sociales de la desaparición y del mantenimiento de las lenguas en las Naciones de América. Hermosillo: Universidad de Sonora. 51–76.Google Scholar
2009a Towards a study of language variation and change in Jonaz Chichimec. In J. N. Stanford and D. R. Preston, eds. Variation in Indigenous Minority Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 153–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009b Vocabulario piloto chichimeco. Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, Mexico City: UNAM.Google Scholar
2011 Dos cambios fonológicos en curso en chichimeco. In P. M. Butragueño, ed. Realismo en el análisis de corpus orales: Primer Coloquio de Cambio y Variación Lingüística, Cátedra Jaime Torres Bodet. Estudios de Lingüística. México City: El Colegio de México. 83–92.Google Scholar
2012 Recent changes in Chichimec. In O. Hitomi, C. Stroh, and A. Urdze, eds. More Morphologies, Contributions to the Festival of Languages, Volume 351 of Diversitas Linguarum, 23–35. Bremen: Universittsverlag Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
2014 La morfología verbal del chichimeco según Angulo y la actual. In P. M. Butragueño and L. Orozco, eds. Argumentos cuantitativos y cualitativos en sociolingüística. Segundo Coloquio de Cambio y Variación lingüística. México City: El Colegio de México. 521–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Los hablantes de chichimeco jonaz a través de la historia. UniverSOS 121: 14–91.Google Scholar
Lastra de Suárez, Y.
1984 Chichimeco jonaz. In N. A. McQuown, ed. Linguistics. Volume 2 of Supplement to the Handbook of Middle American Languages. Austin: University of Texas Press. 20–42.Google Scholar
Levy, E. S.
2009 On the assimilation-discrimination relationship in American English adults’ French vowel learning. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126(5): 2670–2682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, B. and I. Maddieson
1988 Phonetic universals in consonant systems. In C. Li and L. M. Hyman, eds. Language, Speech and Mind. London: Routledge. 62–78.Google Scholar
Martinet, A.
1955 Économie des changements phonétiques. Traité de phonologie diachronique, Volume X1 of Bibliotheca Romanica, Manualia et Commentationes. Berne: A. Fracke.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. S. and C. B. Vigouroux
2017 Individuals, populations, and timespace: Perspectives on the ecology of language revisited. Language Ecology 1(1): 75–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nettle, D. and S. Romaine
2002 Vanishing Voices: The Extinction of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Palancar, E. L. and H. Avelino
2015 Inflectional complexity and verb classes in Chichimec. In E. L. Palancar, M. Baerman, and T. Feist, eds. Inflectional Complexity: New Lights from the Oto-Manguean Languages of Mexico. [URL]. Accessed 2017-05-17.
Price, S. A. and J. L. Gittleman
2007 Hunting to extinction: Biology and regional economy influence extinction risk and the impact of hunting in artiodactyls. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 274(1641): 1845–1851. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Purvis, A.
2008 Phylogenetic approaches to the study of extinction. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 391: 301–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Purvis, A., M. Cardillo, R. Grenyer, and B. Collen
2005 Correlates of extinction risk: Phylogeny, biology, threat and scale. In A. Purvis, J. L. Gittleman, and T. Brooks, eds. Phylogeny and Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 295–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, J. D.
2003 Life histories and extinction risk. In T. M. Blakburn and K. J. Gaston, eds. Macroecology: Concepts and Consequences. The 43rd Annual Symposium of the British Ecological Society, held at the University of Birmingham, 17–19 April 2002. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 195–217.Google Scholar
Reznick, D. N. and R. E. Ricklefs
2009 Darwin’s bridge between microevolution and macroevolution. Nature 457(7231): 837–842. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robins, R. H. and E. M. Uhlenbeck
eds. 1991 Endangered Languages. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Romero Castillo, M.
1958 Los fonemas del chichimeco-jonaz. Análes del Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia XI1: 289–297.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S.
2011 Language Attrition. Key Topics in Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scicon R&D Inc.
2015 Pcquirer and x16 series hardware system. [URL]
Seliger, H. and R. Vago
1991 First Language Attrition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverman, D., B. Blankenship, P. Kirk, and P. Ladefoged
1995 Phonetic structures in Jalapa Mazatec. Anthropological Linguistics, 70–88.Google Scholar
Soriano, Fray Guadalupe
1767 Tratado del Arte y unión de los idiomas otomí y pame; vocabularios de los idiomas pame, otomí, mexicano y jonaz. Yolanda Lastra, ed. 2012 Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Soustelle, J.
1937 La famille Otomí-Pame du Mexique Central. Paris: Institute D’Ethnologie.Google Scholar
Sutherland, W. J.
2003 Parallel extinction risk and global distribution of languages and species. Nature 423: 276–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vitousek, P. M., M.H.A., J. Lubchenco, and J. M. Melillo
1997 Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science 277(5325): 494–499. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woodbury, A. C.
2011 Language documentation. In P. K. Austin and J. Sallabank, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages. Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 159–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar