The necessity for roots to be categorized in syntax is recast as an interface condition, resulting from the SEM-deficient character of free acategorial roots. The question of how much descriptive content roots (may) bear is linked to the idiomatic, non-compositional interpretation of the First Phase. The consequences of such a version of syntactic decomposition of words for the morphological realization of roots are outlined, as well as this account’s compatibility with conceptual atomism.
2008“Structuring participles.” In Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Charles B. Chang and Hannah J. Haynie (eds), 33–41. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Anagnostopoulou, Elena and Samioti, Yota
2009Domains for Idioms. Paper presented at the Roots II Workshop,
University of Stuttgart.
Arad, Maya
2003“Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: The case of Hebrew denominal verbs.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2: 737–778.
Arad, Maya
2005Roots and Patterns: Hebrew Morpho-syntax. Dordrecht: Springer.
Aronoff, Mark
1976Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Aronoff, Mark
1994Morphology by Itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Aronoff, Mark
2007“In the Beginning was the Word.”Language 83: 803–830.
Baker, Mark
2003Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Basilico, D
2008“Particle verbs and benefactive double objects in English: High and low attachments.”Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 731–729.
Boeckx, Cedric
2010 “Defeating lexicocentrism.” Unpublished Ms., ICREA, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona.
Borer, Hagit
2003“Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations: syntactic projections and the lexicon.” In The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory, John Moore and Maria Polinsky (eds), 31–67. Stanford: CSLI.
Borer, Hagit
2005Structuring Sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Borer, Hagit
2009Roots and Categories. Paper presented at the 19th Colloquium on Generative Grammar
. University of the Basque Country, Vitoria-Gasteiz.
Chomsky, Noam
1970“Remarks on nominalization.” In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick Jacobs and Peter Rosenbaum (eds), 184–221. Waltham, MA.: Ginn & Company.
Cruse, D.A
1982Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Belder, Marijke
2011Roots and Affixes: Eliminating Lexical Categories from Syntax. Utrecht: LOT.
Embick, David
2000“Features, syntax, and categories in the Latin perfect.”Linguistic Inquiry 31: 185–230.
Embick, David and Marantz, Alec
2008“Architecture and blocking.”Linguistic Inquiry 39: 1–53.
Emonds, Joseph
1985A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
Emonds, Joseph
2001Lexicon and Grammar: the English Syntacticon. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Raffaella, Folli, Harley, Heidi and Karimi, Simin
2003“Determinants of event type in Persian complex predicates.” In Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics, Luisa Astruc and Marc Richards (eds), 1: 100–120. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
Fodor, Jerry
1970“Three reasons for not deriving ‘kill’ from ‘cause to die’.”Linguistic Inquiry 1: 429–438.
Fodor, Jerry and Lepore, Ernest
1996“The red herring and the pet fish: why concepts still can’t be prototypes.” Cognition 58: 253–270.
Fodor, Jerry and Lepore, Ernest
1998“The emptiness of the lexicon, critical reflections on James Pustejovsky’s ‘The generative Lexicon’.”Linguistic Inquiry 29: 269–288.
Galani, Alexandra
2005 “The morphosyntax of verbs in Modern Greek.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of York.
Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay
1993“On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations.” In The View from Building 20, Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 53–109. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hale, Kenneth and Keyser, Samuel Jay
2002Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harley, Heidi
2005a“How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, Manner Incorporation and the ontology of verb roots in English.” In The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation, Nomi Erteschik-Shir and Tova Rapoport (eds), 42–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harley, Heidi
2005b“Bare phrase structure, a-categorial roots, one-replacement and unaccusativity.” In Harvard Working Papers on Linguistics 9, Slava Gorbachov and Andrew Nevins (eds), 1–19. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Harley, Heidi
2007The Bipartite Structure of Verbs Cross-Linguistically, or Why Mary Can’t Exhibit John her Paintings. Talk presented at the
2007 ABRALIN Congres
in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, March 2007.
Harley, Heidi
2009“The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP.” In Quantification, Definiteness, and Nominalization, Anastasia Giannakidou and Monika Rathert (eds), 320–342. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harley, Heidi
2012On the Identity of Roots. Unpublished Ms., University of Arizona.
Harley, Heidi and Noyer, Rolf
2000“Formal versus encyclopedic properties of vocabulary: Evidence from nominalisations.” In The Lexicon-Encyclopedia Interface, Bert Peeters (ed.), 349–374. Current Research in the Semantics/pragmatics Interface v. 5. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Haugen, Jason
2009“Hyponymous objects and late insertion.”Lingua 119: 242–262.
Kiparsky, Paul
1982“Word-formation and the lexicon.” In Proceedings of the Mid-America Linguistics Conference, F. Ingemann (ed.). Lawrence, Kansas.
Levin, Beth and Hovav, M. Rappaport
1995Unaccusativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Levin, Beth and Hovav, M. Rappaport
2005Argument Realization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lowenstamm, Jean
2008 “On n, √, and types of nouns.” In Sounds of silence: empty elements in syntax and phonology. [North Holland Linguistic Series, Linguistic Variations Volume 63]. 107–144. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Marantz, Alec
1997“No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon.”University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4: 201–225.
2002“On the systematic aspect of idioms.”Linguistic Inquiry 33: 665–672.
Geoffrey, Nunberg, Sag, Ivan and Wasow, Thomas
1994“Idioms.”Language 70: 491–538.
Panagiotidis, Phoevos
2005“Against category-less roots in syntax and word learning: objections to Barner and Bale (2002).”Lingua 115: 1181–1194.
Panagiotidis, Phoevos
2011“Categorial features and categorizers.”The Linguistic Review 28: 325–346.
Panagiotidis, Phoevos
2014Categorial Features: A generative theory of word class categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pullum, Geoffrey
2010 “Pullum 2010. Isms, gasms, etc.” The Language Log. [URL].
Siddiqi, Daniel
2006 “Minimize Exponence: Economy Effects on a Model of the Morphosyntactic Component of the Grammar.” Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Arizona.
Svenonius, Peter
2005 “Idioms and domain boundaries.” Unpublished Ms., CASTL, University of Tromsø.
Volpe, Mark
2009 “Root and deverbal nominalizations: Lexical flexibility in Japanese.” Unpublished Ms., available from [URL].
Cited by
Cited by 6 other publications
Carston, Robyn
2021. Polysemy: Pragmatics and sense conventions. Mind & Language 36:1 ► pp. 108 ff.
Carston, Robyn
2023. The relevance of words and the language/communication divide. Frontiers in Psychology 14
Nóbrega, Vitor A. & Phoevos Panagiotidis
2020. Headedness and exocentric compounding. Word Structure 13:2 ► pp. 211 ff.
2021. A morphosyntactic analysis of nominal expressive suffixes in Russian and Greek. The Linguistic Review 38:4 ► pp. 645 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.