Chapter published in:
Sonic Signatures: Studies dedicated to John Harris
Edited by Geoff Lindsey and Andrew Nevins
[Language Faculty and Beyond 14] 2017
► pp. 163188
Anttila, Arto
2007Variation and optionality. In Paul de Lacy (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, 519–536. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Archangeli, Diana & Douglas Pulleyblank
2015aPhonology without universal grammar. Frontiers in Psychology 6. 1229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015bTonal allomorphy in Kinande. In L. H. Wee & Y. Hsiao (eds.), Capturing Phonological Shades, 76–100. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Becker, Michael, F. Nihan Ketrez & Andrew Nevins
2011The surfeit of the stimulus: Grammatical biases filter lexical statistics in Turkish voicing deneutralization. Language 87(1): 84–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Downing, Laura J., T.A. Hall & Renate Raffelsiefen
(eds.) 2005Paradigms in Phonological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & Zsuzsa Londe
2006Stochastic phonological knowledge: The case of Hungarian vowel harmony. Phonology 23: 59–104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce, Kye Zuraw, Péter Siptár & Zsuzsa Londe
2009Natural and unnatural constraints in Hungarian vowel harmony. Language 85: 822–863. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kálmán, László, Péter Rebrus & Miklós Törkenczy
2012Possible and impossible variation. In Ferenc Kiefer, Mária Ladányi & Péter Siptár (eds.), Current Issues in Morphological Theory. (Ir)regularity, Analogy and Frequency. Papers from the 14th International Morphology Meeting, Budapest, 13–16 May 2010, 23–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael
2005Paradigmatic uniformity and contrast. In Laura J. Downing, T. A. Hall & Renate Raffelsiefen (eds.), Paradigms in Phonological Theory, 145–169. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kiefer Ferenc
1985Natural morphology. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 35: 85–105.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J
2005Optimal paradigms. In Laura J. Downing, T. A. Hall & Renate Raffelsiefen (eds.), Paradigms in Phonological Theory, 170–210. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky
1993/2004Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Ms. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, and University of Colorado, Boulder. [Published by Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.]
Rácz, Péter & Péter Rebrus
2012Variation in the possessive allomorphy of Hungarian. In Ferenc Kiefer, Mária Ladányi & Péter Siptár (eds.), Current Issues in Morphological Theory: (Ir)regularity, Analogy and Frequency. Selected papers from the 14th International Morphology Meeting, Budapest, 13–16 May 2010, 51–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rebrus, Péter
2000Morfofonológiai jelenségek. In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.), Strukturális magyar nyelvtan III. Alaktan, 763–947. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
2013Miért nincs j? In Attila Benő, Emese Fazakas & Edit Kádár (eds.), „…hogy legyen a víznek lefolyása…” Köszöntő kötet Szilágyi N. Sándor tiszteletére, 383–401. Kolozsvár: Erdélyi Múzeum Egyesület Kiadó.Google Scholar
& Péter Szigetvári 2016Diminutives: Exceptions to harmonic uniformity. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 15: 101–119.Google Scholar
Rebrus, Péter, Péter Szigetvári & Miklós Törkenczy
2012Dark secrets of Hungarian vowel harmony. In Eugeniusz Cyran, Henryk Kardela & Bogdan Szymanek (eds), Sound, Structure and Sense: Studies in Memory of Edmund Gussmann, 491–508. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Google Scholar
Ritter, Nancy
2002The Hungarian possessive suffix revisited. In István Kenesei (ed.), Approaches to Hungarian. Volume 8. Papers from the Budapest Conference, 283–307. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Rebrus, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy
2015Monotonicity and the typology of front/back harmony. Theoretical Linguistics 41(1–2): 1–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simonović, Marko
2015Lexicon immigration service: Prolegomena to a theory of loanword integration. Ph.D thesis, Universiteit Utrecht.
Smolensky, Paul
1995On the internal structure of the constraint component of UG. Colloquium presented at the University of California, Los Angeles. [ROA-86.]
Siptár, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy
2000/2007The Phonology of Hungarian. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca
2000Paradigm uniformity and the phonetics-phonology boundary. In Michael Broe & Janet Pierrehumbert (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology 5. Acquisition and the Lexicon, 313–334. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Törkenczy, Miklós
2011Hungarian vowel harmony. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 2963–2990. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Ozburn, Avery
2019. A target-oriented approach to neutrality in vowel harmony: Evidence from Hungarian. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 4:1 Crossref logo
Rebrus, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy
2021. Harmonic Uniformity and Hungarian front/back harmony. Acta Linguistica Academica 68:1-2  pp. 175 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.