Cover not available
Article published In:
Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 41:2 (2018) ► pp.240–268

A corpus-based study of the automatic extraction and validation of V-N Italian oral academic collocations

| University for Foreigners of Perugia

This study describes the outcomes of a POS-based method for the automatic extraction of V-N Italian oral academic collocations from an annotated corpus. A frequency statistical measure is applied to automatically extract the collocations from the POS-tagged corpus. The results reveal that frequency alone is not sufficient to measure the degree of association that connects the two elements of a word pair. In order to detect the real-attested Italian collocations, the data has been further evaluated by 50 Italian native speakers. The results indicate that these combinations are tightly linked to their context of usage. Thus, native speakers should be exposed to these phrasal contexts to activate their mechanisms of explicit reflection and assess the degree of collocativity of these combinations.

Keywords: collocations, academic lexicon, computational methods, applied linguistics, corpus linguistics
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • 1.Towards a definition of “collocation”
    • 1.1Collocations in applied linguistics
  • 2.Data and methodology
    • 2.1Collecting data for structuring the ASIC corpus
    • 2.2Extracting and filtering collocations from the ASIC corpus
    • 2.3Validation of the extracted academic Italian collocation list
      • 2.3.1Results of the crowd sourcing experiment
      • 2.3.2Double validation of the data
  • Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00022.pep
References

References

Ackerman, K. & Chen, Y.
2014 The Academic Collocation List. [online] Available at: [URL].
Basili, R., Pazienza, M. T., & Velardi, P.
1992 A shallow syntactic analyzer to extract word associations from corpora. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 71, 113–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benson, M.
1990 Collocations and general-purpose dictionaries. International Journal of Lexicography, 311, 23–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benson, M., Benson, E., & Ilson, R.
1986 The BBI Dictionary of English Word Combinations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. & Conrad, S.
2009 Register, Genre and Style. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Callison-Burch, C.
2009 Fast, cheap, and creative: Evaluating translation quality using Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 286–295. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calzolari, N. et al.
2002 Towards Best Practice for Multiword Expressions in Computational Lexicons. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 1934–1940.Google Scholar
Chan, T. P., & Liou, H. C.
2005 Effects of web-based concordancing instruction on EFL students’ learning of verb-noun collocations. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 231–251.Google Scholar
Cowie, A.
1978 The place of illustrative material and collocations in the design of a learner’s dictionary. In P. Strevens (Ed.), In Honour of A.S. Hornby, 127–139. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1981 The treatment of collocations and idioms in learners’ dictionaries. Applied Linguistics, 21, 223–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coxhead, A.
2000 A New Academic Word List. TESOL Quarterly, 341, 213–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Church, K. W. & Hanks, P.
1990 Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics, 161, 22–29.Google Scholar
Church, K. W., Gale, W., Hanks, P., & Hindle, D.
1991 Parsing, word associations, and typical predicate-argument relations. In M. Tomita (Ed.), Current Issues in Parsing Technology, 75–81. Boston: Kluwer Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durrant, P.
2008 High frequency collocations and second language learning. Final Thesis Ph.D., University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Durrant, P. & Schmitt, N.
2009 To what extent do native and nonnative writers make use of collocations?. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 471, 157–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., Simpson-Vlach, R. & Maynard, C.
2008 Formulaic language in native and second-language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus Linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 421, 375–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evert, S.
2008 Corpora and collocations. In A. Lüdeling, & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics. An International Handbook, 223–233. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Evert, S. & Hardie, A.
2011 Twenty-first century Corpus Workbench: Updating a query architecture for the new millennium. Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2011 conference.Google Scholar
Firth, J.
1956 Synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–1955. Reprinted in F. R. Palmer (Ed.) 1968, Selected Papers of J. R. Firth, 168–205. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Gao, Z.-M.
2011 Exploring the effects and use of a Chinese-English bilingual concordancer. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 241, 255–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Automatic Extraction of English Collocations and their Chinese-English Bilingual Examples: A Computational Tool for Bilingual Lexicography. Studies in Linguistics, 401, 11, 95–121.Google Scholar
Gardner, D. & Davies, M.
2013 A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 351, 1–24.Google Scholar
Gledhill, C. J.
2000 Collocations in Science Writing. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Granger, S., & Meunier, F.
2008 Phraseology. An interdisciplinary perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, S., & Paquot, M.
2009 In search of a General Academic vocabulary: A corpus-driven study. In K. Katsampoxaki-Hodgetts (Ed.), Options and Practices of LSP Practitioners, 94–108. Crete: University of Crete Publications.Google Scholar
Hardie, A.
2012 CQPweb – combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 171, 31, 380–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, B.
2012 Research on L2 learners’ collocational competence and development – a progress report. In C. Bardel, B. Laufer, & C. Lindqvist (Eds.), L2 vocabulary acquisition, knowledge and use. New perspectives on assessment and corpus analysis, 29–56. Eurosla Monographs Series 2, EUROSLA.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, S., Evert, S., Smith, N., Lee, D. Y. W. & Berglund Prytz, Y.
2008 Corpus Linguistics with BNCWeb – a Practical Guide. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Howarth, P.
1996 Phraseology in English academic writing: some implications for language learning and dictionary making. Niemeyer: Tübingen. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hsueh, P., Melville, P. & Sindhwani, V.
2009 Data quality from crowdsourcing: a study of annotation selection criteria. Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2009 Workshop on Active Learning for Natural Language Processing, 27–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
2008 As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for specific purposes, 271, 4–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Justeson, J. S. & Katz, S.
1995 Technical terminology: Some linguistic properties and an algorithm for identification in text. Natural Language Engineering, 11, 9–27.Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., Rychly, P., Smrz, P. & Tugwell, D.
2004 The Sketch Engine. Proceedings of EURALEX, 105–116 Lorient, France.Google Scholar
Kjellmer, G.
1987 Aspects of English collocations. In W. Meijs (Ed.), Corpus Linguistics and Beyond: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of English of English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, 133–140. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, R.
2006 Collocations. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd Edition, 596–600. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kupiec, J., Pedersen, J. & Chen, F.
1995 A Trainable Document Summarizer. Proceedings of the 18th ACM-SIGIR, 68–73 Seattle.Google Scholar
Laufer, B. & Waldman, T.
2011 Verb-noun collocations in second-language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning, 6121, 647–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M.
1993 The lexical approach. The State of ELT and the Way Forward. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.Google Scholar
Lorenz, G.
1999 Adjective intensification-learners versus native speakers: A corpus study of argumentative writing. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Manning, C. D. & Schütze, H.
1999 Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nagy, W. & Townsend, D.
2012 Words as Tools: Learning Academic Vocabulary as Language Acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 4711, 91–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nation, I. S. P.
2001 Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nesi, H., & Gardner, S.
2012 Genres across the Disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, N.
2005 Collocations in a learner corpus. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, H. E.
1933 Second Interim Report on English Collocations. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Peppoloni, D.
2012 Linguistic and computational tools in support of non-native Italian speaking students: the development of the Academic Spoken Italian Corpus. In A. Llanes, L. Astrid, L. Gallego, & R. Mateu (Eds.), La lingüística aplicada en la era de la globalización. Lleida: Edicions i Publicacions de la Universitat de Lleida.Google Scholar
Post, M., Callison-Burch, C., & Osborne, M.
2012 Constructing parallel corpora for six indian languages via crowdsourcing. Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation. Montréal, 401–409.Google Scholar
Ramisch, C., Villavicencio, A., Moura, L., & Idiart, M.
2008 Picking them up and figuring them out: Verb-particle constructions, noise and idiomaticity. In A. Clark, & K. Toutanova (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2008), 49–56. Manchester, UK: Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, I. C. & Tukey, J. W.
1975 Introduction to these Volumes. In J. W. Tukey (Ed.), Index to Statistics and Probability, IV–X. Los Altos: R&D Press.Google Scholar
Sag, I. A., Baldwin, T., Bond, F., Copestake, A., & Flickinger, D.
2002 Multiword expressions: A pain in the neck for NLP. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics CICLING 2002, 1–15.Google Scholar
Schütze, H.
1998 Automatic Word Sense Discrimination. Computational Linguistics, 24(1), 97–123.Google Scholar
Shei, C.-C. & Pain, H.
2000 An ESL writer’s collocation aid. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 131, 167–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shin, D., & Nation, P.
2008 Beyond single words: The most frequent collocations in spoken English. ELT Journal, 62(4), 339–348.Google Scholar
Simpson-Vlach, R. & Ellis, N. C.
2010 An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics, 31, 4, 463–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J.
1987 Collins Cobuild English Language Dictionary. London: Collins.Google Scholar
1991 Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2004 How to use corpora in language teaching. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smadja, F.
1993 Retrieving collocations form text: Xtract. Computational Linguistics, 1911, 143–177.Google Scholar
Snow, R., O’connor, B., Jurafsky, D., & Ng, A.
2008 Cheap and fast – but is it good?: evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Association for Computational Linguistics, 254–263.Google Scholar
Tiberii, P.
2012 Il dizionario delle collocazioni. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Villavicencio, A., Kordoni, V., Zhang, Y., Idiart, M., & Ramisch, C.
2007 Validation and evaluation of automatically acquired multiword expressions for grammar engineering. In J. Eisner (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL 2007), 1034–1043. Prague, Czech Republic: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wang, A., Hoang, C., & Kan, M. Y.
2012 Perspectives on Crowdsourcing Annotations for Natural Language Processing. Language Resources and Evaluation, 47(1), 9–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westbrook, P. & Henriksen, B.
2014 Advanced non-native university lecturers’ collocational competence. Thinking, Doing, Learning: Usage Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning 24–26 April 2013, Odense, Denmark.Google Scholar