Article published in:
Morphology and its interfaces: Syntax, semantics and the lexicon
Edited by Dany Amiot, Delphine Tribout, Natalia Grabar, Cédric Patin and Fayssal Tayalati
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 37:2] 2014
► pp. 256274
Cited by

Cited by 11 other publications

No author info given
2021.  In Constructions in Contact 2 [Constructional Approaches to Language, 30], Crossref logo
Battefeld, Malte, Torsten Leuschner & Gudrun Rawoens
2018.  In Category Change from a Constructional Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20],  pp. 229 ff. Crossref logo
Hartmann, Stefan
2019. Compound worlds and metaphor landscapes: Affixoids, allostructions, and higher-order generalizations. Word Structure 12:3  pp. 297 ff. Crossref logo
Heine, Bernd, Heiko Narrog & Haiping Long
2016. Constructional change vs. grammaticalization. Studies in Language 40:1  pp. 137 ff. Crossref logo
Hendrikx, Isa, Kristel Van Goethem & Stefanie Wulff
2019. Intensifying constructions in French-speaking L2 learners of English and Dutch. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5:1  pp. 63 ff. Crossref logo
Norde, Muriel & Caroline Morris
2018.  In Category Change from a Constructional Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20],  pp. 47 ff. Crossref logo
Norde, Muriel & Kristel Van Goethem
2018.  In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4],  pp. 475 ff. Crossref logo
Sicherl, Eva
2018. A comparison of diminutive expressions in English and Slovene as exemplified by Roald Dahl’s Matilda . Languages in Contrast 18:2  pp. 283 ff. Crossref logo
Van Goethem, Kristel & Nikos Koutsoukos
2018. “Morphological transposition” as the onset of recategorization: The case of luxe in Dutch. Linguistics 56:6  pp. 1369 ff. Crossref logo
Van Goethem, Kristel & Muriel Norde
2020. Extravagant “fake” morphemes in Dutch. Morphological productivity, semantic profiles and categorical flexibility. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0:0 Crossref logo
Van Goethem, Kristel, Muriel Norde, Evie Coussé & Gudrun Vanderbauwhede
2018.  In Category Change from a Constructional Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20],  pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Baayen, H.
(2009) Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity. In A. Luedeling, & M. Kyto (Eds.), Corpus linguistics. An international handbook (pp. 900–919). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Booij, G.
(2009) Compounding and construction morphology. In R. Lieber, & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 201–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2010) Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Booij, G., & Hüning, M.
(2014) Affixoids and constructional idioms. In R. Boogaart, T. Colleman, & G. Rutten (Eds.), Extending the scope of construction-based grammar (pp. 77–105). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M.
(1999) Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics, 37(6), 1043–1068. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, B.
(2002) On the role of context in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoeksema, J.
(2012) Elative compounds in Dutch: Properties and developments, In G. Oebel (Ed.), Intensivierungskonzepte bei Adjektiven und Adverben im Sprachvergleich (pp. 97–142). Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J.
(1991) On some principles of grammaticization. In E. C. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. I (pp. 17–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klara, L.
(2012)  Steinreich ist saucool: Adjektivische Steigerungsbildungen des Gegenwartdeutschen. In G. Oebel (Ed.), Intensivierungskonzepte bei Adjektiven und Adverben im Sprachvergleich (pp. 143–170). Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.Google Scholar
Leuschner, T.
(2010)  Ausnahmepianist Fettgeschreckt-inbleich! Deutsche, Nierländische und Schwedische präfixoide im Spannungsfeld von Genealogie, Kreativität und Norm. In A. Dammel, S. Kürschner, & D. Nübling (Eds.), Kontrastive Germanistische Linguistik (Germanistische Linguistik, 206–209) (pp. 863–892). Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar
Norde, M.
(2009) Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norde, M., Beijering, K., & Lenz, A.
(2013) Current trends in grammaticalization research. Language Sciences, 36, 1–6. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norde, M., & Van Goethem, K.
(2015) Emancipatie van affixen en affixoïden: degrammaticalisatie of lexicalisatie? To appear in Nederlandse Taalkunde. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oebel, Guido
(2012) Elation im Schwedischen. In G. Oebel (Ed.), Intensivierungskonzepte bei Adjektiven und Adverben im Sprachvergleich (pp. 183–248). Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.Google Scholar
Sachs, Emmy
(2012) On “steinalt”, “stock-still” and similar formations. In G. Oebel (Ed.), Intensivierungskonzepte bei Adjektiven und Adverben im Sprachvergleich (pp. 59–79). Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.Google Scholar
Schäfer, R., & Bildhauer, F.
(2012) Building large corpora from the web using a new efficient tool chain. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010) (pp. 486–493). Valletta, Malta: European language resources distribution agency.Google Scholar
(2013) Web corpus construction (synthesis lectures on human language technologies). San Francisco: Morgan & Claypool.Google Scholar
Schlücker, B.
(2013) Non-classifying compounds in German. Folia Linguistica 47(2), 449–480. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
SRB
(2005) = Språkriktighetsboken. Utarbetad av Svenska Språknämnden. Stockholm: Norstedts.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R.
(2002) Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Goethem, K.
(2008)  Oud-leerling versus ancien élève. A comparative study of adjectives grammaticalizing into prefixes in Dutch and French. Morphology, 18, 27–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) From adjective to affix in Dutch and French. The influence of word order patterns on grammaticalization. Studies in Language, 35(1), 194–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014)  Reuze bedankt, het was echt top! Een vergelijkend onderzoek naar loskoppeling van samenstellingscomponenten. Internationale Neerlandistiek, 52(1), 27–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Goethem, K., & De Smet, H.
(2014) How nouns turn into adjectives. The emergence of new adjectives in French, English and Dutch through debonding processes. Languages in Contrast, 14(2), 251–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Goethem, K., & Hiligsmann, Ph
(2014) When two paths converge: Debonding and clipping of Dutch reuze ‘lit. giant; great’. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 26(1), 31–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar