Article published In:
Morphology and its interfaces: Syntax, semantics and the lexiconEdited by Dany Amiot, Delphine Tribout, Natalia Grabar, Cédric Patin and Fayssal Tayalati
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 37:2] 2014
► pp. 256–274
Edited by Dany Amiot, Delphine Tribout, Natalia Grabar, Cédric Patin and Fayssal Tayalati
[Lingvisticæ Investigationes 37:2] 2014
► pp. 256–274
Bleaching, productivity and debonding of prefixoids
A corpus-based analysis of ‘giant’ in German and Swedish
In this paper, we present a contrastive survey of a morpheme originally meaning ‘giant’ in German and Swedish. In both languages, this morpheme has developed into a prefixoid with simile or intensifying meaning. More recently, these prefixoids have been shown to occur as free morphemes as well, and it is the purpose of this paper to explore whether a quantitative analysis of synchronic corpus data can be used to determine whether the free forms are spelling variants, or whether they are truly new constructions that are the result of debonding. Drawing data from the COW corpus of contemporary web text, we compare bound and free forms on the levels of R1 collocations, semantic bleaching, and productivity. Our analysis suggests that the German prefixoid has undergone debonding, whereas the Swedish free forms are mere spelling variants.
Keywords: prefixoids, compounding, debonding, productivity, semantic bleaching, Swedish, German, corpus linguistics
References
Baayen, H.
(2009) Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity. In A. Luedeling, & M. Kyto (Eds.), Corpus linguistics. An international handbook (pp. 900–919). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Booij, G.
(2009) Compounding and construction morphology. In R. Lieber, & P. Štekauer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp. 201–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2010) Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Booij, G., & Hüning, M.
(2014) Affixoids and constructional idioms. In R. Boogaart, T. Colleman, & G. Rutten (Eds.), Extending the scope of construction-based grammar (pp. 77–105). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Haspelmath, M.
(1999) Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics, 37(6), 1043–1068. 
Heine, B.
(2002) On the role of context in grammaticalization. In I. Wischer, & G. Diewald (Eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hoeksema, J.
(2012) Elative compounds in Dutch: Properties and developments, In G. Oebel (Ed.), Intensivierungskonzepte bei Adjektiven und Adverben im Sprachvergleich (pp. 97–142). Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.
Hopper, P. J.
(1991) On some principles of grammaticization. In E. C. Traugott, & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. I1 (pp. 17–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Klara, L.
(2012)
Steinreich ist saucool: Adjektivische Steigerungsbildungen des Gegenwartdeutschen. In G. Oebel (Ed.), Intensivierungskonzepte bei Adjektiven und Adverben im Sprachvergleich (pp. 143–170). Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.
Leuschner, T.
(2010)
Ausnahmepianist Fettgeschreckt-inbleich! Deutsche, Nierländische und Schwedische präfixoide im Spannungsfeld von Genealogie, Kreativität und Norm. In A. Dammel, S. Kürschner, & D. Nübling (Eds.), Kontrastive Germanistische Linguistik (Germanistische Linguistik, 206–209) (pp. 863–892). Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlag.
Norde, M.
(2009) Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Norde, M., Beijering, K., & Lenz, A.
(2013) Current trends in grammaticalization research. Language Sciences, 361, 1–6.
Norde, M., & Van Goethem, K.
(2015) Emancipatie van affixen en affixoïden: degrammaticalisatie of lexicalisatie? To appear in Nederlandse Taalkunde.
Oebel, Guido
(2012) Elation im Schwedischen. In G. Oebel (Ed.), Intensivierungskonzepte bei Adjektiven und Adverben im Sprachvergleich (pp. 183–248). Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.
Sachs, Emmy
(2012) On “steinalt”, “stock-still” and similar formations. In G. Oebel (Ed.), Intensivierungskonzepte bei Adjektiven und Adverben im Sprachvergleich (pp. 59–79). Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovac.
Schäfer, R., & Bildhauer, F.
(2012) Building large corpora from the web using a new efficient tool chain. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010) (pp. 486–493). Valletta, Malta: European language resources distribution agency.
(2013) Web corpus construction (synthesis lectures on human language technologies). San Francisco: Morgan & Claypool.
Schlücker, B.
(2013) Non-classifying compounds in German. Folia Linguistica 47(2), 449–480.
SRB
(2005) = Språkriktighetsboken. Utarbetad av Svenska Språknämnden. Stockholm: Norstedts.
Taylor, J. R.
(2002) Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Goethem, K.
(2008)
Oud-leerling versus ancien élève. A comparative study of adjectives grammaticalizing into prefixes in Dutch and French. Morphology, 181, 27–49.
(2011) From adjective to affix in Dutch and French. The influence of word order patterns on grammaticalization. Studies in Language, 35(1), 194–216.
(2014)
Reuze bedankt, het was echt top! Een vergelijkend onderzoek naar loskoppeling van samenstellingscomponenten. Internationale Neerlandistiek, 52(1), 27–46.
Van Goethem, K., & De Smet, H.
(2014) How nouns turn into adjectives. The emergence of new adjectives in French, English and Dutch through debonding processes. Languages in Contrast, 14(2), 251–277.
Van Goethem, K., & Hiligsmann, Ph
(2014) When two paths converge: Debonding and clipping of Dutch reuze ‘lit. giant; great’. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 26(1), 31–64.
Cited by
Cited by 12 other publications
Battefeld, Malte, Torsten Leuschner & Gudrun Rawoens
2018. Chapter 9. Evaluative morphology in German, Dutch and Swedish. In Category Change from a Constructional Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20], ► pp. 229 ff. 
Hartmann, Stefan
2019. Compound worlds and metaphor landscapes: Affixoids, allostructions, and higher-order generalizations. Word Structure 12:3 ► pp. 297 ff.
Heine, Bernd, Heiko Narrog & Haiping Long
Hendrikx, Isa, Kristel Van Goethem & Stefanie Wulff
2019. Intensifying constructions in French-speaking L2 learners of English and Dutch. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Hoeksema, Jack
2023. Elative Compounds. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff.
Norde, Muriel & Caroline Morris
2018. Chapter 3. Derivation without category change. In Category Change from a Constructional Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20], ► pp. 47 ff.
Norde, Muriel & Kristel Van Goethem
2018. Debonding and Clipping of Prefixoids in Germanic: Constructionalization or Constructional Change?. In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4], ► pp. 475 ff.
Sicherl, Eva
2018. A comparison of diminutive expressions in English and Slovene
as exemplified by Roald Dahl’s Matilda
. Languages in Contrast 18:2 ► pp. 283 ff.
Van Goethem, Kristel & Isa Hendrikx
2021. Intensifying constructions in second language acquisition. In Constructions in Contact 2 [Constructional Approaches to Language, 30], ► pp. 376 ff.
Van Goethem, Kristel & Nikos Koutsoukos
2018. “Morphological transposition” as the onset of recategorization: The case of luxe in Dutch. Linguistics 56:6 ► pp. 1369 ff.
Van Goethem, Kristel & Muriel Norde
2020. Extravagant “fake” morphemes in Dutch. Morphological productivity, semantic profiles and categorical flexibility. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16:3 ► pp. 425 ff.
Van Goethem, Kristel, Muriel Norde, Evie Coussé & Gudrun Vanderbauwhede
2018. Chapter 1. Category change from a constructional perspective. In Category Change from a Constructional Perspective [Constructional Approaches to Language, 20], ► pp. 3 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.